net calories only 350....good or bad?

Yes, a net that low is bad. Your net should be at least 1200. You need to be eating your exercise calories back.

Yes that is bad. Please research about this topic. My suggestion would be to cut your workout to an hour.

http://www.weightlossresources.co.uk/calories/burning_calories/starvation.htm

On a regular basis, bad. If it were to just happen every once in awhile if you weren't feeling well enough to eat or you just ran a half-marathon and couldn't possibly eat back that many calories, not a big deal, but it's not something you want to make a habit of.

Agree. Occassionally, not a big deal, but daily? no.

I have a question and would really appreciate your input
So first off I am pretty sure I am allergic to wheat so I have been working on changing my diet to fresh meat and vegetables, fruit, ect. and no processed food.
So for the last couple days I have been working out 2 to 3 hours a day and averaging about 850 to 950 calories burned.
My food intake has been 1200-1300 calories (since I started eating all this fresh food I can't get anymore down if I wanted to).
Sorry for all the back ground information but it is necessary.
So with burning 900 calories and only consuming 1250 calories my net has been usually around 300 calories. Is this bad? Will I go into starvation mode? I am not hungry and working out that much makes me feel really refreshed and a little tired but not exhausted. Any advice will be appreciated
thanks!

Agreed. There is a post somewhere in the unofficial MFP FAQ which talks about netting less than 700 calories a day. Your body will start using your muscle for fuel - lean muscle mass is what influences your BMR (metabolism).. so definitely need to eat more, or exercise less. Nuts, oil, avocado are good choices for nutrient dense, calorie dense foods

Yes, a net that low is bad. Your net should be at least 1200. You need to be eating your exercise calories back.

^ this !

If you can't possibly eat more in a day, then you shouldn't work out that much. It's all about finding a good balance. Can you sustain a lifestyle that also contains 2-3 hours of exercise per day? Not if you don't figure out how to get more calorie-dense foods in you!

*Almonds - 23 kernels = 160 calories
*Peanut butter - 2 Tbsp = 190 calories
*Avocado - 1 avocado = 322 calories
*Olive oil - 1 Tbsp = 119 calories

If you have just one serving of each (or an extra if you already have them) of these per day, it fills in 791 calories, easily filling your exercise gap. You might be successful with this eating plan right now, since you have almost 100 pounds to lose, but you'll probably have trouble sustaining such a low calorie eating plan in the long run. It's better to find something you can sustain than take yourself to the brink of a crash and burn. Good luck!

Curious to ask why do you spend so long exercising?

For short term weight loss net 350 is excellent.

For long term weight loss and health it's probably bad and unsustainable.

You're eating a healthy amount though so it has to be better than if you were just eating 350 cals and not exercising.

it takes months of starving before your body goes into "starvation mode."

in fact, you can read all about the Minnesota Starvation Experiment. It is some really interesting stuff.

From Wikipedia

The full report of results from the Minnesota Starvation Experiment was published in 1950 in a two-volume, 1,385 page text entitled The Biology of Human Starvation (University of Minnesota Press). The 50-chapter work contains an extensive analysis of the physiological and psychological data collected during the study, and a comprehensive literature review.
Among the conclusions from the study was the confirmation that prolonged semi-starvation produces significant increases in depression, hysteria and hypochondriasis as measured using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Indeed, most of the subjects experienced periods of severe emotional distress and depression.[1]:161 There were extreme reactions to the psychological effects during the experiment including self-mutilation (one subject amputated three fingers of his hand with an axe, though the subject was unsure if he had done so intentionally or accidentally).[5] Participants exhibited a preoccupation with food, both during the starvation period and the rehabilitation phase. Sexual interest was drastically reduced, and the volunteers showed signs of social withdrawal and isolation.[1]:123-124 The participants reported a decline in concentration, comprehension and judgment capabilities, although the standardized tests administered showed no actual signs of diminished capacity. There were marked declines in physiological processes indicative of decreases in each subject’s basal metabolic rate (the energy required by the body in a state of rest), reflected in reduced body temperature, respiration and heart rate. Some of the subjects exhibited edema (swelling) in their extremities, presumably due to the massive quantities of water the participants consumed attempting to fill their stomachs during the starvation period.