Is 1000 calories REALLY too little?

Andromeda173
Andromeda173 Posts: 33
edited November 12 in Food and Nutrition
Hello all, relative newbie here.

The TL;DR is that I'm very short, and if I stick to the minimum of 1200 calories a day net, I don't even make a 500 cal/day deficit; therefore, I do 1000 calories a day--is this REALLY too little?

I'm about 5'1", and was close to 140 at the start. I'd like to be 115, so that's a 25 pound difference. I've been eating 1000 net most days (some more, some less) for the past month and I've lost about four pounds. So the 1000/day seems to be working, and I rarely feel deprived or hungry. I do an hour of cardio once a week and and hour of yoga, plus briskly walking all over campus all day, every day (comes to 40-100 minutes per day).

I'm happy right now, but everyone who mentions cutting down to 1000 calories seems to get an instant reprimand. Shouldn't I just stick with what works and adjust from there?
«13

Replies

  • waffleflavoredtea
    waffleflavoredtea Posts: 235 Member
    shorter people require less calories, technically. So if you feel fine, I would say you should be okay! Just listen to your body, eat healthy foods, and if you sense anything bad or a loss of energy or you hit a plateau, you may need to upp your cals a bit. :)
  • bobie1978
    bobie1978 Posts: 204 Member
    Yes it is.. I am 5ft 2 and the lowest anyone should go is 1200... But also you are always hungry. Everyone is different but we all burn calories throughout the day.. It might even stall your weight loss.. but its all up to you.
  • kleighsamboer
    kleighsamboer Posts: 250
    Hi! MFP suggests that I eat a little over 1200 per day and I always come in a little under and for me I think that is fine. I'm not doing any major work outs right now and I am losing. BUT....I am a clean eater which means I can eat more for less calories than other people so I think people need to realize that it isn't a one size fits all type of thing. I think as long as you are eating clean whole foods and getting proper nutrition which INCLUDES fats you should be fine. With that being said, if you are getting hungry, dizzy, nauseated, headaches, ect. only consuming that many calories you definitely need to be eating more!
  • wftiger
    wftiger Posts: 1,283 Member
    Just to give you a heads up that this will be met with many not so nice posts. People here are not very friendly to those on low calorie diets.

    With that warning, I do it. I am 5'4" so a little taller than you. Mine is Dr. ordered and monitored and that is what I really recommend if you want to do it. They can watch to make sure that you are not losing muscle mass or not getting enough nutrients.

    Good luck getting to your goal.
  • ashnm88
    ashnm88 Posts: 748
    I'm 5'3" and I eat more than that, and I've dropped 67lbs in total. 35lbs before MFP and 32lbs with MFP.
  • tmoyer1209
    tmoyer1209 Posts: 213 Member
    The 1200 guideline is for most people, but since you are petite, I would think that you should be fine. If you are not hungry, and are still losing, I wouldn't worry. But you might thing about setting for 0.5lbs lost, which would mean that you wouldn't need as much of a deficit. Just an idea, I have lots of 'em but don't know what works for myself, so I just brainstorm.
  • tross0924
    tross0924 Posts: 909 Member
    Figure out your TDEE (total daily energy expenditure . . . google a calculator for it) and reduce by 20%. If that puts you under 1200 calories, no problem. But you really shouldn't go more than a 20% reduction. That's true if it puts you at 2000 calories or 1000 calories.
  • YummyTpn
    YummyTpn Posts: 334 Member
    YES!
  • agthorn
    agthorn Posts: 1,844 Member
    Shorter people require less calories, but it's not as much less as many people think. Your BMR is 1347. That means if you're sedentary your maintenance is about 1685 (and if you're walking all over campus, you're not sedentary. I know I wasn't when I was in college either). So 1200 would get you a 485 calorie deficit, which is pretty darn close to 500.
  • tataliciousd89
    tataliciousd89 Posts: 465
    Short answer, yes it really is. Even for short people an adult requires at least 1200 calories to function and be healthy. Anything below 1500 really should be accompanied by nutritional supplementation. I know it's lame, but it is medically proven. Either way tho it is your body and only you can make that call. I've eaten less, but it isn't a sustainable diet and it does take a huge toll on your body.
  • Missrachelf
    Missrachelf Posts: 30
    It is to little, because once you lose 5 pounds, you will have to lower your calories to keep losing. My suggestion would be to eat the 1200, no less. And exercise, but don't eat the "extra calories". If you are starting off it is discouraging to only lose a pound or two and to take 5 weeks to lose 6 pounds. But, as you lose your body will adjust. If you keep your calories at a steady number that slows things down too. I lost 45 pounds. CW 135 5'8". Days I eat more, I worry to only find by the end of the week I lost weight.
  • Becky_47
    Becky_47 Posts: 1
    What is a clean eater? I am interested.
  • Andromeda173
    Andromeda173 Posts: 33
    I'm still trying to figure out what works best for me. I think that a lot of days I would have to force myself to eat the extra calories to make it to 1200--and not in a healthy way. I may try upping to 1200 for a few weeks and see if I''m still losing/losing more/staying steady/gaining.

    I'll see if I can make an appointment with a dietician here on campus and see what he/she says.
  • menagerie4
    menagerie4 Posts: 8 Member
    Figure out your TDEE (total daily energy expenditure . . . google a calculator for it) and reduce by 20%. If that puts you under 1200 calories, no problem. But you really shouldn't go more than a 20% reduction. That's true if it puts you at 2000 calories or 1000 calories.
    ^
    This
  • wftiger
    wftiger Posts: 1,283 Member
    Short answer, yes it really is. Even for short people an adult requires at least 1200 calories to function and be healthy. Anything below 1500 really should be accompanied by nutritional supplementation. I know it's lame, but it is medically proven. Either way tho it is your body and only you can make that call. I've eaten less, but it isn't a sustainable diet and it does take a huge toll on your body.

    This is not true. 1500 is the low end for men not women.
  • jocemorg
    jocemorg Posts: 26 Member
    The ultimate goal of all of us being here is to lose weight the right way.

    That being said, if restricting yourself to 1,000 calories makes your life unnaturally difficult (in that you are making sure that slice of bread is 80 calories as opposed to 85 because EVERY calorie HAS to count) then I don't think you should. Perhaps try it, and if it works with your current eating habits and lifestyle, then go for it. If not, adjust accordingly.

    Just remember you probably don't want to be counting calories forever, so this should be a diet that you can maintain in the long run.
  • LorinaLynn
    LorinaLynn Posts: 13,247 Member
    Shorter people require less calories, but it's not as much less as many people think. Your BMR is 1347. That means if you're sedentary your maintenance is about 1685 (and if you're walking all over campus, you're not sedentary. I know I wasn't when I was in college either). So 1200 would get you a 485 calorie deficit, which is pretty darn close to 500.

    :heart: This is some really good advice.

    I'm twice your age (how it pains me to say that!) and my BMR is closer to 1200 since I'm so old and feeble :tongue: and I did best between 1350 and 1500 plus most of my exercise calories, usually totaling between 1800-2000.

    I used to think that I had to eat 1000 or less to lose, but I was wrong. Everything was better on more calories... my energy, my mood, my progress, my results. It was amazing. http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/494091-i-just-don-t-care-anymore
  • kleighsamboer
    kleighsamboer Posts: 250
    What is a clean eater? I am interested.

    a clean eater is someone who eats mostly fresh sometimes cooked fruits and veggies. i also don't eat grain except the occasional piece of sprouted ezekiel bread. I don't drink or smoke. drink lots of water and herbal tea. I eat mostly organic. you can check out my food journal.
  • jamesfit99
    jamesfit99 Posts: 61
    Losing a pound a week is somewhat aggressive but doesn't seem drastic, especially if you're not feeling hungry, deprived or having any other ill effects. Unless you've researched it out, you might check with a doc or nutritionist to make sure you're getting the proper nutriments. There's a 1000 calories and there's a 1000 calories. Not all calories are equal.

    -- James
  • angieleighbyrd
    angieleighbyrd Posts: 989 Member
    I've lost 4 pounds in a week eating around 1200-1400 cals. I am 5 2
  • Virginia90
    Virginia90 Posts: 317 Member
    I'm 5'1", and I started on 1200 calories. I was losing with no problem, but someone said to not eat below my BMR, so I calculated my BMR (1350) and upped my calories to that. I'm able to eat 1350 calories a day, plus a spike day (2700 calories) each week and I'm still losing 2-3lbs a week. I usually eat most of my exercise calories. I'd try upping your calories to at least 1200 and seeing how it goes for a couple weeks. You might even try raising it a little higher even and see how it goes.
  • suziecue66
    suziecue66 Posts: 1,312 Member
    my only concern would be that I am losing mostly fat and not muscle. So at that low calorie amount I would make sure I ate at least my minimal amount of protein.

    In this study they ate 800 calories with no muscle loss for those that did resistance training, post by fitness black book
    http://fitnessblackbook.com/dieting_for_fat_loss/maintain-muscle-mass-on-800-calories-per-day/

    I wouldn't do it long term. Like suggested in the link do it for 2-4 weeks, multiply your goal weight - yours is 115 x 10 = 1150 calories.
  • Captain_Tightpants
    Captain_Tightpants Posts: 2,215 Member
    Shorter people require less calories, but it's not as much less as many people think. Your BMR is 1347. That means if you're sedentary your maintenance is about 1685 (and if you're walking all over campus, you're not sedentary. I know I wasn't when I was in college either). So 1200 would get you a 485 calorie deficit, which is pretty darn close to 500.

    ^^ listen to this.
  • tataliciousd89
    tataliciousd89 Posts: 465
    This is not true. 1500 is the low end for men not women.
    I'm not saying to eat 1500, I'm saying that a diet of less than 1500 calories for any adult really doesn't supply what you need and should be supplemented by vitamins and minerals on a daily basis. Talk to a doctor about it.
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 49,031 Member
    Just to give you a heads up that this will be met with many not so nice posts. People here are not very friendly to those on low calorie diets.

    With that warning, I do it. I am 5'4" so a little taller than you. Mine is Dr. ordered and monitored and that is what I really recommend if you want to do it. They can watch to make sure that you are not losing muscle mass or not getting enough nutrients.

    Good luck getting to your goal.
    How do you NOT lose muscle mass on calorie deficit if you are under 1000 calories daily? Your doc is a quack if they are telling you that. Research peer reviewed clinical studies by Journals of Medicine, Nutrition, Endocrinology, and Metabolism. They will ALL tell you that you lose lean muscle and fat on a calorie deficit and if in extreme calorie deficit you lose lean muscle faster.
    It's irresponsible to recommend anyone doing it if you're not properly knowledgeble of how physiology works.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 28+ years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
  • suziecue66
    suziecue66 Posts: 1,312 Member
    Just to give you a heads up that this will be met with many not so nice posts. People here are not very friendly to those on low calorie diets.

    With that warning, I do it. I am 5'4" so a little taller than you. Mine is Dr. ordered and monitored and that is what I really recommend if you want to do it. They can watch to make sure that you are not losing muscle mass or not getting enough nutrients.

    Good luck getting to your goal.
    How do you NOT lose muscle mass on calorie deficit if you are under 1000 calories net? Your doc is a quack if they are telling you that. Research peer reviewed clinical studies by Journals of Medicine, Nutrition, Endocrinology, and Metabolism. They will ALL tell you that you lose lean muscle and fat on a calorie deficit and if in extreme calorie deficit you lose lean muscle faster.
    It's irresponsible to recommend anyone doing it if you're not properly knowledgeble of how physiology works.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 28+ years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    Not if you do resistance training.
  • lisakyle_11
    lisakyle_11 Posts: 420 Member
    yep...overall.
  • joejccva71
    joejccva71 Posts: 2,985 Member
    With that warning, I do it. I am 5'4" so a little taller than you. Mine is Dr. ordered and monitored and that is what I really recommend if you want to do it. They can watch to make sure that you are not losing muscle mass or not getting enough nutrients.

    Sorry but even bodybuilders on steroids lose a little muscle mass when they cut for a contest, but yet you're going to tell us that your doctor can "monitor" you to make sure you don't lose any?

    It's posts like yours that warrant those "not very friendly" people as you so claim.

    To answer the OP's question. 1000 calories is too little for long term weight loss. Sure if you only consume 1000 calories, you may lose weight on the short term but you'll plateau and then you'll be scratching your head as to what went wrong. I have a few friends on MFP that would eat less than 1000 calories and then I'd get an email or private message later saying "help me I can't lose anymore weight!" I just shake my head.

    Follow the guidelines that are in various threads that different people here create. There is a wealth of knowledge to be had by many users here.
  • EbbySoo
    EbbySoo Posts: 267 Member
    Just to give you a heads up that this will be met with many not so nice posts. People here are not very friendly to those on low calorie diets.

    With that warning, I do it. I am 5'4" so a little taller than you. Mine is Dr. ordered and monitored and that is what I really recommend if you want to do it. They can watch to make sure that you are not losing muscle mass or not getting enough nutrients.

    Good luck getting to your goal.
    How do you NOT lose muscle mass on calorie deficit if you are under 1000 calories net? Your doc is a quack if they are telling you that. Research peer reviewed clinical studies by Journals of Medicine, Nutrition, Endocrinology, and Metabolism. They will ALL tell you that you lose lean muscle and fat on a calorie deficit and if in extreme calorie deficit you lose lean muscle faster.
    It's irresponsible to recommend anyone doing it if you're not properly knowledgeble of how physiology works.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 28+ years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    Not if you do resistance training.

    No you still lose a significant amount of muscle even if you resistance train while on large deficits. Plus you set yourself up for injury because the body fatigues itself and can't repair properly on such little fuel. Your macros/micros have to be very finely tuned and you have to have set spike days to prevent this as much as possible while getting lean. What Niner said was 100% fact. People do themselves a huge disservice doing too much, on too little food.
  • joejccva71
    joejccva71 Posts: 2,985 Member
    Just to give you a heads up that this will be met with many not so nice posts. People here are not very friendly to those on low calorie diets.

    With that warning, I do it. I am 5'4" so a little taller than you. Mine is Dr. ordered and monitored and that is what I really recommend if you want to do it. They can watch to make sure that you are not losing muscle mass or not getting enough nutrients.

    Good luck getting to your goal.
    How do you NOT lose muscle mass on calorie deficit if you are under 1000 calories net? Your doc is a quack if they are telling you that. Research peer reviewed clinical studies by Journals of Medicine, Nutrition, Endocrinology, and Metabolism. They will ALL tell you that you lose lean muscle and fat on a calorie deficit and if in extreme calorie deficit you lose lean muscle faster.
    It's irresponsible to recommend anyone doing it if you're not properly knowledgeble of how physiology works.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 28+ years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    Not if you do resistance training.

    Yes even if you do resistance training. That's too small of a calorie intake unless you're 3 feet tall and weigh like 80 pounds to where your BMR isn't very much. Not to mention that also in order to retain muscle mass you need to get your minimum protein macro requirements which would most likely cause you to go above 1000 calories per day anyway.

    Just doing resistance training is not enough. You require calories. You require protein. You require knowledge.
This discussion has been closed.

Categories