HRM: Am I doin somethin wrong or is my expectation high?
viannee
Posts: 52 Member
So I bought an HRM (Oregon Scientific). It came with a chest strap. Upon recommendations I wore it under my bra strap.
I have also calibrated my maximum heart rate at 60% - 70%.
I tested it earlier while doing hulahoops for 15 minutes.
It says I only burned 32 calories.
Wait, what? Only 32? But my back was drenched in sweat. How is that possible?
Using a different calorie burn calculator it says I burned 121 calories.
Okay, I know calorie calculators are rough estimates but I expected the difference would be at least 50% but 75%?
Isn't that a bit too low? Or are my expectations just too high?
For reference I am 169 lbs.
I have also calibrated my maximum heart rate at 60% - 70%.
I tested it earlier while doing hulahoops for 15 minutes.
It says I only burned 32 calories.
Wait, what? Only 32? But my back was drenched in sweat. How is that possible?
Using a different calorie burn calculator it says I burned 121 calories.
Okay, I know calorie calculators are rough estimates but I expected the difference would be at least 50% but 75%?
Isn't that a bit too low? Or are my expectations just too high?
For reference I am 169 lbs.
0
Replies
-
So I bought an HRM (Oregon Scientific). It came with a chest strap. Upon recommendations I wore it under my bra strap.
I have also calibrated my maximum heart rate at 60% - 70%.
I tested it earlier while doing hulahoops for 15 minutes.
It says I only burned 32 calories.
Wait, what? Only 32? But my back was drenched in sweat. How is that possible?
Using a different calorie burn calculator it says I burned 121 calories.
Okay, I know calorie calculators are rough estimates but I expected the difference would be at least 50% but 75%?
Isn't that a bit too low? Or are my expectations just too high?
For reference I am 169 lbs.
Did you enter gender, age, weight, perhaps height, and ability to change the HRmax on that HRM?
If not, probably not greatly accurate.
Calc'd max HR at 60-70%? Of what? Not sure what that means, never heard of such a reference.
There may be a stat regarding your HRmax, along with your other stats, not associated with a specific workout.
And those calories depends on what your HR was. It may have been hot out and sweat was expected, but not high effort for you.
What did it say the avg HR was for the session?0 -
I purchased one of those from Ben's Outlet (online sale) and it was horrible even after caibrating it and entering my information the reading was off. WAY off! I spent about $21 on it, so I sent it back for a refund. I purchased a Polar ft4 and it's been great ever since (knock on wood). I would call the manufacturer or read the manual, if you did it correctly and you still feel it's incorrect. Perhaps you should look into a different brand after reading reviews or something. Sorry to hear that and good luck!0
-
If you are trying to lose fat then all you need to worry about is your diet. Unless your a serious athlete or on medication there is no reason for you to use a heart rate monitor. But at the end of the day you can do whatever you want.0
-
Did you enter gender, age, weight, perhaps height, and ability to change the HRmax on that HRM?
If not, probably not greatly accurate.
Calc'd max HR at 60-70%? Of what? Not sure what that means, never heard of such a reference.
There may be a stat regarding your HRmax, along with your other stats, not associated with a specific workout.
And those calories depends on what your HR was. It may have been hot out and sweat was expected, but not high effort for you.
What did it say the avg HR was for the session?
I entered the all the info required.
The watch was also asking about target activity maximum heart rate and I set it 60-70%
it says my
lower heart rate limit is 84
upper heart rate limit is 100
when I finished, it says my avg HR is 74.
I concede it was a little bit hot where i exercised.0 -
If your average heart rate is only 74 while working out....... That is hardly any effort at all if any. Mine fluctuates from 130 up to 175 during a workout of cardio and heavy weight training. I would say to seriously step it up a notch or look into other devices. That doesn't sound right at all.0
-
listen to bales he knows well about this stuff. Do you want to be my girlfriend?
Thanks. I'll add you up. We could be friends for sure.
I purchased one of those from Ben's Outlet (online sale) and it was horrible even after caibrating it and entering my information the reading was off. WAY off! I spent about $21 on it, so I sent it back for a refund. I purchased a Polar ft4 and it's been great ever since (knock on wood). I would call the manufacturer or read the manual, if you did it correctly and you still feel it's incorrect. Perhaps you should look into a different brand after reading reviews or something. Sorry to hear that and good luck!
Oh man, I wish it won't come to that, coz I can't return it anymore.
Thank you for your reply.If you are trying to lose fat then all you need to worry about is your diet. Unless your a serious athlete or on medication there is no reason for you to use a heart rate monitor. But at the end of the day you can do whatever you want.
I just want some sort way to factor in my exercise with my diet coz I do tend to overestimate my exercise. Thinking I have worked up a sweat, I eat more calories than I should. Thank you for your input though.0 -
If your average heart rate is only 74 while working out....... That is hardly any effort at all if any. Mine fluctuates from 130 up to 175 during a workout of cardio and heavy weight training. I would say to seriously step it up a notch or look into other devices. That doesn't sound right at all.
Thank you! I guess my expectations were steep for hulahoops. lol
I'll try a different kind of workout and see if there's any change.0 -
Also, maybe the sensors weren't well lined up. And make sure to wet them before putting it on.0
-
I did wet them before use.
I'm sorry. I'm embarrassed to be such a dunce at this. lol.
Thank you for your input. 0 -
It all sounds fishy. My HR isn't 74 lying on the couch. 100 is too low to be a high.0
-
I entered the all the info required.
The watch was also asking about target activity maximum heart rate and I set it 60-70%
it says my
lower heart rate limit is 84
upper heart rate limit is 100
when I finished, it says my avg HR is 74.
I concede it was a little bit hot where i exercised.
Wow - I'm actually surprised you didn't get higher than 74! I think I'd be up around 90 trying to hula hoop.
Anyway, yeah, that's not much effort. That's probably not a correct estimate since it's under the aerobic range. Calorie estimates are for steady state aerobic in range about 90-160 bpm. Outside that range, or anaerobic like intervals or weight lifting, is inaccurate.
So the fact you enter in the max for a workout by %, means the HRM has already calculated your HRmax in general, probably by 220-age. Which may or may not be accurate. It wanted to know for a workout, when should it warn you.
I'd enter 85%. Unlikely you'll reach it, but just in case, good warning.
Tell you what, forget the HRmax figure, forget the calorie estimates.
The Zones will still be useful. Unless you are almost 100 yrs old and out of shape, you should have it set much higher than that.
Get ready for the workout!
Lower 110
Upper 145
Post workout, take the avg HR to this site with your stats and get your calorie burn estimate.
http://www.braydenwm.com/calburn.htm0 -
If in denial try the non gimmicky method :P
http://www.wikihow.com/Check-Your-Pulse0 -
Not at all!
I really think it's your device. Even a light workout usually will bring your average heart rate over 100. I really think it's not reading right. Maybe borrow a friends and compare the difference if you can. 0 -
If it helps my resting heart rate when I first turn the HRM on is around 65 then if I get up and move around I'm up near 74 so that isn't much of a HR. What is your resting heart rate?0
-
Also, as a very general rule of thumb, a vigorous workout should put you in the 6-12 calories per minute range. And by vigorous, I mean 60%+ of your max. Max heart rates differ strongly between individuals. A generic formula to use is 220 minus your age. Try that as your max HR to get a target HR for a good workout, and then adjust depending on your experience. For example, my estimated max HR is about 185, but I can easily hit that during a hard workout, so that means that my actual max HR is probably a bit higher.
You can get a basic idea of the relative accuracy of your HRM by comparing its results with the calculation from this site:
http://www.triathlontrainingblog.com/calculators/calories-burned-calculator-based-on-average-heart-rate/
Your HRM results should be within 10% or so. The online calculator will also be more accurate if you know your actual VO2Max.
Here is a MFP blog post on HRM calibration:
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/blog/Azdak/view/new-hrm-how-to-make-the-calorie-estimate-more-accurate-183102
Congratulations on getting one. Accurate measurements of your inputs and outputs are key to success at a healthy lifestyle.0 -
Wow - I'm actually surprised you didn't get higher than 74! I think I'd be up around 90 trying to hula hoop.
Anyway, yeah, that's not much effort. That's probably not a correct estimate since it's under the aerobic range. Calorie estimates are for steady state aerobic in range about 90-160 bpm. Outside that range, or anaerobic like intervals or weight lifting, is inaccurate.
So the fact you enter in the max for a workout by %, means the HRM has already calculated your HRmax in general, probably by 220-age. Which may or may not be accurate. It wanted to know for a workout, when should it warn you.
I'd enter 85%. Unlikely you'll reach it, but just in case, good warning.
Tell you what, forget the HRmax figure, forget the calorie estimates.
The Zones will still be useful. Unless you are almost 100 yrs old and out of shape, you should have it set much higher than that.
Get ready for the workout!
Lower 110
Upper 145
Post workout, take the avg HR to this site with your stats and get your calorie burn estimate.
http://www.braydenwm.com/calburn.htm
Thank you! it's taking me a while to process all this but I hope I'll understand it all soon and get the most of my workouts.0 -
If in denial try the non gimmicky method :P
http://www.wikihow.com/Check-Your-Pulse
You know what? you're right. Maybe I don't really need all these thingamajigs. 0 -
Not at all! I really think it's your device. Even a light workout usually will bring your average heart rate over 100. I really think it's not reading right. Maybe borrow a friends and compare the difference if you can.
I'll visit the gym once (not a fan of fitness gyms. lol) and see if there are people who have better devices. Thank you. 0 -
the person saying you dont need a HRM because you are just trying to lose weight is way off...
you DO want to know where your HR falls during cardio - especially if you want to manage the fat burn and fitness HR zones, but more importantly, if you are tracking your calorie burn you want to know how much you burn - a good HRM does that.
a good HRM is a fundamental tool for exercise and fitness assessment and ongoing tracking/monitoring.
Definately check it against your pulse so you can feel confident in what it reports.
Also - make sure your chest strap is used properly - most you need to wet the conductor pads to get good body signal and readings.0 -
74 as a max HR is low...I use a Polar FT4 and my resting heart rate is higher than that. Polar is pretty accurate IMO. You may need to invest in a higher quality HRM.0
-
another vote for Polar - they are great HRMs.
I use a FT7 and love it.0 -
The monitor I have must be worn slightly to the left side rather than right in the middle of the chest to work correctly. Try this and see if it helps. Also, I agree, 74 is a pretty good resting heart rate and even walking a few feet at a leisurely pace should raise it higher than that unless you are a marathoner or something. I would say the monitor is either faulty or needs to be adjusted. Hope this helps.0
-
My resting heart rate is anywhere from 74 - 85, and my heart rate when I'm hiking is around 140 - 170, when I'm running 120 - 140 and when I'm doing my workout DVD's anywhere from 130 - 180. My fitness zone on my Polar FT4 is from 129 to 180.
You need a better device. :laugh:0 -
Post workout, take the avg HR to this site with your stats and get your calorie burn estimate.
http://www.braydenwm.com/calburn.htm
I'm so glad I discovered that webpage last week, it's been a huge help to me and my clueless self!0 -
If it helps my resting heart rate when I first turn the HRM on is around 65 then if I get up and move around I'm up near 74 so that isn't much of a HR. What is your resting heart rate?
my resting HR is at around 64 (I measured it first thing in the morning for 3 days).Also, as a very general rule of thumb, a vigorous workout should put you in the 6-12 calories per minute range. And by vigorous, I mean 60%+ of your max. Max heart rates differ strongly between individuals. A generic formula to use is 220 minus your age. Try that as your max HR to get a target HR for a good workout, and then adjust depending on your experience. For example, my estimated max HR is about 185, but I can easily hit that during a hard workout, so that means that my actual max HR is probably a bit higher.
You can get a basic idea of the relative accuracy of your HRM by comparing its results with the calculation from this site:
http://www.triathlontrainingblog.com/calculators/calories-burned-calculator-based-on-average-heart-rate/
Your HRM results should be within 10% or so. The online calculator will also be more accurate if you know your actual VO2Max.
Here is a MFP blog post on HRM calibration:
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/blog/Azdak/view/new-hrm-how-to-make-the-calorie-estimate-more-accurate-183102
Congratulations on getting one. Accurate measurements of your inputs and outputs are key to success at a healthy lifestyle.
OMG I am so confused! But I will study this. Thank you!the person saying you dont need a HRM because you are just trying to lose weight is way off...
you DO want to know where your HR falls during cardio - especially if you want to manage the fat burn and fitness HR zones, but more importantly, if you are tracking your calorie burn you want to know how much you burn - a good HRM does that.
a good HRM is a fundamental tool for exercise and fitness assessment and ongoing tracking/monitoring.
Definately check it against your pulse so you can feel confident in what it reports.
Also - make sure your chest strap is used properly - most you need to wet the conductor pads to get good body signal and readings.
I'll make manual readings for the next few days so I can get a good baseline before I try this hrm again. Thank you!74 as a max HR is low...I use a Polar FT4 and my resting heart rate is higher than that. Polar is pretty accurate IMO. You may need to invest in a higher quality HRM.
Thank you. I think I should. Oh man, I hope I get the best out of all this.The monitor I have must be worn slightly to the left side rather than right in the middle of the chest to work correctly. Try this and see if it helps. Also, I agree, 74 is a pretty good resting heart rate and even walking a few feet at a leisurely pace should raise it higher than that unless you are a marathoner or something. I would say the monitor is either faulty or needs to be adjusted. Hope this helps.
Thank you! I'll try it and see it works better.My resting heart rate is anywhere from 74 - 85, and my heart rate when I'm hiking is around 140 - 170, when I'm running 120 - 140 and when I'm doing my workout DVD's anywhere from 130 - 180. My fitness zone on my Polar FT4 is from 129 to 180.
You need a better device. laugh
Thank you! At least I know have a few baselines to test when working out. I wish I can return this thing. lol0 -
If in denial try the non gimmicky method :P
http://www.wikihow.com/Check-Your-Pulse
You know what? you're right. Maybe I don't really need all these thingamajigs.
Honestly, I was about to buy myself a HRM until I realized I had more important things to spend my money on right now (school prep, etc). I have found that by checking my pulse via my neck (during spinning, treadmill), I now know what my average heart rate is. Since I started doing that, it's made a difference in my weight loss. I'm now NOT eating all of my exercise calories back. lol (my previous calorie burn numbers were way off).
The brayden webpage someone mentioned earlier is a nifty thing to bookmark! That's what I've been using before I enter my exercise into mfp. It's a bummer to find out my heart rate isn't too high and I am really only burning like 3xx for 60 mins of spinning instead of 5xx...but, at least I know now. 0 -
If in denial try the non gimmicky method :P
http://www.wikihow.com/Check-Your-Pulse
You know what? you're right. Maybe I don't really need all these thingamajigs.
Honestly, I was about to buy myself a HRM until I realized I had more important things to spend my money on right now (school prep, etc). I have found that by checking my pulse via my neck (during spinning, treadmill), I now know what my average heart rate is. Since I started doing that, it's made a difference in my weight loss. I'm now NOT eating all of my exercise calories back. lol (my previous calorie burn numbers were way off).
The brayden webpage someone mentioned earlier is a nifty thing to bookmark! That's what I've been using before I enter my exercise into mfp. It's a bummer to find out my heart rate isn't too high and I am really only burning like 3xx for 60 mins of spinning instead of 5xx...but, at least I know now.
Thank you. Bookmarked and reading the site right now. 0 -
Honestly, I was about to buy myself a HRM until I realized I had more important things to spend my money on right now (school prep, etc). I have found that by checking my pulse via my neck (during spinning, treadmill), I now know what my average heart rate is. Since I started doing that, it's made a difference in my weight loss. I'm now NOT eating all of my exercise calories back. lol (my previous calorie burn numbers were way off).
The brayden webpage someone mentioned earlier is a nifty thing to bookmark! That's what I've been using before I enter my exercise into mfp. It's a bummer to find out my heart rate isn't too high and I am really only burning like 3xx for 60 mins of spinning instead of 5xx...but, at least I know now.
Here's an even niftier thing for that brayden webpage for calorie burn estimate.
It is of course more accurate if you can tell it your VO2max.
Outside doing a max test, the next most accurate thing as study found out, was a formula.
Here is how to estimate your VO2max to use on that page.
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/577839-hrm-s-with-vo2max-stat-improve-calorie-estimate
Or you can use a calculator in my spreadsheet. HRM tab, second section down, just plug in your numbers above, and get results below.
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/620206-spreadsheet-for-bmr-tdee-deficit-calcs-mfp-tweaks-hrm0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions