Favorite Restaurant says NO to calories on the menu...

McKayMachina
McKayMachina Posts: 2,670 Member
edited October 4 in Food and Nutrition
Jut got this email back from one of my new favorite spots...

***

McKay,

Congratulations on your weight loss and your goal to be healthy!

I applaud your efforts and your approach with calorie counting. It seems like it's working well for you.

Determining accurate calorie count in dishes is a difficult and expensive endeavor for a small restaurant, and most food establishments that do list them are often horribly inaccurate. Our approach to food does not take calories into consideration as our philosophy supports whole food. We believe if you are eating food which is good for you, the calories essentially don't play as much of a part, and your body will find it's healthy weight on its own. Therefore, even before opening, we decided that calories were not something we were going to add to the menu.

We love taking our dogs out with us, too!

Good luck with your journey to health! See you soon!

***

Well, that stinks. :frown: I wished they would have at least considered it. :/

Also, this part scares me now, tremendously:

"and most food establishments that do list them are often horribly inaccurate"

:noway:
«1

Replies

  • TexasNurseMom78
    TexasNurseMom78 Posts: 897 Member
    What restaurant is this from?
  • McKayMachina
    McKayMachina Posts: 2,670 Member
    What restaurant is this from?

    Nourish in Scottsdale, Arizona. They have indicators for lactose-free, vegetarian, vegan, gluten-free, egg-free, etc. for all menu items. I thought they would at least give it some thought. :(
  • mslh84
    mslh84 Posts: 180
    That sounds really ridiculous...

    I think they are at least required to make the food nutrition information available..
  • Random, you're in Scottsdale? I am in Mesa!

    Also, that really stinks. It seems like they should have at least made some kind of effort. Isn't that some kind of regulation? Restaurants have to know calorie and nutrition info?
  • McKayMachina
    McKayMachina Posts: 2,670 Member
    That sounds really ridiculous...

    I think they are at least required to make the food nutrition information available..

    I didn't think it was a requirement at all. Someone earlier said restaurants with 5 or more locations are required to. I found this:

    http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/health/2011/04/fda_wants_restaurants_to_provi.html

    but I don't know if there have been any developments. Most one-off restaurants in AZ don't provide nutrition info so at least Nourish is a step ahead with all the ___-free indicators.
  • Leslietheriot
    Leslietheriot Posts: 303 Member
    They are right about alot of places nutrition info being inaccurate.
  • DannyMussels
    DannyMussels Posts: 1,842 Member
    There's also a good chance they know their #s will be super high, like most sit-down restaurants in the 1000-2000 calorie dish range.
  • RNMDFF
    RNMDFF Posts: 153 Member
    I'm terrified to eat out now. It truly scares me.
    They probably are off. The cook may add more sauce and cheese to the pasta, or more fries to the plate. etc.
  • McKayMachina
    McKayMachina Posts: 2,670 Member
    Random, you're in Scottsdale? I am in Mesa!

    Also, that really stinks. It seems like they should have at least made some kind of effort. Isn't that some kind of regulation? Restaurants have to know calorie and nutrition info?

    You should definitely try Nourish out sometime! Their food is simple enough that it's less of a hassle to estimate than most other places. Their chicken pizza and tea+chocolate for dessert is amazing. :D

    Oh and the lemon artichoke hummus with the saffron quinoa is incredible!

    But yeah, I don't think there's a requirement to provide it. Which is why I appreciate it so much when restaurants do! But now this girl is saying the other places are way off, so I don't know what to think! Waa!
  • McKayMachina
    McKayMachina Posts: 2,670 Member
    I'm terrified to eat out now. It truly scares me.

    you deleted me :(

    Oh noez! I only delete people if they stop logging in. Did you take a break? Re-add me! <3
  • chuckyp
    chuckyp Posts: 693 Member
    There's no requirement that I've ever heard of. As they said in the email, having all their menu items tested by a lab for caloric and nutritional content is prohibitively expensive for an independent restaurant. That's why you normally only see it done for large chain restaurants. I don't think I've even been in a mom and pop restaurant that posted nutrition information. I suppose they could come up with a ball park figure by just adding up each ingredient similar to how we enter recipes here on MFP.
  • McKayMachina
    McKayMachina Posts: 2,670 Member
    There's also a good chance they know their #s will be super high, like most sit-down restaurants in the 1000-2000 calorie dish range.

    Could be but I'd be surprised! They have super simple, healthful ingredients. But I've been surprised before!
  • McKayMachina
    McKayMachina Posts: 2,670 Member
    There's no requirement that I've ever heard of. As they said in the email, having all their menu items tested by a lab for caloric and nutritional content is prohibitively expensive for an independent restaurant. That's why you normally only see it done for large chain restaurants. I don't think I've even been in a mom and pop restaurant that posted nutrition information. I suppose they could come up with a ball park figure by just adding up each ingredient similar to how we enter recipes here on MFP.

    That's what I was thinking. I could oversee it for them and have it done in a day or two. No problem.
  • mslh84
    mslh84 Posts: 180
    That sounds really ridiculous...

    I think they are at least required to make the food nutrition information available..

    I didn't think it was a requirement at all. Someone earlier said restaurants with 5 or more locations are required to. I found this:

    http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/health/2011/04/fda_wants_restaurants_to_provi.html

    but I don't know if there have been any developments. Most one-off restaurants in AZ don't provide nutrition info so at least Nourish is a step ahead with all the ___-free indicators.

    Actually I checked the FDA's website, and its for restaurants that have 20 or more locations.

    http://www.fda.gov/food/labelingnutrition/ucm217762.htm
  • mslh84
    mslh84 Posts: 180
    There's no requirement that I've ever heard of. As they said in the email, having all their menu items tested by a lab for caloric and nutritional content is prohibitively expensive for an independent restaurant. That's why you normally only see it done for large chain restaurants. I don't think I've even been in a mom and pop restaurant that posted nutrition information. I suppose they could come up with a ball park figure by just adding up each ingredient similar to how we enter recipes here on MFP.

    Actually like I previously quoted, there is a requirement for restaurants that have 20 or more locations.

    On March 23, 2010, the President signed the health care reform legislation into law. Section 4205 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 requires restaurants and similar retail food establishments with 20 or more locations to list calorie content information for standard menu items on restaurant menus and menu boards, including drive-through menu boards. Other nutrient information – total calories, fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, sodium, total carbohydrates, sugars, fiber and total protein – would have to be made available in writing upon request. The Act also requires vending machine operators who own or operate 20 or more vending machines to disclose calorie content for certain items.

    The FDA has issued a Federal Register notice that explains how restaurants and similar retail food establishments with fewer than 20 locations and vending machine operators with fewer than 20 vending machines can voluntarily register to become subject to new federal menu labeling requirements. Anyone needing assistance with filling out this form call 240-402-2371.

    Quoting the FDA website...again the link is http://www.fda.gov/food/labelingnutrition/ucm217762.htm
  • McKayMachina
    McKayMachina Posts: 2,670 Member

    Actually I checked the FDA's website, and its for restaurants that have 20 or more locations.

    http://www.fda.gov/food/labelingnutrition/ucm217762.htm

    That's awesome. Thanks very much for the link. Good to know. :drinker:
  • Laces_0ut
    Laces_0ut Posts: 3,750 Member
    Gilbert, AZ checking in!

    when i eat out i usually do not go by their nutrition estimates because they are so inaccurate and i can understand a small restaurant not wanting to print the info. i usually ballpark the calories based on the ingredients and round up a lot.


    speaking of Scottsdale have any of you been to Iruna for tapas? fantastic place.
  • mslh84
    mslh84 Posts: 180

    Actually I checked the FDA's website, and its for restaurants that have 20 or more locations.

    http://www.fda.gov/food/labelingnutrition/ucm217762.htm

    That's awesome. Thanks very much for the link. Good to know. :drinker:

    NP...but now I'm reporting cookout because they have way more than 20 locations, and have never had a Food nutrition menu available...and personally I try to pick out what I'm going to eat, before I go out to eat! Makes it easier! Sorry if I sounded like a butt!
  • lsilly15
    lsilly15 Posts: 137 Member
    me too! i did terrible tonight and added like 800 calories NOT needed. I cut everything in half too!
  • That sounds like they are trying to hide something. That's disappointing!
  • MissHellsing
    MissHellsing Posts: 133 Member
    There is a Vegan Restaurant by campus I like to go to get some quick to eat before class or after the gym/class. They didn't have the calorie info either BUT they do have recipe book with all the stuff they make at the restaurant and some that I was able to buy from them. So i can just basically put in what they use from there. Very helpful.
  • rileysowner
    rileysowner Posts: 8,328 Member
    As to the comment about restaurant nutritional information being very inaccurate, that sounds more like justification for not providing nutritional information of a sour grapes type. It would not be 100% accurate which is the case for all nutritional information, but I remember an episode of Dr. Oz where they took various foods from fast food restaurants and had them tested for nutritional information. They were all quite close. I think the furthest out was only about 30 calories off and most were much closer. If you are shooting for 2 pounds per week that variation will make little difference unless you are eating out a lot. As much as you may think your calorie count for the stuff you measure at home is accurate, it will probably fall into the same sort of range simply from variations of food.
  • Pebble321
    Pebble321 Posts: 6,423 Member
    Hey that's life, I've never seen calories on a menu in my part of the world and I've managed to lose weight while eating out pretty often, I think it's a good life skill to be able to make a "best guess" smart choice from the menu.
  • TheBraveryLover
    TheBraveryLover Posts: 1,217 Member
    That was a very nice email they sent you.
  • poisongirl6485
    poisongirl6485 Posts: 1,487 Member
    Honestly, any good chef isn't going to measure ingredients, but eyeballs everything anyway. Even the calorie counts you see for chains etc I wouldn't rely on as accurate as one cook can be heavy-handed on certain ingredients, etc.

    My rule is that if I know I'm going to eat out that day, I try to save extra calories for the large amount I'm going to likely consume at the restaurant.
  • McKayMachina
    McKayMachina Posts: 2,670 Member
    That was a very nice email they sent you.

    Absolutely! While I'm bummed about the calories thing, their food and customer service is amazing and I will so go back. I went twice last week with new members of my family each time and now they all love it too! Bonus: they allow dogs on the patio! :D
  • michelledruss
    michelledruss Posts: 40 Member
    Only large chains are required to post their nutrition info. I live in AZ and have not tried Nourish yet. Pita Jungle posts theirs and I was surpised on how large the calories were in some of my simple dishes like their mahi mahi. I know wildflower posts their nutrition info and I can take a salad and minus out the things I am not eating such as the bread or the cheese.
  • Only large chains are required to post their nutrition info. I live in AZ and have not tried Nourish yet. Pita Jungle posts theirs and I was surpised on how large the calories were in some of my simple dishes like their mahi mahi. I know wildflower posts their nutrition info and I can take a salad and minus out the things I am not eating such as the bread or the cheese.

    Just wanted to say that I went to Pita Jungle and it was very difficult to find a lowish calorie meal. The veggie burger with their potato things was 850 calories. Most of their stuff was near that range, I was quite surprised.
  • wolfchild59
    wolfchild59 Posts: 2,608 Member
    But Pita Jungle is so delicious who cares? ;) (I can only say that cuz I only get to eat there when I visit my family in Mesa and vacation days are cheat days for me)

    And in regards to the thread topic - 1. yes, only restaurants with 20 or more locations are/will be required to provide nutritional info. 2. The law was originally going to go into effect by Mar 2011 but got pushed back to next year, so no restaurants could be reported at this time. 3. Testing the food and getting official FDA numbers is ridiculously expensive and that's one reason why there was even pushback at the 20 restaurant level, so really small places are highly unlikely to ever do it. 4. I'm not sure what Dr. Oz tested, but most of the studies I've read about testing restaurant dishes vs nutritionals supplied about 30% of the meals were off by hundreds of calories. Some restaurants have been forced to do new FDA testing to get new nutritionals published. Even stuff like ice cream servings from Coldstone and Baskin Robbins were wildly off. One article I read the average serving was 150% of the published serving size. (I.e. if it was a 4oz serving in the data you were getting 6oz). Great for value, horrid for calorie counting.

    And through all of this typing, all I've been able to think about is Chompie's from my last AZ trip. lol
  • neanderthin
    neanderthin Posts: 10,220 Member
    I agree with their stance. It's almost impossible and virtually unaffordable for the smaller restaurant given the rotation of the menu and cooking from scratch from day to day or week to week to do it, and it would also go against my philosophy as a chef, which I am.

    The large chain restaurants that offer a formulated menu that rarely changes are the same restaurants that also use large suppliers of processed foods like Sysco that also look at portion as value, the larger the more competitive. As well, the obesity situation in the Country has gotten worse since the implementation of nutritional information.
This discussion has been closed.