Where are the former Weight Watchers??

teenyinni
teenyinni Posts: 15
edited October 3 in Introduce Yourself
Hey everyone!

This is my second day on MFP... coincidentally I found this site yesterday just as the WW site had a major several-hours-long crash. I know there are other threads on this topic but I would really love to know how WW people feel about MFP vs WW. I've seen people say that it is better and I just want to know what specifically about MFP made you decide that WW wasn't getting your money any longer ? (I know that cost is a reason in itself hehe)

IMHO, the nice thing about WW was the extra weekly/flex points that you could use outside of the daily allowance. Do you find it restrictive to eat the same amount of cals everyday without any wiggle room? I don't know the MFP program well yet so I'm not sure if there is any rollover of cals from day to day if you eat less than your daily allowance, if there are "exercise points," etc.


Please enlighten me!!
«13

Replies

  • mrshickey
    mrshickey Posts: 239
    mfp all the way. its free, its more normal in my opinion- calorie counting rather than working out points all the time. food labels have calories, not propoints, lol!! and its free.

    just my opinion (i did weight watchers and had success on the old points system, not so much success on the new propoints system, which is what led me here)
  • FTIM2015
    FTIM2015 Posts: 460 Member
    Done WW, before they changed the points system around, and I MUCH prefer it here!

    You can earn extra cals if you want to eat more, a lot of people will earn more cals in the week if they know that they're going out for a big meal. I've fallen off the wagon lately but I have to say I found it a LOT more supportive here than anywhere else.

    Good Luck! :)
  • brimir
    brimir Posts: 72
    If you work out, you get to eat back those calories you burned off.. so there is plenty of "wiggle room" as you put it! just have to move a little!
  • tiedye
    tiedye Posts: 331 Member
    There isn't any "wiggle room" exactly, but you can earn your extra calories through exercise if you get what i mean.
  • gradgal01
    gradgal01 Posts: 46 Member
    i think the biggest difference as far as my own compliance goes is that the mfp website is way more user friendly and comprehensive. i also like that you can track whatever nutrients you like (in the food section, you can play around with settings). and i cheat less when i just take a handful of this or that -- on ww, if it was less than a full point, i didnt count it. everything counts here.

    about "no flex points" here: everything is wiggle room. you set your food and exercise goals. you know exactly how much exercise you've done and how that affects your calorie intake for the day. obviously, neither system is 100% accurate, but... i am a convert to mfp.
  • remolding
    remolding Posts: 25 Member
    I just left ww today after the crash yesterday, I have been on this site for over a year and I find it easier to log onto. I will continue to use my point system and log all foods.:smile:
  • Mustangsally1000
    Mustangsally1000 Posts: 854 Member
    WW didn't work for me..this does! AND....it's free!
  • meerkat70
    meerkat70 Posts: 4,605 Member
    Lost lots on ww. I find this easier and more transparent.
  • kweaner
    kweaner Posts: 1 Member
    I personally switched to MFP because its free... but I have found that it is so much easier for me to count calories and I love how MFP does the breakdown of fat, carbs, sodium, protein, fiber...you get the point. I have had more success with MFP then I was having with weight watchers. I also love that you can motivate your friends so easily on their homepage. I think to each their own, as long as something is working for you then the key is to just stick to it!
  • Chastityx
    Chastityx Posts: 192 Member
    I joined this site after 3 months on the points plus system and not losing one lb. I like this site so much more and I make healthier choices here when I see the amount of sodium and sugar in my foods.
  • Foxzy
    Foxzy Posts: 38
    When I was on the old WW points system, I compared points and the calories on those food items and it equalled to allowed points and calories. So my 30 something points equalled to 1200 calories. MFP does subtract calories burned, which would be your exercise points. You could easily use MFP and still use WW guidelines.

    Also check out www.fooducate.com, this gives you food points on the products.

    Hope this helps.
  • jlc1243
    jlc1243 Posts: 272 Member
    I lost over 50lbs on WW but I slowly gained it all back. I was tired of points and meetings just bored me to tears after a while. Concepts and tips, tricks I learned have stuck with me and I apperciate that. But, counting calories is much easier than needing a points calulator to determine whether or not I should eat it. I feel I am learning a lot more about health and fitness from others here not just about a new 100 calorie item at the grocery store...

    And this is free and the support, IMO, is much better here. It's daily not once a week! And did I mention it was free?
  • Kimmer2011
    Kimmer2011 Posts: 569 Member
    MFP > WW

    Free is good. Not having to find time for a meeting is good. The tools here are great. The people are better. I can be flexible with my calories based on how much I exercise. Sometimes I eat up to my max but not always.
  • sissamae
    sissamae Posts: 232 Member
    I used to do WW online and was successful for awhile. I have to admit that the cost was a big part of my decision, but I love this site! I don't think that the Flex Points from WW give you any more wiggle room than any other diet other than you feel permitted to eat additional calories each week. It was nice knowing that I had those points to use if I needed them, but I also felt the need to use them (whether I was hungry or not) a lot of times too.

    With MFP I know that if I want to keep losing the way I have been I need to stay within a certain number of calories each day. I know if I want to have that candy bar I should cut something else out or add more exercise that day. I know that my body uses a certain number of calories each day and that doesn't change just because WW says I can use more points lol :) I guess what I am trying to say is that MFP holds me more accountable and I feel I do better with MFP because of that. For the first time ever I feel like I am only eating when I am truly hungry. I hope this helps!

    Also, the people on this site are amazing and I have found so much more motivation and support on this site than I ever found on WW. We all have different preferences though, so it may not be true for everyone.
  • lydt5880
    lydt5880 Posts: 90 Member
    I switched in March after being on WW for four years and was a bit dubious- a case of better the devil you know! I did lose my initial 2 stone on WW but i found it more restrictive and realised this was easier to monitor nutrients such a sodium levels and carbs than WW. Its good to have the friends status update like Facebook on your homepage making your support network and motivators more easily accessible than WW.

    I am now loving MFP and most of the people on here and feel more in control of my results.
    =)
  • H_Factor
    H_Factor Posts: 1,722 Member
    things I didn't like about WW (and I stopped using it several months before I found MFP):

    1. I don't like the points plus system because I couldn't eat all of the free food (veggies/most fruit), eat all of my points, and lose weight. I finally decided I just wouldn't eat all of my points, would stop eating when I was full, and, voila, I started losing weight.

    2. I wasn't in love with WW's food database. I think the food database on MFP is much better.

    3. There were some nice articles on WW, but MFP has better tools (if you use them) for accountability and support. the community pages are great....the amount of information you can put on your profile can be very helpful...the support from pals as well as success stories are inspiring. I didn't get any of that on WW, and perhaps I just didn't know where to find it (notably, I did WW on-line and did not go to the meetings...so, my comments are from an on-line perspective).
  • sissamae
    sissamae Posts: 232 Member
    I personally switched to MFP because its free... but I have found that it is so much easier for me to count calories and I love how MFP does the breakdown of fat, carbs, sodium, protein, fiber...you get the point. I have had more success with MFP then I was having with weight watchers. I also love that you can motivate your friends so easily on their homepage. I think to each their own, as long as something is working for you then the key is to just stick to it!

    I also find that I pay more attention to sodium, carbs, etc! That's another good point!
  • erniebaby123
    erniebaby123 Posts: 4 Member
    Also, I think the difference between WW and MFP is that WW is a specific weight loss system whereas MFP is more of a measure of a person's specific weight loss system. Everyone here is doing their own thing food/exercise -wise, and MFP allows you to track and measure your efforts, so you can reach your goals in your own way and in your own time. This is freedom in itself. And, of course, MFP-ers are extremely supportive, and that's also a big plus!
  • TaraFTMVA
    TaraFTMVA Posts: 309 Member
    I was on WW ( the old system) back in 2009. I loved it! Lost 20lbs in 3 months or so. I tried to get back on that same program by myself (not the new one, the old points plus program!) and I did lose ( 7lbs in 6 weeks), but I kept flunctuating, even if I would exercise and not go over my points, it just seemed it wasnt working for me. Also I had a baby in May and it just seemed like with a newborn it was too much to count my points, write them down, figure them out, etc. I found mfp thanx to a fb friend who said she was using it. I figured I would try it and see. I overlapped with WW for a week and found that according to mfp, I had more calories to eat ( even without exercise calories) than I had alotted points. I decided this was easier for me bc of the database and its free bc I couldnt afford the official WW site. I would never put down WW, I think that its an amazing program! But for me, I am very excited about MFP, its easier and faster for me. Plus I love that I know the calories I am burning when exercising and I can eat them if I want to. I know you can points wise as well, but to me its simpler to look at any package and see 200 calories vs trying to convert the nutrition facts into a certain number of points. I have seen fantastic progress since I have joined MFP. Almost 10lbs in 5 weeks. Which I would have lost more if I wouldn't have slacked with exercise and sometimes I would eat bad. But I know its by choice and I make it up the next day and get right back on track. I am excited to see how much farther I can go with MFP. I never reached my GW on WW bc I could no longer afford it, and I plan to stick with MFP until I do it and even after to maintain. It just makes sense to me.
  • Chastityx
    Chastityx Posts: 192 Member
    There are Atkins,Paleo, low carb,calorie counters, vegetarians,and people trying to gain or maintain weight here. Different things work for different people. I love the support I get from everyone. You can track different things and change around your carb,protien, fat levels, till you find what works for you and your lifestyle.
  • jennysmission
    jennysmission Posts: 391 Member
    I LOVED the old ww program just Points..I can not get my head around the new program I just didnt want to have to relearn everything stubborn I guess...plus I lost my job going to school and a big move so I wanted CHEAP..oh wait FREE

    I also love MFP database you can find anything in that thing!!
  • Still on the fence. I am still with WW. I started with meetings that did not help so I switched to online. Since March Ive lost 42lbs. What I find now with MFP is that the food database with WAY more advanced with much more options. Its scary how they have almost everything I plug in.

    The Points Plus systems is getting boring for me and I have been stuck at my current weight since mid-July. I reecntly started using MFP and i really like it so far, especially because of the phone app/scanner. But also the community here is awesome and you get a bunch of replies very fast.

    I like the calorie system and that you can earn extra calories by working out. This plan with a heart rate monitor seems to be a very good thing. The only thing so far I would like to see is a weekly weigh in type thing where it shows the graph, like on WW.
  • phocid
    phocid Posts: 85 Member
    Ill say it...MFP = naked weigh-ins! :0

    Plus the weigh-ins are private; no one asking me what I could do differently this week, etc.
  • Hi there

    Im doing MFP and converting it to WW PP
    MFP has some great features you can find an abundance of foods from all major supermarkets and build you own recipes

    When WW PP was first launched I did a lot of research on it and I read the theory behind the plan is to divide the calorie value in food by 40 so if a chocolate muffin is 350 calories it would be e.g. 350 / 40 = 8.75 which would be 9 PP

    1160 calories = 29PP
    1960 calories = 49PP

    I do a MFP daily diary up to 1160 calories then divide the total by 40


    Good luck and I hope this helps
  • WW was great, but this has all the features I need for free. My dietician recommended it. :flowerforyou:
  • hanna1210
    hanna1210 Posts: 286 Member
    I switched over in the spring, mainly because WW didn't have a real app for droids. I'm a huge fan of MFP! I have lost weight a lot slower on here, but I've also stuck with it a lot longer. I had a tendency to burn out every few months on WW, probably because they decided how much I could have on a daily basis. On here, you can choose how quickly you want to lose weight without being unhealthy. And it changes as your weight goes down - usually about 10 calories depending on the change of your weight - which I think works better. MFP also has a much larger, and ever-growing, nutrition database. WW flat out refused to add some places and types of food.

    Oh yeah, and the biggest kicker? It's FREE! That, and I like the community a *lot* more on here than on WW.
  • Stephinow
    Stephinow Posts: 273
    I like them both for different reasons. I am a WW Lifetime member so I still do it but don't have to pay. I like the structure of WW, and I find it easier to just count Points (or Points+). Here on MFP, I like the support and participation with other members. I don't use the food diary, but I do log my exercise here just because I where a HRM and like to log my calories burned, even though I still log them as Activity Points in my WW tracker.

    I say everybody is different, and everybody should do what works best for them. For me, it's a combination of the two.
  • kyunda
    kyunda Posts: 340 Member
    i love MFP! It took me 4 months on WW to lose 17lb and i've been doing mfp since aug and im down about 27lbs! Plus its free. In the real world my food has calories not points. I personally dont think WW teaches me how to eat/be healthy in the long run
  • vmccartt21
    vmccartt21 Posts: 1 Member
    Glad to see I'm not the only one who used the old WW tool and had trouble with the new points plus system they have now. I did WW in 2007 and lost 20 lbs in the first three months, and a total of 70 lbs. I have slowly gained half of it back, and started back on WW again. This time around I have only lost 11 lbs in four months. I know it's different this time around, I don't have as much to lose, and I'm five years older (ugh!), but I really did not feel like I was having the success like I did before. I almost felt like they were way more restrictive with carbs than they were before. And I really have a hard time with that. I'm hoping MFP will be more "balanced" for me - I just signed on this week, and if all goes well I will be cancelling my WW online subscription.
  • Truebeauty101
    Truebeauty101 Posts: 15 Member
    done WW...much prefer MFP! and yeah, its FREE! ;-)
This discussion has been closed.