Question for MFP Vets
davidrip1
Posts: 70 Member
If you follow MFP directions explicitly, logging precisely, over a controlled time period, how accurate are the provided weight loss predictions. It would be nice to hear some anecdotal testimony.
0
Replies
-
Not very accurate.
It’s an estimate. You’ll discover your individual numbers over time. A trending app may be helpful to you, like Happy Scale for iPhone.7 -
Do you mean the “if everyday were like today, in 5 weeks you’d weigh...” numbers?
If you consistently have the same “net” calories most of the time, I found the number to be not too far off - especially earlier on when I had a lot to lose (and my deficit was larger so 100 calorie difference wasn’t a HUGE deal).
But having the same net calories every day isn’t easy and the smaller your deficit, the more small differences from day to day will impact that prediction.
5 -
LOL. If the “In 5 Weeks You Would Weigh” thing were accurate at all, I’d be like a human black hole of negative number by now.
It’s about as accurate as that fairground mannequin that spits out your fortune.
OTOH, however, MFP has been a godsend for me. I am 84 pounds down regardless of the wonky predictions, and all it took as equal parts mindfulness, self control, time, patience, and exercise.
There is no perfect predictor for imperfect people. Some days you’re gonna screw it up, some days there was a hidden salt, PMS, stress, or other factors that are unpredictable.4 -
Overall pretty good for me.
After a few weeks I worked out I was about 1,000 cals a week out - probably more due to consistent but not particulalrly accurate logging (food and exercise) rather than the calorie goal being wrong.
Adjusted my goal and lost at chosen rate of loss all the way to my target weight.
I made a deliberate choice not to go for precise logging, consistency and adjusting based on results I found far less onerous.
TBH people's inaccuracy seems to be a much bigger issue rather than the estimate itself being miles off.6 -
In my case, MFP's calories were a bit low. I lost weight faster than expected and when I began maintenance, I continued to lose weight until I adjusted my goal. OTOH, I don't weigh my food, so I may be overestimating what I am eating rather than underestimating as most do. Or I'm just more active than I think so burn more calories than most women my age.1
-
I haven’t checked mine in forever, but I’d say in general, no. There’s a few factors at play. Water weight being a big one. Another being your activity level may not perfectly sync with MFP, which would affect your TDEE and may result in faster or slower loss. That’s with the multitude of little things that affect scale weight. I just make sure the trendline is down, and everything else can lie where it may.4
-
MFP seriously underestimated my calorie needs, by something like 25-30%, as compared with what's nearly 5 years of fairly careful food and exercise logging, alongside weight loss (at first) and maintenance (about 4 years, since losing from obese to current weight). This is unusual. It seems to be close for the majority of people, but it can be under or over for a few. (That's the nature of statistical estimates, which is what MFP is giving you as a goal.)
Follow the MFP recommendation for 4-6 weeks (at least one full menstrual cycle for premenopausal women, to compare the same point in two different monthly cycles). In the first week or two, a fair fraction of people see unusual weight loss results (slower or faster), but for most it settles down after that to a somewhat consistent weekly average. Please note, I'm not saying it will be the same loss each and every week, but that the average over several weeks will stabilize. The daily and even weekly scale weights will be a bit of a roller coaster up and down, because water retention and variations in digestive contents can disguise what's going on with the fat loss we really care about. A pound a week loss rate could be two pounds one week, then no loss for a couple of weeks, then another pound the following week, and so forth.
With several weeks of your own data, you'll know whether MFP is accurate for you, or not, on average. If it is, carry on. If it isn't, adjust your goal.
Best wishes!5 -
I find it's a bit off (I don't lose quite as much) but I know that now. If I never had a taste of anything while cooking or skipped weighing my food occasionally I would guess it would come closer. Truthfully not too many people eat exactly the same number of calories every day for 5 weeks and move in exactly the same way. If you stick to it though you will lose weight which is the ultimate goal anyway right?2
-
I agree with AnnPT above.
The estimates of a calorie goal that MFP gave me are off by about 500 calories per day. That's about 25% for me.
I figured that out by careful logging over a period of several months and I've been maintaining my 80 pound loss for over 11 years now.3 -
The calorie goal MFP gave me originally was a little too high. 2 years later with significant weight loss and habit changes it is now a little too low.
The process works if you can find an easy way for yourself to stick with it. If you are just starting out you won't know everything you need to know right now possibly including a more accurate calorie estimate. The estimate you are given by MFP is a good starting place and will likely produce some results for you if you log accurately.2 -
If you're talking about the "if everyday was like today" thing, not very accurate...too many variables for such a simple algorithm. That said, I selected to lose 1 Lb per week, and as an average over time, that's about what it was.4
-
I’ve found it to be pretty accurate. I’m older and 5’2” and don’t have a lot to lose. If I’m off it’s usually because of my guestimate on exercise calories.1
-
When I weigh my food on a digital food scale, eat the calories MFP gives me, eat most (but not all) of my exercise calories, I lose as expected over the course of a month.1
-
I have found the MFP goals tool to be *extremely*, as in unbelievably, accurate. During my first 5 months of dieting, I had my goal set to 2 lbs per week, ate precisely the calories it told me to eat, and lost 2.03 lbs per week, meaning it was accurate within a 2 % tolerance. Over the next 5 months my goal has shifted from 2 to 1.5 to 1 lbs/week and my actual consumption became a bit more erratic and less dead-on to the calorie target, with some poorly logged binge days that really threw off my spreadsheet, so it's harder to tell whether MFP has continued to be as accurate as it was earlier, but in general, I think it has been. I completely trust the MFP goals tool.0
-
Human bodies are not machines, and everyone's body works a tiny bit differently. These numbers are averages that work for the majority of the population, most people being roughly around that point.
But there's also the story of water weight or poop to take into account. If your weight day comes 5 weeks after you made a note of that number and your body happens to store just a bit more water then, or you've not poop'ed for 2 days then the weight will be higher, though this of course is not bodyfat. More uncertainty as well with not logging precisely, etc...0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions