Is 1200 really enough?
Dexy_
Posts: 593 Member
I am 75kgs, 160cm tall and 18. I am fairly inactive if I don't intentionally exercise. Is 1200 cals a day enough for me?
0
Replies
-
The only way to know for sure is to talk to your doctor. I was never able to only eat 1200. I personally can't eat below 1400 on a daily basis.0
-
hi there, your about the same hight/age as me, and i am living on a bit less then 1200. But 1200 is a good amount to start with, it is the minimum. For weightloss, if you ate more without exercise and being inactive you would probably gain. Ive loss about 11kgs so far, without exercise on around 800-1100 calories a day.
hope this helps,0 -
have you ever calculated your bmr? basal metabolic rate. its different for everyone. it's the calories you take in to maintain your body weight. that minus 500 is how mfp calculated your calories. if I'm not mistaken, I mean. anything you eat under your personal bmr will allow you to lose weight - just more slowly. you can find lots of bmr calculators on line. personally, 1200 was way too few for me. I increased my setting in mfp to 1500. I'm losing about a half pound a week.0
-
:noway: if you are inactive and only consuming 1200 calories a day, you have to be sure that they are all nutrition dense to be sure you are getting all the nutrition your body needs.0
-
1st, mangledspoon, that's inappropriate. You don't know someone else situation, to say they have an eating disorder because of their calorie intake is wrong. Maybe they have a reason, maybe they don't but that's not for you to determine.
second, a doctor is NOT who you should be asking about your calorie intake, you should seek out the help of a registered dietitian, doctors don't generally receive much in the way of nutrition training, and unless your doctor has taken specific add-on courses, then he/she isn't the one to ask. At a minimum vet your doctor to see whether they have additional nutrition training, if they say no, then move along. Dietitians (note I said dietitian, not nutritionist, they are NOT equivalent, a dietitian can be a nutritionist, but unless that nutritionist has gone to college, then they can't be a dietitian) have gone to a 4 year accredited college for nutrition training and are prepared to help, doctors haven't.
third, Dexy_ to answer your original question, we can't really tell you. I can give you estimates based on your numbers, but then it's up to you. you're 18, female, 75 kg (or about 160 lbs) and 160 cm tall (or about 5'3"), thus very VERY rough estimate of your maintenance calories (assuming lightly active) is probably around 1900 to 2000 or somewhere around there, 1200 calories is a big deficit for you. Assuming you are in the average as far as body fat % goes for your weight and height, you should be eating probably somewhere between 1300 and 1500 calories to lose about 1 to 1.25 lbs a week (I.E. about 1/2 kg per week or so). You can go with a smaller deficit to make it easier to maintain, but going bigger will probably cause more problems than it's worth. Again, I'm just making educated guesses here based on VERY limited information. I could be way off, I just can't tell with the info given.
feel free to PM me if you need any more in depth assistance.
-Banks0 -
If you are inactive and eating 1200 than that might work for you. Just to be sure though you should calculate your BMR or talk to your doctor.0
-
response disorder...!0
-
Its what I have done and its pretty tough to start, but you can eat veggies and cut down on the calories. Its pretty successful but you have to research the foods you can eat. My food dairy viewable if you want to look at what I eat.0
-
have you ever calculated your bmr? basal metabolic rate. its different for everyone. it's the calories you take in to maintain your body weight. that minus 500 is how mfp calculated your calories. if I'm not mistaken, I mean. anything you eat under your personal bmr will allow you to lose weight - just more slowly. you can find lots of bmr calculators on line. personally, 1200 was way too few for me. I increased my setting in mfp to 1500. I'm losing about a half pound a week.
MFP doesn't figure your deficit off your BMR. It figures your deficit off your TDEE. TDEE is your BMR multiplied by your activity level.
My BMR is 1338. My TDEE is around 2449. My deficit would be taken off the 2449, NOT off the 1338. The 1338 is the amount of calories my body needs just to survive. You don't want to take the deficit off the basic number of calories your body needs.0 -
I don't think it's sustainable for most people. I recently increased my intake to 1500. Even though I'm short, have a small frame, and fall within the "normal" range, I don't want to eat 1200 calories and plateau and stunt my metabolism.0
-
I was thinking the same thing and wondering if I need to be eating more then 1200 calories as I have read and heard the amount of calories should be based on the ideal weight you want to be which for example 1200=120lbs. or 1300=130lbs. When I did a calorie count using another website my calories came up as 1430 calories to lose the 40lbs. I needed. My height is 5'0 and I am 171lbs. and very active.0
-
After I'd lost some weight, MFP put me at 1200 and I went into a plateau within a couple weeks. I needed to increase my food intake to around 1300 to start losing again. You need to remember that 1200 is average, and everyone is different. See if it works for you and, if not, increase upward 50 - 100 cals at a time until you find what works for you. It's worth the time it takes.0
-
I have read and heard the amount of calories should be based on the ideal weight you want to be which for example 1200=120lbs. or 1300=130lbs.
I heard the same thing the other day! It was the first time I had ever heard it before....Interesting and right now I am eating along those same lines! I just follow what is suggested for me by MFP until I go to the dietitian on the 15th0 -
Honestly? This isn't something we can tell you. For me, there's NO WAY I could function on 1200 calories a day. No way. No how. I would be literally starving to death. I see other people on here who've seen success on 1200 calories. Our bodies are all just a little different and so what works for one, may or may not work for another.0
-
I was thinking the same thing and wondering if I need to be eating more then 1200 calories as I have read and heard the amount of calories should be based on the ideal weight you want to be which for example 1200=120lbs. or 1300=130lbs. When I did a calorie count using another website my calories came up as 1430 calories to lose the 40lbs. I needed. My height is 5'0 and I am 171lbs. and very active.
I weigh 145lbs and there's NOW WAY I could function on 1450 calories a day. I'm currently maintaining while consuming 2300-2500 NET calories a day. When I was actively losing, I was averaging between 2100-2200 net calories a day. My body would flip out if I cut it down to 1450.0 -
I was just thinking about this this morning, love the way every time I am thinking about some issue a thread comes up on MFP! I think it is quite hard. Also think you shouldn't try to lose weight in an inactive way, you still need to build muscle tone. Otherwise you will end up being skinny fat. You should definitely take up a regular form of exercise 3-4 times a week at least and buy a HRM and eat all your calories. Otherwise you will feel really deprived long term.0
-
I'm 5'00, 65 kg, sedentary (workout aside) and I'm also supposed to eat 1200 calories according to this site, in order to drop to 50 kg. It's my second day, but I'm finding it really hard. However, I'm petite, and I wonder if it's just that I haven't learnt how to maximize my calories.0
-
It is hard. I tried it and I almost never got in under calorie goal. I also felt like crap after about a month of it.0
-
Like people have been saying, it's up to you to figure out. If you want to try, make sure to maximize protein and fiber to help stay feeling full. Also, veggies are a great substitue for anything if you are trying to lower calories. All I have to say is, "Good luck", because I can't handle that little food for more than a day.0
-
It's too much for me...I don't lose weight unless I eat around 11000
-
I believe MFP put everyone at 1200 because I have a friend who does this with me and it kicked out the same number there is a book called " Cook Yourself Thin " thats really good you might like that goes based on your ideal weight theory and they have some delicious recipes as well.0
-
I believe MFP put everyone at 1200 because I have a friend who does this with me and it kicked out the same number there is a book called " Cook Yourself Thin " thats really good you might like that goes based on your ideal weight theory and they have some delicious recipes as well.
MFP does not automatically put everyone at 1200, however there are a lot of people at 1200 due to their maintenance level and due to the amount of weight they think they are trying to lose each week. If a person's maintenance calories would be 2200 and they tell MFP they want to lose 2 lbs per week, MFP puts them at 1200 b/c you have to have a total 7000 calorie deficit each week to lose 2 lbs of fat. If someone has a maintenance of LESS than 2200 and tells MFP they want to lose 2 lbs per week, MFP is going to default to 1200 b/c it absolutely won't go any lower than that, even if the person would have to eat lower than that to get a 1000 calorie per day deficit. So basically, MFP's calculations ARE based off of each individual's height/weight/age/sex, however there is a point where it starts giving the 1200 number to people even though the 1200 number doesn't meet the goals the person asked for, simply b/c MFP cannot recommend a person eat less than that and be held liable for recommending a diet lower in calories than is generally recommended as safe. When I started out and was trying to lose 2 lbs per week, my goal was set at 1200, then after losing some weight and reevaluating my goals to lose only 1 lb per week, my goal re-set to 1210, then after reevaluating again and deciding to slow down to 1/2 lb per week, my goal is now 1420. MFP takes your individual situation at the time into consideration, but it simply will not go below 1200 which is why you see so many people on the 1200 goal. B/c a lot of people want to lose weight faster than is really recommended for their current size and also some people are small enough that just about any weightloss goal they put in will yield a 1200 goal b/c they just don't have a lot of wiggle room based on their maintenance calories.
Dang, it's late, and that was a lot of rambling. Sorry. LOL0 -
I am also about 5.3 tall, close to goal weight, have a small frame and am fairly inactive except when I go to the gym (about twice a week). I try to stick to 1200 a day (then eat exercise cals when i have them) and have one day a week when I eat slightly over maintainence (1900). Which works well and i lose about 2 lbs a week this way. 1200 is very low and you have to be careful that you eat well, so limit the crisps and biscuits in favour of meats, veg, milk, oats etc to make sure you get enough protein and nutrients. its very restrictive and makes eating out a no no, hence the day off a week.
I lift weights at the gym and read some stuff around that and eating slightly more, but when I eat 1500 a day I dont lose.
I think if you have a lot to lose you wont need to go this low and could lose successfully on a higher amount but when you are close to goal it does get more difficult!0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 427 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions