Major sucess with higher calories!
Replies
-
bump
I am thinking that I should be upping my calories soon...however, it's hard because my meals have LOTS of veggies in them and they don't have many calories and they are filling. LOL0 -
bump for later0
-
bump0
-
Thanks for the post! After reading your story and many others like yours I think I finally found out what I am doing wrong! Starting tomorrow I will eat my burned calories. Wish me luck!0
-
This thread is intriguing me...I've been on 1200 calories since November, and I feel that now I should be eating more as I only have 14 more lbs to lose.
I'm 5'6'', 19, female, started at 170 lbs, (have lost 36 lbs), currently at 134 lbs, and want to get down to 120 lbs. In the past month or so, I've only been losing 0.5 lb a week despite always being at or under my calorie goal, and doing cardio for 30-45 mins, 4-5 times a week...I'm just terrified of eating more. I'm scared of gaining to be honest.
im in the same boat as you....im so scared of upping
i feel like im just gona turn obese! how about you do a one week challenge with me? my friend psulemon suggested it and says for a week i shud eat 1700 (dont eat back excercise cals) and see what happens. that sounds like a huge amount of food but hey why not, a week is a week!
I might as well, It's scary but we'll never know if we don't try, right? I'll start tomorrow and do it for a week (until next Thursday), then weigh in and hope to see a loss (even if it's a very minor one!). I'll report back in a week!
Edit: I've decided I'm going to increase to 1400 rather than 1700, I'm not brave enough to go up to 1700. My BMR is 1399 and I would call myself sedentary, so I think 1400 for me is a good start. Hopefully I'll see some results and increase gradually to 1700 0 -
Bump0
-
Just a quick note...
The human body takes at least 2 weeks to adjust.
Changing a diet for 1 week then changing it to another will do nothing but wreak havoc on your hormones.
If you do decide to up your numbers you WILL gain water weight for the first 3 days.
Then youll have more energy to do the things you are trying to do to lose weight.
Please dont jump in for a week because you will not see any difference except in water weight.
Commit to a month then see where you stand.0 -
But how do you know whether to go with the Harris-Benedict or Katch-McArdle formula?
All the BMR calc's are based on studies of people AT healthy weight, so they are all off, and more so, when you weigh more. Or at healthy weight but very muscular.
That being said, if you have a decent bodyfat % estimate, Katch-McArdle is going be more accurate, then MFP's Mifflin, and then the Harris used by most other sites.0 -
can anyone tell me how to up the my calories? Thanks!
Add 200 a day for a week, like a snack associated with a workout, pre or post, which ever makes sense with the closest meal.
The next week, increase 2 meals by 100 cal each.
The next week, again 200 cal until you are there.
If you have been running a big workout routine with lots of cardio, your glucose/water stores will be depleted.
As you increase and they get a chance to top off, you can gain 3 lbs of glucose/water weight.
That is good healthy weight, energy stores, but not fat stores.
If you really have had a big workout routine for a couple months, it would also be very good when you hit the week of eating at BMR level, before you move higher, is take a week off exercising while eating at that BMR level.
Only walk up to 3mph during your allotted workout time. This gives body a chance to recover and reset, see that the food doesn't need to be stored, but can increase metabolism. And walking is mainly fat burning.0 -
This thread is intriguing me...I've been on 1200 calories since November, and I feel that now I should be eating more as I only have 14 more lbs to lose.
I'm 5'6'', 19, female, started at 170 lbs, (have lost 36 lbs), currently at 134 lbs, and want to get down to 120 lbs. In the past month or so, I've only been losing 0.5 lb a week despite always being at or under my calorie goal, and doing cardio for 30-45 mins, 4-5 times a week...I'm just terrified of eating more. I'm scared of gaining to be honest.
im in the same boat as you....im so scared of upping i feel like im just gona turn obese! how about you do a one week challenge with me? my friend psulemon suggested it and says for a week i shud eat 1700 (dont eat back excercise cals) and see what happens. that sounds like a huge amount of food but hey why not, a week is a week!
I might as well, It's scary but we'll never know if we don't try, right? I'll start tomorrow and do it for a week (until next Thursday), then weigh in and hope to see a loss (even if it's a very minor one!). I'll report back in a week!
Edit: I've decided I'm going to increase to 1400 rather than 1700, I'm not brave enough to go up to 1700. My BMR is 1399 and I would call myself sedentary, so I think 1400 for me is a good start. Hopefully I'll see some results and increase gradually to 1700
I hate to say it, but with this short term view you both have, you are both going to be mighty disappointed when you see weight gain first.
Then you'll bop off to something else probably.
Whoever asked why their weight loss seems to have slowed to a crawl - that's because that is what you did to your metabolism.
You took several week to make it slower, be willing to give it several weeks to wake back up again.
And since you slowed your BMR probably down to below 900 cal a day, ALL your exercise calories and daily activity no longer burn what you think they burn.
Your 1200 eating level is no longer a deficit with BMR around 900, it is now almost maintenance level.
This is exactly how you create a stall - eat too little, exercise too much, and don't eat it back. Your BMR plummets, your deficit eating is now maintenance level.
So think about this. Do you really want to eat less and/or exercise more?
I sure hope you don't think chasing a downward spiral is the correct direction. Let your metabolism fly!0 -
bump0
-
bumpity bump0
-
@ blair and tori.
Please be inspired and realize no fear is required.
Read all the success you want.
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/531086-before-and-after-pics-no-starvation0 -
I had the same concept: higher output and less intake should equal amazing/quick results right? My pic to the left shows what happened. I gained mass in the gym but in two ways. Muscle and fat. I was stumped until I noticed a friend lose 70 lbs and I know for a fact he wasn't in the gym doing what I was doing. I found he went to a doctor that specialized in nutrition and began to ask about what I took in food wise. We determined I was taking in as much as a 12 year old (I'm 41) and had put myself into perpetual starvation mode. Once explained properly I had a big "well, duh" moment. The methods used in my 20's and 30's doesn't quite cut it nowadays. I've almost doubled my intake of good, quality food and have noticed differences in this first week already and look forward to the months to come. I hope this helps someone out there....
0 -
What do yall do if you work at night? I work out at night after my kids and hubby go to bed. I hate to think I have to sit down and eat the 300 calories I just burned off. Should I eat peanut butter with a fruit? I need to loose 50 lbs but I'm lucky if I get a pound here and a pound there. I'm aloud to have 1350 calories. I work out 5 times a weeek. Should I up my calories?0
-
What do yall do if you work at night? I work out at night after my kids and hubby go to bed. I hate to think I have to sit down and eat the 300 calories I just burned off. Should I eat peanut butter with a fruit? I need to loose 50 lbs but I'm lucky if I get a pound here and a pound there. I'm aloud to have 1350 calories. I work out 5 times a weeek. Should I up my calories?
Yes, and don't select 2 lb weight loss goal. You are allowed because you made the goal. Change the goal and you'll be allowed to eat more. Actually, you may have selected 1.5 or 1lb, since you don't have the magical 1200, in which case, very smart.
But, do they really know what your total daily maintenance calories is?
Did you log any days the way you used to eat that maintained your current weight?
That is your true maintenance calories, you take 1000 from that figure, not an estimated one. That would be the best method, but truly hardly anyone knows that figure.
So we go for estimated, not even questioning how close it is to truth.
If after a cardio workout, really need the carbs for sure, those can be built up the next morning.
Only the MFP day starts at midnight, you can log some of that food in the morning for the previous day since that is what it is feeding afterall.0 -
I had the same concept: higher output and less intake should equal amazing/quick results right? My pic to the left shows what happened. I gained mass in the gym but in two ways. Muscle and fat. I was stumped until I noticed a friend lose 70 lbs and I know for a fact he wasn't in the gym doing what I was doing. I found he went to a doctor that specialized in nutrition and began to ask about what I took in food wise. We determined I was taking in as much as a 12 year old (I'm 41) and had put myself into perpetual starvation mode. Once explained properly I had a big "well, duh" moment. The methods used in my 20's and 30's doesn't quite cut it nowadays. I've almost doubled my intake of good, quality food and have noticed differences in this first week already and look forward to the months to come. I hope this helps someone out there....
Oh man, now that you are feeding the workouts, you are going to be so strong!
You'll have to watch the fat melt away, because I'll bet the scales won't show it at first.0 -
Well done love it !! I have wondered about extra work out cals I will be seeing if that makes a difference as I go to the gym 6 days a week x0
-
O my gosh! I did what you told me. I'm also a stay at home mom, I changed my light active to active and changed my 2 lbs to 1lb a week. I'm now allowed over 2,000 calories a day!! I will be eating all day long...I'll keep ya posted. Thanks again.0
-
Ive bumped minewayyyyy up to 1.7 and 1.9 on weight lifting days.....Bit scary really.
Im gonna give it a month, its taken about a month to have no change whatseoeverl so I have nothing to lose! Except body fat
0 -
O my gosh! I did what you told me. I'm also a stay at home mom, I changed my light active to active and changed my 2 lbs to 1lb a week. I'm now allowed over 2,000 calories a day!! I will be eating all day long...I'll keep ya posted. Thanks again.
And please dont be afraid to eat at night either.
My initial weight loss happened when I started eating carbs later in the evening.
I'd have a full bowl of cereal before bed!
Once I started getting below 14% BF that changed a little but I'll still do it on heavy eating days.
If you work out at night, try and save extra calories for pre and post workout meals!
This is called bracketing!0 -
@ helloitsdan and heybales
Thank you for your advice, it's much appreciated! I sincerely hope my BMR hasn't slowed down...I will gradually increase my calories over the next month and see how I go.0 -
I am 30 years old. I am 5'1 and currently weigh 121 lbs. I am aiming to lose about 7 more lbs. I am a stay at home mom to 3 kids ages 4 and under---so I would say I am lightly active. I am on my feet quite a bit doing housework and taking care of my kids. I also workout about 5-6 days a week between 30-60 minutes. I usually burn between 200-400 calories.
I put all this into the Fat 2 Fit radio.com website and it is telling me that my BMR is 1322, I have 20% body fat and that for lightly active I need 1783 calories a day. Can someone tell me is that NET calories? Because if I ate 1783 calories + 200 exercise calories (or 400 depending on my workout) that is A LOT of food. I was currently netting between 1350-1550 calories---but my weight loss has been stalled so I guess I will try it. The scale isn't moving anyways . 0 -
I love this thread and reading the success stories!!! I'm hopeful that I might still become a success story, but not yet.
I'm 3 weeks in to gradually increasing calories to 1900 ( @helloitsdan recommended 2000 for a while then increasing to 2200 every other day). As of today I'm up 1.2# over three weeks, though that can swing as much as 3# either way on a given day. I honestly consider that maintaining. The bad news is, I've been 'maintaining' for 2 years while trying to lose 15#. The good news is I'm no 'maintaining' on 1900 calories a day and I WAS 'maintaining' on 1200.
@helloitsdan, thanks for your willingness to help so many here.
Keep the success stories coming! They are really encouraging when I start to feel like I'm lost and wandering aimlessly in the fog of weight loss information.0 -
Interesting info! Saving to read later.0
-
bump0
-
I am 30 years old. I am 5'1 and currently weigh 121 lbs. I am aiming to lose about 7 more lbs. I am a stay at home mom to 3 kids ages 4 and under---so I would say I am lightly active. I am on my feet quite a bit doing housework and taking care of my kids. I also workout about 5-6 days a week between 30-60 minutes. I usually burn between 200-400 calories.
I put all this into the Fat 2 Fit radio.com website and it is telling me that my BMR is 1322, I have 20% body fat and that for lightly active I need 1783 calories a day. Can someone tell me is that NET calories? Because if I ate 1783 calories + 200 exercise calories (or 400 depending on my workout) that is A LOT of food. I was currently netting between 1350-1550 calories---but my weight loss has been stalled so I guess I will try it. The scale isn't moving anyways .
That estimate includes all activity, unlike the MFP method that includes no exercise, and you add that back when accomplished.
So if Lightly Active is correct assessment of your daily routine including exercise (notice the descriptions), that is daily goal, not net. But Lightly Active sounds correct for just the kids aspect, but you are exercising, you are much higher, and there is a description for 5-6 days a week exercise, so that is the correct one.0 -
Ok...so i went to the Fat 2 Fit website and did all the cals.
So someone please help guide me!!! Pretty pretty please!
Here's the stats:
Entered information: 32 year old female, 65 inches tall, weighing 162 pounds.
From the information that you entered, you'd like to weigh 140 lbs.
Katch-McArdle Forumla
The numbers above are fairly accurate, however they don't take into account your lean body mass. A more accurate formula that does take your lean body mass into account is the Katch-McArdle formula. Since many of us have scales that will tell us our current body fat, this formula may yield more accurate results. Based on the information you provided, body fat percentage of 43.3%, you have a lean body mass of 92 lbs., and your BMR is 1273 calories.
BMR 1273
BF% 43.3%
From the chart:
Moderately Active (moderate exercise/sports 3-5 days/wk) 2199
So...please tell me what this means?
MFP has me eating 1,300 cals a day. I do workout. Why does this all have to be so confusing...? :grumble:0 -
BUMP!!!!!0
-
O my gosh! I did what you told me. I'm also a stay at home mom, I changed my light active to active and changed my 2 lbs to 1lb a week. I'm now allowed over 2,000 calories a day!! I will be eating all day long...I'll keep ya posted. Thanks again.
You are inspired!
But those 2 changes together may have been a bit much. :ohwell:
What is your current BMR?
Tools - BMR calc
See, now when a smaller but still safer number is thrown out, it'll be a relief to you!0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions