Confused! Am I good with 1200 cal/day & getting the starvati

Whatever you do your net should never go below 1200.

Really the only people who should be losing 2 pounds a week are at a higher weight than you appear to be. Your ticker shows you are only trying to lose 13 total so really 1/2 to 1 pound a week is probably safer and much easier to follow. You are hungry for a reason, you need more food.

I agree with this. I am bigger than you, I started at 202, so that could be why I lost a lot each week?
You only having so little to lose maybe you could up your calories?

I kinda want to lose weight fast but I have no idea yet on how to maintain it. That has been a problem with me. I will lose and then gain. I used to think that when you starve yourself and your body has no food or cal to burn then thats the time that it will burn your fats lol

Eating habits like this are why you lose and regain. Instead of trying for super-fast results, set it for something slower. .5 lbs/week would be ideal. Yes, it'll take longer. Then when you get there, set MFP to maintain. Because you will have been eating close to it already (only 250 less) it won't be a drastic jump and you shouldn't see a sizeable weight gain then.

OP, with the amount you have to lose your goal should be 0.5lbs/week, which would give you much more than 1200 cals/day. losing too fast when you don't have a lot to lose will lead to the loss of a large % of lean muscle mass, not just fat.

Muscle does not weigh more than fat.....a pound is a pound! But.....one pound of muscle takes up less space than one pound of fat.

You should figure out your BMR. Mine for example is 1,978, but when you subtract 500 (which is what you do if you're trying to lose weight, so if I wanted to maintain my weight I could eat 2,000 a day) then I'm at 1,978. So you should figure out your BMR first, you then have to multiply your BMR by the Harris-Benedict equation (I'm pretty sure that's what it's called) with how active you are. You could be putting yourself in starvation mode by eating 1,200 and that's not even counting the exercise you're doing! Like for me, I eat 1,450 a day just to keep my body running, but if I work out and burn 500 then my net would be less than 1,000, so I'd need to eat 1,950 instead for the day. Good luck!

Here's one of my old posts from a similar topic:

OK. I'm gonna give this a shot. I am an avid lifelong athlete. I have never been overweight, however, I used to eat too few calories (without knowing it), and a couple years ago, I actually GAINED weight bc of having slowed my metabolism to the point that every little extra treat I ate caused a weight gain, even though overall my calories were too low. THIS DOES HAPPEN.

It is also the reason so many fat people stay fat. They restrict their calories so low, slow their metabolisms, binge (even a little), gain weight, restrict more . . . . and so on and so on. But they are still fat.

It is also the reason most people can't lose that last 10-20 lbs. For real.

1. MFP has a deficit built in. Let's say you're trying to lose 1 lb/ week. That is a 500/day deficit from your BMR (the amount of calories your body needs to complete basic functions.

2. You exercise and burn 500 calories. Now you are at a 1000 deficit. If you eat back those 500 exercise calories, you refuel your body and you still have a 500 deficit for that 1 lb loss. If you DON'T eat back those calories, you have too little fuel. This is bad. This is too much of a deficit for basic functions. If you do this for a long time, you will STOP LOSING WEIGHT. Why? bc your metabolism will slow down -- it's like a brownout--not quite enough electricity to make the whole city (your body) run, so it has to slow down some things. You will probably start being tired a lot, your skin and hair might start to look worse, and you might even gain weight. But you might NOT be hungry -- your body is getting used to fewer calories. That's bad.


That's when you start to gain weight. Let's say you're running along, eating 1200 calories a day, and exercising 400 calories a day, so net is 800. You're losing, you think this is great. You keep doing it, but after a while you stop losing. hmmmmm. One weekend you go out to a special event and have a slice of pizza and a beer. 1 slice of pizza and 1 beer. So you ate maybe 2000 calories that day and exercised off 400, so net 1600. BOOM! You gain 3 lbs! What?!

Next, you freak out and restrict yourself down to 1000 calories a day and work out extra hard, burning 500 calories. Great, netting 500 now. You don't lose any weight, but you sure feel tired. Better get some red bull.

Are you getting the picture?

EDIT: When you work out, you need fuel. Food is fuel. If you don't eat back those exercise calories, you will not only have a big calorie deficit, you will have an ENERGY deficit. Remember, the calorie deficit for weight loss is built in when you use MFP. Exercising basically earns you more calories because you must refuel.
--

There are many people who will tell you not to eat exercise calories. Before you take their advice, you might want to see whether they are at goal, have EVER been at goal, or have ever been able to maintain at goal. If anyone says to you 'THE LAST TIME I LOST WEIGHT", just stop listening right there.

Ask some athletes whether or not they replenish their bodies with food equal to the calories they burn. Ask people who are fit and have achieved and maintained a healthy weight for some years. Don't ask people who count walking across a parking lot as exercise.

Here's an interesting case study about how to stay fat while consuming only 700 calories a day. Take a moment, you'll be glad you did:

http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/3047-700-calories-a-day-and-not-losing

blessings.