to eat or NOT to eat all recommended calories

160poundgirl
160poundgirl Posts: 84
Hey,

I am given 1200 a day in calorie intake. I am 207 and looking for a 2 pounds a week weight loss. I am working out daily (this is only day 4) where i get additional 400+ calories. Should i therefore eat 1600+ calories? I thought I am trying to lose weight hence the low cal diet. But again word is that my body will get into starvation mode and retain the fat?

PLEASE HELP :(

Replies

  • AngieM76
    AngieM76 Posts: 622 Member
    You are going to get so many different opinions on this topic as its asked a lot. My best advice is to try it both ways and see what works for you. Everyone is different.
  • poseyj88
    poseyj88 Posts: 140 Member
    My advice? If you're hungry... eat the extra calories. If you're not, don't. When I was only having like 1350 cals a day I was STARVING even eating back my exercise cals so I upped it a bit. You want to set yourself up for long-term success : )
  • russelljclarke
    russelljclarke Posts: 836 Member
    Hey,

    I am given 1200 a day in calorie intake. I am 207 and looking for a 2 pounds a week weight loss. I am working out daily (this is only day 4) where i get additional 400+ calories. Should i therefore eat 1600+ calories? I thought I am trying to lose weight hence the low cal diet. But again word is that my body will get into starvation mode and retain the fat?

    PLEASE HELP :(
    Eat them, always. There ARE conflicting opinions on this subject, which is why I tested the theory. Believe me everyone, starvation mode exists!
  • BeautyFromPain
    BeautyFromPain Posts: 4,952 Member
    1200 NET is what you have been given to lose 2 lbs/week. Any less than that, and it is hard to get necessary vitamins and you may go into starvation mode where your body holds onto fat because it can. Eat your 1200 and you will still lose 2lb per week, ALSO losing any more than this may give you extra skin, etc. etc
  • cramernh
    cramernh Posts: 3,335 Member
    Agreeing.... how a person will react to eating their exercise-calories will be different to another... see how it goes...
  • I would stay with the 1200 calories. Don't eat what you've burned off. Kind of defeats the purpose if you ask me. Don't starve yourself though. If you find you are ravenous, make sure you add a small snack in there. Yogurt, apple, almonds, cheese stick, carrots...100 to 200 calories. Don't forget to drink your water too. That flushes out the wastes from the exercise.
  • When I started out I was 204lbs. I did NOT eat my exercise calories. I lost an average of 2lbs a week. I was feeling great and not feeling tired or drained. I walked on the treadmill everyday and burned an additional 400-500 calories. I was also at a 1200 daily allowance. Some days I did get into my exercise calories but never ate all of them back. I made sure I filled my 1200 calories with good healthy nutrient packed foods. It wasn't junk, which I am sure helped a lot with feeling great!!

    As I started to lose more, I started eating them back - at least half of them to start with for a while, and then all (leaving some for errors in calculations). I still was averaging 2lbs a week.

    I am now 64lbs down and maintaining and I mostly eat back my exercise calories.

    Bottom line...this is what I found worked for *me* It might take some trial and error for you to find what works for you. You can try this if you want too. Good luck :happy:
  • bcattoes
    bcattoes Posts: 17,299 Member
    The calorie deficit is already figured into the 1200 calorie goal, so if you earn extra calories and eat them, you should still lose at the 2 lbs a week rate. If you are eating enough healthy food at 1200 calories to feel full and get proper nutrition then you don't have to eat them. But you'll probably find that you get hungry if you workout and don't eat a little extra. At least I do.
  • lawtechie
    lawtechie Posts: 708 Member
    You tell MFP your activity level and goal (2 lb/week loss). With eating 1200 calories alone (NO EXERCISE) you are on track to lose 2 lbs a week. When you add in exercise, it's like decreasing your net calories -- which is why many recommend eating those calories BACK. You will still be on track for losing 2 lbs/week because your net (Calories eaten - calories burned through exercise) comes around 1200, depending how much you eat back.

    Over long term, if you don't eat them all back you'll fall regularly under 1200 and long term, that could cause you to not lose or even gain weight.
  • lukybug
    lukybug Posts: 209
    I've teetered with this topic for some time. In the beginning, I only ate my recommend cals and maybe a few hundred of my exercise cals if I was hungry and felt like I needed to eat. Everyone is different. I just recently plateaued for over a month and decided it was time to change it up a bit. So I'm eating my recommended cals and eating all of my exercise calories back. I've lost 2 more pounds since then. Yay for eating :wink:

    So yes, you will get advise from all over the board. Best advise is to try a few different things and see what works best for YOU. Most importantly though, when you're trying the different approaches, make sure you're giving them enough time to work.

    Best of luck!
  • Arynamber
    Arynamber Posts: 162 Member
    Well I talked with my Dr. and he told me to just listen to my body. Make healthy choices and eat slow. When you feel almost full stop. Eat often. and nothing after 7. This has worked for me. Im sure Im going to get flamed here.. but I dont always eat my full calories.. and Im not "starving" either. I feel full, happy, healthy, and the best part is IM LOSING WEIGHT! I honestly think that everyones body is different. Listen to your body, its smarter then you might think. I dont think there is any magic calorie number
  • TMcBooty
    TMcBooty Posts: 780 Member
    Make sure you eat at least 1200, if you are hungry eat the others. If not, then don't.

    I think though it's always best to start at 1 lb a week in the beginning.. 1200 is low to start out at.

    For example. I weigh 140 and my cal goal is 1200.. you weigh 207 and yours is the same.. you probably need more to feel full just because you weigh a little more. I wouldn't start big.. because you are probably going to shock your body with such a huge drop in what it's used to.

    Of course, this is my opinion. You have to do what works for you.
  • TMcBooty
    TMcBooty Posts: 780 Member
    Well I talked with my Dr. and he told me to just listen to my body. Make healthy choices and eat slow. When you feel almost full stop. Eat often. and nothing after 7. This has worked for me. Im sure Im going to get flamed here.. but I dont always eat my full calories.. and Im not "starving" either. I feel full, happy, healthy, and the best part is IM LOSING WEIGHT! I honestly think that everyones body is different. Listen to your body, its smarter then you might think. I dont think there is any magic calorie number

    I agree. If you're hungry EAT.
  • mum2littledove
    mum2littledove Posts: 53 Member
    You've got quite a long journey ahead of you, and my guess is that you want this to be forever, i.e. not put all the weight back on when you reach your goal weight and stop dieting.

    Therefore I would recommend that you hover about your daily calorie allowance after adding back your exercise calories. Some days you'll eat a bit less, and other days maybe a little above, but the important thing is where you average out. Coupled with regular exercise, the weight will come off and most importantly it is more likely to stay off. If you're regularly way under, not only will your metabolism slow but you are also setting yourself up for failure psychologically, because your brain will make you start thinking about food too much.

    I lost 30 lbs and always ate back my exercise calories, and have managed to keep the extra weight off since July. I'm still very nervous about piling it all back on again, and I'm not sure if that feeling will ever go away, but I'd say that my new lifestyle is sustainable, and that is the key. Starvation is never sustainable, no matter how eager you might be at the start.
  • armymil
    armymil Posts: 163 Member
    I determine by knowing my hunger signal. If I am hungry, I will pop out a salad with spinach leaves and a few toppings. I am on 1500 calories because I am a bigger dude. There was one time I was near 1500, and burned 580 calories in a day. I was hungry so I ended up leaving myself at 1200 for the day after my snack.

    I've heard trainers tell individuals to eat 1200-1500 calories a day and burn that in a gym. Is it right? Not sure. I would never do that, but those people are still alive.

    So everyone before me that said to judge thy self, do that. Learn the difference between hunger, thirst, and bored signals.

    Edit: The other thing to note is that sometimes you may get the wrong guess at your calories. Sometimes the machines can be wrong and MFP might over estimate sometimes. So I always take the lowest number, but try not to live on this. I use to try to work out to catch any overage in the past but I quickly learned that was a bad method.
  • hi , i'm not sure of the answer to that question. because i've been doing this check for two and a half weeks i am not checking on weekends but am keeping watch during the week . i eat light and i believe if your determined to do it you will keep it off because it's and attitude change cause i don't eat my full calories either and i am full and i am losing weight so far 5 lbs so listen to your body.
  • CMmrsfloyd
    CMmrsfloyd Posts: 2,380 Member
    I'm on the 1200 calorie plan but I actually tend to eat more than that, even after my exercise. I have my activity set to 'sedentary' and at 1200 calories a day MFP tells me I should be losing 1.1 lbs per week. I usually eat closer to 1250-1300 on the days that I don't exercise. On the days that I *do* exercise and MFP tells me to eat back the calories, I do, so that my final number at the end of the day is slightly over just like on the non-workout days. (so if I burn 200 calories and MFP wants me to eat 1400 as a result, I end the day somewhere around 1400-1500). I am losing MORE than what MFP said I'd be losing. I'm averaging 1 lb every 4 days which is about 1.75 lbs/week. But of course I am set to 'sedentary' and I'm not exactly going to try and figure up how many calories I burn going up and down the stairs, shopping, playing outside with the kids etc so after that stuff I probably am under the 1200. But I don't have the time and desire to add up every single little tiny action I take during the day, and I'm too afraid to up my activity level setting b/c I'm scared the amount MFP would give me would be too high. I don't think you have to be super-strict about eating every single calorie every day though - if you have a day where you eat kind of low, balance it out with a day where you have an extra snack. I've been watching these 'zigzagging' discussions lately and they totally make sense to me - your body averages out your intake/burn over time. Plus this is a plan I can stick with for a LONG time and be satisfied (eating 1200-1300 on non-active days and eating more on days that I workout) - I'm not hungry all the time so I don't feel like I'm on a 'diet'. If I were to try and stay much lower than that on a daily basis, I would personally feel like I was depriving myself and it would backfire after awhile. So I like the MFP endorsed method for me, but others may find that different methods work better for them. :-)
  • missikay1970
    missikay1970 Posts: 588 Member
    some days i do and some days i don't. i think you'll have to find what works for you. if you are in this as a lifestyle change, you are going to probably not see changes as rapidly as you'd like vs. if you are just trying to lose a lot of weight as a short-term goal. i am really trying to make life-time changes in my entire lifestyle, not just weight loss, so even if i only lose .5 lb per week, it's ok b/c overall, i am making better choices in food and activity level. whereas before i would eat about 3000 VERY HORRIBLE calories per day and 2 to 3 cokes per day and had almost no exercise, now, i eat 1200-1400 calories per day and go to the gym 5/6 times per week. so eating back 200 or 300 exercise calories really isn't going to make a huge difference in my overall goals, considering how much better my eating habits are. good luck :smile:
  • I hadn't been. Now I'm trying to eat some of them and my weight is going up. I'm having such a hard time lately. But maybe if you do it in the beginning it won't affect you like it is me.
  • armymil
    armymil Posts: 163 Member
    I hadn't been. Now I'm trying to eat some of them and my weight is going up. I'm having such a hard time lately. But maybe if you do it in the beginning it won't affect you like it is me.

    Maybe you are over estimating your workout calories? Thus, when you are eating what you assume is correct, you are actually eating over your maintenance level. Weight loss is calories in vs calories out. So if you are putting more in than you are out, then you might need to reconsider your meal plans or exercise.
  • Thank you so much every body- i really appreciate it.

    It is week # 1 so I will listen to my body.

    Thanks again.:smile:
This discussion has been closed.