We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

Hiking vs. Walking and how to log it

Sageyoku
Sageyoku Posts: 77 Member
edited November 2024 in Fitness and Exercise
Hi MFP! :heart:

I've done a great deal of googling on this subject recently, as going for very long walks..or hikes...or whatever....is one of my favorite activities.

Today I did a 5k hike/walk/thing which took about two hours, so I figure I was moving at around 3 mph.
The trail had some decent inclines, twists and turns, and was only really 'flat' or 'level' in a few areas.
The trail terrain was either gravel track or plain old earth w/tree roots and rocks and whatnot.

When I came home to log my activity, I noticed that 'hiking' allows almost twice as many calories as 'walking - 3 mph, flat track'.
I don't want to cheat myself by logging this as plain ol' walking, but don't want to give myself credit for calories I didn't earn either!!

In your opinion, what is the difference, and how should I log this activity? Hiking or walking?

Food for thought/The results of my googling:
http://www.sparkpeople.com/mypage_public_journal_individual.asp?blog_id=1345110
http://www.sparkpeople.com/myspark/team_messageboard_thread.asp?board=0x749x33803674
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090622095138AAbtW9u

Replies

  • HikeRunLift
    HikeRunLift Posts: 70 Member
    ehh.. cheap answer is to buy a heart rate monitor. Thats the best way
  • nicholettebell
    nicholettebell Posts: 414
    If it were me, I would split the time in half or whatever adjustments neccessary to equal two hours. Example: 30 minutes 3.0 walking flat track and 90 minutes hiking.
  • karisma81
    karisma81 Posts: 71 Member
    I wouldn't be surprised that trail burns twice as much as flat pavement. I get a lot more winded walking on a trail.
  • lstnlondry
    lstnlondry Posts: 1,794 Member
    I do some hiking and do a lot of walking where I hike. My normal walking speed is about a 17 minute miles whereas my hikes are more like 20. When I log under hiking I always adjust my number because its smaller than mfp.
  • UpEarly
    UpEarly Posts: 2,555 Member
    Get a heart rate monitor! I log my walks as hikes because I'm not on a sidewalk and the route I cover is extremely hilly. (I live on the side of a mountain) I actually burn *more* calories than MFP estimates, even using the 'Hiking, climbing hills (carrying 10-20 lb load)'.
  • skadoosh33
    skadoosh33 Posts: 353 Member
    Walking doesn't burn many calories per hour. Hiking up trails is much more difficult and gets your heart going. A good heart rate monitor with have a calorie counter as well. You don't really burn many calories until you hit at least 120bpm. When I walk 3.5mph on the treadmill to warm my legs up, my HR is only 95-100bpm burning very few calories. However when I am hiking and going up some steep trails my HR gets up to 160+ and burns about 3x as many calories for same distance/time. It also works more muscles and helps strengthen them.
  • deedah1216
    deedah1216 Posts: 16 Member
    I also do a lot of hiking and walking. If I'm on a hiking trail with all the ups and downs and twist and turns as you described, I log it as hiking. I also use a pedometer that keeps track of my steps, distance and calories burned based on my weight when I set up my pedometer. I also note the time I start and end my hike. Like you, I try to be as accurate as I can when logging my food and my exercise. I've found that sometimes all I can do is find a happy medium. I log my exercise, but very rarely use the extra calories earned. I don't know if I've been much help, but keep up the good work and happy trails.
  • Sageyoku
    Sageyoku Posts: 77 Member
    If it were me, I would split the time in half or whatever adjustments neccessary to equal two hours. Example: 30 minutes 3.0 walking flat track and 90 minutes hiking.

    Thank you everyone for the suggestions!

    I have done the quoted 'time compensation' before, and will do it for this particular trek because MFP said I burned 700 calories, and that just can't be right!!
    HOWEVER, there are other trails that I walk regularly that I would have logged as 'hiking'.
    This trail was somewhere in-between.

    A heart rate monitor would be great, and I will invest in one when I can. Many of the good ones seem to be $90 and up, and being relatively stingy, I'm loathe to invest in one for now.

    Thanks again! :heart:
This discussion has been closed.

Categories