Count carbs or calories?

gregfrompenn
gregfrompenn Posts: 13 Member
edited November 11 in Health and Weight Loss
I weigh 219 pounds, I was thinking about counting only my carbs and reducing them to 200 grams per day, do you think this is a good weight loss plan?
«1

Replies

  • malibu927
    malibu927 Posts: 17,562 Member
    As long as you're in a calorie deficit, that's fine
  • kristen6350
    kristen6350 Posts: 1,094 Member
    Nope. Sorry. I eat (most of the time) less than 150g a day, but if I don't keep my calories under 1600, I'm not losing. It's all about calories in/calories out.

    You'll get mixed reviews, but even the people that do ketosis (where you keep your carbs at VERY low levels) still count calories.
  • Alyssa_Is_LosingIt
    Alyssa_Is_LosingIt Posts: 4,696 Member
    Counting carbs alone will not cause you to lose weight. You can eat 200 g of carbs a day and still very easily be in a calorie surplus. Count calories - it's easy and effective, and it gives you more flexibility in your diet.
  • tennisdude2004
    tennisdude2004 Posts: 5,609 Member
    Count calories - unless you are in a deficit it will not matter how many or how few carbs you eat, you will not lose weight.

    The only think you really need to keep an eye on, Macro nutrient wise, when counting calories is that you get adequate protein.

    Outside of that, in a calorie deficit, let the carbs and fat just match your taste buds.
  • SergeantSausage
    SergeantSausage Posts: 1,673 Member
    No.

    Carbs are irrelevant.

    Count calories instead.
  • Liftng4Lis
    Liftng4Lis Posts: 15,151 Member
    Calories.
  • PeachyCarol
    PeachyCarol Posts: 8,029 Member
    It won't matter if you cut your carbs to 20g a day. You could still eat so much fat and protein that you're eating too many calories.

    It's all about calories. You need to count them.

    I used to think that all you needed to do was count carbs because I read Atkins book and that's what his book makes you think. It's wrong. Calories count.
  • Calories but keep a watchful eye on the carbs
  • Sabine_Stroehm
    Sabine_Stroehm Posts: 19,263 Member
    I weigh 219 pounds, I was thinking about counting only my carbs and reducing them to 200 grams per day, do you think this is a good weight loss plan?

    I support low carb diets. However, I doubt 200 is low enough to really impact anything.
    If 200 seems low to you, I'd suggest calorie counting, or another approach.

    Why did you pick carbs, and why 200?
  • gregfrompenn
    gregfrompenn Posts: 13 Member
    edited February 2015
    I picked 200 because I was thinking 2000 calories per day, 40% of that equals 800 calories or 200 grams and I know carbs are my problem
  • Sabine_Stroehm
    Sabine_Stroehm Posts: 19,263 Member
    I picked 200 because I was thinking 2000 calories per day, 40% of that equals 800 calories or 200 grams and I know carbs are my problem
    Oh, I see.
    So you'd be counting calories too? If not, how would you know if you were at 40%?
  • juggernaut1974
    juggernaut1974 Posts: 6,212 Member
    Calories

    /thread
  • AdannaIkoli2015
    AdannaIkoli2015 Posts: 4 Member
    Calories is what really matters
  • elphie754
    elphie754 Posts: 7,574 Member
    I weigh 219 pounds, I was thinking about counting only my carbs and reducing them to 200 grams per day, do you think this is a good weight loss plan?

    This alone will not make you lose weight. To lose weight you have to be in a calorie deficit which restricting carbs may or may not give you.

    Track your total cals.
  • elphie754
    elphie754 Posts: 7,574 Member
    Calories but keep a watchful eye on the carbs

    Why?
  • yolo9752
    yolo9752 Posts: 69 Member
    Calories.
  • Hornsby
    Hornsby Posts: 10,322 Member
    No.

    Carbs are irrelevant.

    Count calories instead.


    Correct, and straight to the point.
  • nsoss
    nsoss Posts: 34 Member
    Carbs are not irrelevant.

    In order to lose weight efficiently, you need to efficiently burn fat. This is much easier to do with a low carb diet. This is a very simplified explanation, but with a moderate or high carb diet you're burning more sugar and less fat. How efficiently or inefficiently you burn sugar vs fat also varies greatly from person to person.

    You can still lose weight ignoring carb intake if your calorie deficit is enough, but it's harder.

    So calories and carbs both count.

    And 200 mg of carbs is far from a low level.
  • cerad2
    cerad2 Posts: 70 Member
    Assumptions
    1. Your weight is more or less stable with your current eating habits
    2. You currently consume more than 200 grams of carbs per day
    3. You don't replace your reduced carbs with high calorie food

    If the above assumptions are accurate then going to 200 carbs will put you in a calorie deficit which will (eventually) result in weight loss. It's not a bad way to get started as it allows you to ease into a new eating style without trying to "fix" everything in one shot. You will stall eventually since your body needs fewer calories as your weight drops.
  • cerad2
    cerad2 Posts: 70 Member
    G35GT wrote: »
    ceoverturf wrote: »
    Calories

    /thread

    I'm all for making simple things simple and not complicating them. Calories first.
    So counting calories is simpler than counting carbs? Seems like counting calories requires tracking all your foods while counting carbs can be limited to foods containing carbs.
  • LowCarbHeart
    LowCarbHeart Posts: 69 Member
    I found great success counting carbs, and I agree calories do count, I just never counted them. I aim for 20 - 25 Net Carbs a day and eat mostly low carb veggies, meat, eggs, cheese, and nuts. The one gripe I have with Atkins is that they don't make it clear that they're banking on the fact that foods like veggies, meat, butter etc are self-limiting foods. Meaning its really hard to overeat on chicken breasts and green beans. So what a lot of people don't realize is Atkins is a reduced calorie diet and that plays a major part in them losing weight. That and the fact that their body has switched to primarily burning stored fat for fuel, like nsoss said.

    So you can overeat on Atkins and that will stall your weight loss. My friend was eating 20 Net Carbs a day but also drinking a cup of heavy cream (heavy cream is limited to no more than 3T a day on Atkins). So she wasn't losing, too many calories in and not enough going out.

    I've even noticed with myself that the smaller I get the less calories I burn so I need to watch my portions and/or increase my exercise to keep losing. I still don't count my calories though ;)
  • segacs
    segacs Posts: 4,599 Member
    I could eat cheese all day and add very few carbs and still gain weight.

    Count calories.
  • cerad2
    cerad2 Posts: 70 Member
    segacs wrote: »
    I could eat cheese all day and add very few carbs and still gain weight.

    Count calories.
    Struggling to understand your post within the context of this thread. What leads you to believe that the original poster plans to eat a cheese only diet?
  • earlnabby
    earlnabby Posts: 8,171 Member
    cerad2 wrote: »
    segacs wrote: »
    I could eat cheese all day and add very few carbs and still gain weight.

    Count calories.
    Struggling to understand your post within the context of this thread. What leads you to believe that the original poster plans to eat a cheese only diet?

    It is called an "illustration" or an "example"

  • cwolfman13
    cwolfman13 Posts: 41,865 Member
    you can count all the carbs you want...but if you go over calories it won't matter. Your energy (calorie) consumption is the bottom line.
  • earlnabby
    earlnabby Posts: 8,171 Member
    I weigh 219 pounds, I was thinking about counting only my carbs and reducing them to 200 grams per day, do you think this is a good weight loss plan?

    Calories. Reducing your carbs to 40% of your total is not a bad balance but you also need to know how much of the other 60% is fat, and how much is protein so counting calories and staying within set macro limits is the best way to go.

  • cerad2
    cerad2 Posts: 70 Member
    edited February 2015
    earlnabby wrote: »
    cerad2 wrote: »
    segacs wrote: »
    I could eat cheese all day and add very few carbs and still gain weight.

    Count calories.
    Struggling to understand your post within the context of this thread. What leads you to believe that the original poster plans to eat a cheese only diet?

    It is called an "illustration" or an "example"
    An "illustration" or an "example" of what? This thread is concerned with the impact of a modest reduction of carbs. How does one get from that to some sort of extreme diet?
  • ladymiseryali
    ladymiseryali Posts: 2,555 Member
    Count both. I'm on a low carb diet. I try to keep my carbs under 30 and my calories 1500 or under. So definitely count both.
  • JPW1990
    JPW1990 Posts: 2,424 Member
    cerad2 wrote: »
    G35GT wrote: »
    ceoverturf wrote: »
    Calories

    /thread

    I'm all for making simple things simple and not complicating them. Calories first.
    So counting calories is simpler than counting carbs? Seems like counting calories requires tracking all your foods while counting carbs can be limited to foods containing carbs.

    You keep using the term "counting carbs" but I don't think you realize what that actually means. LCHF is more work than simple calorie counting, not less. If you want easy, count calories and eat whatever you want, just less than a set point. Not very efficient, but eventually, you'll get there. All the other options, LCHF/IF/LF/exercise, are what you do in addition to counting calories/reducing intake to make the process more healthy and/or efficient.
  • earlnabby
    earlnabby Posts: 8,171 Member
    cerad2 wrote: »
    earlnabby wrote: »
    cerad2 wrote: »
    segacs wrote: »
    I could eat cheese all day and add very few carbs and still gain weight.

    Count calories.
    Struggling to understand your post within the context of this thread. What leads you to believe that the original poster plans to eat a cheese only diet?

    It is called an "illustration" or an "example"
    An "illustration" or an "example" of what? This thread is concerned with the impact of a modest reduction or carbs. How does one get from that to some sort of extreme diet?

    a) cheese has few carbs
    b) eating too many calories causes you to gain weight
    c) Therefore eating lots of cheese (few carbs but lots of calories) will cause weight gain

    It is concentrating the gist of the (count calories, not carbs) theme of the answers into something obvious. is it too early in the morning for you, do you take everything literally, or are you being deliberately obtuse?

This discussion has been closed.