Here's What 2,000 Calories Look Like (Restaurant Chains): New York Times

Options
«134

Replies

  • randomtai
    randomtai Posts: 9,003 Member
    Options
    Yummy! :D
  • skyfall91
    Options
    wow no wonder some people think they don't eat enough to have put on weight. I mean a milkshake for 2000 calories?!
  • leggup
    leggup Posts: 2,942 Member
    Options
    I love this- thanks for posting!
  • AmberRamos123
    AmberRamos123 Posts: 14 Member
    Options
    So interesting! I love the Java Chip. No more!
  • prattiger65
    prattiger65 Posts: 1,657 Member
    Options
    randomtai wrote: »
    Yummy! :D

    Absolutely, I'm hungry now. Need more pics of yummy food.
  • loveliftlaughxo
    loveliftlaughxo Posts: 72 Member
    Options
    Crazy!
  • RhonndaJ
    RhonndaJ Posts: 1,615 Member
    Options
    Man, this was educational.
  • Malteaster
    Malteaster Posts: 75 Member
    Options
    That is frightening.
  • ejdp254
    ejdp254 Posts: 342 Member
    Options
    That was astonishing!
  • chitchatcatt
    chitchatcatt Posts: 19 Member
    Options
    It makes me realize, all of those times I thought, well, I only had a milkshake and breakfast today, I'd done myself in with just the shake!
  • CooCooPuff
    CooCooPuff Posts: 4,374 Member
    Options
    I never knew Pizza Hut cut their cookies like that. It's adorable!
  • stephanieluvspb
    stephanieluvspb Posts: 997 Member
    Options
    What's in a martini to make it 230 calories? I'm more of a wine and crown n coke girl myself so I have no idea ;)
  • TheVirgoddess
    TheVirgoddess Posts: 4,535 Member
    Options
    It's sort of obnoxious that the at home meals mostly had calorie free beverages, while the restaurants all had calorie packed XL choices. I would have liked to have seen a more realistic comparison (either no beverages at all, or more consistent beverages).
  • Daiako
    Daiako Posts: 12,545 Member
    Options
    Looks delish. Probably tastes delish too.
  • Aemely
    Aemely Posts: 694 Member
    Options
    It's sort of obnoxious that the at home meals mostly had calorie free beverages, while the restaurants all had calorie packed XL choices. I would have liked to have seen a more realistic comparison (either no beverages at all, or more consistent beverages).

    Yeah, I noticed a lot of OJ and calorific drinks. Cheaters. :wink:
  • aplcr0331
    aplcr0331 Posts: 186 Member
    Options
    I plugged in one of the meals that I used to eat on a regular basis at Jack in the Box...

    3,140 Calories.

  • TheVirgoddess
    TheVirgoddess Posts: 4,535 Member
    Options
    Aemely wrote: »
    It's sort of obnoxious that the at home meals mostly had calorie free beverages, while the restaurants all had calorie packed XL choices. I would have liked to have seen a more realistic comparison (either no beverages at all, or more consistent beverages).

    Yeah, I noticed a lot of OJ and calorific drinks. Cheaters. :wink:

    I think I'm just bitter because I don't drink all my calories anymore. :(
  • jayliospecky
    jayliospecky Posts: 25,022 Member
    Options
    That chocolate cake!!! 1700 calories? Is it really rich, or just gigantic?

    Either way, I'm in.
  • CooCooPuff
    CooCooPuff Posts: 4,374 Member
    Options
    It's sort of obnoxious that the at home meals mostly had calorie free beverages, while the restaurants all had calorie packed XL choices. I would have liked to have seen a more realistic comparison (either no beverages at all, or more consistent beverages).
    I just wish they had picked a more realistic meal for Starbucks. Three sugary drinks around the same time is an overkill.