To eat or not to eat...

CherryIceGlitter
CherryIceGlitter Posts: 145
edited October 5 in Food and Nutrition
What do you do when it comes to exercise calories?

Sometimes I eat them and sometimes I don't. Which is better? Would I lose weight quicker if I DIDN'T eat them?

Replies

  • rblair_22
    rblair_22 Posts: 202 Member
    I have been eating some of them back, but not all. I guess it just depends on how hungry you are for that day.
  • fteale
    fteale Posts: 5,310 Member
    I always eat some back. Usually most of them. I usually aim for 100 or so below target to be on the safe side, as I do occasionally skip a few things, like tasting the children's food.

    Edit, I don't find it makes any difference to my loss (not that I am aiming to lose any more), and I feel better when I do eat them.
  • msjones2831
    msjones2831 Posts: 126 Member
    When I ate my calories back I didn't lose weight so I stopped
  • For the past couple of weeks, I HAVE been eating them back and have only lost 1 lb a week. I have been really good with my excersise, so I should have lost more than that if I hadn't ate them. This week I will be sticking to 1200 cals a day and no more!......hopefully! :D
  • ausped
    ausped Posts: 58 Member
    I think it depends to on how intense the workout was. For example, if the calories are for "light cleaning" I would probably not eat them. When I ran the 1/2 marathon last month, I ate some of the calories but not all - I think it was over 1000 for that! Usually if I do an intense cardio workout, I do eat some (most) of them to refuel my body.
  • JeSuisPrest
    JeSuisPrest Posts: 2,005 Member
    I have been eating some of them back, but not all. I guess it just depends on how hungry you are for that day.

    I do the same!
  • JeSuisPrest
    JeSuisPrest Posts: 2,005 Member
    When I ate my calories back I didn't lose weight so I stopped

    And I had the opposite effect. I didn't lose until I ate them back! it's a matter of finding what works for you!
  • Puddykat1026
    Puddykat1026 Posts: 164 Member
    I think it also depends on what your goals are set to on MFP. I had mine set to lose a pound a week so if i ate my cals back I really would lose a pound a week. My problem is that I find it hard to eat more than 1200 cals, so if I ate 1289 cals & burned 300 cals, my body wasn't getting enough cals. I recently changed my goal to 2 lbs a week and my daily goal changed to 1200 cals. So now when I work out I eat the majority of my cals back and it's been working well for me that way. Good luck!
  • savage22hp
    savage22hp Posts: 278 Member
    I don't stress as much about my calorie goal if I have some exercise calories to add. I am trying to stay close to 1200 but average 1300 so the exercise calories keeps me under most days .
  • savage22hp
    savage22hp Posts: 278 Member
    I don't stress as much about my calorie goal if I have some exercise calories to add. I am trying to stay close to 1200 but average 1300 so the exercise calories keeps me under most days .


    Edit. I didn't mean to post twice, happens all the time with this touch screen and I don't know how to delete one. Sorry
  • MinnieInMaine
    MinnieInMaine Posts: 6,400 Member
    I eat most, if not all, of mine. The however to this, and something not many people mention, is that I only count actual time in the gym as activity and use a Polar HRM with chest strap so I know my calorie numbers are spot on (for you naysayers, I know they're not 100% but pretty darn close). If you're using the calorie #s MFP gives you, they may not be very accurate so if you do eat them back, you may be overeating, or even undereating.

    Try different methods (eat all back, don't eat any back, eat half back) for 2-3 weeks each and see how the scale responds...
  • ksandy1224
    ksandy1224 Posts: 35 Member
    I usually eat mine back, but I'm maintaining, not trying to lose. I was eating the bare minimum while I was trying to get to this point and wasn't losing. I went to a nutritionist and she said if I can write what I eat for a week and it fits on a post-it, well, then I'm basically starving myself. So I started eating something every two hours or so like she suggested and it made a difference as weird as that sounds. She said you have to eat to lose weight. Otherwise your body doesn't know when it will be nourished again so your metabolism is not working like it should. I try not to eat after dinner though, and try to eat by 8:00 although that isn't always realistic. Bottom line, yes, eat. I do an Advanced Step class on Saturday mornings for an hour that burns around 550 calories, and then I go have a burger and fries at Five Guys. :) Isn't that why we work out like we do? So we can eat what we want? At least that's my game plan and it seems to be working so far. Good luck, but EAT!
  • rml_16
    rml_16 Posts: 16,414 Member
    I eat them if I'm hungry. If not, I don't.
  • kekl
    kekl Posts: 382 Member
    I try to listen to my body to dictate eating them back or not. Usually I'm ravenous though so I eat them most of the time and I do notice a definate lack of energy when I don't eat them.

    but... it's whatever works for you!
  • SpitfireStacey
    SpitfireStacey Posts: 158 Member
    Eat when you're hungry up to your cals allowed, including exercise cals. If you're not hungry, don't eat.

    Somedays I eat them back, some days I don't.
  • krist3ng
    krist3ng Posts: 259 Member
    I don't eat them back. I may be the luckiest person ever (or maybe I am just so out of shape I feel sick after exercising :P) but I get extremely un-hungry after exercising, and I almost always do it at night (if I do it in the afternoon I regain my appetite after an hour or two).
    Also, my HRM ran out of batteries (guess I was using it too much, heh) so now I have to use MFP's calorie burn estimation, which could or could not be accurate.
    I feel like a problem people have with exercising is they overeat because of that, so I try to avoid it.
  • PBJunky
    PBJunky Posts: 737 Member
    Results of not eating those exercise calories

    AmyLooseSkin06.jpg

    photo2jj6.jpg

    0403080002.jpg


    Yes you will lose faster but because of the larger deficit you are prone to catabolism and loose skin...
  • joejccva71
    joejccva71 Posts: 2,985 Member
    Results of not eating those exercise calories

    AmyLooseSkin06.jpg

    photo2jj6.jpg

    0403080002.jpg


    Yes you will lose faster but because of the larger deficit you are prone to catabolism and loose skin...

    LOL. Wow that's hideous. =)

    This needs to be stickied.
  • Moonbyebye
    Moonbyebye Posts: 180 Member
    I read a quote a while ago that I stick with

    "If you want to eat like a champ, workout like a champ"

    so if I burn a ton (800+) calories, I will eat some back. But if I only burn around like 400, which is my usual, I won't eat those back.
  • odusgolp
    odusgolp Posts: 10,477 Member
    catabolism... this is my new word for the day.

    and sadly, that second pic only reminds me of having a baby...
  • vim_n_vigor
    vim_n_vigor Posts: 4,089 Member
    Results of not eating those exercise calories

    AmyLooseSkin06.jpg

    photo2jj6.jpg

    0403080002.jpg


    Yes you will lose faster but because of the larger deficit you are prone to catabolism and loose skin...

    I know the point of this was to promote eating the calories back, but it has kind of um, ruined my appetite for the moment! I will eat most of them back, all if I am hungry enough. I won't go below about 1300 calories unless I am sick. If I am really not hungry, I will try to eat something higher calorie, or watch my hunger level the next day and eat more then.
  • kyle4jem
    kyle4jem Posts: 1,400 Member
    Results of not eating those exercise calories

    AmyLooseSkin06.jpg

    photo2jj6.jpg

    0403080002.jpg

    Yes you will lose faster but because of the larger deficit you are prone to catabolism and loose skin...
    That's surely not you, PB.... after all we've seen those delicious wash-board abs of yours begging to be smothered in peanut butter and jelly :tongue: :love: :laugh:

    Sorry... just had a funny turn :blushing: :laugh:

    To the OP... if they are not scared into a feeding frenzy by the above pics....

    I don't eat all my exercise cals back, because not all of them are confirmed (my swimming cals are MFP calculations minus TDEE cals, as I can't wear my FT4 in the pool:grumble: :laugh: ) and I'm trying to stick to ca. 1800kc a day or thereabouts, although at the weekends, that rockets to 2500kc after I've been to the pub :drinker: :drinker: :drinker:

    Remember too that it's not a daily count so maybe one day you're lighter and another day you're over... it's swings and roundabouts and finding the right balance for you. I'm happy with slow and steady progress now that I've shed the bulk of my bulk.. so to speak. I'm still a fat wee fook, but at least I'm no longer Mr Blobby :laugh:
  • jram70
    jram70 Posts: 91 Member
    I eat mine back until I am full. I never try to eat all of them though to account for errors in my calories burned (i.e. as one poster noted - house cleaning - which I do not log that stuff). Personally, I have noticed that while I lost more weight initially eating less I have lost more overall eating most of them back. It also has to do with what kind of calories. Just because you have an extra 800, you shouldn't have a bowl of ice cream.
  • jfcarlson713
    jfcarlson713 Posts: 108 Member
    I do not eat mine back. MFP has me set at 1200/day. I'm usually a little under that in actual food. I work out 5-6 x week - I use my HRM when I work out so I'm tracking REAL calories burned & it averages to about 400 per work out although I am kicking up my running days and have seen 500 a few times. My net is usually around 650 - 700/day. I'm satisfied and not hungary & losing at a slow but steady pace.
  • kyle4jem
    kyle4jem Posts: 1,400 Member
    I do not eat mine back. MFP has me set at 1200/day. I'm usually a little under that in actual food. I work out 5-6 x week - I use my HRM when I work out so I'm tracking REAL calories
    To all folks with HRMs.... do you log the calories that the HRM tells you or do you subtract your TDEE calories from that total?

    Just that in the beginning I just logged what the HRM told me I'd burnt, but then it was brought to my attention that if you spent 60mins sat on your padded backside you would also burn calories because we all do every second/minute/hour of the day. So now I have worked out my TDEE per minute and multiply that by however many minutes I've swum or cycled or walked and then subtract that from the calories my HRM (or MFP) tells me I've used.

    That way I should have a more accurate account for calories out so I know how many calories I CAN take in.

    :bigsmile:
  • twinmom01
    twinmom01 Posts: 854 Member
    I do not eat mine back. MFP has me set at 1200/day. I'm usually a little under that in actual food. I work out 5-6 x week - I use my HRM when I work out so I'm tracking REAL calories
    To all folks with HRMs.... do you log the calories that the HRM tells you or do you subtract your TDEE calories from that total?

    Just that in the beginning I just logged what the HRM told me I'd burnt, but then it was brought to my attention that if you spent 60mins sat on your padded backside you would also burn calories because we all do every second/minute/hour of the day. So now I have worked out my TDEE per minute and multiply that by however many minutes I've swum or cycled or walked and then subtract that from the calories my HRM (or MFP) tells me I've used.

    That way I should have a more accurate account for calories out so I know how many calories I CAN take in.

    :bigsmile:

    I go by what my HRM tells me I burned for that activity - the difference between what i would have burned just sitting on my butt is fairly negligable to me...I do know the numbers MFP gives vs actual is WAY WAY off for me...I do a fairly sweat inducing kickboxing class twice a week for anywhere from 45-60 minutes - I have worn my HRM a few different times and get a burn rate of about 10 calories a minute once I have warmed up...so for a 45 minute class i would put in 375 calories burned to take into account the warm up phase burning less per minute - but if I left it up to MFP it tells me I "burned" 646
  • AmyEm3
    AmyEm3 Posts: 784 Member
    I was eating them all back but then I stopped losing for a month. I've changed a few things up recently (stopped eating back exercise calories, increased protein, eating 5-6 smaller meals throughout the day) and I finally lost again this week. I feel better too and I'm not hungry.
  • tasnim81
    tasnim81 Posts: 91 Member
    I eat most of them back, or all if I feel like I need it.
  • twinmom01
    twinmom01 Posts: 854 Member
    The topic of eating back calories is a huge one....some say yes others say no....

    My personal belief is that it has to do with the type of foods you eat, your body composition, etc...

    If your purpose is to loose weight - then the addage is calories in vs calories out - so you have to work at a deficit to loose weight...exercise creates a greater deficit and therefore SHOULD have you loosing weight..

    However one part of the equation is the food you eat - if you are eating clean and healthy and getting loads of vitamins, minerals, protiens, good fats, etc...from the food you are eating rather than processed "diet" food crap - then you may not need to eat back your exercise calories...

    Another part is your body type - if you have a high % of body fat - body fat is stored potential energy...when you eat your body will first use what you give it in any given day and then turn to using your stored fat to use as energy. While it is true that if you don't feed your body enough it can screw with your metabolism and want to hold on to energy reserves because it doesn't know whenit will get more food (another reason not to "skip" meals) People with lower body fat can and should eat more during a day and would probably benefit from eating back exercise calories as muscle burns more calories at rest than fat does.

    Yet another part of the equation is how many calories do you actually burn in any given day...Calucations can give you a rough idea of how many you burn (i.e. your metabolism rate) - but it could be wayyyyyy off due to all sorts of things...think about people you may know who can seemingly eat anything and not gain a lb...whereas others have an extra piece of cake and bam gain 2 lbs...so here at MFP everything is based on a calculation...based on height, weight, age, etc... so MFP tells me to loose 1 lb a week i should eat no more than 1400 calories for a total of 9800/week...so it is calculating my daily burn rate is about 1900 calories or 13300/week - well it could be that my burn rate is only 1700 calories a day - 11900/week - thereby leaving me a deficit of only 2100 - so rather than loosing a lb a week I loose much less...

    All of that being said everyone is different...and you may have to experiment to see what works best for you. I know for me the days I do big workouts I attempt to make sure I eat as close to my goal as possible and not to net under 1000 calories...the days I don't do workouts I do my best to stay a little under my 1400 calorie goal...

    As far as the pictures go - if someone is overweight and the skin stretches - sometimes it doesn't matter how fast you loose weight - the skin has lost elasticity and therefore will never be smooth and taunt without medical intervention - ask most women who have been pregnant of they can ever get rid of stretch marks...I know mine are around to stay
This discussion has been closed.