starvation mode might be a myth
Options
Replies
-
christinev297 wrote: »What does TL; DR mean?
And Selena, not having a go. But using paragraphs makes things so much easier to read and understand xx
Too long;didn't read. Abbreviated as TL;DR and then as "teal deer," usually with commonly found images of just that.
0 -
christinev297 wrote: »What does TL; DR mean?
And Selena, not having a go. But using paragraphs makes things so much easier to read and understand xx
TL;DR means too long; didn't read.
Thanks. I think I'll be using that abbreviation a lot on these boards
0 -
These days the "starvation mode" myth doesn't bug me so much as the mystical magical 1200 calories. It's as low as MFP will go, so it must be instantaneously lethal if we fall below it.
I have two female friends who are both small enough to function just fine on under a thousand calories. One's maintenance calorie level is something like 1100, yet every day I see threads that start with an OP saying some version of "I'm eating 1199 calories" and the first fifteen respondents going apoplectic and shouting the 1200 number.
No one would INSIST that they should only buy clothes made for people 5'5" or above, why the belief in the magical number 12000 -
FoCoAlphaNerd wrote: »No one would INSIST that they should only buy clothes made for people 5'5" or above, why the belief in the magical number 1200
Because there is nothing - NOTHING - that humans can't turn into a religious food fight.
0 -
FoCoAlphaNerd wrote: »No one would INSIST that they should only buy clothes made for people 5'5" or above, why the belief in the magical number 1200
Because there is nothing - NOTHING - that humans can't turn into a religious food fight.
haha, as far as options for holy wars go, I'd say "food fight" is far and away the best option.0 -
FoCoAlphaNerd wrote: »These days the "starvation mode" myth doesn't bug me so much as the mystical magical 1200 calories. It's as low as MFP will go, so it must be instantaneously lethal if we fall below it.
I have two female friends who are both small enough to function just fine on under a thousand calories. One's maintenance calorie level is something like 1100, yet every day I see threads that start with an OP saying some version of "I'm eating 1199 calories" and the first fifteen respondents going apoplectic and shouting the 1200 number.
No one would INSIST that they should only buy clothes made for people 5'5" or above, why the belief in the magical number 1200
The point is not to eat under your BMR, and 1200 is generally lower than most people's BMR. I have a difficult time believing that any adult maintains at 1100 calories. They could definitely be eating more than they realize.0 -
Selina_Kyle_60 wrote: »y is there so much confusion about weight lossSelina_Kyle_60 wrote: »y is there so much confusion about weight loss
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 392.1K Introduce Yourself
- 43.6K Getting Started
- 259.9K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.7K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.4K Fitness and Exercise
- 403 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.8K Motivation and Support
- 7.9K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.4K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 982 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.4K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions