Question regarding calories burned via MFP versus my ellipticall

lipss2die4

the calories burned shown on my ellipitiHELL differs somewhat from the calories burned on MFP when I plug in time and activity. For example , 60 mins on my elliptical registers must lower in calorie burned than when I plug in the same exact info to MFP. Both entries include my weight as well as time and activity! Please help! Anyone have an idea?!?

strong_curves

They're both estimates, if you want a better idea of how many cals you're burning you might need to invest in a HRM.

toughlove25

they are using different algorithms. MFP states that theirs is more accurate than the more commonly used one. I have to agree from experience using the calorie counter on the machine a fitness tracker and MFP.

lisab64mfp

Don't trust the machine or MFP for calorie burned numbers. I bust my butt on the elliptical and my Garmin (HRM) says I only burn about (good day) 60% of what MFP or the elliptical says.

3dogsrunning

John854 wrote: »

they are using different algorithms. MFP states that theirs is more accurate than the more commonly used one. I have to agree from experience using the calorie counter on the machine a fitness tracker and MFP.

I would argue it depends on the entry.
For something that accounts for intensity, like the walking at specific speed entries, yes. But the elliptical entry is very general and does not account for speed or resistance level. I have always found it to be extremely high. But I hate the ellipitcal and never used a high resistance. I was getting calorie burns higher than a run and was putting out nowhere near the same effort.

A really great blog or two on the topic

http://www.myfitnesspal.com/blog/Azdak/view/exercise-calories-sometimes-the-cardio-machines-are-more-accurate-404739
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/blog/Azdak/view/estimating-calories-activity-databases-198041

ETA - regardless of source, I always go with the lower estimate

Ready2Rock206

Both estimates - log the lower number.

Mr_Knight

I would log half of the lower number, track for a while and see if your weight loss is as expected. If you start losing too fast, you'll know your burn number is too low.

lipss2die4

Thanks everyone! Maybe I will look into a HRM, I never knew about them since I started MFP

3dogsrunning

@lipss2die4 - before buying one, have a read
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/blog/Azdak/view/the-real-facts-about-hrms-and-calories-what-you-need-to-know-before-purchasing-an-hrm-or-using-one-21472

Mr_Knight

lipss2die4 wrote: »

Thanks everyone! Maybe I will look into a HRM, I never knew about them since I started MFP

Don't believe the hype. HRMs are one of the most problem-inducing purchases MFPers make. They cause more problems with their burn over-estimates than just about anything else here, other than bad logging.

lipss2die4

Thanks! I just find this app, although I like it because I log all good in, when it comes to exercise calorie burn it's not very accurate...