We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

Do you change your activity level?

FatMoojor
FatMoojor Posts: 483 Member
edited November 2024 in Getting Started
My activity level is set as sedentary during the week because I so sit on my *kitten* most of the day. I have a 2 hour commute to work, 7 hours of sitting at a desk and another 2 hour commute home. So I think that counts pretty well for sedentary.

I have a 4 year old daughter and my weekends normally start around 5am when I get up and go for a long run and then I am pretty much running/chasing/hiding, until 7pm at night when it is time for her to have a stories and bed.

Do people think it's worth changing activity level for the weekends if they are so different from their normal week patterns?

Replies

  • myfatass78
    myfatass78 Posts: 411 Member
    No keep it as it is
  • Dave2041
    Dave2041 Posts: 257 Member
    Keep it as it is... I cycle 10 - 22 hours a week but still have it set to sedentary ~
  • FatMoojor
    FatMoojor Posts: 483 Member
    Dave2041 wrote: »
    Keep it as it is... I cycle 10 - 22 hours a week but still have it set to sedentary ~

    But you would then include those burned calories in your daily amounts?

  • MKEgal
    MKEgal Posts: 3,250 Member
    Leave it at sedentary.
    Exercise calories are a bonus toward weight loss anyway - don't eat them back. (At least, most of the time.)
  • FatMoojor
    FatMoojor Posts: 483 Member
    MKEgal wrote: »
    Leave it at sedentary.
    Exercise calories are a bonus toward weight loss anyway - don't eat them back. (At least, most of the time.)

    I would be on a nett of around 700 calories a day if I didn't eat back my exercise calories. 1600 target from MFP and normally burn around 900 odd on a run.
    Weekends I'm burning 1500 - 2500 calories. Would be so ill if I didn't eat those back.
This discussion has been closed.