Whats the diff between fat burn and cardio

lokin4deer
lokin4deer Posts: 44 Member
edited November 2024 in Fitness and Exercise
So tonight I was on the ellipitcal and I pushed the fat burn button and entered my age and weight and proceded to do 50 minutes with my heart rate around 120s thats where the macine wanted me to stay. But I was wondering what is the difference between fat burn and cardio to my body? Thanks!!

Replies

  • regmcc
    regmcc Posts: 81 Member
    Bump
  • qtiekiki
    qtiekiki Posts: 1,490 Member
    I believe the fat burn button is when the machine keeps your heart rate at the target heart rate zone, and that's why it was keeping you at a hb of 120. Personally, I would not choose that program because you end up burning less total calories.
  • froeschli
    froeschli Posts: 1,293 Member
    'fat burn' is the heart rate percentage range, at which your body metabolizes the most fat (out of the overall calories you are burning). if you exercise at a higher intensity, the percentage of calories burned from fat decreases, BUT the overall amount of calories increases, which means, you probably burn more fat after all, plus some sugar calories...

    if you read up on heart rate training zones, you'll find it easier to decide at which intensity you want to train, ranging from endurance, over strengthening your cardiovascular system, to training your body to handle lactic acid more efficiently....

    all depends what kind of results you are looking to achieve...
  • Azdak
    Azdak Posts: 8,281 Member
    From a machine standpoint, the difference is just the default setting they use for providing a "target" heart rate.

    For a "fat burn" program, the machines defaults to 55% or 60% of age-predicted maximum heart rate and "cardio" defaults to 75% or 80%.

    If you want to know why the machines are programmed this way--there will either be other comments explaining it in this thread or you can google "fat burning zone myth" and get lots o' info.

    While there is some benefit to including lower-intensity endurance cardio and higher-intensity cardio in your routine, I recommend not using these settings at all. Number one, there is so much variability in max heart rate that there is only about a 50-50 chance at best that the heart rate they suggest will be the right one for you. Secondly, heart rate "drifts" upward during a longer cardio workout, even with no increase in workload. So, because your heart rate drifts up out of the "zone", the machine will continuously lower your workload, thus leading you to burn fewer calories, and get a lessened training stimulus. Kind of defeats the purpose.
  • CoderGal
    CoderGal Posts: 6,800 Member
    Bump
  • Toddrific
    Toddrific Posts: 1,114 Member
    The intensity of the workout determines where the body tries to get its fuel from. At a lower intensity it has time to convert fat for energy. At higher intensities it gets it from more readily available sources.

    http://exercise.about.com/od/weightloss/a/The-Truth-About-The-Fat-Burning-Zone.htm
  • prettygirlhoward
    prettygirlhoward Posts: 338 Member
    BUMP
  • meshashesha2012
    meshashesha2012 Posts: 8,329 Member
    i stick to cardio.. fat burning zone might burn a greater percentage of fat calories, but you burn more overall calories (and often more fat calories) on cardio. the broscience i've seen says that it's 60% of fat calories from fat burning zone vs 30% at a higher intensity.

    but in the end, what's a larger number, 60% of 400 calories (what i'd burn during a 60 minute fat burning zone cardio session) or 30% of 800 calories (what i burn during a typical kickboxing class that's higher intensity)?

    my personal plan is to go as hard as i can for as long as i can, recover a bit, then pick up the intensity for as long as i can. i dont pay attention to heart rates or what zone i'm in
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 49,047 Member
    Ignore. Just bust your *kitten*. The harder you can work in a duration, the more you burn overall. That's the most important stat when doing cardio.


    A.C.E. Certified Personal Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 28+ years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
  • ScatteredThoughts
    ScatteredThoughts Posts: 3,562 Member
    Secondly, heart rate "drifts" upward during a longer cardio workout, even with no increase in workload. So, because your heart rate drifts up out of the "zone", the machine will continuously lower your workload, thus leading you to burn fewer calories, and get a lessened training stimulus. Kind of defeats the purpose.

    Interesting. I had noticed that my heart rate does indeed go up after a while, even when using a constant speed on the treadmill. Its good to know that this is typical.
  • Azdak
    Azdak Posts: 8,281 Member
    Secondly, heart rate "drifts" upward during a longer cardio workout, even with no increase in workload. So, because your heart rate drifts up out of the "zone", the machine will continuously lower your workload, thus leading you to burn fewer calories, and get a lessened training stimulus. Kind of defeats the purpose.

    Interesting. I had noticed that my heart rate does indeed go up after a while, even when using a constant speed on the treadmill. Its good to know that this is typical.

    Just another of the many reasons why I urge caution with HRM calorie counts--this one more factor that throws off their accuracy.
This discussion has been closed.