going over on macros...
rachylouise87
Posts: 367 Member
i always go over on protein, i eat a lot of eggs, fish and meat and i am on 1100 calories per day. is it better to go over say on protein rather than carbs my fat is set at 37g per day carbs at 120 and protein at around 80. my day to day diet varies but adding protein shakes in has really helped my energy seeing as im at a low calorie. i never go over on calories just the protein . how can i deal with this without lowering the others too much?
0
Replies
-
Ultimately is your0
-
1100 calaries a day is too few, and you say you never go over - how far under this target are you? Minimum calories recommended for a woman is 1200 - MFP will never set your calories as less than this, and most women will lose weight eating considerably more than this.
The reason you are struggling to meet your macro requirements is that you aren't eating enough to meet them. I'd look at uping your calories to a healthy target first - then worry about the macros.0 -
Oops. Ultimately it's your calorie intake that matters most. However I personally would rather go over on protein than carbs because the body burns more calories processing them.0
-
why do you have a calorie goal of 1100?0
-
i am 5ft 1 ... my NEAT is 1700. i previously had a deficit of 500 but it wasnt working so this week i shook up my workout routine and lowered my calories. my diet is good and varied.i always meet the 1100 target on non exercise days and on exercise days i net 1200 possibly 1300 some days. so i am not always eating 1100. i have started at the maximum which was 1300 and worked down. i managed to lose 20lbs at 1200 and then it stalled after christmas. i didnt allow myself to fall off the wagon and kept pushing on and only lost 3lbs with a stomach virus last week in december. since then i havnt lost anything i was struggling before the stomach virus too so i probably would say i have not lost anything with diet and exercise since beginning of december.0
-
oh and i am pretty sedentary apart from t25 every day ... desk job kinda kills it0
-
I look at protein as a minimum. You need to eat at least 1200 calories.0
-
I wouldn't worry about a 2-3 week stall. It happens especially as we get closer to our goals. Just stick with it and you will start to lose again.0
-
I, too, look at protein as a minimum. I watch it and calories and everything else falls wherever it falls, though I am also never low on fat (and don't care if I'm over.)0
-
i think people really shouldnt be telling people their macros calories etc are too low when they dont know the details. but i appreciate the advice. i think i have been stalling for 7 weeks now and only lost when i had a tummy bug... couldnt keep anything down for 5 days then the weight loss stopped then i was on 1200 so i saw dr, he said 1100 absolute lowest and see how i get on.0
-
rachylouise87 wrote: »i think people really shouldnt be telling people their macros calories etc are too low when they dont know the details.
...then why are you looking for people to advise you on your macros?0 -
rachylouise87 wrote: »i think people really shouldnt be telling people their macros calories etc are too low when they dont know the details.
...then why are you looking for people to advise you on your macros?
Good question!0 -
rachylouise87 wrote: »i think people really shouldnt be telling people their macros calories etc are too low when they dont know the details.
...then why are you looking for people to advise you on your macros?
It was a dig at me - noone else. I'm backing out of this thread now!0 -
I'm 4'10" and even to me 1100 seems a bit low.
And if you have hit a plateau ... reducing calories is not the answer. Increasing activity is - no way to get around that one.
But onto OP orig question, personally I always would rather go over in protein than carbs and carbs over fats.
But it really just depends on what will work best for you.
Good luck!0 -
MFP's default protein setting is pretty much bare minimum for a sedentary person. I wouldn't worry at all about going over and in fact generally recommend more protein for people who are trying to lose weight in order to mitigate muscle loss. If you're active at all, you definitely need more.
Beyond that, people stress out way too much about macros...most people would be better served to just focus on hitting there calorie goals and stop obsessing about things that are ultimately not all that important outside of your fitness goals and potentially some body composition goals....people need to get their calories straight first and then worry about all that other *kitten* later...and really, trying to hit them bang on is a bit OCD IMO.0 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »MFP's default protein setting is pretty much bare minimum for a sedentary person. I wouldn't worry at all about going over and in fact generally recommend more protein for people who are trying to lose weight in order to mitigate muscle loss. If you're active at all, you definitely need more.
Beyond that, people stress out way too much about macros...most people would be better served to just focus on hitting there calorie goals and stop obsessing about things that are ultimately not all that important outside of your fitness goals and potentially some body composition goals....people need to get their calories straight first and then worry about all that other *kitten* later...and really, trying to hit them bang on is a bit OCD IMO.
thanks. i try to get close sometimes i am sometimes at 1100 sometimes 1200 and 1300 depends on my activity. lots of crazy nut jobs on here i see
0 -
rachylouise87 wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »MFP's default protein setting is pretty much bare minimum for a sedentary person. I wouldn't worry at all about going over and in fact generally recommend more protein for people who are trying to lose weight in order to mitigate muscle loss. If you're active at all, you definitely need more.
Beyond that, people stress out way too much about macros...most people would be better served to just focus on hitting there calorie goals and stop obsessing about things that are ultimately not all that important outside of your fitness goals and potentially some body composition goals....people need to get their calories straight first and then worry about all that other *kitten* later...and really, trying to hit them bang on is a bit OCD IMO.
thanks. i try to get close sometimes i am sometimes at 1100 sometimes 1200 and 1300 depends on my activity. lots of crazy nut jobs on here i see
what are your stats? Current weight, body composition goals (do you have any?), do you exercise regularly or just randomly, any medical conditions that would affect your ability to eat certain things/macros, body fat % if known, do you lift weights, etc.0 -
If you want a way to get over your plateau, you should try carb cycling. There are many levels and you can try to see what your body responds to best. http://chrispowell.com/carb-cycling-101/0
-
I focus on at least meeting the protein and fat macros, and letting the carbs fall where they may within my daily calorie intake - 40% protein 30% carb 30%fat0
-
rachylouise87 wrote: »i think people really shouldnt be telling people their macros calories etc are too low when they dont know the details.
...then why are you looking for people to advise you on your macros?
0 -
As others said, make sure that calorie goal isn't too low for you, make sure you're logging absolutely accurately with a food scale before you drop too low. However on the protein end of things, There's nothing wrong with going over on protein, protein is great for you. My macros are set to 35% protein which for me is about 150 grams. I set mine according to the macro calculator at IIFYM.com. You could always check out their calculation and see what your recommended macros are.0
-
rachylouise87 wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »MFP's default protein setting is pretty much bare minimum for a sedentary person. I wouldn't worry at all about going over and in fact generally recommend more protein for people who are trying to lose weight in order to mitigate muscle loss. If you're active at all, you definitely need more.
Beyond that, people stress out way too much about macros...most people would be better served to just focus on hitting there calorie goals and stop obsessing about things that are ultimately not all that important outside of your fitness goals and potentially some body composition goals....people need to get their calories straight first and then worry about all that other *kitten* later...and really, trying to hit them bang on is a bit OCD IMO.
thanks. i try to get close sometimes i am sometimes at 1100 sometimes 1200 and 1300 depends on my activity. lots of crazy nut jobs on here i see
what are your stats? Current weight, body composition goals (do you have any?), do you exercise regularly or just randomly, any medical conditions that would affect your ability to eat certain things/macros, body fat % if known, do you lift weights, etc.
thanks,
weight 155lbs
body fat 38%
t25 6 days a week no other exercise
sedentary job
no medical conditions but suspected hormone related PCOS drs refuse to test further due to it being on the slight side.
i dont lift much maybe once a week.
moods are better since weight loss, skin better, no memory fogs any more. the more protein the better i feel.
goal weight is 130lbs0 -
rachylouise87 wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »MFP's default protein setting is pretty much bare minimum for a sedentary person. I wouldn't worry at all about going over and in fact generally recommend more protein for people who are trying to lose weight in order to mitigate muscle loss. If you're active at all, you definitely need more.
Beyond that, people stress out way too much about macros...most people would be better served to just focus on hitting there calorie goals and stop obsessing about things that are ultimately not all that important outside of your fitness goals and potentially some body composition goals....people need to get their calories straight first and then worry about all that other *kitten* later...and really, trying to hit them bang on is a bit OCD IMO.
thanks. i try to get close sometimes i am sometimes at 1100 sometimes 1200 and 1300 depends on my activity. lots of crazy nut jobs on here i see
what are your stats? Current weight, body composition goals (do you have any?), do you exercise regularly or just randomly, any medical conditions that would affect your ability to eat certain things/macros, body fat % if known, do you lift weights, etc.
Yes, they are worth being aware of...but MFP is hilarious in it's obsession with hitting macros. Having a relatively balanced macro ratio and being in the general neighborhood of those goals is just fine for the vast majority.
The way people freak on their macros with MFP just cracks me up...like if they don't bang on 1 gram of protein per Lb of LBM they're going to wither away or something...it's hilarious.
Also OP, you're getting pretty good advise in RE to eating more....even 90 year old 4' noting women can lose weight eating more than you're eating. Nobody is really being nutty...my original comment was more in RE to why are you so worried about going over certain macros when it really doesn't have a whole lot of bearing here.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 430 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions