Best Body Fat Calculator (at home)
arrrrjt
Posts: 245 Member
My Fitbit is on the fritz so I am looking to move to a TDEE/IIFYM plan.
Best way to calculate Body Fat %? I am relatively lean for my weight (I think), so I get varying answers. I carry most of my fat in my torso, inner thigh, and upper/inner arms.
Using the more basic body fat calculator (http://www.bmi-calculator.net/body-fat-calculator/) I am around 39% but using others that allow for additional measurements for example (http://www.bmi-calculator.net/body-fat-calculator/) it comes in around 27%.
Help! I honestly could care less at this point what the number is (I'm happily moseying along on my weight loss/strength training, although slower than most ), just want to find the most accurate way (at home). I'm not just trying to find the lowest number to look better!
Using the IIFYM Calculator, and lean mass formula, the difference in TDEE is 2363 cal (39%) to 2721 (27%). My head is saying go with the 39% and lower cal to be safe.
Weight - 208
Height - 5"5"
Waist - 34/34.5
Hips - 43/43.5
Wrist - 6"
Forearm - 11"
Female, 26 yo
Those are a bit old but still pretty accurate.
Best way to calculate Body Fat %? I am relatively lean for my weight (I think), so I get varying answers. I carry most of my fat in my torso, inner thigh, and upper/inner arms.
Using the more basic body fat calculator (http://www.bmi-calculator.net/body-fat-calculator/) I am around 39% but using others that allow for additional measurements for example (http://www.bmi-calculator.net/body-fat-calculator/) it comes in around 27%.
Help! I honestly could care less at this point what the number is (I'm happily moseying along on my weight loss/strength training, although slower than most ), just want to find the most accurate way (at home). I'm not just trying to find the lowest number to look better!
Using the IIFYM Calculator, and lean mass formula, the difference in TDEE is 2363 cal (39%) to 2721 (27%). My head is saying go with the 39% and lower cal to be safe.
Weight - 208
Height - 5"5"
Waist - 34/34.5
Hips - 43/43.5
Wrist - 6"
Forearm - 11"
Female, 26 yo
Those are a bit old but still pretty accurate.
0
Replies
-
I've read a lot about measuring body fat % and it really is difficult to get an accurate reading. You saw yourself how you can get multiple answers that vary drastically depending on which method you use. Generally visual approximation will be your best bet. Google "women's body fat percentage" and check out the images and see which one you think you are closest to.
Also, the TDEE -20% method is great. I highly recommend it!0 -
Thank you! The TDEE -20% is similar to the modifications after my Fitbit calories were included, so I think that moving forward it will work well.0
-
Look in the mirror while naked.0
-
Omg, I can't believe it! Our stats are almost identical, height and measurements wise. Funny enough I have the same question about body fat percentage....
My last test was when I weighed 246lb back in April( at the gym with a handheld bio impedance tester) and I was at 40%. I plan to take another test soon with the InBody 230 and see how it changed after dropping 41lb.
For reference, I do like the pictures on Google for visual estimation.
Good luck !!!0 -
-
danelutza19 wrote: »Omg, I can't believe it! Our stats are almost identical, height and measurements wise. Funny enough I have the same question about body fat percentage....
My last test was when I weighed 246lb back in April( at the gym with a handheld bio impedance tester) and I was at 40%. I plan to take another test soon with the InBody 230 and see how it changed after dropping 41lb.
For reference, I do like the pictures on Google for visual estimation.
Good luck !!!
Azdak, I tried that, but I royally suck at any type of estimation. Like I said, I only want an accurate number to get a reasonable estimate of my TDEE, not for personal satisfaction.
0 -
-
I have a feeling it was overestimating it... it's hard to quantify strength training (only about 100 cal/hr) and my horseback riding with it (I tried to use MFP estimations - approx 360 cal/hr - to replace but it was tricky). It would vary between 2600 - 3000 cal measured but that seems high.0
-
See if any of the trainers in your gym can do a skin fold measurement with a caliper, it's more accurate than these pictures I think0
-
See if any of the trainers in your gym can do a skin fold measurement with a caliper, it's more accurate than these pictures I think0
-
Here's a bf percentage image for males as well:
And some useful tools:
healthiack.com/images/body-fat-percentage-calculator
healthiack.com/images/bmr-calculator
0 -
You might try doing an internet search for "navy circumference body fat calculator". You should be able to find a calculator and a .pdf file that explains it if you are interested in the details. For woman it was as accurate as skin fold test and more accurate then the impedance tester relative to a hydrostatic weight test. You do need to keep in mind the subjects used were active military, so it may not correlate well to a severely over weight person. It was developed as an alternative for military personal that did not meet BMI requirements. You might also consider looking for information on waist to hip measurement ratio.0
-
Ups, here are correct links (typo)
healthiack.com/body-fat-percentage-calculator
healthiack.com/bmr-calculator
0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions