Everywhere shrinks but lower belly
Options
Replies
-
22 pounds in 88 days is a loss of 1.75 pounds a week. Part of your impatience may stem from not eating enough food to keep yourself satisfied.9
-
22 pounds in 88 days is a loss of 1.75 pounds a week. Part of your impatience may stem from not eating enough food to keep yourself satisfied.
Nice catch, I didn't "run the numbers".
OP losing this fast will also lead to a loss of lean muscle, not just fat. Meaning at your current weight you are a higher BF% than you would have been had you lost slower, while lifting and getting enough protein.4 -
22 pounds in 88 days is a loss of 1.75 pounds a week. Part of your impatience may stem from not eating enough food to keep yourself satisfied.
3 -
Mostly, I agree with others. You've made wonderful progress. You're within the range of normal appearance, but might want to continue losing a bit more weight given your goals.
In addition, though I hesitate to say this, and it may just be a side effect of how you're standing to get the side selfie, but in the photo you seem to have some (very common) posture issues that exaggerate the feature that's concerning you. I think you may have some anterior pelvic tilt/exaggerated lumbar curve, i.e. upper part of pelvic bones tilted slightly forward of neutral. Your upper body isn't visible, but a bit of shoulder slump can also emphasize the belly area further (and it's super common among those of us who use computers and cell phones a lot), and is often seen in combination with the pelvic tilt.
I don't mean to be picking on you, I'm truly trying to help you achieve your appearance goals. (Think of me as a sort of concerned old internet auntie who picks on you a little out of caring and concern, as I'm for sure old enough to be one.) :flowerforyou:
Thank you for commenting this. It’s not the first time I’ve been told this in comments! Both my maternal grandmother and my mother have this exaggerated curve in the back. I’ve also been to a chiropractor and I don’t any hip / back issues. But I agree, that posture could change how a belly sticks out. However I’m not sure if there is anything I could do about this? I don’t think it comes down to my posture, just the way my body is built (I assume)? Haha.
2 -
I can see the difference and I'd say if you did a measurement before and after there'd be a pretty significant difference.1
-
Mostly, I agree with others. You've made wonderful progress. You're within the range of normal appearance, but might want to continue losing a bit more weight given your goals.
In addition, though I hesitate to say this, and it may just be a side effect of how you're standing to get the side selfie, but in the photo you seem to have some (very common) posture issues that exaggerate the feature that's concerning you. I think you may have some anterior pelvic tilt/exaggerated lumbar curve, i.e. upper part of pelvic bones tilted slightly forward of neutral. Your upper body isn't visible, but a bit of shoulder slump can also emphasize the belly area further (and it's super common among those of us who use computers and cell phones a lot), and is often seen in combination with the pelvic tilt.
I don't mean to be picking on you, I'm truly trying to help you achieve your appearance goals. (Think of me as a sort of concerned old internet auntie who picks on you a little out of caring and concern, as I'm for sure old enough to be one.) :flowerforyou:
Thank you for commenting this. It’s not the first time I’ve been told this in comments! Both my maternal grandmother and my mother have this exaggerated curve in the back. I’ve also been to a chiropractor and I don’t any hip / back issues. But I agree, that posture could change how a belly sticks out. However I’m not sure if there is anything I could do about this? I don’t think it comes down to my posture, just the way my body is built (I assume)? Haha.
Perhaps there's a genetic component, but part of it is which muscles are stronger/weaker, tighter/more-stretched, from our life habits. Every Physical Therapy practice on YouTube or the web has recommendations for this, it seems like. This is just one example, to give you an idea:
https://www.theptdc.com/5-steps-dealing-anterior-pelvic-tilt22 pounds in 88 days is a loss of 1.75 pounds a week. Part of your impatience may stem from not eating enough food to keep yourself satisfied.
Not release of toxins (that whole concept is mostly an internet myth). It's mainly just a water weight drop from consuming fewer carbs/salt (less foods so less carbs/salt, doesn't have to be true "low salt" or "low carb"), plus lower average digestive system contents from reduced intake. Not everyone, but lots of people, lose faster for a couple of days to couple of weeks when first starting out.7 -
22 pounds in 88 days is a loss of 1.75 pounds a week. Part of your impatience may stem from not eating enough food to keep yourself satisfied.
Do you mean release of water? Water would be right. 5 pounds of toxins would probably be fatal. Adjusted for water loss your rate of loss for 88 days is 1.35 per week. Ideally you would be at 1 pound per week which would require another 175ish calories per day on your average.7 -
CharlieCharlie007 wrote: »Lower belly is the real *kitten*. It truly is the last to go. I am at 9.2% bf, I still have 6 centimeters to go. because of my body type. MY dietitian calculated with her formulas that for me to see abszzzz, I need to go to 5.7%. Now, that sounds ridiculously low, but, I am putting on 1.2 pounds of muscle for every pound on fat I drop. So, My weight is actually the same or a bit higher. But, losing everywhere. So, do not lose faith. Stay consistent, stay in the game, and you will achieve the desired results. Just have a realistic timeline.
For many people that is true. I carry the last reserve of fat over my hips toward the back above my glutes. I can have a flat belly and extra fat there and it is the hardest to make disappear.
Lol! Woo'd and flagged for where I carry body fat!!6 -
CharlieCharlie007 wrote: »Lower belly is the real *kitten*. It truly is the last to go. I am at 9.2% bf, I still have 6 centimeters to go. because of my body type. MY dietitian calculated with her formulas that for me to see abszzzz, I need to go to 5.7%. Now, that sounds ridiculously low, but, I am putting on 1.2 pounds of muscle for every pound on fat I drop. So, My weight is actually the same or a bit higher. But, losing everywhere. So, do not lose faith. Stay consistent, stay in the game, and you will achieve the desired results. Just have a realistic timeline.
For many people that is true. I carry the last reserve of fat over my hips toward the back above my glutes. I can have a flat belly and extra fat there and it is the hardest to make disappear.
Lol! Woo'd and flagged for where I carry body fat!!
I'm guessing there's a lot of us that should be flagged for where we carry our body fat
7 -
CharlieCharlie007 wrote: »Lower belly is the real *kitten*. It truly is the last to go. I am at 9.2% bf, I still have 6 centimeters to go. because of my body type. MY dietitian calculated with her formulas that for me to see abszzzz, I need to go to 5.7%. Now, that sounds ridiculously low, but, I am putting on 1.2 pounds of muscle for every pound on fat I drop. So, My weight is actually the same or a bit higher. But, losing everywhere. So, do not lose faith. Stay consistent, stay in the game, and you will achieve the desired results. Just have a realistic timeline.
at 9.2% you wuld be ripped already, my profile pic is me at 11ish. and no way you are putting on 1.2 lbs of muscle for every lb you lose. you would need to be new to lifting and on gear to get those kinds of results. most people actually lose a little muscle as they cut, esp. once they are sub 12% BF% as there is less fat stores to pull from.
not saying your results are not impressive, the difference in your photos shows your work. just that the body takes like a month to add a lb of muscle in a surplus getting adequate protein, nutrition, etc. younger new to lifting men may be able to add 2lbs/month.
Either someone is vengeful, or they have no idea what the woo button is... I go woo'd 3 times for this post??4 -
CharlieCharlie007 wrote: »Lower belly is the real *kitten*. It truly is the last to go. I am at 9.2% bf, I still have 6 centimeters to go. because of my body type. MY dietitian calculated with her formulas that for me to see abszzzz, I need to go to 5.7%. Now, that sounds ridiculously low, but, I am putting on 1.2 pounds of muscle for every pound on fat I drop. So, My weight is actually the same or a bit higher. But, losing everywhere. So, do not lose faith. Stay consistent, stay in the game, and you will achieve the desired results. Just have a realistic timeline.
at 9.2% you wuld be ripped already, my profile pic is me at 11ish. and no way you are putting on 1.2 lbs of muscle for every lb you lose. you would need to be new to lifting and on gear to get those kinds of results. most people actually lose a little muscle as they cut, esp. once they are sub 12% BF% as there is less fat stores to pull from.
not saying your results are not impressive, the difference in your photos shows your work. just that the body takes like a month to add a lb of muscle in a surplus getting adequate protein, nutrition, etc. younger new to lifting men may be able to add 2lbs/month.
Either someone is vengeful, or they have no idea what the woo button is... I go woo'd 3 times for this post??
Seems like there's been an explosion of false woos & flags lately.3 -
CharlieCharlie007 wrote: »Lower belly is the real *kitten*. It truly is the last to go. I am at 9.2% bf, I still have 6 centimeters to go. because of my body type. MY dietitian calculated with her formulas that for me to see abszzzz, I need to go to 5.7%. Now, that sounds ridiculously low, but, I am putting on 1.2 pounds of muscle for every pound on fat I drop. So, My weight is actually the same or a bit higher. But, losing everywhere. So, do not lose faith. Stay consistent, stay in the game, and you will achieve the desired results. Just have a realistic timeline.
at 9.2% you wuld be ripped already, my profile pic is me at 11ish. and no way you are putting on 1.2 lbs of muscle for every lb you lose. you would need to be new to lifting and on gear to get those kinds of results. most people actually lose a little muscle as they cut, esp. once they are sub 12% BF% as there is less fat stores to pull from.
not saying your results are not impressive, the difference in your photos shows your work. just that the body takes like a month to add a lb of muscle in a surplus getting adequate protein, nutrition, etc. younger new to lifting men may be able to add 2lbs/month.
Either someone is vengeful, or they have no idea what the woo button is... I go woo'd 3 times for this post??
Yeah, that's been happening a lot lately. When it happens for me, it's usually because I emphasize lifting and talk about the benefits of preserving muscle during weight loss.
I think there are many that don't want to hear about the benefits of progressive overload strength training. For me, it was a game-changer (to use a cliché I really don't care for).2
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 389 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 919 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions