Newcomer-Disappointment
seancmccabe1972
Posts: 1 Member
I have joined MFP today to try the app before commiting to Premium membership.
This maybe an old repetitive finding but I cannot sync MFP with Google fit. They are both visible (as connected) in the apps and indeed my xiaomi fitness band works with Fit (irony right there). No shared data can be found in either MFP or Fit app. I have emptied caches and force stopped MFP and Fit and reopened to no avail.
This is really making me look elsewhere for a nutrition app and as a first impression doesn't look good. Can anyone help?
This maybe an old repetitive finding but I cannot sync MFP with Google fit. They are both visible (as connected) in the apps and indeed my xiaomi fitness band works with Fit (irony right there). No shared data can be found in either MFP or Fit app. I have emptied caches and force stopped MFP and Fit and reopened to no avail.
This is really making me look elsewhere for a nutrition app and as a first impression doesn't look good. Can anyone help?
3
Replies
-
I’m using Carbon, an app created by Layne Norton. It doesn’t connect to trackers. It does have an algorithm built in that acts as a virtual coach. I like it much better than MFP and I’ve been using this app since 2014 to track and meal plan. It’s a paid app, you can do monthly or you can do 6 months or one year.1
-
I agree with Talan79 Carbon is way better than MFP. It's worth the money over MFP as you actually get coached in the app1
-
I have the same issue, so i use Samsung to sync with mfp0
-
lukejoycePT wrote: »I agree with Talan79 Carbon is way better than MFP. It's worth the money over MFP as you actually get coached in the app
If one wants to be coached, that might be worth the money. On the whole I think MFP appeals to many who want to track food and maybe exercise and don't have an interest in coaching from an app.
On the other hand, MFP can be quite buggy, which might explain OP's syncing issue.4 -
lukejoycePT wrote: »I agree with Talan79 Carbon is way better than MFP. It's worth the money over MFP as you actually get coached in the app
If one wants to be coached, that might be worth the money. On the whole I think MFP appeals to many who want to track food and maybe exercise and don't have an interest in coaching from an app.
Yeah, I quit Noom for MFP because I did not want a coach 🙂 I'm guessing I'm not alone in not wanting/needing a coach.6 -
Google Fit used to work pretty well with MFP but several months ago it got really glitchy and inconsistent so I stopped using it. Now I use Pacer to track the runs/walks that I want to add to my exercise data. Pacer will sync with MFP, and it is free but 1) I use it only for walking/running and 2) I have to remember to activate the GPS each time. It does not run in the background like Fit used to.
ETA: I have used MFP for a few years now, have lost 49 lbs and maintained that loss, and I have never paid for the premium MFP. IMO the premium membership is not necessary.3
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 394.1K Introduce Yourself
- 43.9K Getting Started
- 260.4K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.1K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 435 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.9K MyFitnessPal Information
- 15 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.7K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions