6 meals a day
Replies
-
Meal timing is irrelevant. Calories in vs. calories out in a given period of time leads to weight loss.0
-
I try to eat 6 meals a day and recommend it to clients at the gym I train at as well. Many people will discredit this method commonly referred to as "grazing". There is always a new method like intermittent fasting touted to work better, but I've seen 5-6 meals a day work well, tried and true, and if you ask a traditional figure model, bodybuilder or athlete it is a basic fundamental.
It's understandable that many cannot do this due to their jobs etc, and so you make different plans but I feel grazing is the ideal and easy if you work at a desk or somewhere you can pretty much time out your meals with a reminder. The whole purpose is to never let yourself feel hungry and eat even when you are not hungry again yet. Once your gut has received the hormone responsible for hunger, it means your metabolism has already begun to slow and you are not going to oxidize as much body fat for energy as you would when your feeling well fed.
Yes, of course a calorie deficit is the simple science behind weight loss, but you want to try and condition your body to burn the right kind of weight: fat weight, not lean mass. Muscle is what is responsible for burning calories so the more LBM you have, the more calories you need to sustain yourself and when you go long periods without food your body wants to begin using lean mass for energy over fat as a survival mechanism. There are 3500 calories in one pound of body fat, so you need to eat 3500 calories less than you burn over a given amount of time to lose 1 pound over that given time. So it is ideal to be in a deficit but eat frequently so your body has to constantly work to break down food (yes, this in itself takes energy) and this is also why we should eat foods that have been processed outside our bodies as little as possible (whole grains, whole fruits, vegetables, brown rice and other fibrous sources). This is also why you should have protein in every meal, because it slows the absorption of carbohydrates and you feel full longer, not to mention protects your muscles from being burned as energy.
Another reason to eat frequently is because it makes it easier for to eat what you should and not what you crave when you get really hungry and helps not to over eat either. This is what I've found is the best method of helping people lose weight. If it was easy, everyone would be thin. It’s a lifestyle change that you have to be comfortable with because a “diet” will fail you every single time and you’ll end up losing muscle in the process and go back to a higher weight than you were before as a result.0 -
Are you hungry every three hours? Do you need to eat that often in a day or are you fine with less? Eating more often won't cause more weight loss.
If you do want to eat that often, break up your meals or add in snacks to add more meals in a day like the above poster mentioned.
Eating more often will aid in weight loss. If you are only eating two to three meals a day, your body thinks "Oh, I'm not going to get more food for another 6 hours, I better store this food for energy." Food get stored as fat. If you are eating every 2-3 hours, your body thinks, "I know I'll be getting more fuel in a couple hours, I can go ahead and use this food for energy now". This increases your metabolism, which in turns helps burn fat.
Probably why this guy is so fat...
http://www.leangains.com/
I don't practice this and I actually do eat 5-6 times per day, but the whole speeding up your metabolism thing is just a bunch of bro-science.
Um, you obviously have no idea what you are talking about. First, I'm 6'0" and 180 lbs, so, not so fat. Second, I'm a certified personal trainer, so it's not "bro-science", its real science. Maybe you should do your research before you try to insult people on a weight loss help website.
Wasn't calling you fat bra...I was referring to the lean gains dude...making a point that that dude was once fat and is now a BB and does not eat 6 times per day. He practices IF. My point was that all of this meal timing bull**** is highly overrated. I said that I ate 6 times a day...I do so because I practically go insane otherwise. I don't believe in all of tis stoking the fires BS...people have success eating at all times per day and doing just fine.
I don't have any problems with people doing what works...I do take issue when people say you have to do something to be successful.0 -
Great advice!
This is exactly what happened to me. I ate at 1200 calories, lost muscle, felt terrible, gained it back as soon as I started eating over 1200 calories and now I'm creating a new lifestyle for myself. TRYING to eat clean, lift weights, do some cardio, and eating about 2000 a day and working out 6 days/week. I already eat little snacks throughout the day so maybe I will try the 5-6 meals a day...couldn't hurt....didn't see one you naysayers that it would make me GAIN weight. 0 -
Eating 5 times a day is bad for your teeth. Ask your dentist! At least that's what my dentist told me which further reassures me that humans are not made to eat like a chipmunk. That's not to say that eating 5 times a day doesn't work. It works because it makes the person engaged with food all day long, constantly planning the next meal that's 2 hours away. At the end of the day, it boils down to your personal preference, lifestyle, and how satisfied you feel eating at your current frequency.
Hodgetwins eat only once or twice a day and they're pretty fit. They've been doing it for over a year now.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3m6cT51bWY 0 -
This content has been removed.
-
Eating 6 small meals a day compared to eating 1 large meal a day has no special effect on increased weight loss.
This is correct!0 -
I try to eat 6 meals a day and recommend it to clients at the gym I train at as well. Many people will discredit this method commonly referred to as "grazing". There is always a new method like intermittent fasting touted to work better, but I've seen 5-6 meals a day work well, tried and true, and if you ask a traditional figure model, bodybuilder or athlete it is a basic fundamental.
It's understandable that many cannot do this due to their jobs etc, and so you make different plans but I feel grazing is the ideal and easy if you work at a desk or somewhere you can pretty much time out your meals with a reminder. The whole purpose is to never let yourself feel hungry and eat even when you are not hungry again yet. Once your gut has received the hormone responsible for hunger, it means your metabolism has already begun to slow and you are not going to oxidize as much body fat for energy as you would when your feeling well fed.
Yes, of course a calorie deficit is the simple science behind weight loss, but you want to try and condition your body to burn the right kind of weight: fat weight, not lean mass. Muscle is what is responsible for burning calories so the more LBM you have, the more calories you need to sustain yourself and when you go long periods without food your body wants to begin using lean mass for energy over fat as a survival mechanism. There are 3500 calories in one pound of body fat, so you need to eat 3500 calories less than you burn over a given amount of time to lose 1 pound over that given time. So it is ideal to be in a deficit but eat frequently so your body has to constantly work to break down food (yes, this in itself takes energy) and this is also why we should eat foods that have been processed outside our bodies as little as possible (whole grains, whole fruits, vegetables, brown rice and other fibrous sources). This is also why you should have protein in every meal, because it slows the absorption of carbohydrates and you feel full longer, not to mention protects your muscles from being burned as energy.
Another reason to eat frequently is because it makes it easier for to eat what you should and not what you crave when you get really hungry and helps not to over eat either. This is what I've found is the best method of helping people lose weight. If it was easy, everyone would be thin. It’s a lifestyle change that you have to be comfortable with because a “diet” will fail you every single time and you’ll end up losing muscle in the process and go back to a higher weight than you were before as a result.
Like I said above, I eat 6 times per day because of a lot of the behavioral things you mention. But I'm trying to figure out from this how long you think it takes for your body to begin to catabolize muscle. Do you really think that intermittent fasters are going to start to lose muscle just by not eating for 16 hours? Do you have any evidence that IFers lose more lean body mass than people with more traditional eating schedules?0 -
at least 6 I sometimes go to 12 or even 15 meals a day...fantastic!!0
-
Are you hungry every three hours? Do you need to eat that often in a day or are you fine with less? Eating more often won't cause more weight loss.
If you do want to eat that often, break up your meals or add in snacks to add more meals in a day like the above poster mentioned.
Eating more often will aid in weight loss. If you are only eating two to three meals a day, your body thinks "Oh, I'm not going to get more food for another 6 hours, I better store this food for energy." Food get stored as fat. If you are eating every 2-3 hours, your body thinks, "I know I'll be getting more fuel in a couple hours, I can go ahead and use this food for energy now". This increases your metabolism, which in turns helps burn fat.
This is exactly what the program said!!!
are you guys for real???0 -
I eat about every 2 hours. This keeps your blood sugar level even throughout the day, so you don't get spikes, which can cause cravings and the afternoon slump. I have eaten this way for several years and my body has become used to it and I start to get hungry about 2-3 hours after my last meal. I have so much more energy eating this way and it keeps me from hitting the vending machine at work.
Typical day:
6:00am-Chocolate Whey Protein Shake-before I exercise.
8:00am-3 slices turkey bacon and either a smoothie with greens or oatmeal with an apple and a few pecans
10am-red bell peppers/cucumber slices/baby carrots-with homemade guacamole
12pm-lunch-usually a grilled chicken breast and salad
3:00pm-green smoothie
6:00pm-Dinner
It takes planning and preparing everything the night before that way I just pack my cooler before I leave for work in the morning.0 -
at least 6 I sometimes go to 12 or even 15 meals a day...fantastic!!
Def 15.
anything more than 15 and the metabolic furnace stops functioning.. and metabolic damage shall occur. 0 -
Great advice! This is exactly what happened to me. I ate at 1200 calories, lost muscle, felt terrible, gained it back as soon as I started eating over 1200 calories and now I'm creating a new lifestyle for myself. TRYING to eat clean, lift weights, do some cardio, and eating about 2000 a day and working out 6 days/week. I already eat little snacks throughout the day so maybe I will try the 5-6 meals a day...couldn't hurt....didn't see one you naysayers that it would make me GAIN weight.
That's because it won't make you gain. The problem people have is saying that it has some kind of magical impact on your metabolism...as someone who has done both IF and now eats 5-6 times per day, I can tell you it has no magical powers and doesn't help you lose weight. It's a fine way to eat if it fits your lifestyle because ultimately, that's what it's all about...it's just the stoking the fires BS that gets everyones feathers ruffled.
I lost weight just fine doing IF...I lose weight just fine eating 5-6 times per day. I'm personally happier eating 5-6 times per day simply because I love food and enjoy eating...but it has no magical effect on my metabolism.0 -
Meal frequency does not arbitrarily increase thermogenesis. If a given frequency increases activity or performance then obviously one should adhere to that, but that's going to differ from person to person.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9155494
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19943985
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17483007
Diet induced thermogensis isn't frequency based. The idea that you should eat more frequently so that your body has to spend more energy breaking down the food is incorrect. It's based on quantity and macronutrient composition.0 -
.
Obviously the theory behind it is to keep your metabolism stoked by consistently giving it fuel to burn. You can still give it too much fuel though so you do need to keep an eye on your calories and macros.
Good luck!
With respect... there is no such thing as "metabolism stoking"0 -
meal timing is irrelevant. I used to "graze" and didnt work, I never felt satisfied.
I turned to Intermittent fasting (leangains protocol) and got to where I wanted to be. I lost weight, gained lean mass, and recomped to below 10% BF while eating 1-ish meals a day(4 hour eating window)
but do what works for you0 -
anything less than 3000 cals and 6 "meals" a day doesn't make sense to me. 6 snacks maybe.0
-
My meal times begin at abut 7:30 am and vary in calorie count. My diary is always open.
730 - breakfast
10am - snack
Noon - lunch
2pm - snack
4pm - snack
6-7ish - supper
10pm or so - post workout snack (I work out at night)
Depending on the intensity of the workouts I can eat anywhere from 1800 or so to 2300 calories a day, eating seven times.0 -
I try to eat 6 meals a day and recommend it to clients at the gym I train at as well. Many people will discredit this method commonly referred to as "grazing". There is always a new method like intermittent fasting touted to work better, but I've seen 5-6 meals a day work well, tried and true, and if you ask a traditional figure model, bodybuilder or athlete it is a basic fundamental.
It's understandable that many cannot do this due to their jobs etc, and so you make different plans but I feel grazing is the ideal and easy if you work at a desk or somewhere you can pretty much time out your meals with a reminder. The whole purpose is to never let yourself feel hungry and eat even when you are not hungry again yet. Once your gut has received the hormone responsible for hunger, it means your metabolism has already begun to slow and you are not going to oxidize as much body fat for energy as you would when your feeling well fed.
Yes, of course a calorie deficit is the simple science behind weight loss, but you want to try and condition your body to burn the right kind of weight: fat weight, not lean mass. Muscle is what is responsible for burning calories so the more LBM you have, the more calories you need to sustain yourself and when you go long periods without food your body wants to begin using lean mass for energy over fat as a survival mechanism. There are 3500 calories in one pound of body fat, so you need to eat 3500 calories less than you burn over a given amount of time to lose 1 pound over that given time. So it is ideal to be in a deficit but eat frequently so your body has to constantly work to break down food (yes, this in itself takes energy) and this is also why we should eat foods that have been processed outside our bodies as little as possible (whole grains, whole fruits, vegetables, brown rice and other fibrous sources). This is also why you should have protein in every meal, because it slows the absorption of carbohydrates and you feel full longer, not to mention protects your muscles from being burned as energy.
Another reason to eat frequently is because it makes it easier for to eat what you should and not what you crave when you get really hungry and helps not to over eat either. This is what I've found is the best method of helping people lose weight. If it was easy, everyone would be thin. It’s a lifestyle change that you have to be comfortable with because a “diet” will fail you every single time and you’ll end up losing muscle in the process and go back to a higher weight than you were before as a result.
finally. everyone, listen to this.0 -
at least 6 I sometimes go to 12 or even 15 meals a day...fantastic!!
Def 15. anything more than 15 and the metabolic furnace stops functioning.. and metabolic damage shall occur.0 -
precisely!!0
-
I don't listen to broscience which has been scientifically disproven.finally. everyone, listen to this.
If eating 6 (or 8, or 10) meals a day helps with satiation, personal preference, workout performance and/or dietary adherence, there's nothing whatsoever wrong with it. But there's no science proving that it "stokes the metabolism" or provides any kind of advantage whatsoever when it comes to weight loss or body composition.0 -
Great advice! This is exactly what happened to me. I ate at 1200 calories, lost muscle, felt terrible, gained it back as soon as I started eating over 1200 calories and now I'm creating a new lifestyle for myself. TRYING to eat clean, lift weights, do some cardio, and eating about 2000 a day and working out 6 days/week. I already eat little snacks throughout the day so maybe I will try the 5-6 meals a day...couldn't hurt....didn't see one you naysayers that it would make me GAIN weight.
Saying that it isn't necessary is not the same as being a "naysayer." There's nothing wrong with doing it that way. The problem is with telling people that it *has* to be done that way.0 -
The point of this method of eating is to prevent hunger, and therefore, prevent overeating. It works best if you have a regular schedule to time your meals and not just eating when you feel hungry. Its hard to get used to it at first, but once you do its not too bad.
I personally dont do it because I dont have a regular schedule each day, but I have done it in the past and it helped keep my hunger/ appetite in check and curbed unplanned snacking.0 -
anything less than 3000 cals and 6 "meals" a day doesn't make sense to me. 6 snacks maybe.
This.
I eat between 1500-1700, depending on what I feel like eating, and I couldn't imagine splitting that into 6 meals. That's what, sub 300 calories each? Sounds like a bunch of mid-sized snacks to me.0 -
There are studies supporting both types of meal plans, but really what it comes down to is what works for you. I prefer grazing and not having the sensation of fullness in my belly, so 6 meals works well for me. I am never hungry on a 6-meals-a-day lifestyle. But for some people, this leaves them feeling constantly unsatisfied because they need that fullness trigger, or they do not like having to constantly think about getting that next meal in, either because it keeps food on the brain or because it does not work with their schedule.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions