Is 2000 calories a day high?

hmhill17
hmhill17 Posts: 284 Member
edited January 20 in Health and Weight Loss
I was active here 4-5 years ago, got down to 162, stabilized at 175 for a while, stopped tracking.
Over the last 2 years, the weight crept up and I hit 200 again. I blame turning 50 and stress eating.
I’m trying to get back down to 175-180 losing 1 pound a week and MFP tells me 2000 calories a day with a not very active lifestyle setting will do it. I don’t remember the calories ever being that high before.

Answers

  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,928 Member
    You haven't told us your current weight (just that you hit 200), height, age (did you just turn 50?), sex, or activity level. How could we possibly guess how many calories you need?

    One individual's experience tells us zero about another individual's calorie needs: That's what research-based statistical estimates like MFP's are for . . . and they're only a starting point, a hypotheses to test for 4-6 weeks, then adjust based on individual results if necessary.

    That said, I maintain weight on 2100-2200 as a 5'5" (165cm), low 130s pounds (60-ish kg), 69 y/o retired woman, so 2000 doesn't seem crazy high for weight loss in someone who's male, younger, bigger, or has a more active job or daily life.

    If MFP gave you 2000, it thinks you'd maintain at 2500. That's not unreasonable for someone of 200 pounds or over who has a normally-active life, isn't much over 50, especially if male. Sailrabbit (https://www.sailrabbit.com/bmr/) thinks a 50 y/o slightly active 5'10" 200-pound male would maintain around 2500. If female and same size, it thinks she'd maintain at 2500 if moderately active.

    Try it and see?
  • tomcustombuilder
    tomcustombuilder Posts: 2,280 Member
    There is no way to really tell you if it’s valid or not. You’ll just have to try it for 4 to 6 weeks and see what the outcome is.
    2,000 or any other calorie amount is only valid If in fact you’re being as accurate as possible with your weekly calorie counting and tracking.