Dieting and exercise
Bosatch87
Posts: 11 Member
If I'm on a 2000 calorie diet that will allow me to lose 1 to 2 pounds a week and I'm aslo burning about 500 calories a day through exercise do I need to eat those calories back. I just want to me sure I'm not going about this the wrong way
0
Replies
-
Unlike other sites which use TDEE calculators, MFP uses the NEAT method (Non-Exercise Activity Thermogenesis), and as such this system is designed for exercise calories to be eaten back. However, many consider the burns given by MFP to be inflated for them and only eat a percentage, such as 50%, back. Others, however, are able to lose weight while eating 100% of their exercise calories.
http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/818082/exercise-calories-again-wtf/p18 -
You are supposed to eat back exercise calories on this site. Most people start at 50-75% of their exercise calories, though, to account for any inaccuracies.5
-
It kind of depends. If the 2000 goal is what you need to average 1 pound per week, and you feel satisfied/full on that with the exercise you're doing: I'd say to not eat extra in general for exercise. But to allow yourself the room to choose on a day to day basis if you feel you need more.
I say this because it is generally accepted to aim for a 2 pound weight weekly loss overall - and if you're eating for 1 pound loss and exercising for the other - you should be ok. As long as you pay attention to body signals. THat, and its possible that you think you're burning 500 but its actually less. We rarely burn as much as we think.
On the other hand if 2000 is your goal for losing 2 per week, then you probably should eat some portion of exercise calories back as you're already aiming for a serious deficit before exercise.1 -
StaciMarie2020 wrote: »It kind of depends. If the 2000 goal is what you need to average 1 pound per week, and you feel satisfied/full on that with the exercise you're doing: I'd say to not eat extra in general for exercise. But to allow yourself the room to choose on a day to day basis if you feel you need more.
I say this because it is generally accepted to aim for a 2 pound weight weekly loss overall - and if you're eating for 1 pound loss and exercising for the other - you should be ok. As long as you pay attention to body signals. THat, and its possible that you think you're burning 500 but its actually less. We rarely burn as much as we think.
On the other hand if 2000 is your goal for losing 2 per week, then you probably should eat some portion of exercise calories back as you're already aiming for a serious deficit before exercise.
There is a lot of misinformation in your post. It is not recommended to aim for a 2 lb weight loss per week unless you have a lot to lose. Like 75lbs or more.
Paying attention to body signals is in no way indicative of getting enough nutrients. There are many stories here of people that were under eating and felt fine...until they suddenly didn't as their hair started falling out and their nails got brittle and their energy level disappeared.
OP, the previous posts about how the MFP system works and the activity estimates are ones you should take to heart. Also, what do you mean by "1 to 2" lbs per week. What deficit did you use to set your goals?6 -
When I started I was 304 it said that I needed to eat around 2000 calories a day to lose 2 lbs per week but I'm also doing an hour of cycling every day about 15 miles in an hour1
-
When I started I was 304 it said that I needed to eat around 2000 calories a day to lose 2 lbs per week but I'm also doing an hour of cycling every day about 15 miles in an hour
Good effort - learn how to fuel your cycle rides and the sky is the limit.
Don't learn to fuel your rides and you will hit a limit.
Look ahead to maintenance when you get to goal weight and you have to take your exercise calories into account.
A good skill to learn and practice now.
BTW - there's better methods to estimate cycling calories than the MyFitnessPal database.
Are you cycling indoors on an exercise bike or outdoors?3 -
Indoors on a exercise bike0
-
And I do a little light lifting as well0
-
Indoors on a exercise bike
Don't use speed related calorie estimates as they are meaningless when you aren't actually moving (no wind resistance or rolling resistance).
If your bike displays watts then average watts per hour X 3.6 gives a very accurate net calorie estimate.
For lifting simply log the entire duration of your workout under the Cardio section of your diary and search for "strength training" for a modest estimate.3 -
How did you arrive at the 2000? Was this a number MFP gave you after setting up your stats and goals, or did you obtain it from another source?
If from MPF, then as stated above you should eat back about half your exercise calories. If from another source, then it depends how that source arrived at your number because there are several methods use, some include exercise and others do not.0 -
How did you arrive at the 2000? Was this a number MFP gave you after setting up your stats and goals, or did you obtain it from another source?
If from MPF, then as stated above you should eat back about half your exercise calories. If from another source, then it depends how that source arrived at your number because there are several methods use, some include exercise and others do not.
Not for good estimates, it would be a way to turn an accurate estimate into an inaccurate estimate.0 -
I got that number from MFP0
-
As said above, yes you should eat your exercise calories. How long ago did you set up on MFP / how long have you been eating around 2000 cals and doing that amount of exercise? If there's any doubt about the accuracy of cals given for your cycling, the usual suggestion on here is to eat and exercise at that level for 6 weeks and then work out how how much weight you're actually losing per week. If it's faster /slower than it should be, up your calories / adjust accordingly. It's common to over-estimate exercise calories, especially if you're using the MFP database. It's also common to underestimate what you're actually eating, unless you weigh absolutely everything that you eat / measure every liquid.0
-
I have been measuring everything lol0
-
0 -
You have lost 11 pounds in 10 days. Likely much of that was water weight but you may still be losing too fast. It is really hard to know until you have more data that doesn't have water loss in it. I would follow @sijomial's advice on cycling estimates and stay really consistent in your habits for the next 21 days. At that time you can get a true rate of loss for the period between tomorrow and October 11 and see if you are losing faster or slower than expected. If you need any help with that just ask this forum.4
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions