Did you read this article? I think it is awesome.

naugustyniak
naugustyniak Posts: 836 Member
edited September 2024 in Food and Nutrition
Not glad he got fired, but glad about the sign thing.


Doctor Ousted for 'Death' Doughnuts Sign

(Aug. 14) -- Dr. Jason Newsom railed against burgers, french fries, fried chicken and sweet tea in his campaign to promote better eating in a part of the country known as the Redneck Riviera. He might still be leading the charge if he had only left the doughnuts alone.
A 38-year-old former Army doctor who served in Iraq, Newsom returned home to Panama City a few years ago to run the Bay County Health Department and launched a one-man war on obesity by posting sardonic warnings on an electronic sign outside:

Dr. Jason Newsom says he was forced to resign his job running the Bay County Health Department in Florida because of his crusade against unhealthy food. Newsom says he came under fire after he posted an electronic sign saying "America Dies on Dunkin'" -- a twist on the Dunkin' Donuts slogan, "America Runs on Dunkin'."

Dr. Jason Newsom says he was forced to resign his job running the Bay County Health Department in Florida because of his crusade against unhealthy food. Newsom says he came under fire after he posted an electronic sign saying "America Dies on Dunkin'" -- a twist on the Dunkin' Donuts slogan, "America Runs on Dunkin'." He says a county commissioner who owns a doughnut shop, along with some others, turned against him.


"Sweet Tea (equals) Liquid Sugar."
"Hamburger (equals) Spare Tire."
"French Fries (equals) Thunder Thighs."
He also called out KFC by name to make people think twice about fried chicken.
Then he parodied "America Runs on Dunkin'," the doughnut chain's slogan, with: "America Dies on Dunkin'."

Some power players in the Gulf Coast tourist town decided they had had their fill.
A county commissioner who owns a doughnut shop and two lawyers who own a new Dunkin' Donuts on Panama City Beach turned against him, along with some of his own employees, Newsom says. After the lawyers threatened to sue, his bosses at the Florida Health Department made him remove the anti-fried dough rants and eventually forced him to resign, he says.
"I picked on doughnuts because those things are ubiquitous in this county. Everywhere I went, there were two dozen doughnuts on the back table. At church, there were always doughnuts on the back table at Sunday school. It is social expectation thing," says Newsom, a lean 6-foot, 167-pounder in a county where 39 percent of all adults were overweight in 2007 and one in four was considered obese.
Newsom was hired by the state Health Department to direct the county agency. His $140,000-a-year salary is paid jointly by the state and the county. His job primarily involves educating the public about health issues — swine flu, AIDS and the like — but he also decided to address the dangers of glazed, sprinkled and jelly-filled treats.
He angered staff members by barring doughnuts from department meetings and announcing he would throw the fat-laden sweets away if he saw them in the break room. He also banned candy bars in the vending machines, putting in peanuts instead.
In May, lawyers Bo Rivard and Michael Duncan, co-owners of a new Dunkin' Donuts, asked Newsom to take down the "America Dies on Dunkin'" message. Newsom already had run other anti-doughnut warnings, including "Doughnuts (equals) Diabetes," and "Dunkin' Donuts (equals) Death."
The businessmen had the backing of County Commissioner Mike Thomas, who owns a diner and a doughnut shop. Thomas called for Newsom's ouster, saying the doctor shouldn't have named businesses on the message board.
"I think he was somewhat of a zealot," Thomas says. "I don't have a problem with him pushing an agenda, it's the way he did it. People borrowed money to go into business and they are being attacked by the government."
A short time after Newsom's meeting with Rivard and Duncan, Newsom says, his bosses at the state Health Department told him that his leadership wasn't wanted and that he could be fired or resign. He chose to resign May 8 but has reapplied for the job.
"I have never been known for my subtlety. I don't have a knack for it. I speak the truth to people and just assume that that my data and purpose are so real and true that everyone will see the value of what I'm doing," says Newsom, who now works at a prison, doing exams of inmates.
Rivard and Duncan did not return numerous calls to their offices.
"Dunkin' Donuts is pleased that the signs have been removed," Andrew Mastrangelo, a spokesman for Canton, Mass.-based Dunkin' Donuts said in an e-mail.
The Florida Health Department has refused to talk about Newsom since he is considered a job applicant. "We will be happy to talk to you after the position has been filled," department spokeswoman Susan Smith said in an e-mail.
Newsom is hoping to get his job back so that he can resume his campaign against overeating.
"My method was a little provocative and controversial," he says, "but there wasn't a person in Bay County who wasn't talking about health and healthy eating."

Replies

  • astridfeline
    astridfeline Posts: 1,200 Member
    Way to go! I did a short project at one local dept of public health and it just baffled me. There we were sitting in meetings talking about obesity & diabetes, and on the snack table was cookies, brownies, doughnuts!! The public health people should def be able to walk the talk!! :mad:
  • Wow, so being outspoken about obesity and naming businesses that promote killer eating habits can get you fired! That's disturbing. Thanks for posting the article.
  • adopt4
    adopt4 Posts: 970 Member
    Wow, wouldn't this be free speech? Goodness.
  • He wouldn't have gotten fired if he hadn't used the company name in the sign. It's no longer freedom of speech, it's libel when you use slander a company name like that (whether true or untrue, it doesn't matter).

    I understand why he was fired and while I agree that America in general over eats, obnoxious signs blaring about how you're going to get diabetes if you eat that doughnut isn't the way to go about promoting healthy eating. It's like passing a church sign that says, "If you don't come this Sunday and repent, you're GOING TO HELL." Would you go to that church?

    As an overweight person, I wouldn't want to deal with the people in that building, I would feel that instead of helping me they would judge me and preach to me about things I already know. America knows that fries, sweet tea, doughnuts, and burgers are bad for us. And yet, there's a McDonalds on every corner and a line out the door at Dunkin Doughnuts in the mornings. It's not because of ignorance.
  • MacMadame
    MacMadame Posts: 1,893 Member
    Individuals have free speech. Government agencies do not... he's free to post his opinions on a sign at his house but he was using the bulletin boards at a government agency to do so.

    Not to mention, his "war on junk food" oversimplifies a complicated issue.
  • adopt4
    adopt4 Posts: 970 Member
    He wouldn't have gotten fired if he hadn't used the company name in the sign. It's no longer freedom of speech, it's libel when you use slander a company name like that (whether true or untrue, it doesn't matter).

    I understand why he was fired and while I agree that America in general over eats, obnoxious signs blaring about how you're going to get diabetes if you eat that doughnut isn't the way to go about promoting healthy eating. It's like passing a church sign that says, "If you don't come this Sunday and repent, you're GOING TO HELL." Would you go to that church?

    As an overweight person, I wouldn't want to deal with the people in that building, I would feel that instead of helping me they would judge me and preach to me about things I already know. America knows that fries, sweet tea, doughnuts, and burgers are bad for us. And yet, there's a McDonalds on every corner and a line out the door at Dunkin Doughnuts in the mornings. It's not because of ignorance.

    I wasn't sure that he was "representing" a company or govt agency with his sign, I thought he was doing it on his own. So yeah, he's a dummy. Apparently for many lower income people (so the news outlets have said) it is because of ignorance. I don't understand that but that's what's reported. I think it would be due more to cost - McDs is cheap, fresh produce is not.

    Mac says, it oversimplifies the issue, but does it? If we didn't have McDs and DDonuts and junk food on every corner, every block... wouldn't we be a healthier country in general? I personally wouldn't mind if there were no more places to get fast food/junk food... but then again, I wouldn't live in a place that would tell me what I can and cannot eat... LOL
  • naugustyniak
    naugustyniak Posts: 836 Member
    Individuals have free speech. Government agencies do not... he's free to post his opinions on a sign at his house but he was using the bulletin boards at a government agency to do so.

    Not to mention, his "war on junk food" oversimplifies a complicated issue.

    He was working for a government agency in the health department and his job was to educate the public on health issues so are those really his opinons? I think that is a gray area. Was what he was saying untrue? I really don't think so. Maybe his war on junk food oversimplifies, but at least he started one. Personally with all of the resources available, I don't think "ignorance" can be an excuse. I personally don't consider myself "ignorant" yet I am considered obese. What I can be considered is overwhelmed at times. I mean look at us, we are trying to find the quickest way to do things, including eating or feeding our families. We are in such a rush as a society that our quest for getting more done in a day is literally killing us. It is easier to stop at a place like McDonald's and get quick food that is unhealthy than to go home and cook a healthy meal. I am guilty of it and am making no excuses for myself. I was/am not ignorant or uninformed, just over stretched.
  • LuckyLeprechaun
    LuckyLeprechaun Posts: 6,296 Member
    it isn't ignorance. gimme a break. nobody actually thinks that eating at McD's is good for you. even if they're poor. the news just loves to give people excuses for themselves and the best one they can come up with for eating yourself to death is... well they must not know what we all know. it is ridiculous.
  • MacMadame
    MacMadame Posts: 1,893 Member
    his job was to educate the public on health issues so are those really his opinons?

    Donuts = Death is not "education." It's an opinion. And it's not even true. Healthy and thin people eat donuts once in a while and they don't die.

    Education is teaching people how to read labels and how to watch out for tricky buzzwords designed to trick them into eating something unhealthy. Education is teaching people how much protein, carbs and fat grams they should be eating. Education is teaching what is a healthy and reasonable portion. If he was doing that, he wouldn't have been fired.
  • firedragon064
    firedragon064 Posts: 1,082 Member
    Donut! I did not eat that for at least 5 yrs. It's weird.. I used to crave for it.

    Anything is moderate is not bad.
    Hamburger is not bad as long I don't get fries with it.
    In fact when I'm in the hurry, I get those $1 burger (right portion),side salad and or a fruit
This discussion has been closed.