Subtract rest time?
MDC2957
Posts: 417 Member
I presume that when the adding exercise such as strength training, we should subtract the total amount of time resting between sets.
If I was in the gym for an hour, but was only actively lifting weights for 40 minutes, I should put 40 minutes, correct?
If I was in the gym for an hour, but was only actively lifting weights for 40 minutes, I should put 40 minutes, correct?
0
Replies
-
No.
The workout in the database for Weights was based on studies with 2-5 sets, 5-15 reps, and rests 2-4 min.
As long as you are in that range, that's a good estimate that it's using for total time taken.
It's incorporating the rests already.5 -
This content has been removed.
-
In my opinion, if it is truly just resistance training, I would leave the clock running between sets. You are not getting a huge calorie burn anyway. However, if it is cardio and you are taking a break, sure stop it.0
-
This content has been removed.
-
Oooh. I’ve been cheating myself for ages then. I’ve been stopping the clock between sets / exercises.
Thanks!0 -
Ohh? Do you have a link where I can read about that?
From the METS database site, which is top level to this link.
For the studies that are listed, usually a Google search will find it and let you read about the parameters used.
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxjb21wZW5kaXVtb2ZwaHlzaWNhbGFjdGl2aXRpZXN8Z3g6MjdiN2Y3NzAwYTU1YWExZQ
For instance, a few of the lifting entries used:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16475061
You'll see scanning through it, besides the difference between circuit training and weights, just not that much variable for doing only 45-60 min.
Always interesting to do the math and discover what appears to be a big difference is maybe up to 50 cal an hour for extremes on the ranges.
Food labels allowed to have bigger % of inaccuracies that through the day probably make a bigger difference.
5 -
This content has been removed.
-
What difference does it make in the end?0
-
I like using the METS database. I am more confident that I am recording my activity accurately (as opposed to my Apple watch).0
-
Many fitness trackers use their metrics to try to figure out your activity and intensity level so that they can then translate it into METS values for the time they were detecting the activity.
Unless they're mistaken ("tricked" or "tripped" by some aspect of the detection) about your activity, they should offer a more granular version of the same Mets database entries0 -
giancarlov1191 wrote: »What difference does it make in the end?
This is my thought also. What difference are we talking? 50 calories. Seems like majoring in the minors.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.7K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions