banish fat boost metabolism
supermum123
Posts: 34
just wondered if anyone has used a heart rate monitor whilst doing BFBM. would be interested to see how many calories you burn
0
Replies
-
bump0
-
anybody??0
-
I suspect you're not getting many responses as your thread title sounds a little like an ad for some questionable supplement. Perhaps if you titled it something like "Calories burned during....." you may get more responses.
Sorry, I'm not familiar with that program.0 -
LOL!! I thought it was quite a well known Jillian Michaels DVD. Thank you for your advice though...I will change the title I think.0
-
Just finished RI 30 and before that 30DS so going to buy it tomorrow......looking forward to it!
Always wear my HRM, so will let you know Tuesday what it says!0 -
Its been months since I have done that routine, so can't remember exact amount,but when I did I usually burned over 600-700 calories. Not sure how much you have to lose so you may burn more or less than me. Hope that helps.0
-
I just did that DVD today though I don't have a HRM, sorry. It's essentially a circuit workout. So I recorded it as circuit for however many minutes you do it (I had to workout a certain number of minutes today as per a challenge, so I repeated one of the circuits to get in 60 minutes...0
-
just wondered if anyone has used a heart rate monitor whilst doing BFBM. would be interested to see how many calories you burn
Unless someone is of the same age, same weight, and same max HR, and you happen to get the exact same avg HR during the session they got, it will be useless info.
That's exactly why machine calorie burns are very rough - they don't know how strenuous an effort that pace was for you, even though they know your weight, maybe gender too.0 -
I log it as high intensity aerobics. So it comes to about 400ish. Most people say 500-600 but if I'd rather assume I'm burning less than go by more and be wrong :P0
-
I usually burned around 400 calories with my HRM - I weigh around 145.0
-
Hi,with HRM I burned just over 400 when I did it the first time and around 330 after doing it for couple of weeks every other day. I weigh around 136.0
-
I'm 139lbs and I burn around 470 cals if I do the whole thing.
I've started skipping circuit 6 though, it's just too much.0 -
I start with circuit 7 then work my way up to circuit 1. I find that the last circuits are harder so I do them at the beginning when I have more energy!!0
-
I start with circuit 7 then work my way up to circuit 1. I find that the last circuits are harder so I do them at the beginning when I have more energy!!
I've been tempted a few times to do the same, but when she says in circuit 7 that you're almost done, and that you can go easy on the jump rope cos it's the last thing....well that would just kill me if it was only my first circut.
Ugh, I'm going to do bfbm now, the thoughts are killing me. I really hate it.0 -
Go on you can do it!!!! Before you start the thought of it kills you but dont you find that once you have done it you fell so GOO-OOO-OOD?0
-
I start with circuit 7 then work my way up to circuit 1. I find that the last circuits are harder so I do them at the beginning when I have more energy!!
I've been tempted a few times to do the same, but when she says in circuit 7 that you're almost done, and that you can go easy on the jump rope cos it's the last thing....well that would just kill me if it was only my first circut.
Ugh, I'm going to do bfbm now, the thoughts are killing me. I really hate it.
Go on you can do it!!!! Before you start the thought of it kills you but dont you find that once you have done it you fell so GOO-OOO-OOD?0 -
just wondered if anyone has used a heart rate monitor whilst doing BFBM. would be interested to see how many calories you burn
Unless someone is of the same age, same weight, and same max HR, and you happen to get the exact same avg HR during the session they got, it will be useless info.
That's exactly why machine calorie burns are very rough - they don't know how strenuous an effort that pace was for you, even though they know your weight, maybe gender too.
OMG! I'm sorry but if you don't want to be helpful then perhaps you should just "shut up!" It is a perfectly acceptable question and ye it won't be accurate but it gives someone a guide. some people are just so darn rude!
going back to the question; I just received the dvd today and I'm hoping to do it tonight (hoping because yesterday I went for a long walk, did an hour of zumba followed by 50 mins kettlecise and my body is started to cease up a bit!!!! haha). I'll let you know when I get it done, either today or tomorrow for you.
Good luck. x0 -
Unless someone is of the same age, same weight, and same max HR, and you happen to get the exact same avg HR during the session they got, it will be useless info.
That's exactly why machine calorie burns are very rough - they don't know how strenuous an effort that pace was for you, even though they know your weight, maybe gender too.
OMG! I'm sorry but if you don't want to be helpful then perhaps you should just "shut up!" It is a perfectly acceptable question and ye it won't be accurate but it gives someone a guide. some people are just so darn rude!
Wow, you don't think it's helpful to be educated!?
Or rather, to have an educated estimate?
I wasn't rude, I didn't say stupid question because it's not, just uninformed. One gal hardly gets her HR on Zumba over 105 HR, her calorie burn appears terrible because she is light already.
Without throwing in that extra info, some folks could be led to think they aren't burning much.
So good to see many of the posts included useful details to give an educated estimate to others wondering, hopefully because of my post stating just such a fact.
Get over yourself thinking you know what is helpful or not to everyone else.0 -
I did some research online and the average person burns roughly 450 cals for the full hour. i just started this workout today and it is intense!!! I added this to the database. now this is just a guide and you could really be burning more or less depending on many factors such as height and weight. I always underestimate my cals burned and overestimate my cals consumed. good luck and keep up the good work!!0
-
I just did it yesterday with my heart rate monitor for the first time (a polar ft7) and mine read 516 calories. I am 5' 3" and weigh 171....my heart rate was at 100% a lot of the time...I have been doing a lot of strength but clearly need to work on my cardio !0
-
I just did it yesterday with my heart rate monitor for the first time (a polar ft7) and mine read 516 calories. I am 5' 3" and weigh 171....my heart rate was at 100% a lot of the time...I have been doing a lot of strength but clearly need to work on my cardio !
If that 100% means 100 of calculated HRmax value - then that value is very wrong, as you could only maintain that for about 5 seconds before needing to stop and puke if it was the real HRmax.
Since your HRmax stat is lower than truth, the HRM thinks you are really workout out at some massive level - but you are not really.
So you really didn't burn that many calories. Badly inflated.
Polar assumes HRmax is 220-age. For women, you have a better chance of being 10 bpm OUTside that figure than in it.
You might look at your stats as to the real peak HR seen during that seasion, and then look at your personal stats and see what the HR max is put in as. If indeed the same, you need to raise the HRmax stat by probably 10-15 easily, probably more.0 -
heybales,
I am totally new to this heart rate monitor thing...I just got it Saturday and I actually have no clue what I am doing. I looked at my display on the watch and my upper limit is set at 163 ( which is 90% of the 220 - my age). Should it be set to just 220 - 39 (my age)? I think that Polar calculated the numbers for me when I entered my info...I only got this darn thing to get a better idea of my calorie burn and it seemed really high to me when I used it. I guess if it seems to good to be true it probably is :frown: ! Thanks for your help!
Christine0 -
I am totally new to this heart rate monitor thing...I just got it Saturday and I actually have no clue what I am doing. I looked at my display on the watch and my upper limit is set at 163 ( which is 90% of the 220 - my age). Should it be set to just 220 - 39 (my age)? I think that Polar calculated the numbers for me when I entered my info...I only got this darn thing to get a better idea of my calorie burn and it seemed really high to me when I used it. I guess if it seems to good to be true it probably is :frown: ! Thanks for your help!
Christine
I'm trying to think back to the last time I used mine.
Women have always reported it used the same 220-age as HRmax value.
And when you set the display to read % HRmax, that's what it is.
Now, I think you are referring to Upper limit, or really a zone alarm, except they can't call it that because it's only the upper side.
So that makes sense, your HRmax is indeed 220-age, you'd find that on the same personal stats as age, height, weight.
The upper zone alarm, or "upper limit", is 90% HRmax.
You can set that upper limit to whatever type of workout you want.
Perhaps you are doing intervals, and for 15 seconds you want to be over that limit, and then for 45 seconds you want to walk down in the "fat-burning" zone. That's a great workout.
Or perhaps you will be lifting tomorrow and don't want to wear out too much, so you set the upper limit to 70% of HRmax and try not to go over. Now you've got strength the next day for great lifting workout.
Or perhaps you want to increase your cardio fitness level, so you set the upper limit to 80% of HRmax, then go work right above it for 1 min, then walk for 1 min.
That's why that upper limit is easier to change than the personal stat of HRmax. Now, at 90% of HRmax you said you averaged for the whole time, that does mean your HRmax is higher, as 90% is pretty intense, probably could only do it for about 5-10 min before needing to stop or massively slow down and get breath. So yours is higher.
I'd say go into those personal stats and change the HRmax about 10 bpm higher than it is. So rounded 190.
Now try to reach 90% HRmax during a workout, you should feel pretty intense and impossible to keep up for very long.
Oh, don't worry about wearing it for lifting for purpose of calorie counting - totally inflated.
Formulas for calorie estimate (not measuring) are based on steady-state aerobic exercise, HR about the same for 2-5 min.
Lifting and intervals is neither steady state, nor aerobic if done right.
So great for training intervals, but inflated calorie count when you do them.
But from the lifting, just notice what the peak HR seen during a session is, that'll give another good idea of what your MaxHR is as you can normally see it then.0 -
Thank you so much heybales...I am fairly new to doing anything other than the treadmill so it can all be a bit overwhelming. I finally got the numbers off of the display instead of just the % and it said that my maximum heart rate was 182 and that my average was 162. How inflated do you think the calorie burn is on these things?0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions