Muscle weigh more than fat?? Help!
kimbar303
Posts: 5 Member
I hope someone maybe able to answer a question for me as my weight loss has stopped completely! I,m 5'8 and currently weigh 12st 11lb my goal is 11st 10lb. I have been loosing inches but not weight and wondering if its because i've increased strength training but cut back on my running machine workouts? I've dropped my calorie intake to 1300 and try not use any calories i've burnt through exercise. I know I need to drink more as well. When attending slimming world a year ago the leader there said its a myth that muscle weighs more? Very confused and any advice gratefully received!!! :happy:
0
Replies
-
From what I've read and heard, muscle weights more then fat by volume.
But honestly, when someone looks at you are they going to see a scale over your head that reads your weight? No, they're going to see the composition of your body, and all of the inches you've lost.0 -
Bones weigh more than muscle or fat... I win!!0
-
Hi there,
Sorry to hear you're feeling frustrated! Saying that muscle weighs more than fat is not true - it's a misconception. A pound is a pound no matter how you weigh it. The truth is that a pound of muscle takes up less space than a pound of fat. That's why you can lose inches but not weight - because you're gaining muscle and losing fat, so you get smaller (a pound of fat is larger than a pound of muscle), but your weight may not change much. For example, a pound of feathers would take up a LOT of space, whereas a pound of concrete would take up very little space... I hope that helps!0 -
From what I've read and heard it's true, muscle weights more than fat, by volume.
Fixed that for you.....so all the arguers can chillax.0 -
By volume, muscle does weigh more. A cubic foot of muscle weighs more than a cubic foot of fat.
But if you've recently switched up your exercise, it's much more likely that your muscles are retaining fluid as they repair. It's almost impossible to gain muscle on a calorie deficit.
Forget the scale for a few weeks.0 -
From what I've read and heard it's true, muscle weights more than fat, by volume.
Fixed that for you.....so all the arguers can chillax.0 -
I'd noticed too that Ive been doing a lot more cardio and strength work outs but my weight barely changed ts all but when i look in the mirror I can see a change in my figure and to me thats more important than what the scales say!0
-
Bones weigh more than muscle or fat... I win!!
skin is the heaviest organ in the human body.0 -
Muscle have higher density than fat, so that means same volume muscle weighs more than fat.
Eating too few calories will not help you loose weight, the risk is that you get into starvation mode and possibly burn the musvcles you're building. So I'd try and eat a little more (lots of protein, nuts, vegetables). How little cardio and how much weights are you doing/week?
Also, don't forget loosing inches clearly shows that you're doing something right0 -
Fat in volume takes up a larger amount of space then muscle. Muscle has more density but 1lb of weight is 1lb of weight.
If you are on a deficit you are not gaining mass you are just on a plateau. Up your cals and change up your workouts and up the intensity.0 -
Bones weigh more than muscle or fat... I win!!
skin is the heaviest organ in the human body.
Maybe for you. I'm 'big boned'.0 -
Bones weigh more than muscle or fat... I win!!
skin is the heaviest organ in the human body.
Skin is the largest organ of the human body!!! Touche0 -
Thanks everyone for your feedback! Lots of good advise there so will try and look at from a positive inch loss perspective and carry on regardless!0
-
Instead of just the link I thought I would copy and paste for all our benefit... this should answer the question at hand!!!
As you can see, the 5 lbs. of fat is much bulkier than the 5 lbs. of muscle, but five pounds is still five pounds. Muscle does not weigh more than fat.
Fat is bulky and lumpy so if you carry an extra five pounds of fat, you'll be lumpier than with five pounds more muscle. A five pound pile of fat will take up more space (volume) than a five pound pile of muscle; but five pounds is still five pounds, so for those of you that don't "get" English, you cannot say one thing weighing a certain weight weighs more than another thing at that same weight. It's a common joke to play on an 8-year old. The correct way to state the muscle weighs more than fat scenario is, "Muscle is heavier by volume than fat."
A woman weighing 150 pounds with 19% fat will look much smaller (and be much healthier) than a woman at 150 pounds with 35% fat. They weigh the same, yet the composition is different. Because muscle is more dense than fat the person with less fat and more muscle will look smaller.
Stop being so obsessed with body weight and start paying attention to body composition. How much body fat do you have compared to muscle? Simply seeing how much you weigh isn't very helpful.
Copied from: http://www.onemorebite-weightloss.com/muscle-to-fat.html0 -
Thats a great link thanks very much for the information. i think it shows well what others have explained so great to see it visually and like you say hope it helps others out.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 427 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions