Maximum deficit - 31cal per lb of fat?
Options
![ladyraven68](https://dakd0cjsv8wfa.cloudfront.net/images/photos/user/0bf7/db3b/d816/cb09/e893/46c6/e501/0d3af7ec084c041453bce4dc35f0c4fda5ed.jpg)
ladyraven68
Posts: 2,003 Member
I have seen this mentioned in other places, but the article Lyle McDonald wrote on it seems to have dissapeared. Maybe he changed his mind. Do any of you Lyle fans have the original article?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15615615
Taken from another site
It has been found in scientific work that a sedentary person can oxidize 31 calories from adipose tissue every 24 hours.
This means that the more fat you carry, the larger your deficit can be, without catabolized non-fatty tissues (muscle).
Example: A 200 pound man with 20% bodyfat carries 40 pounds of fat, thus he can maintain 40x31 calories = 1240 calorie deficit per day, without losing muscle tissue.
Example: A 200 pound man with 5% bodyfat carries only 10 pounds of fat, thus he can only maintain 10x31 calories = 310 calorie deficit per day.
So, the bigger and fatter you are, the bigger your deficit can be. Large, obese persons can maintain large deficits. The leaner you get, the smaller your deficit should be.
here is an article written along these lines, authored by Lyle McDonald, whose is generally credited to be one of the foremost experts in fat loss anatomy.
http://www.mindandmuscle.net/articles/lyle_mc donald/maximum_fatloss"
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15615615
Taken from another site
It has been found in scientific work that a sedentary person can oxidize 31 calories from adipose tissue every 24 hours.
This means that the more fat you carry, the larger your deficit can be, without catabolized non-fatty tissues (muscle).
Example: A 200 pound man with 20% bodyfat carries 40 pounds of fat, thus he can maintain 40x31 calories = 1240 calorie deficit per day, without losing muscle tissue.
Example: A 200 pound man with 5% bodyfat carries only 10 pounds of fat, thus he can only maintain 10x31 calories = 310 calorie deficit per day.
So, the bigger and fatter you are, the bigger your deficit can be. Large, obese persons can maintain large deficits. The leaner you get, the smaller your deficit should be.
here is an article written along these lines, authored by Lyle McDonald, whose is generally credited to be one of the foremost experts in fat loss anatomy.
http://www.mindandmuscle.net/articles/lyle_mc donald/maximum_fatloss"
0
Replies
-
Found the article but it's a few years old.
So, not sure if it is still true or has since been misproven.
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=109897051&page=10 -
*duplicated*0
-
bump0
-
bump0
-
time travel.....
http://web.archive.org/web/20080417050946/http://www.mindandmuscle.net/articles/lyle_mcdonald/maximum_fatloss?page=0,0
In 4 weeks the subjects at http://www.diabetologia-journal.org/Lim.pdf lost an average of 5.4 kg of fat. That's 0.42 pounds per day or 1486 calories worth per day which is probably about right for their deficit. At the end the fat mass was an average of 26 kg / 57 lbs which would make the final release rate 1486 / 57 = 26 calories per day per lb of fat mass.
So that fits with the original result.0 -
Yes, that's the article I linked to in my second post.0 -
Since Facebooks "Timeline" Screws up notes, this is a copy of what Martin Berkhan says about fat loss and body mass.
In essence, the bigger you are the better you lose fat...and vise versa.
http://forum.fitnessbloggen.no/threads/the-logics-of-weight-loss-artikkel-av-martin-berkhan.3181/0 -
bump0
-
Yes, that's the article I linked to in my second post.
it's the original, archived. When I got to your second post I saw that someone had repeated it in a forum that was still active.0 -
Very interesting find.0
-
So applying this to myself..208lb ~26% body fat I can have around a 1700 calorie deficit, but deficit from what? Obviously not BMR.
Maintenance calories is around 2600..that'd put me at...900???
Meh.0 -
Not sure if this was covered, but I'm sure with deficits that large the dieter must be ingesting a *kitten* load of protein and partaking in a heavy lifting resistance training program to not lose lean muscle while losing fat on such a large deficit.
I would assume a minimum of 1gram protein per lb of lean body mass, and a routine that hits every muscle group at least twice/week in order to not lose lean mass.0 -
Just to clarify, I assume this applies to men only*? Having done the maths for my small female stats (23% of 124lb x 31 = 884, take from TDEE of 1600) that would allow me to only eat 750 cals a day, which isn't my idea of healthy!
Edit *I say this because men can get to a much lower body fat %0 -
Not sure if this was covered, but I'm sure with deficits that large the dieter must be ingesting a *kitten* load of protein and partaking in a heavy lifting resistance training program to not lose lean muscle while losing fat on such a large deficit.
I would assume a minimum of 1gram protein per lb of lean body mass, and a routine that hits every muscle group at least twice/week in order to not lose lean mass.
That's why I was wondering if it had been disproved.
It's also being used here - http://www.1percentedge.com/ifcalc/ as a basis for maximum fat metabolism.0 -
That's why I was wondering if it had been disproved.
Disproved could mean higher rates are possible, or other studies couldn't get that high. Like I said above the Newcastle diabetes study was pretty close to this result - large calorie deficit, no specific exercise regime, 46.4% carbohydrate, 32.5% protein and 20.1% fat PSMF.
31 cal per lb suggests a limiting weight loss of 31*100*7/3500 = 6.2% of your body fat per week.
The Newcastle folks lost fat at 5.1% of their fat mass per week at the end, when fat loss was 94% of total weight loss.
http://www.diabetologia-journal.org/Lim.pdf
Very interesting.0 -
Just to clarify, I assume this applies to men only*
No reason to say that as far as I can see.
For clarity, this number is proposed as the maximum rate at which energy can be released from fat stores, for example during a fast or a high deficit diet. It isn't a proposal for a target for dieting, it's a limit above which bad things might happen
The original paper is www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/156156150 -
Bump to read the articles/studies later. Thanks for posting.0
-
Okay---assuming a 15% bf (generous estimation)...I can have a 465 deficit--woo hoo. awesome!0
-
I have seen this mentioned in other places, but the article Lyle McDonald wrote on it seems to have dissapeared. Maybe he changed his mind. Do any of you Lyle fans have the original article?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15615615
Taken from another site
It has been found in scientific work that a sedentary person can oxidize 31 calories from adipose tissue every 24 hours.
This means that the more fat you carry, the larger your deficit can be, without catabolized non-fatty tissues (muscle).
Example: A 200 pound man with 20% bodyfat carries 40 pounds of fat, thus he can maintain 40x31 calories = 1240 calorie deficit per day, without losing muscle tissue.
Example: A 200 pound man with 5% bodyfat carries only 10 pounds of fat, thus he can only maintain 10x31 calories = 310 calorie deficit per day.
So, the bigger and fatter you are, the bigger your deficit can be. Large, obese persons can maintain large deficits. The leaner you get, the smaller your deficit should be.
here is an article written along these lines, authored by Lyle McDonald, whose is generally credited to be one of the foremost experts in fat loss anatomy.
http://www.mindandmuscle.net/articles/lyle_mc donald/maximum_fatloss"
I truely do buy into this...was talking about this the other day...Body fat is STORED energy...if you take in less energy than you need to get through the day your body will burn fat..especially if it's high %'s before muscle...
I know someone who is 5'7" weighed 210...lost 50 lbs since January using the 1200 cal diet AND lifting weights and working out....He is ripped like crazy right now...0 -
Just to clarify, I assume this applies to men only*? Having done the maths for my small female stats (23% of 124lb x 31 = 884, take from TDEE of 1600) that would allow me to only eat 750 cals a day, which isn't my idea of healthy!
Edit *I say this because men can get to a much lower body fat %
I doubt that your TDEE is 1600...but even assuming it's more, the 31 cals per pound of fat is not a RECOMMENDED deficit it is a maximum deficit. All the recommendation is alluding to is the GREATEST POSSIBLE deficit you can have after which you will MOST CERTAINLY catabolize your muscles in order to fuel your metabolic processes. For you it would be if your deficit is greater than 868 (.23 * 124 = 28. 28 x 31 = 868).0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.9K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.8K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.7K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 399 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.8K Motivation and Support
- 7.9K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.4K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 981 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.4K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions