cardio burn on exercise diary
merzback
Posts: 453 Member
appears to be way off mark- for example, I burned 500 calories doing 40 min of elliptical today- if I use the MPF number, they have me burning close to 800. Why the discrepancy?
0
Replies
-
I believe that MFP isn't completely accurate. But...I also know, depending on the type, the ellipticals don't take into consideration the weight of the individual using them, they use an average weight (whatever that is). At least I know the elliptical that I used to own before I killed it didn't have any way to input my weight in order to figure out calories burned for ME. Just my thoughts.0
-
The elliptical at my gym does allow you to put in age and weight. It does show a much lesser calorie burn than MFP. I don't know if this is right or not but I use the lower of the numbers.0
-
I think it's hard for MFP to be completely accurate when it can't take into account how intensely you worked. Sometimes if I know I copped out in a workout I'll lower the amount of time I did it for.0
-
I myself have no idea how many calories I am burning. I just mapped out a 2.6 mile path around my neighborhood to start walking/ jogging... any dea to figure it out without buying something that tells you?????0
-
I like to search online at other sites and compare and see which number to use and create my own for MFP that feels more accurate for me. For example, doing my kettlebell workouts. I guess the other choice would be to get a HRM and use that for a more accurate count.0
-
I found the same thing with a spin class. MVP game me just under 500, but the system they have at the YMCA (which uses my weight and age) gave me over 700. Not sure which to use . . .0
-
I myself have no idea how many calories I am burning. I just mapped out a 2.6 mile path around my neighborhood to start walking/ jogging... any dea to figure it out without buying something that tells you?????
Since you know exactly how long your walk is, all you need is the time, then you can enter it as "Walking, 3.9 MPH" or "2.5 MPH" or whatever it works out to...0 -
Yeah...I almost always have to lower the calorie burn on here, so if I hiked for 2 hours I'll only put 80 minutes in because I feel like I didn't burn the amount of calories MFP claimed I did! ^^0
-
appears to be way off mark- for example, I burned 500 calories doing 40 min of elliptical today- if I use the MPF number, they have me burning close to 800. Why the discrepancy?
You can use several sources and average them.
I did that for months when I first came here. .just find some other calorie counting/burning websites you like and use them and this one and average the three or four including the elliptical's number. Heart rate monitors can be helpful, too.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.8K Introduce Yourself
- 43.9K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 15 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions