Can Increasing Calories Possibly Increase Fat Burning and Metabolism?
TossaBeanBag
Posts: 458 Member
I increased my calories from 1800 to 2000 keeping 50% protein, 30% carbs, and 20% fat. I do 40 minutes of cardio and weight train 6 days per week. Perhaps, my metabolism has just been increasing, but along with the increase in calories, I have been experiencing faster weight loss and fat burning. I also make sure my water intake is plenty. Any explanations as to why increasing calories may lead to a faster metabolism of fat? Thanks.
0
Replies
-
No explanation but i experience the same thing. The 1200 calories on here doesn't work for me. When i eat closer to 1700 calories I lose weight without being any where near hungry and love it! I eat paleo/primal0
-
99% of the time, this is due to increased adherence and more accurate logging. The other 1% of the time there is some extenuating health issue at play.0
-
Nope. If you eat over yours maintenance you gain, under you lose. Unless you have medical problems it really is that simple.0
-
had my blood tested no medical reason for why I am having to eat alot of calories back to stop dropping weight was maintaining lower then my weight started dropping again I do spend alot of time in the gym or working have an outside active job..0
-
-
99% of the time, this is due to increased adherence and more accurate logging. The other 1% of the time there is some extenuating health issue at play.
0 -
Protein helps your metabolism. Maybe you are eating more protein, which you should be if you are working out. I know after a workout, I crave protein.0
-
punctuation is your friend.
lol0 -
had my blood tested no medical reason for why I am having to eat alot of calories back to stop dropping weight was maintaining lower then my weight started dropping again I do spend alot of time in the gym or working have an outside active job..
You have to be accurate with both calories in and calories out. If you are logging your food correctly, then you might think back to your activities around the time things changed. Are you using a fitness tracker or any device to know how many calories you burn each day? Did you add any new activity or have any life change which might have made you a bit more active? Even something like starting a new relationship or getting a new car so that you park further back in the parking lot can make a difference.
0 -
Odds are because you burn a lot of calories, your deficit was so large you were putting your body into calorie conservation mode. Often called "starvation mode" our bodies DO conserve calories when your net caloric consumption is below your basic metabolic rate. Maybe due to your highly active lifestyle or could be hormonal/chemical, perhaps your BMR is relatively high so the deficit takes the net down too low.
I know when I have a few days where I break even with calories in/calories out, I tend to drop a pound or two. My theory is my body sees I'm not going to starve it so it releases some fat stores. I don't know. But it happens to me, too.0 -
Odds are because you burn a lot of calories, your deficit was so large you were putting your body into calorie conservation mode. Often called "starvation mode" our bodies DO conserve calories when your net caloric consumption is below your basic metabolic rate. Maybe due to your highly active lifestyle or could be hormonal/chemical, perhaps your BMR is relatively high so the deficit takes the net down too low.
I know when I have a few days where I break even with calories in/calories out, I tend to drop a pound or two. My theory is my body sees I'm not going to starve it so it releases some fat stores. I don't know. But it happens to me, too.0 -
The short answer is no.
The notion of increasing your metabolism by anything other than simply gaining weight is usually bogus. Adaptive thermogenesis (conservation) can be a thing, but it's pocket change, not enough to negate your deficit. And you can probably default to assuming it wasn't a factor to begin with.
jacksonpt said it pretty well with the bit about increased adherence and accurate logging.
How long has it been since you increased calories?0 -
This content has been removed.
-
Protein helps your metabolism. Maybe you are eating more protein, which you should be if you are working out. I know after a workout, I crave protein.
TEF plays a very minimal role in increasing metabolism. And increasing from 1800 to 2000 calories isn't a large increase. As was stated previously, increased adherence and more accurate logging is a good guess. The other factor is increased movement. If you feel that you have more energy to train harder and longer, or mentally want to train harder and longer because you increased your calories, you are creating a bigger deficit by doing so.
0 -
Sometimes too the time frame is too short to really attribute one result to one calorie level. I mean, if you just raised your calories this week and lost 2 lbs. instead of your usual one, it could be any number of things besides 'more calories = more loss'.0
-
Same with me. If i ear 1200 i lost weighht.. then gain in a week
when i eat 2000 i lose weight.
No idea why!0 -
Each week you have a varying activity level based on work, sleep, life... So no formula for caloric intake and burn can be perfect. Also, some weeks your body is in need of more repair and you have varying homronal levels... attributed to stress both mental and physical.
If you can fluxuate you caloric intake to a range that works for you then it will help you to lose and cut. Remember by doing so you'll also be fluxuating your macros.. that also plays a role. So you may have to adjust your workout as a result. Ultimately what this results in is muscle/body confusion... and thats what keeps your body burning fat and calories.. thats what gets you past those humps...
Dont listen to those who feel that they have the right formula. Each person is different and knows there body. If you have a formula thats worked for you... try using that as a baseline and find a caloric range from there... taking into account the macro variation and workout.
Be sure to not always do anaerobic exercise also...0 -
I know since i upped my calories this week I have had a lot more engry and dont feel like I am starving all the time. Before Inwas eating 1500 to 1800 calories. So yes, no matter what anyone else says. I believe it is the right choice for me. A In the end you can be the only one who says if it is right for you or not.
And, yes there is something called starvation mode. If your body is NOT getting enough calories it does make it harder to lose weight and when you do lose weight you are not doing healthy way. Again, just my feelings and two cents..0 -
Whether starvation mode exists or not, 200 calories probably wouldn't make much of a difference. I find I lose the much more weight when running a horrendous deficit (upwards 3000 calories a day) than a reasonable deficit, but I feel horrible, have no energy, and can't sleep among other disturbing symptoms--surprisingly, most of the weight returns, too.0
-
JZ_Evolution_Mark2 wrote: »Each week you have a varying activity level based on work, sleep, life... So no formula for caloric intake and burn can be perfect. Also, some weeks your body is in need of more repair and you have varying homronal levels... attributed to stress both mental and physical.
If you can fluxuate you caloric intake to a range that works for you then it will help you to lose and cut. Remember by doing so you'll also be fluxuating your macros.. that also plays a role. So you may have to adjust your workout as a result. Ultimately what this results in is muscle/body confusion... and thats what keeps your body burning fat and calories.. thats what gets you past those humps...
Dont listen to those who feel that they have the right formula. Each person is different and knows there body. If you have a formula thats worked for you... try using that as a baseline and find a caloric range from there... taking into account the macro variation and workout.
Be sure to not always do anaerobic exercise also...
That sounds like a lot of lessons learned. Good advice.0 -
dieselbyte wrote: »
TEF plays a very minimal role in increasing metabolism. And increasing from 1800 to 2000 calories isn't a large increase. As was stated previously, increased adherence and more accurate logging is a good guess. The other factor is increased movement. If you feel that you have more energy to train harder and longer, or mentally want to train harder and longer because you increased your calories, you are creating a bigger deficit by doing so.
Since I am new to starting back into lifting and exercising, my cardio intensity has doubled and so has my strength. I think you are right. It isn't simply an increase of 200 calories. My energy expendenture is now much more than the 200 extra calories. The body is adapting and burning more calories because I have increased my output. Assuming my logging was pretty accurate, you are probably on to something.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions