If You Can't Spot Reduce Why Can We Spot GAIN?

We are all well aware of the mantra "You Can't Spot Reduce" but here's the thing; we seem to be able to spot gain so why not spot reduce?

Case in point, my wife is in great shape; 5'11", 130 lbs, great upper body muscle definition, virtually no fat above the waist. Yet, and it frustrates her to no end, she has the dreaded saddle bags. She clearly does not have a uniform fat percentage over her body (and I would be surprised if a caliper test would give the same reading for every part of the body on most people).

So what gives? Honestly curious, not trying to be a smart *kitten*.

Replies

  • Hendrix7
    Hendrix7 Posts: 1,903 Member
    Your body is predisposed to storing fat in certain locations..........and also more inclined to hold on to it in those places.

    So in men for example....fat will more readily be stored around the lower belly and in women thighs/bum and under the arms. This will be the hardest to get rid of and the easiest to add to.

    Genetics i'm afraid.
  • Acg67
    Acg67 Posts: 12,142 Member
    By spot gain do you mean induce hypertrophy to certain muscle groups? Which is not the same thing as losing fat
  • AmberMahfouz
    AmberMahfouz Posts: 316
    @ Hendrix you really know your ****, I don't even have to use Google anymore. LOL
  • mjbrenner
    mjbrenner Posts: 222 Member
    You cannot target a specific location for fat loss or gain. If your wife could actually "spot gain", then she would be able to pick and choose where she gained her body fat. If spot reduction is choosing where you lose body fat, then spot gaining would be choosing where you gain it.

    I would bet that you wife, like many people, would happily chose a different location for extra body fat gains if she was able.
  • WendyTerry420
    WendyTerry420 Posts: 13,274 Member
    Maybe "spot reduce" is the wrong term, but when I was younger, I did the Abs of Steel workout and it helped tremendously. I believe that certain body types benefit from certain exercises, and that doing the wrong exercises can make our bodies out of proportion.
  • IronPlayground
    IronPlayground Posts: 1,594 Member
    Where fat is stored/gained first/lost last, etc, is determined by genetics.
  • AlsDonkBoxSquat
    AlsDonkBoxSquat Posts: 6,128 Member
    Genetics. You lose in your problem area last and gain there first. It's not a purposeful spot gain like you would want a purposeful spot loss. I get my genes from my mom, we have giant *kitten* and little waists, I gain in butt and thighs. My sister's genes from from my dad, she has pancake booty, but you can see her weight fluctuation in her belly.
  • Some spots on both men and women are more prone to store more fat, and due to several reasons (.e.g., low blood flow to that area) it's harder to burn fat from those areas. Tis just the way we're built...
  • spikefoot
    spikefoot Posts: 419
    I have been told that you lose weight first where you gained it last. I think that is pretty true.

    If you were 100 lbs over weight and wanted to lose weight in your belly you cannot target that spot to burn first. Your body is just going to start burning fat where it "chooses". How it makes those "decisions" is where I think my first comment comes in to play and it all comes down to genetics.

    You also cannot in theory spot gain, cause you can't say I am going to eat a ton of food over the next couple of months and put it on in my skinny legs for example. That would take one serious jedi mind trick.

    So in the end your body adds and removes at its discretion based on you.
  • meshashesha2012
    meshashesha2012 Posts: 8,329 Member
    that's not spot gaining. that's just genetics.

    spot reducing or spot gaining is about the belief that you can use certain foods or certain exercises to specifically designate where you want the fat to go to or leave from.
  • Azdak
    Azdak Posts: 8,281 Member
    We are all well aware of the mantra "You Can't Spot Reduce" but here's the thing; we seem to be able to spot gain so why not spot reduce?

    Case in point, my wife is in great shape; 5'11", 130 lbs, great upper body muscle definition, virtually no fat above the waist. Yet, and it frustrates her to no end, she has the dreaded saddle bags. She clearly does not have a uniform fat percentage over her body (and I would be surprised if a caliper test would give the same reading for every part of the body on most people).

    So what gives? Honestly curious, not trying to be a smart *kitten*.

    That's why caliper measurements are done on multiple sites and the results are determined by the sum of the skinfolds, not a measurement from any one area.

    The fat distribution pattern you described is not uncommon.
  • DopeItUp
    DopeItUp Posts: 18,771 Member
    If you could spot gain, every woman in the world would be walking around with F cups or bigger.
  • MoreBean13
    MoreBean13 Posts: 8,701 Member
    If you could spot gain, every woman in the world would be walking around with F cups or bigger.

    I was just going to type this.....Maybe not F cups but the same sentiment! :laugh:
  • meshashesha2012
    meshashesha2012 Posts: 8,329 Member
    If you could spot gain, every woman in the world would be walking around with F cups or bigger.
    i'd say c or maybe even d cups..

    i'ev never known any woman to say she wanted to be an F cup unless she was way larger and wanted to get rid of some :laugh:
  • gxm17
    gxm17 Posts: 374
    If you could spot gain, every woman in the world would be walking around with F cups or bigger.

    In your dreams! Anything above a C is a pain in the @$$!