Does 90 Min of Bikram Yoga Really Only Burn 200 Calories?

knlaurence
knlaurence Posts: 5 Member
edited January 25 in Fitness and Exercise
MFP shows 90 minutes of yoga burns 197 calories. I can't believe that it is so low! Is this right? If not, does anyone have a better estimate of how many calories 90 minutes of bikram yoga burns?

Replies

  • I don't believe that is true. I did some searching online to find out how many calories it does burn and found a site that uses your height and current weight to calcluate calories burned during a class. At my weight i burn about 729 calories in 90 minutes. It does fluctuate with how much you weigh...when i was about 12 lbs heavier the amount of calories burned was higher.
  • Try this link for calories burned during bikram yoga...http://www.everydayhealth.com/Calories-Burned-Yoga.htm
  • Morgaath
    Morgaath Posts: 679 Member
    First, MFP only has yoga, which is different than Bikram, just as bike riding on a flat paved track is different than riding on a hilly dirt path.
    Second, take a look at this thread: http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/279535-fyi-bikram-yoga-calories-burned
  • phjorg1
    phjorg1 Posts: 642 Member
    why is that thead linked? you do know tgat hrms are useless for hot yoga right? so its proof of a bunch of people who have no idea how to use equipment...
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 49,086 Member
    The average burn of yoga (even Bikram) is about 300-450 calories in 90 minutes. Yoga is more anaerobic than aerobic since yoga involves a lot of isometric strength.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal/Group FitnessTrainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
  • i've used a heart rate monitor on several bikram yoga classes. sometimes, it can only burn 200 calories and sometimes up to 400.
  • This content has been removed.
  • DavPul
    DavPul Posts: 61,406 Member
    I don't believe that is true. I did some searching online to find out how many calories it does burn and found a site that uses your height and current weight to calcluate calories burned during a class. At my weight i burn about 729 calories in 90 minutes It does fluctuate with how much you weigh...when i was about 12 lbs heavier the amount of calories burned was higher.

    if you eat that many calories back you're gonna have a bad time
  • DopeItUp
    DopeItUp Posts: 18,771 Member
    At my weight i burn about 729 calories in 90 minutes.

    I promise that you do not burn anywhere near that amount, sorry.
  • I think about 300 calories is just right. But people lose weight not because of calories burned, but because of loss of water weight.
  • MORECHABLIS
    MORECHABLIS Posts: 164 Member
    You'll be best to buy a heart rate monitor and check against websites that calculate calories. I mostly cycle and use a HRM linked to a watch, GPS logger and check against website calorie calculators.

    Its amazing how different the results can be... After around 2-3 hours of cycling - GPS logger is always highest, MFP is lowest and HRM is always in the middle of calories used... Sometimes the highest is over 1,000 calories higher than MFP.

    So I in my mind I use the middle HRM figures, but log down the MFP calorie figures on my calorie count for the day, as that way hopefully always be 'in credit' for the diet.
  • aeschulman
    aeschulman Posts: 1 Member
    i have worn my heart rate monitor many times to Bikram and burn no less than 600 calories per 90 minutes. It all depends on how hard you work on each pose. you can easily phone it in and not get much out of it or you can get a killer workout. My monitor is new and very accurate.
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 49,086 Member
    i have worn my heart rate monitor many times to Bikram and burn no less than 600 calories per 90 minutes. It all depends on how hard you work on each pose. you can easily phone it in and not get much out of it or you can get a killer workout. My monitor is new and very accurate.
    HRM's don't accurately count calories for isometric exercises. It's counting your heart rate, but not actual activity. So if one wore a heart rate monitor to a scary movie for 2 hours, the monitor may show a burn of 900 calories. And we all know that's not accurate.
    Fitbit's and Bodybugg's would do much better because they don't track heart rate, but actual movement.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness industry for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
  • Bikram yoga DEFINITELY burns calories. It depends on the body weight and how hard we do the postures. I wore heart rate monitor for 7 months and have seen every single day with my weight it burns about 450-500 calories. In the past I used to weight train for an hour-in between sipped hydroxycut-then did bikram yoga and observed 600-650 calorie burn. I don't know if hydroxy had anything to do with that increment. But now I am off hydroxy, had a major accident so very limited to my exercise. Even with morbidly obese currently my HRM indicates 450-500 calories. So don't give up your hope.
  • i have worn my heart rate monitor many times to Bikram and burn no less than 600 calories per 90 minutes. It all depends on how hard you work on each pose. you can easily phone it in and not get much out of it or you can get a killer workout. My monitor is new and very accurate.

    I agree. Also it may be interesting to watch the regulars or even those who take part in 30 day challenges. I have seen them shrinking to a noticeable size. With my kind of weight and age (50+) one has to be either thankful to Bikram or God to be able to do rigorous circuit training for an hour. If you are into 3-4 days weight training/week or take part in sports/spinning you will definitely see the difference and prone to less injury from doing 3-4 times/wk bikram yoga.
  • Morgaath
    Morgaath Posts: 679 Member
    Bikram yoga DEFINITELY burns calories. It depends on the body weight and how hard we do the postures. I wore heart rate monitor for 7 months and have seen every single day with my weight it burns about 450-500 calories. In the past I used to weight train for an hour-in between sipped hydroxycut-then did bikram yoga and observed 600-650 calorie burn. I don't know if hydroxy had anything to do with that increment. But now I am off hydroxy, had a major accident so very limited to my exercise. Even with morbidly obese currently my HRM indicates 450-500 calories. So don't give up your hope.

    Bit of a difference in calorie burn between morbidly obese, and OPs current weight of 116, no matter what the exercise.

    Meanwhile, a study on hot yoga, which is not quite Bikram, as they only jacked the temp to 92f.
    https://www.acefitness.org/prosourcearticle/3353/ace-sponsored-study-hot-yoga-go-ahead-and
This discussion has been closed.