Calories from strength training?

aryastark8
aryastark8 Posts: 57 Member
edited December 19 in Fitness and Exercise
Do you log your calories from strength training?

Today I wore my HRM for strength training for the first time, and it showed 300kcal in 1 hour. So far I have not been logging them, and I also heard that HRM's don't measure calories from strength training accurately, they are only good for aerobic training. So, people who are successfully losing weight with strength training? Do you log them and eat them back? How do you count them?
Thanks!

Replies

  • aryastark8
    aryastark8 Posts: 57 Member
    anybody?
  • spammyanna
    spammyanna Posts: 871 Member
    I log them, but I don't eat them back. From what I gather, calories burned from strength training are hard to calculate, so I just enter them more to keep track of how much time I am spending lifting, and less to track calories.

    Good luck!
  • albinogorilla
    albinogorilla Posts: 1,056 Member
    I log them

    I just use the number on here for a rough estimate though.

    I dont do cardio, so if i didn't log my strength training i would have nothing to log...........and i certainly burn calories while doing it
  • CynGoddess
    CynGoddess Posts: 188 Member
    I don't log mine, I only log for cardio
  • shaycat
    shaycat Posts: 980
    I have my calories set to an amount based on my TDEE. So I dont eat back any of my exercise calories. I did that because I only show that I burn about 100 calories for 40 minutes.
  • HonkyTonks
    HonkyTonks Posts: 1,193 Member
    I log a small amount for mine (like 50 calories per half an hour)
  • MzMandi1025
    MzMandi1025 Posts: 78 Member
    I wear a HRM when I work out, but when I log it, I log it all together under Strength training. I don't separate what I burn in cardio from what I burn in lifting weights. I don't eat them all back either, I pretty much just eat enough back to net 1200-1400 calories. My daily intake is about 1660.
  • cabg6
    cabg6 Posts: 40 Member
    Here is a method that will get you in the ballpark. Maybe only in the city of the ballpark...

    What you can do in lieu of a HRM is estimate the number burned based on your average heart rate for the time spend lifting.

    Here is a formula...

    For males:
    C = (0.6309 x H + 0.09036 x W + 0.2017 x A — 55.0969) x T / 4.184.

    For females:
    C = (0.4472 x H — 0.05741 x W + 0.074 x A — 20.4022) x T / 4.184.

    C = calories burned
    H = average heart rate
    W = your weight
    A = your age
    T = the length of your exercise session in minutes.

    An example:
    Assume that you’re a 28-year-old female weighing 146 pounds. Your average heart rate during an exercise session that lasted 36 minutes was 138 bpm. You burned C = (0.4472 x 138 — 0.05741 x 146 + 0.074 x 28 — 20.4022) x 36 / 4.184 = 301 calories.

    I hope this helps. I haven't got a heart monitor either.

    Oh...here is how I track it:
    1) I used the formula to determine my calories for 30 minutes. I guessed low on the average heart rate. I think I picked 90 bpm when I know it was over that! I have been hitting the weights pretty hard twice a week.
    2) I created a Cardio exercise in MFP called weight lifting.
    3) I use that each time I have a weight session.

    It gives me some extra calories on those days. It's not 100% accurate but at least it's a little bit low so if I go over on my food log on those days I sleep well that night.
  • spinedocmfp
    spinedocmfp Posts: 109 Member
    I log them, and eat them back. I wear my HRM the whole time. The HRM may not be the best measure if you are resting 2 to 3 minutes between sets, but I rest 60 seconds or less and am working hard the whole time. One way I compensate is by subtracting my base cal/hr (your daily cal per day/24 X hr working out). On deadlift or squat day, I log 350 to 400 cal typically per workout. Remember you need those cals to build muscle.
  • hanahlai
    hanahlai Posts: 281 Member
    I just estimate under the "circuit training general." I eat enough to keep me energized and not feeling "hungry." Sometimes I eat none, little, some, or all of my exercise calories based on hunger. I am hesitant sometimes to eat all because it being such a rough estimate.
  • aryastark8
    aryastark8 Posts: 57 Member
    Here is a method that will get you in the ballpark. Maybe only in the city of the ballpark...

    What you can do in lieu of a HRM is estimate the number burned based on your average heart rate for the time spend lifting.

    Here is a formula...

    For males:
    C = (0.6309 x H + 0.09036 x W + 0.2017 x A — 55.0969) x T / 4.184.

    For females:
    C = (0.4472 x H — 0.05741 x W + 0.074 x A — 20.4022) x T / 4.184.

    C = calories burned
    H = average heart rate
    W = your weight
    A = your age
    T = the length of your exercise session in minutes.

    An example:
    Assume that you’re a 28-year-old female weighing 146 pounds. Your average heart rate during an exercise session that lasted 36 minutes was 138 bpm. You burned C = (0.4472 x 138 — 0.05741 x 146 + 0.074 x 28 — 20.4022) x 36 / 4.184 = 301 calories.

    I hope this helps. I haven't got a heart monitor either.

    Oh...here is how I track it:
    1) I used the formula to determine my calories for 30 minutes. I guessed low on the average heart rate. I think I picked 90 bpm when I know it was over that! I have been hitting the weights pretty hard twice a week.
    2) I created a Cardio exercise in MFP called weight lifting.
    3) I use that each time I have a weight session.

    It gives me some extra calories on those days. It's not 100% accurate but at least it's a little bit low so if I go over on my food log on those days I sleep well that night.

    Wow, that's very elaborate! How did you come up with this formula? Is it more accurate than HRM?
  • HonkyTonks
    HonkyTonks Posts: 1,193 Member
    Here is a method that will get you in the ballpark. Maybe only in the city of the ballpark...

    What you can do in lieu of a HRM is estimate the number burned based on your average heart rate for the time spend lifting.

    Here is a formula...

    For males:
    C = (0.6309 x H + 0.09036 x W + 0.2017 x A — 55.0969) x T / 4.184.

    For females:
    C = (0.4472 x H — 0.05741 x W + 0.074 x A — 20.4022) x T / 4.184.

    C = calories burned
    H = average heart rate
    W = your weight
    A = your age
    T = the length of your exercise session in minutes.

    An example:
    Assume that you’re a 28-year-old female weighing 146 pounds. Your average heart rate during an exercise session that lasted 36 minutes was 138 bpm. You burned C = (0.4472 x 138 — 0.05741 x 146 + 0.074 x 28 — 20.4022) x 36 / 4.184 = 301 calories.

    I hope this helps. I haven't got a heart monitor either.

    Oh...here is how I track it:
    1) I used the formula to determine my calories for 30 minutes. I guessed low on the average heart rate. I think I picked 90 bpm when I know it was over that! I have been hitting the weights pretty hard twice a week.
    2) I created a Cardio exercise in MFP called weight lifting.
    3) I use that each time I have a weight session.

    It gives me some extra calories on those days. It's not 100% accurate but at least it's a little bit low so if I go over on my food log on those days I sleep well that night.

    Wow, that's very elaborate! How did you come up with this formula? Is it more accurate than HRM?

    Is height in inches or?
  • Emv79
    Emv79 Posts: 245 Member
    I select "Strength Training" under cardio and just take what MFP suggests as I'm not looking for perfection since it's so little (I wear a HRM for cardio, though).

    For example, a 20min session comes up at 71cal, and if I consider the effort I put in but also the rest between sets (although I may be doing sit-ups or a plank in between), I think it's a fair assessment.
  • cabg6
    cabg6 Posts: 40 Member
    Aryastark - I just Googled and read some websites and one of them had the formula. It would be less accurate than a good HRM. I just wasn't sure where the numbers on MFP were coming from.

    HonkyTonks - height is not required sweetie.
  • crisanderson27
    crisanderson27 Posts: 5,343 Member
    I wear a polar FT7. I also train 'circuit style'...but I use my heartrate as my guage, not a watch. When my heart rate drops to somewhere between 130 and 140 (depending on how much it elevated), I start my next set. The only cool down between exercises is walking to the next lifting station, and setting it up. Other than that...it's continuous.

    As a brief breakdown, this was my last three workouts, time vs calories burned:

    5/9/12 - Workout B - 647cal/54min
    5/7/12 - Workout A - 588cal/46min
    5/4/12 - Workout B - 634cal/49min

    Additionally, I use another method to calculate my deficit than MFP (lifting days is +20%/TDEE, off days -20%/TDEE), so I don't eat back my exercise calories either.
  • LemonBurns
    LemonBurns Posts: 538 Member
    I wear a polar FT7. I also train 'circuit style'...but I use my heartrate as my guage, not a watch. When my heart rate drops to somewhere between 130 and 140 (depending on how much it elevated), I start my next set. The only cool down between exercises is walking to the next lifting station, and setting it up. Other than that...it's continuous.

    As a brief breakdown, this was my last three workouts, time vs calories burned:

    5/9/12 - Workout B - 647cal/54min
    5/7/12 - Workout A - 588cal/46min
    5/4/12 - Workout B - 634cal/49min

    Additionally, I use another method to calculate my deficit than MFP (lifting days is +20%/TDEE, off days -20%/TDEE), so I don't eat back my exercise calories either.

    I think I might love you, seriously. :love:
  • toriaenator
    toriaenator Posts: 423 Member
    strength training is unique because your muscles are going to be burning calories after the fact as they grow...theres not an accurate way to measure calories burned, but u definitely want to fuel up afterwards to give ur muscles stuff to grow from! but that being said,strength training especially lifts that use multiple muscles (squats,deadlifts, etc) are GREAT for getting your heart rate up if ur worried about that. also if ur trying to get cardio in, try circuit training!
  • crisanderson27
    crisanderson27 Posts: 5,343 Member
    I wear a polar FT7. I also train 'circuit style'...but I use my heartrate as my guage, not a watch. When my heart rate drops to somewhere between 130 and 140 (depending on how much it elevated), I start my next set. The only cool down between exercises is walking to the next lifting station, and setting it up. Other than that...it's continuous.

    As a brief breakdown, this was my last three workouts, time vs calories burned:

    5/9/12 - Workout B - 647cal/54min
    5/7/12 - Workout A - 588cal/46min
    5/4/12 - Workout B - 634cal/49min

    Additionally, I use another method to calculate my deficit than MFP (lifting days is +20%/TDEE, off days -20%/TDEE), so I don't eat back my exercise calories either.

    I think I might love you, seriously. :love:

    Ahh, but unfortunately my lovely LemonBurns...you're married, and probably live halfway across the planet anyway...

    /sigh!
    strength training is unique because your muscles are going to be burning calories after the fact as they grow...theres not an accurate way to measure calories burned, but u definitely want to fuel up afterwards to give ur muscles stuff to grow from! but that being said,strength training especially lifts that use multiple muscles (squats,deadlifts, etc) are GREAT for getting your heart rate up if ur worried about that. also if ur trying to get cardio in, try circuit training!

    This is very true. There are also other, hormonal benifits that come with heavy lifting that are immeasurable when compared to just calories burned.

    For the record though, I only use my lifting calories as a guage of my intensity...as I said, I use another program than MFP to calculate my deficit. MFP is just for tracking and the wonderful atmosphere :).
  • HonkyTonks
    HonkyTonks Posts: 1,193 Member
    Aryastark - I just Googled and read some websites and one of them had the formula. It would be less accurate than a good HRM. I just wasn't sure where the numbers on MFP were coming from.

    HonkyTonks - height is not required sweetie.

    Oops you are right, I misunderstood
  • MashaSK
    MashaSK Posts: 142 Member
    there is "strength training, weight lifting" in cardio part+elliptical training is count as this. I do strength trianing 50% now, but log it mostly to cardio
  • talamer
    talamer Posts: 516 Member
    there is "strength training, weight lifting" in cardio part+elliptical training is count as this. I do strength trianing 50% now, but log it mostly to cardio

    I never logged my strength training as I never had HRm before! just got one few days ago! so I think for strength training we should log it as well! I agreed with Mashenka :)
  • Weaz66
    Weaz66 Posts: 1,846 Member
    bumping, til I can read later
  • marriedwith
    marriedwith Posts: 72 Member
    I select "Strength Training" under cardio and just take what MFP suggests as I'm not looking for perfection since it's so little (I wear a HRM for cardio, though).

    For example, a 20min session comes up at 71cal, and if I consider the effort I put in but also the rest between sets (although I may be doing sit-ups or a plank in between), I think it's a fair assessment.

    this is what I do. If you are lifting you have to be burning some calories.
This discussion has been closed.