I have 900+ calories left... do I need to eat them?

xstephnz
xstephnz Posts: 278 Member
edited November 14 in Health and Weight Loss
I'm not sure how many calories I burnt doing resistance.

Replies

  • Sued0nim
    Sued0nim Posts: 17,456 Member
    Resistance training log 1 calorie

    As long as you don't continually eat under your net amount ...or your weekly average is at your net calorie defecit goal..you should be fine
  • jennifershoo
    jennifershoo Posts: 3,198 Member
    If you're not hungry tonight, don't force yourself. You can catch up tomorrow and eat more! Lots of people have a weekly calorie goal instead of daily.
  • Lasmartchika
    Lasmartchika Posts: 3,440 Member
    You need to at least eat 1200, not less.
  • xstephnz
    xstephnz Posts: 278 Member
    You need to at least eat 1200, not less.

    Erm... I've eaten about 1400. I've had 3 meals plus snacks
  • blankiefinder
    blankiefinder Posts: 3,599 Member
    Steph, you need to eat at least 1200 calories per day. As rabbit said, don't log weights (or bodyweight exercises) for calories. Log cardio calories conservatively (50%) and eat those back.
  • This content has been removed.
  • Lasmartchika
    Lasmartchika Posts: 3,440 Member
    xstephnz wrote: »
    You need to at least eat 1200, not less.

    Erm... I've eaten about 1400. I've had 3 meals plus snacks

    Your diary says 1056. Log more accurately.
  • sheldonklein
    sheldonklein Posts: 854 Member
    xstephnz wrote: »
    You need to at least eat 1200, not less.

    Erm... I've eaten about 1400. I've had 3 meals plus snacks

    So your target is 2300 calories?
  • jennifershoo
    jennifershoo Posts: 3,198 Member
    If you're not hungry tonight, don't force yourself. You can catch up tomorrow and eat more! Lots of people have a weekly calorie goal instead of daily.

    I'm quoting myself, because This^
  • Cadori
    Cadori Posts: 4,810 Member
    edited March 2015
    xstephnz wrote: »
    You need to at least eat 1200, not less.

    Erm... I've eaten about 1400. I've had 3 meals plus snacks

    Your diary says 1056. Log more accurately.

    It's tomorrow there...check more accurately.
  • xstephnz
    xstephnz Posts: 278 Member
    MrM27 wrote: »
    Why only 30g of dietary fat?

    I don't know, I'm assuming that was the default?
  • bio_fit
    bio_fit Posts: 307 Member
    edited March 2015
    xstephnz wrote: »
    You need to at least eat 1200, not less.

    Erm... I've eaten about 1400. I've had 3 meals plus snacks

    Your diary says 1056. Log more accurately.

    Her diary is saying 1402 for me.

    I agree, one day is fine if you're not hungry, but don't make a habit of it! You might find yourself hungrier tomorrow from post-exercise recovery, so if you go over your calories tomorrow or later in the week it's not a big deal.

    Though personally, I'd take it as a great excuse to reward your exercise and keeping on track with a little bit of something you love - everybody needs to stay motivated :smile:
  • xstephnz
    xstephnz Posts: 278 Member
    Your diary says 1056. Log more accurately.

    That's strange, it is close to 1400 for me, and I'm about to increase it by having another bowl of pumpkin soup! :-D
  • xstephnz
    xstephnz Posts: 278 Member
    Cadori wrote: »
    It's tomorrow there...check more accurately.

    Thanks :)
  • bio_fit
    bio_fit Posts: 307 Member
    HOWEVER - I should also say, I just had a peek at your exercise diary - those sound like insanely overinflated calorie burns for the amount of time you exercise... please be cautious!
  • xstephnz
    xstephnz Posts: 278 Member
    bio_fit wrote: »
    I'd take it as a great excuse to reward your exercise and keeping on track with a little bit of something you love - everybody needs to stay motivated :smile:

    I suggested making some chocolate muffins from the healthy food guide (they are about 100 calories), and my mum who I live with, freaked out. :(
  • xstephnz
    xstephnz Posts: 278 Member
    bio_fit wrote: »
    HOWEVER - I should also say, I just had a peek at your exercise diary - those sound like insanely overinflated calorie burns for the amount of time you exercise... please be cautious!

    Well I am about 275lbs
  • flatlndr
    flatlndr Posts: 713 Member
    Looking at your exercise diary, the calories burned for the times listed look a bit high.

    For example, you note 182 cals for 10 mins on the elliptical.
    In comparison, per my heart rate monitor, I burned 538 cals across 40 mins, which works out to 134 per 10 mins.

    Likewise, when walking, at a 4 mph pace, I burn ~120 cals per mile per my HRM.
    You did 5 mins at 15min per km. That works out to 1/3 km or 1/5 mile. Per my metric, that should be ~25 cals, but you recorded 30 cals.

    Of course, weight and fitness level can affect these figures, but my feeling is that you are overestimating your calories burned.
  • xstephnz
    xstephnz Posts: 278 Member
    flatlndr wrote: »
    Looking at your exercise diary, the calories burned for the times listed look a bit high.

    For example, you note 182 cals for 10 mins on the elliptical.
    In comparison, per my heart rate monitor, I burned 538 cals across 40 mins, which works out to 134 per 10 mins.

    Likewise, when walking, at a 4 mph pace, I burn ~120 cals per mile per my HRM.
    You did 5 mins at 15min per km. That works out to 1/3 km or 1/5 mile. Per my metric, that should be ~25 cals, but you recorded 30 cals.

    Of course, weight and fitness level can affect these figures, but my feeling is that you are overestimating your calories burned.

    I didn't input those numbers, myfitnesspal did.
  • bio_fit
    bio_fit Posts: 307 Member
    xstephnz wrote: »

    I didn't input those numbers, myfitnesspal did.

    Don't worry, the app is notorious for overestimating calorie burns! But the important thing is to bear it in mind, and maybe assume that myfitnesspal is being over generous. Lots of people advocate only eating back half your calories. Others advocate the use of heart rate monitors to get a more accurate log. Personally, I put all my info into other online calculators, and use the lowest number! And it's normally a fair bit lower than MFP. Take a look here for example: http://caloriesburnedhq.com/calories-burned-on-elliptical/

  • flatlndr
    flatlndr Posts: 713 Member
    bio_fit wrote: »
    xstephnz wrote: »

    I didn't input those numbers, myfitnesspal did.

    Don't worry, the app is notorious for overestimating calorie burns! But the important thing is to bear it in mind, and maybe assume that myfitnesspal is being over generous. Lots of people advocate only eating back half your calories. Others advocate the use of heart rate monitors to get a more accurate log. Personally, I put all my info into other online calculators, and use the lowest number! And it's normally a fair bit lower than MFP. Take a look here for example: http://caloriesburnedhq.com/calories-burned-on-elliptical/

    ^^^ Agreed
  • xstephnz
    xstephnz Posts: 278 Member
    bio_fit wrote: »
    Don't worry, the app is notorious for overestimating calorie burns! But the important thing is to bear it in mind, and maybe assume that myfitnesspal is being over generous. Lots of people advocate only eating back half your calories. Others advocate the use of heart rate monitors to get a more accurate log. Personally, I put all my info into other online calculators, and use the lowest number! And it's normally a fair bit lower than MFP. Take a look here for example: http://caloriesburnedhq.com/calories-burned-on-elliptical/

    :)
  • bio_fit
    bio_fit Posts: 307 Member
    Sorry, I should have said " Lots of people advocate only eating back half your exercise calories" - i.e. those you have 'earned' on top of your normal calorie allowance!

    Best of luck! And keep asking questions, it's how we all learn from each other :)
  • blankiefinder
    blankiefinder Posts: 3,599 Member
    bio_fit wrote: »
    Sorry, I should have said " Lots of people advocate only eating back half your exercise calories" - i.e. those you have 'earned' on top of your normal calorie allowance!

    Best of luck! And keep asking questions, it's how we all learn from each other :)


    Great advice :)
  • fnoblebrown
    fnoblebrown Posts: 61 Member
    1402 is plenty for one day, especially if they are GOOD calories.
  • LKArgh
    LKArgh Posts: 5,178 Member
    If you are consistently way below (or above) your daily calories, there is a reason to closer examine your diary, goals etc. If it happens every now and then, it isnotthing to worry about.
    Like others have said, when estimating calories from cardio based on MFP, aim for eating about 50% back, because it tends to overestimate. If you follow ths pattern and you see you are losing too fast after a few weeks, then you can play around a bit and try eating them all back.
  • Sued0nim
    Sued0nim Posts: 17,456 Member
    xstephnz wrote: »
    flatlndr wrote: »
    Looking at your exercise diary, the calories burned for the times listed look a bit high.

    For example, you note 182 cals for 10 mins on the elliptical.
    In comparison, per my heart rate monitor, I burned 538 cals across 40 mins, which works out to 134 per 10 mins.

    Likewise, when walking, at a 4 mph pace, I burn ~120 cals per mile per my HRM.
    You did 5 mins at 15min per km. That works out to 1/3 km or 1/5 mile. Per my metric, that should be ~25 cals, but you recorded 30 cals.

    Of course, weight and fitness level can affect these figures, but my feeling is that you are overestimating your calories burned.

    I didn't input those numbers, myfitnesspal did.

    double click on the calorie amount and half it before submitting so you don't have to do any further calculations
  • Sydbert93
    Sydbert93 Posts: 11
    if you're not hungry theres no point forcing it down
  • This content has been removed.
  • determined_14
    determined_14 Posts: 258 Member
    MrM27 wrote: »
    1402 is plenty for one day, especially if they are GOOD calories.

    Which are much better than bad calories right?

    I think the previous poster only meant that it is possible to fill up well on 1400 calories if it's 1400 cals of nutrient-dense food. I can eat a ton of extra calories via ranch dressing or something, but I'll be quickly hungry. Some foods are more satiating than others, as you know-- I don't think it was meant to be a "food judgement." :)
This discussion has been closed.