Can i really eat this??

EcHoOoOoO
EcHoOoOoO Posts: 89
edited September 19 in Health and Weight Loss
So mfp has allowed me 1200 calories and i do very strenuous cardio workouts burning from 800-1000 calories each day. So today i did my work out at night an had eaten about 900 calories worth of stuff through the day so I made a yummy celery and cream cheese snack and i am full but was only worth about 150-200 calories now i have roughly 900 more...wow..so technically i could eat like a big mac or pizza and fries right? So as long as im within my calories i can eat anything i choose????? There is no way i can consume 900 calories tonight or even throughout the day without eating crap which i actually dont mind eating crap and still lose weight (who wouldnt) but i just want to do this the right way. Would it be so bad to just not eat any of them?

Replies

  • EcHoOoOoO
    EcHoOoOoO Posts: 89
    So mfp has allowed me 1200 calories and i do very strenuous cardio workouts burning from 800-1000 calories each day. So today i did my work out at night an had eaten about 900 calories worth of stuff through the day so I made a yummy celery and cream cheese snack and i am full but was only worth about 150-200 calories now i have roughly 900 more...wow..so technically i could eat like a big mac or pizza and fries right? So as long as im within my calories i can eat anything i choose????? There is no way i can consume 900 calories tonight or even throughout the day without eating crap which i actually dont mind eating crap and still lose weight (who wouldnt) but i just want to do this the right way. Would it be so bad to just not eat any of them?
  • sassiebritches
    sassiebritches Posts: 1,861 Member
    Why would you eat a big mac.....or fries? If you are following MFP as a "diet" a Big Mac would not be acceptable, if you were making a "Life Change" with MFP then a Big Mac would not be acceptable.

    Why not have something worth eating, even if it is not all 900 cals. Like a glass of milk with 2 graham crackers, (290 cals). Some cheese and crackers (250 cals), Corn Flakes (240 cals), some nuts. Don't just assume you can have a pizza or a fake wanna be beef Big Mac.

    My thoughts, I would just assume not eat anything then to go for the Big Mac. Better that way.

    (Also just an FYI, in the 1950's a meal size at McDonalds was a kids happy meal - cheesburger, small fries and a soda (590 cals) Not the huge portions we have now......)
  • EcHoOoOoO
    EcHoOoOoO Posts: 89
    Why would you eat a big mac.....or fries? If you are following MFP as a "diet" a Big Mac would not be acceptable, if you were making a "Life Change" with MFP then a Big Mac would not be acceptable.

    Why not have something worth eating, even if it is not all 900 cals. Like a glass of milk with 2 graham crackers, (290 cals). Some cheese and crackers (250 cals), Corn Flakes (240 cals), some nuts. Don't just assume you can have a pizza or a fake wanna be beef Big Mac.

    My thoughts, I would just assume not eat anything then to go for the Big Mac. Better that way.

    (Also just an FYI, in the 1950's a meal size at McDonalds was a kids happy meal - cheesburger, small fries and a soda (590 cals) Not the huge portions we have now......)

    I understand what your saying...im just trying to understand if i can eat my calories however i choose as long i stay within what its allowing me!
  • akamaki
    akamaki Posts: 33 Member
    I understand where you're coming from. I'm having trouble filling in those extra calories too even at 1200 calories!
    Well, you probably shouldn't eat those things simply because they're not good for you in the first place. The quality of food you ingest is just as important as the number of calories you eat. From what I've heard, you WILL lose weight as long as you burn more calories than you ingest, regardless of what foods you eat, but it may give you some ill effects in the end. It's simply not a nutritionally healthy choice. It could effect your mood, or the way you feel along with other things. In the long run you could be susceptible to cholestorol problems and heart trouble, etc? Not an expert, but In my opinion excersice doesn't cure all eating habits.
  • July
    July Posts: 239
    I'd listen to your body - if you aren't hungry, I wouldn't eat. Your body knows best!
  • mandyc1108
    mandyc1108 Posts: 57 Member
    "(Also just an FYI, in the 1950's a meal size at McDonalds was a kids happy meal - cheesburger, small fries and a soda (590 cals) Not the huge portions we have now......)
    [/quote]"


    Isn't that insane? The military clinic here always gives me info about portion sizes....the one that really got me was the difference in popcorn (like you get at the movie theater) size 50 years ago compared to the one today. No wonder our world is full of overweight people.

    As far as your food goes, I would eat, but I would make a better choice than a big mac. If you want a hamburger...make it at home. It's bound to be healthier. I would not eat "empty calories". Try to find something with nutriional value to it.
  • stillkristi
    stillkristi Posts: 1,135 Member
    And, not to harp on the topic, but in order to be healthy over the long haul, its best to eat several times a day, every two and a half to three hours - smaller portions rather than one or two large meals at strange intervals. If you are winding up at the end of the day with a lot of calories to eat, chances are you won't be able to sustain that kind of eating for very long. Eventually you will either be driven to overeating your calories, or you will find your metabolism slowing down to the point you can't lose weight even eating as few as 1200 calories. Speaking from YEARS of experience of trying to starve myself to lose the weight quickly, I have yo-yo dieted up to my present state. Correction, to about 30 lbs over my present weight!
  • twink
    twink Posts: 6
    Okay, I totally feel the same, for instance, I just entered my food for the day and had three glasses of wine as I am visiting with my sister whom I have not seen in years and I still have 250 cals. I ate pretty well all day. And this is what I have been doing for approx two months with no weight loss????? Very frustrating
  • stillkristi
    stillkristi Posts: 1,135 Member
    SO, twink, what about uppping your calories? It sounds like you have not been eating enough calories for a while. I am pasting a post from cmriverside posted in another thread last week. It explains how you can eat so little and still not lose weight. I am obviously no professional, but from what I have learned here at mfp, I think you need to revise what eating pretty well all day is for you.

    This is kind of long, but very important!

    By: David Greenwalt

    I want you to consider a common female client. She's a woman about 5'5" and 185 pounds. A combination of a mostly sedentary lifestyle, quick-fix, processed foods and consistent excessively low calories has resulted in an incredibly stubborn fat loss scenario. Not only has it created a stubborn fat loss scenario but her ability to add body fat is remarkably strong.

    Most would believe there is simply no possible way she could be 185 pounds eating mostly low calories. While it's true the average obese American created their own obesity by being a huge over consumer, a sedentary glutton if you will, many are able to maintain their level of obesity with the following formula in very precise ratios: starvation + binges + sedentary lifestyle.

    An initial review of this woman's calories indicates she is just above starvation level in the 400-700 per day range. The food choices are mostly protein in this case (low-carb is all the rage you know) and there are virtually no vegetables or fruits to speak of.

    Five or six days per week the calories remain low in this range, however, there are nighttime binges from time to time and weekend binges where carbs loaded with fat (doughnuts, rolls, cookies, pizza etc.) are consumed.

    So while the calories are very low the majority of the time, there are one to two days per week where this isn't always the case. Even so, the nighttime binges and weekend slack offs don't amount to what you might presume would be thousands of extra calories, thus explaining the 185-pound body weight.

    Very few foods are prepared from home. There are lots of fast foods being consumed. Convenience and taste rule.

    I must say. Early on in my coaching and teaching career this woman was a real head scratcher for me. Isn't it calories in and calories out? Even if she's not active she's starving!

    How in the heck does she stay at 185 eating an average, including all binges, of maybe 750 calories per day? She's frustrated beyond belief. She sees her friends and coworkers eating more and weighing less. Is she simply unlucky? Is everyone else blessed? And what in the world is she supposed to do to fix this, if it can be fixed?


    Why Is She Not Losing Weight?

    First, let me tell you why she's not losing weight. Then I'll tell you what she has to do to fix the situation. With a chronic (months and months) intake of less than 1000 calories per day and a 185-pound body weight her metabolism is suffering greatly. It's running cool, not hot. It's basically running at a snail's pace.

    Think of it this way. Her metabolism has matched itself to her intake. She could, indeed, lose body fat but she's in that gray area where she is eating too few calories but not quite at the concentration-camp level yet.

    If she were to consume 100-300 calories per day her body would have virtually no choice but to begin liberating stored body fat. This is NOT the solution. It's unhealthy and, in fact, quite stupid.


    The Practical Way To Lose Fat!
    Today's society is about speed. We no longer have to wait for the oven to warm our food because we have microwaves ready to do the work in less time. The same is not true when it comes to fat loss.

    Not only has her metabolism matched her intake, her body has maximized production of enzymes that are designed to help store any additional calories as fat. Anytime additional, immediately-unnecessary calories are consumed the enzymes are there and waiting to store the additional calories as fat. Her body is starved nutritionally and it has one thing on its mind - survival.

    Being mostly sedentary, her metabolism (hormones play a large role here) can do a pretty good job of keeping things slow enough so that the pathetically low calories she's consuming are just enough to maintain.

    But since certain enzymes are elevated, waiting for more calories so more bodyfat can be stored, every nighttime binge or weekend mini-feast will contribute to fat stores.

    So on the days she's not bingeing her body does not lose fat, or if it does, it's very little. And on the few days or times she does binge a bit her body is quite efficient at storing fat. So, while she may lose a smidge of fat from starving it is quickly replaced with every binge.

    Remember, these binges aren't a gluttonous 4000-calorie feast. Oh no, a binge might be 4-5 cookies worth about 500-700 calories. Nevertheless, since the binge foods are mostly carbs and fat it's very easy for the enzymes to shuttle the dietary fat into stored body fat. It's what they were designed to do.


    So, What's The Solution?

    Well then, now that we presumably know some valid reasons why she's not seeing a scale change and definitely no body fat change how do we fix her? We have to do something she's going to freak out over.

    We have to get her eating more. Not only do we have to get her eating more but more of the right, whole foods need to be eaten. Foods lower in fat that aren't as easily STORED as body fat have to be consumed. And we have to warn her.


    A Discouraging Start

    We have to warn her that since she's been sedentarily living on protein with binges of carbs and fats she is likely to see a weight gain right away. It's true.
    Once we begin really feeding her body with nutritious carbohydrates so she can become more active, her glycogen-depleted body will hang on to some of those carbohydrates (in skeletal muscle and liver) so she has stored energy for activity.

    When her body hangs on to those carbohydrates it has no choice but to hang on to more water too. For every gram of glycogen (stored carbs) she stores she'll hang on to three grams of water.

    This is not a negative response by the body but it will be interpreted by her as quite negative when she steps on the scale.

    It's quite likely she'll see a five to seven pound weight gain when she really starts eating properly again. This weight gain will remain for one to three weeks before it starts moving in the other direction.

    For argument's sake let's assume my Calorie Calculator and Goal Setter at Club Lifestyle suggests a 1500-calorie per day average in week one for a one-pound loss per week. First, she is going to freak out about this many calories.

    For months she's been eating less than 1000 and usually around 400-700 in one to three feedings total per day. To her 1500 calories is a ton of food. And if she even begins to eat less fast and packaged-foods it will be a ton of food.

    There is no doubt whatsoever that she will resist the increase. This resistance may take one to three weeks to overcome. During this period no weight loss will occur. She is too fat already in her mind and believes it will only hurt her to increase her food intake.

    I mean, after all, isn't that how she got fat to begin with? In her early stages of fat gain this was probably true. She overconsumed. But as I've said already, that's not why she's staying heavy.

    In addition to a freaked-out mindset about adding more food to her already overfat body she will simply find that it's all but impossible to eat four or more times per day.

    She's just not hungry at first. Makes sense when you think about it. Why would she be hungry three hours after eating a 300-calorie, balanced breakfast? Her body is used to 400-700 calories per day!

    So, even though she gets a plan and begins using my nutrition analyzer to log foods and meals she finds after having a balanced breakfast of 250 calories she couldn't force herself to eat meal number two on time.

    It'll take several more days of realizing what is going on and being one-hundred percent honest and diligent with her logging and planning before she begins to eat her meals as planned no matter what - even if she's not hungry.

    By now two to four weeks have passed and the only thing she's seen on the scale is it going up--not very encouraging if I say so myself.


    Raising The Grade

    After the first two to four weeks have passed she's probably beginning to consume her meals as planned although not quite like an "A" student yet. That is coming. She feels better because she's working out and is more active.
    And she feels like she has more energy throughout the day because she's feeding her body more calories and the right kinds of calories.

    She has finally begun eating the right kinds of fast foods (low in fat, moderate in protein) and less packaged food overall. She is making more meals from home and taking them to work for lunch rather than always grabbing something quick from a vending machine or the break room that always has some treat another employee brought in.

    After another two weeks or so she's moved from a "B" grade to more consistent "A"s. She's planning her days one day ahead in the Nutrition Analyzer; she's consuming fresh veggies and fruits on a daily basis.

    Her calories are almost ALWAYS in line with what is recommended by my Lean Account and she has seen her first signs of the scale moving in the right direction.

    She is now dropping from 190 pounds (her high after reintroducing food and carbohydrates again) to 189.3! "Progress at last!" she says. In actuality, the entire process was progress. But that's not how she saw it in the beginning.

    With a total of two to four weeks of increased caloric intake behind her and eating more consistently the right kinds of foods her metabolism has truly begun to rebound.

    She didn't kill it as she thought. She only wounded it. And since our metabolisms are like kids (they are quite resilient) and she doesn't have thyroid issues or diabetes or any known wrench that could be thrown into the spokes of fat loss, she will begin, for the first time in months or years, to see results that make sense and that one would expect of someone who is active (30-60 minutes five or more days per week) and consuming a caloric intake of 1300-1500 calories per day.


    Butterfly Effect: The Basics Of The Thyroid - Part 1.
    Avoiding Sabotage

    This process is in no way easy. I think you can see a plethora of ways it could be screwed up, sabotaged, given up on too early and so forth.
    A key to success for this very common woman (men too) is not giving up too soon, having faith in the fix, and moving sooner rather than later to the increased, quality food intake.

    It's going to take effort to overcome the mental hurdles of eating more food as well as the increase in scale weight that is going to occur in weeks one to three or so. It's disheartening, however, to charge hard down the weight-loss field only to get to the one-yard line and decide it's time to quit.


    Don't Let Your Metabolism Fall.
    These are the top ten ways you can boost your metabolism and keep it high - even through Fall.
    Many don't realize they only had one more yard to go and they'd have had a touchdown. You gotta hang in there with this plan. It's going to take some time for the glycogen levels to be replenished and level out. It's going to take some time for mental adjustments to occur.
    It's going to take some time before hunger signals are restored to anything close to normal. It's going to take time for the metabolism to rebound and not be in its protective mode.


    Giving A Stubborn Body The Message

    In certain, very stubborn cases, it may be necessary to eat at a eucaloric (maintenance) or hypercaloric (over maintenance) level for a few weeks to ensure the metabolism does get the signal that everything is alright and you aren't going to kill the body.
    Remember, your body could care less about your desire for fat loss. It just wants to survive.


    Some Take-Home Points

    The most common cause of obesity is Americans are sedentary overeaters/drinkers. Nothing in this article should be construed as to say that under eating is the root cause of obesity. It's not.

    It IS common for many men and women to be under eating with sporadic binges as I described here. This creates a perfect environment for continued obesity even if total caloric intake is quite low on average.

    Low-carb followers or "starvers" WILL see the scale go up when calories are consumed at reasonable levels again and carbohydrates are reintroduced. Live with it. Deal with it. It's going to happen. 98% of the gain will be water.

    The time it takes for mental acceptance and other adjustments to occur will vary but one should expect a two to four week window for these things to take place. Being forewarned with an article like this may speed this process up some.

    Once the right types of foods are consumed and the right caloric intake is consumed and the right ratios of carbohydrates, proteins and fats are consumed on a consistent basis, then, and only then, will metabolism begin to be restored and the key to fat loss be inserted into the lock with a noticeable drop in the scale resulting.
    This may take an additional two to four weeks to occur. Your metabolism is never dead or broken for good. But it may take several weeks of proper eating and activity for it to be restored.


    From day one, until the first, noticeable drop in the scale occurs may be four to six weeks--maybe one to two weeks longer. Those who give up on the one-yard line will never see the scale drop as will occur when intelligent persistence and consistency over time are adhered to.
    David Greenwalt

    Many Thanks To CM Riverside for posting this
  • Hailey
    Hailey Posts: 199 Member
    Hmm, I think I've been in starvation mode for a while now. I always thought not to eat much, and lately we haven't really had any food in the house. One day all I ate was some soda crackers and corn flakes.
    When I get really hungry, I start to feel sick. I get really shaky and feel like I'm going to pass out.

    Right now I am consuming a 1200 calories a day (well always a little less that that). I have been off soda for 2 whole days now, lol, and replacing it with water, or will sometimes replace it with a Fuze, or juice.

    Its hard for me to eat lately because theres usually nothing in the house to eat. We have kraft dinner, eggs, bread, corn flakes, rice, corn, and thats the big basics for now. Sometimes we go to the store for something for supper.

    I just dont know what to do now. I know I have no metabolism. And I dont have a job now, so Im at home all the time.

    Any tips or suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks!
  • That article was really useful. I have found in the past if I don't eat enough, I put weight on. It always baffled me. I never use the extra calories it suggests after excercise and try eat 1200 a day. Sometimes don't make it to 1200. When I started eating breakfast, the weight started moving. I mostly have porraige which is low in calories and keeps you full till late morning, when I have a piece of fruit. I make my own Chicken wrap for lunch, have a piece of fruit or yoghurt for snack in afternoon and then small meal for supper. It is working for me although I do dance for around 6-8 hours a week. Keep up the good work!
  • tron3002
    tron3002 Posts: 440 Member
    When I was on my diet it said to eat ever two to three hours to keep your matabilism going and to watch what you eat. Meaning no fats, salt, sugar or it could greatly impact you weight loss. So I would think that unhealthy choices like a big mac would affect you even if you did stay below your calorie intake for the day.
  • xXmimiXx
    xXmimiXx Posts: 564 Member
    So mfp has allowed me 1200 calories and i do very strenuous cardio workouts burning from 800-1000 calories each day. So toay i did my work out at night an had eaten about 900 calories worth of stuff through the day so I made a yummy celery and cream cheese snack and i am full but was only worth about 150-200 calories now i have roughly 900 more...wow..so technically i could eat like a big mac or pizza and fries right? So as long as im within my calories i can eat anything i choose????? There is no way i can consume 900 calories tonight or even throughout the day without eating crap which i actually dont mind eating crap and still lose weight (who wouldnt) but i just want to do this the right way. Would it be so bad to just not eat any of them?

    Hey, I sometimes wonder the same and worry that I shouldn't be eating my exercise cals but everyone I've asked on here says you should. As long as you have enough fat and saturated fat left for the day etc etc PERSONALLY I think you could technically eat a Big Mac (not that you'd want to) but if you have enough calories and enough fat left for the day I don't see what harm it could do. If it DOES do harm then the whole basis of this calorie counting and adding your exercise calories is unfounded and considering that I've been losing weight well with it and occasionally if I have enough calories I do eat something nice like fish and chips or something and am STILL losing weight, I'd say it should be fine. It's all very well eating healthily and wanting it to be a life change but these things can't hurt occasionally - perhaps you could tone down the cardio though hehe! 900 cals a day is ALOT! :wink:
  • SHBoss1673
    SHBoss1673 Posts: 7,161 Member
    Here's my thing guys. I become extremely frustrated when people say "when you're not hungry, don't eat".

    While for a healthy person, with no eating issues, eating at a maintenance weight, this may (generally) be true.

    For MANY of us (not all, but many), this does not hold true. The body tells you you're hungry by releasing chemicals (I won't go deep, but there it is), when we don't eat healthy for a long time (be it starving our bodys, or overeating) our body chemistry looses it's balance, chemicals are sent out at the wrong times, and you may or may not get the feeling of being hungry for the wrong reasons. Until you are sure that you are eating the right amount for your body, and have been for a while, don't trust your hunger as your metric for when to eat.

    The best bet is to make up a food plan for your day, or week, or month, or what ever you feel comfortable with, stick to it, and keep sticking too it. If you know or are pretty sure you're going to to work out that day, take that into account when making up your food plan, don't just tack on calories at the end of the day, that's not the best way to go about things. Besides the possibility of ending up with too many left over calories to eat productivly, you'll probably end up eating unhealthy foods just to reach your calories.

    All it takes is 30 minutes of planning once a week, and you can do it no problem. After a while, you won't even need to any more, I haven't needed to make a plan for about 8 months now, because I just KNOW how much to eat, and I know how much extra I need if I think I'll be working out that day, so I bring it, big deal if you don't workout and don't need it, just put it away for the next day.
  • singfree
    singfree Posts: 1,591 Member
    Really good advice Banks. Especially during the week I plan and log what I am going to eat ahead of time. Then I adjust according to my workouts.

    Yesterday I screwed up. I was not hungry before my 20+ mile bike ride. The last 3 miles were mostly uphill and I completely bonked. I knew the symptoms immediately. When I finally got home, my HRM indicated that I burned 916 cals. Having not eaten in many hours, it was no wonder why I bonked. If you work out, you need to keep a steady stream of fuel in your body, don't load up before bedtime!
This discussion has been closed.