Overeating the day after a big exertion
Jthanmyfitnesspal
Posts: 3,529 Member
Yep, ran for 90 minutes yesterday. Calorie estimate was 1000kcals (It was a pretty slow pace to start to get used to that distance.) Today, there isn't a carb I can pass up. It's a rest day, so I'm probably over-compensating.
Man, bod wants them carbs! Ya feel me?
Man, bod wants them carbs! Ya feel me?
2
Replies
-
The runger is real :laugh:4
-
Yep the day after a long run I'm always starving1
-
I ran 10 miles yesterday and feel the runger. Of course I ate like a horse and was still 1,000 calories under goal yesterday so it will balance out today.0
-
garystrickland357 wrote: »I ran 10 miles yesterday and feel the runger. Of course I ate like a horse and was still 1,000 calories under goal yesterday so it will balance out today.
I ran 9.2 miles yesterday... only got 770 cals... :grumble: :sad:3 -
TavistockToad wrote: »garystrickland357 wrote: »I ran 10 miles yesterday and feel the runger. Of course I ate like a horse and was still 1,000 calories under goal yesterday so it will balance out today.
I ran 9.2 miles yesterday... only got 770 cals... :grumble: :sad:
*nods sadly*
5-mile run Sunday afternoon only got me 314...1 -
It pays to be a Clydesdale... Oh, and those weren’t all run calories. I’m one of those folks that exercise suppresses my appetite - at the time. The next day is the struggle.2
-
A 60 minute run today got me 5.85 miles and 700 calories. I’ve got on OMAD “science experiment” in progress which got tested because of the run. I did well, keeping busy kept runger quiet.0
-
TavistockToad wrote: »The runger is real :laugh:
So much this.
I do a long run (10-20miles) every Sunday and from around 7pm Sunday until Tuesday morning I eat every thing in sight. Good job I'm in bulk mode really.1 -
TavistockToad wrote: »garystrickland357 wrote: »I ran 10 miles yesterday and feel the runger. Of course I ate like a horse and was still 1,000 calories under goal yesterday so it will balance out today.
I ran 9.2 miles yesterday... only got 770 cals... :grumble: :sad:
I ran 10 very hilly miles in 50mph winds and got 1000 calories, it did take me over 2 hours though and was very hard work.0 -
TavistockToad wrote: »garystrickland357 wrote: »I ran 10 miles yesterday and feel the runger. Of course I ate like a horse and was still 1,000 calories under goal yesterday so it will balance out today.
I ran 9.2 miles yesterday... only got 770 cals... :grumble: :sad:
I ran 10 very hilly miles in 50mph winds and got 1000 calories, it did take me over 2 hours though and was very hard work.
i wish i got 1000 cals for 10 miles... :laugh:2 -
Just make sure you eat the calories instead of drinking them. I ran my 10 miles on Saturday AM and didn't quite eat back the calories with a good sized lunch. I made the mistake of having a few cocktails before dinner and was promptly knocked on my *kitten* by the liquor given that I was still at a net negative calorie count for the day.
I won't be making that mistake again soon.1 -
Well, the old
kcals=.75*(weight in lbs)*(miles)
Is pretty crude, but it does underline the point that calorie burn from running scales with weight. Put differently, being lighter makes you a more-efficient runner.0 -
Jthanmyfitnesspal wrote: »Well, the old
kcals=.75*(weight in lbs)*(miles)
Is pretty crude, but it does underline the point that calorie burn from running scales with weight. Put differently, being lighter makes you a more-efficient runner.
0.75 or 0.63? I thought it was the latter per Runner's World.2 -
garystrickland357 wrote: »I ran 10 miles yesterday and feel the runger. Of course I ate like a horse and was still 1,000 calories under goal yesterday so it will balance out today.TavistockToad wrote: »garystrickland357 wrote: »I ran 10 miles yesterday and feel the runger. Of course I ate like a horse and was still 1,000 calories under goal yesterday so it will balance out today.
I ran 9.2 miles yesterday... only got 770 cals... :grumble: :sad:collectingblues wrote: »TavistockToad wrote: »garystrickland357 wrote: »I ran 10 miles yesterday and feel the runger. Of course I ate like a horse and was still 1,000 calories under goal yesterday so it will balance out today.
I ran 9.2 miles yesterday... only got 770 cals... :grumble: :sad:
*nods sadly*
5-mile run Sunday afternoon only got me 314...TavistockToad wrote: »TavistockToad wrote: »garystrickland357 wrote: »I ran 10 miles yesterday and feel the runger. Of course I ate like a horse and was still 1,000 calories under goal yesterday so it will balance out today.
I ran 9.2 miles yesterday... only got 770 cals... :grumble: :sad:
I ran 10 very hilly miles in 50mph winds and got 1000 calories, it did take me over 2 hours though and was very hard work.
i wish i got 1000 cals for 10 miles... :laugh:
So much this. With you both there. ~72 cal/mi <grumble>
And yes..I'm ravenous the day after endurance stuff.2 -
Jthanmyfitnesspal wrote: »Well, the old
kcals=.75*(weight in lbs)*(miles)
Is pretty crude, but it does underline the point that calorie burn from running scales with weight. Put differently, being lighter makes you a more-efficient runner.
0.75 or 0.63? I thought it was the latter per Runner's World.
the latter. (the former is probably the gross number including BMR).0 -
Just make sure you eat the calories instead of drinking them. I ran my 10 miles on Saturday AM and didn't quite eat back the calories with a good sized lunch. I made the mistake of having a few cocktails before dinner and was promptly knocked on my *kitten* by the liquor given that I was still at a net negative calorie count for the day.
I won't be making that mistake again soon.
...but it does make that 100 calories of rum so much more effective. (I personally consider that a plus).
1 -
i haven't really experienced it with running but with aerial yoga, i will eat a horse.1
-
I once ate an entire pizza had a few beers and then went to dinner and had a steak and a few more beers after a Century ride with a 20mph speed. I rode the 100 miles back the next day (slower) even eating a bit every 25 miles or so, I was tanked. Couldn't even eat when I got done, but the next 2 days I was a beast. My husband laughed, he's a 3:15 marathoner and he can put it back after his long runs. Net loss for the week was 3#.3
-
Jthanmyfitnesspal wrote: »Well, the old
kcals=.75*(weight in lbs)*(miles)
Is pretty crude, but it does underline the point that calorie burn from running scales with weight. Put differently, being lighter makes you a more-efficient runner.
0.75 or 0.63? I thought it was the latter per Runner's World.
I'll have to look up where I read this, but the calculations were:
Body Weight x .75 x miles = Gross Calories Burned
Body Weight x .63 x miles = Net Calories Burned
My Garmin puts me right in between the two for calories burned, which is surprisingly pretty accurate over the time I've been tracking my runs.
I'm thinking perhaps the Gross Calorie Burn is taking into account 'after burn' as your heart rate returns to it's resting heart rate post run.
But, please take what I've written with a grain a salt, as I do not know that for sure. This is simply my deduction on the matter.1 -
I can't remember where I got the .75 factor. My only point was that it scales with body weight. Interesting discussion.
I assume Garmin and other apps take a number of other factors into consideration, such as grade. I note that the Garmin calorie estimates are low when you run at a grade on the treadmill.0 -
RunnerGrl1982 wrote: »Jthanmyfitnesspal wrote: »Well, the old
kcals=.75*(weight in lbs)*(miles)
Is pretty crude, but it does underline the point that calorie burn from running scales with weight. Put differently, being lighter makes you a more-efficient runner.
0.75 or 0.63? I thought it was the latter per Runner's World.
I'll have to look up where I read this, but the calculations were:
Body Weight x .75 x miles = Gross Calories Burned
Body Weight x .63 x miles = Net Calories Burned
My Garmin puts me right in between the two for calories burned, which is surprisingly pretty accurate over the time I've been tracking my runs.
I'm thinking perhaps the Gross Calorie Burn is taking into account 'after burn' as your heart rate returns to it's resting heart rate post run.
But, please take what I've written with a grain a salt, as I do not know that for sure. This is simply my deduction on the matter.
Gross calories usually include your basal burn. That is, it includes the amount you've burned specifically through that exercise and the amount of calories that you would have burned anyway over that period.
Net usually includes only the incremental calories burned via that exercise.1 -
TavistockToad wrote: »TavistockToad wrote: »garystrickland357 wrote: »I ran 10 miles yesterday and feel the runger. Of course I ate like a horse and was still 1,000 calories under goal yesterday so it will balance out today.
I ran 9.2 miles yesterday... only got 770 cals... :grumble: :sad:
I ran 10 very hilly miles in 50mph winds and got 1000 calories, it did take me over 2 hours though and was very hard work.
i wish i got 1000 cals for 10 miles... :laugh:
Rather strangely the 100Cal/mile seems almost spot on for me, as long as I'm pushing myself whether that's with hills, speed or stupid headwinds.
I remember the days when I got 100Cal per km, those were the days, except I was still very overweight and that km half killed me.2 -
TavistockToad wrote: »TavistockToad wrote: »garystrickland357 wrote: »I ran 10 miles yesterday and feel the runger. Of course I ate like a horse and was still 1,000 calories under goal yesterday so it will balance out today.
I ran 9.2 miles yesterday... only got 770 cals... :grumble: :sad:
I ran 10 very hilly miles in 50mph winds and got 1000 calories, it did take me over 2 hours though and was very hard work.
i wish i got 1000 cals for 10 miles... :laugh:
Rather strangely the 100Cal/mile seems almost spot on for me, as long as I'm pushing myself whether that's with hills, speed or stupid headwinds.
I remember the days when I got 100Cal per km, those were the days, except I was still very overweight and that km half killed me.
Lucky you :laugh:0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 394.2K Introduce Yourself
- 43.9K Getting Started
- 260.4K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.1K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 437 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.9K MyFitnessPal Information
- 15 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.7K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions