Is burning 1000 Cals alot?
Options
Replies
-
Katerina9408 wrote: »
marathon of running....if u make it (and survive !!! ) u might burn that calemily_stew wrote: »Iron_Feline wrote: »Katerina9408 wrote: »Unless you're spending hours at the gym, it's doubtful you are burning that much. Machines can often-times over inflate calorie burn estimates.
But in general, 1000 calories is alot, and 2000 is beyond overkill. You're leaving yourself open to injury even trying to get that much.
Yes def 2000 is too,too much and 1000 cal maybe if u do 15 km marathon
*twitch*
What's a 15km marathon?
A marathon is 42km (26.2 miles)
You can do a 15km run.0 -
Katerina9408 wrote: »They make such thing here.But it is not for everyone.
No they don't. They do a 15km race.0 -
Katerina9408 wrote: »They make such thing here.But it is not for everyone.
A marathon is a set distance - 42.195km or 26 miles and 385 yards.
0 -
Iron_Feline wrote: »Katerina9408 wrote: »They make such thing here.But it is not for everyone.
No they don't. They do a 15km race.
ok race....whatever....The point still stands that u have to workout probably 3 h to burn that cal .0 -
Someone said to just take half the calories burned on those machines and use that. There's an elliptical machine that I first used when I first joined the gym. It wasn't a regular elliptical, but it's hard to describe it. But it had me sweating, heart pumping, said I lost close to 700 calories for a full hour, but what if that's not true? It sure felt I did.0
-
FashionQueen86 wrote: »Someone said to just take half the calories burned on those machines and use that. There's an elliptical machine that I first used when I first joined the gym. It wasn't a regular elliptical, but it's hard to describe it. But it had me sweating, heart pumping, said I lost close to 700 calories for a full hour, but what if that's not true? It sure felt I did.
It's not true. Sorry.0 -
Its possible to burn 1000 calories, but it requires a lot of time and effort imo either by duration or intensity. The more you weigh the easier it is. The OP never returned to the thread, but like everyone else I would be querying where she was taking the burns from, her weight, as well as the duration and intensity of what she was doing.
1000 calories is manageable over 2hrs, 2000 is just getting silly imo and youd need rest after.0 -
I got almost 1000 exercise calories yesterday but that took and hour of Zumba, 20 mins of intervals on a gym bike and around 3 miles of walking. How are you measuring it?0
-
I would be surprised if I burned 1000 calories exercising a week...and I go 5 days.0
-
Iron_Feline wrote: »FashionQueen86 wrote: »Someone said to just take half the calories burned on those machines and use that. There's an elliptical machine that I first used when I first joined the gym. It wasn't a regular elliptical, but it's hard to describe it. But it had me sweating, heart pumping, said I lost close to 700 calories for a full hour, but what if that's not true? It sure felt I did.
It's not true. Sorry.
That depends on the machine (some you have to input age, gender, weight, height etc, and some you just input weight) as some will be more accurate than others, and your weight. Also your level of intensity.
I've used a HRM at the gym and I actually burned more on the treadmill and elliptical than the machines said, but less on the stepper.
Not that I eat back exercise calories so it doesn't really matter.0 -
DawnieB1977 wrote: »Iron_Feline wrote: »FashionQueen86 wrote: »Someone said to just take half the calories burned on those machines and use that. There's an elliptical machine that I first used when I first joined the gym. It wasn't a regular elliptical, but it's hard to describe it. But it had me sweating, heart pumping, said I lost close to 700 calories for a full hour, but what if that's not true? It sure felt I did.
It's not true. Sorry.
That depends on the machine (some you have to input age, gender, weight, height etc, and some you just input weight) as some will be more accurate than others, and your weight. Also your level of intensity.
I've used a HRM at the gym and I actually burned more on the treadmill and elliptical than the machines said, but less on the stepper.
Not that I eat back exercise calories so it doesn't really matter.
It is very very unlikely that she burnt 700 calories on a machine at the gym in an hour. Esp an elliptical like machine that does some of the work for you.
So yeah. I'm sticking with my answer. 700 cals in an hour, no.
0 -
That depends on what your doing? For example I'm down 75LB and 11 inches and burn over 1100+ calories. This includes Cardio 30mins, funtional / strength / crossfit training. On a max day I burn 1500 calories0
-
DawnieB1977 wrote: »Iron_Feline wrote: »
It's not true. Sorry.
That depends on the machine (some you have to input age, gender, weight, height etc, and some you just input weight) as some will be more accurate than others, and your weight. Also your level of intensity.
I've used a HRM at the gym and I actually burned more on the treadmill and elliptical than the machines said, but less on the stepper.
Not that I eat back exercise calories so it doesn't really matter.
I also wear a HRM while working out and the treadmill is very accurate (if I input age, weight, gender and I don't cheat by holding on to the rails a lot lol). But the elliptical is waaaaay off most of the time, sometimes my actual burn is only 60% of what the elliptical says.
0 -
The best way to track performance is to use a strap heart monitor and fitness watch. I use the polar H7 heart monitor and Polar HT 80 fitness watch with iOS app to track real performance.0
-
When I'm exercising I burn in excess of 2000 calories quite often. That is according to MFP and other means of measuring. Not sure I really think they are all that accurate. Not that many in the gym though. If you want to burn that many calories you need to do endurance sports. Long distance running, long distance biking, triathlon and the like.0
-
FunbagsMcGee wrote: »DawnieB1977 wrote: »Iron_Feline wrote: »
It's not true. Sorry.
That depends on the machine (some you have to input age, gender, weight, height etc, and some you just input weight) as some will be more accurate than others, and your weight. Also your level of intensity.
I've used a HRM at the gym and I actually burned more on the treadmill and elliptical than the machines said, but less on the stepper.
Not that I eat back exercise calories so it doesn't really matter.
I also wear a HRM while working out and the treadmill is very accurate (if I input age, weight, gender and I don't cheat by holding on to the rails a lot lol). But the elliptical is waaaaay off most of the time, sometimes my actual burn is only 60% of what the elliptical says.
Like I said, it depends on the machine. I use a different gym sometimes and the machines are newer and the elliptical seems far easier, and so I burn less on that than I do at my gym.
I do think if you're on a machine for an hour you won't keep up the intensity so won't burn as much as if you did shorter bursts on different machines, or did HIIT.0 -
As an elite athlete it was normal for me to burn a few thousand calories during intensive spring training (with 3 workouts a day). But that was only ever 10 days at a time. You are really going to over stress your body and you will reach a point when your body just won't take it anymore. You need to go easier on yourself or you risk reaching a point where you cannot workout at all.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 392.1K Introduce Yourself
- 43.6K Getting Started
- 259.9K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.7K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.4K Fitness and Exercise
- 403 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.8K Motivation and Support
- 7.9K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.4K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 982 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.4K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions