We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

MFP cal. burned calculations??..

Jenny1061
Jenny1061 Posts: 29
edited November 2024 in Fitness and Exercise
I was just wondering if anyone knows if the calories burned on the exercises on MFP are calculated with your weight and height in mind. Or if they are just a "general" calculation like if you were using a machine at the gym. To me I think your particular height and weight matter when calculating calories burned. Or am I uninformed? Any info on this topic is appriciated.

Replies

  • shreddin_mama
    shreddin_mama Posts: 1,076 Member
    bump
  • cherriewilliams
    cherriewilliams Posts: 107 Member
    I use a HRM and MFP always shows way more calories burned than my Heart rate Monitor says I burn.
  • I have noticed too that the calories burned is rather high, I take note but would rather stick to reality so in my head I divide the amount or cut the time in half to get a more realistic figure ! :)
  • teelynn35
    teelynn35 Posts: 239 Member
    I know that my S.O and I just did the same workout and MFP said I burned 446 cals and he burned 495. He is 3 inches taller and a bit heavier, so my guess is its to your height & weight, or maybe it just goes by male & female, lol. who knows:)
  • AZKristi
    AZKristi Posts: 1,801 Member
    I'm not sure of their algorithm, but whatever it is, it doesn't work for me. MFP overestimates exercise calories anywhere from 20-50% compared to my HRM.
  • PokerChris
    PokerChris Posts: 120 Member
    I believe the number does take into account your height, weight, and maybe age (?), because 2 of my MFP friends and I all did the same exercise for the same amount of minutes and MFP said we all burned a different number of calories.
  • MFP is SO generous with cals burned..
    There is at least a 200+ cal difference in my HRM vs MFP. 200 cals is huge when trying to lose a few lbs.

    I suggest getting a HRM. Its worth the investment.
  • ashleab37
    ashleab37 Posts: 575 Member
    Yeah it way over estimates, however it UNDERESTIMATES walking for me. Very odd.
  • Jenny1061
    Jenny1061 Posts: 29
    Thank you all for the reply's, i think i'm going to get a HRM.
  • nikrit84
    nikrit84 Posts: 44 Member
    Since I do most of my workouts in the gym, I use the total amount of calories burned on the machines and then just adjust the time on MFP. When I used the HRM, mine would actually be higher than what it showed on MFP so I would take a number in between. If you are worried, use the lower number of whatever you use (HRM, Machine, MFP)
This discussion has been closed.