Based on my personal stats – why super rapid weight loss would be nearly impossible

Angel_Grove_
Angel_Grove_ Posts: 205 Member
edited November 17 in Health and Weight Loss

So, I keep seeing posts pop up with questions about how to lose X number of pounds in X number of days/months. Usually the number of pounds is high, the number of days/months is low, and OP is trying to meet a pretty much unattainable goal. If you’ve been here on the forums for a while, you’ve read the general figures over and over:

1 lb = 3500 calories
Maximum safe rate of loss = 1-2lb/week
Minimum safe calories/day for a woman = 1200
Minimum safe calories/day for a man = 1500

Aside from the (pretty close to) fact that losing weight too fast usually means that you won’t maintain that weight loss and will possibly even gain back more than you lost to begin with (because nobody looking for a quick fix is going to believe that anyway), I thought I would post up my stats as a fairly average, moderately overweight, 30 year old woman, and what the various CICO methods will do for me in terms of rate of loss to illustrate that even a 2lb/week loss is a bit much.

So, here goes. If you want to see the spreadsheet/calculations that brought me to these conclusions, feel free to look HERE: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1Mu6rDkPKOySXpBRlQ5VXFoalU/view?usp=sharing

My Current Stats (imperial units – lbs, inches, etc):
Weight: 175.6
Height: 68
Waist (at naval): 35
Hips: 42.5
Wrist: 6.8
Forearm: 11
Lean Body Weight: 128.4
Body Fat Percentage: 26.9% (http://www.livestrong.com/article/90931-measure-body-fat-percentages-calipers/)
BMI: 26.7

My current goal weight is 155, mostly because that is 40 lbs from where I started in January, and is pretty much the lowest I can ever remember being since high school. I may adjust once I get closer, but for now, let’s say I have 20 lbs left to lose. That will put me at a BMI of about 23.5, but hopefully a lower BFP, as I’m incorporating strength training as well. Just using MFP at the fastest possible setting that it allows, this will take me a little over 13 weeks/3 months. That’s if I get back on that track. I’ve lost my first 20 pounds in about 4 months so far.

Here’s what my MFP set-up looks like at 1200 calories:

Based on MFP
TDEE (sedentary): 1960
Minimum net calories: 1200
Minimum deficit: 760
Max lb/week loss: 1.5
Average calories burned/day (last 30 days): 652
Average daily calorie allowance to lose 1.5 lb/wk (last 30 days): 1852
Average daily calorie allowance maintain (last 30 days): 2612

If I use a TDEE-X% method instead, and don’t eat back exercise calories (since they're already figured in), I have the following options. Notice that, in order to lose even 2 lbs/week, I would have to consume under 1200 calories without exercising or less than 1500 calories exercising 3-5 hours or 5 times/week. I can’t even imagine doing the workouts I do on that few calories. I just wouldn’t make it. I could probably eat under 1200/day if I just sat in front of the TV all day – that is if I didn’t fall prey to boredom snacking.

Based on Scooby's Workshop http://scoobysworkshop.com/fat-loss-plateau-calculator/

BMR 1590
TDEE (sedentary) 1909
TDEE (3-5 hours moderate exercise) 2465

TDEE (sedentary-20%) 1527
Deficit (sedentary-20%) 382
Loss Rate lb/wk (sedentary-20%) 0.8
TDEE (sedentary-30%) 1336
Deficit (sedentary-30%) 573
Loss Rate lb/wk (sedentary-30%) 1.1
TDEE (sedentary-40%) 1145
Deficit (sedentary-40%) 764
Loss Rate lb/wk (sedentary-40%) 1.5

TDEE (exercise-20%) 1972
Deficit (exercise-20%) 493
Loss Rate lb/wk (exercise-20%) 1.0
TDEE (exercise-30%) 1726
Deficit (exercise-30%) 740
Loss Rate lb/wk (exercise-30%) 1.5
TDEE (exercise-40%) 1479
Deficit (exercise-40%) 986
Loss Rate lb/wk (exercise-40%) 2.0

Based on Katch-McCardle http://iifym.com/tdee-calculator/

BMR 1624
TDEE (sedentary) 1949
TDEE (exercise 5x/week) 2375

TDEE (sedentary-20%) 1559.2
Deficit (sedentary-20%) 389.8
Loss Rate lb/wk (sedentary-20%) 0.8
TDEE (sedentary-30%) 1364
Deficit (sedentary-30%) 585
Loss Rate lb/wk (sedentary-30%) 1.2
TDEE (sedentary-40%) 1169
Deficit (sedentary-40%) 780
Loss Rate lb/wk (sedentary-40%) 1.6

TDEE (exercise-20%) 1900
Deficit (exercise-20%) 475
Loss Rate lb/wk (exercise-20%) 1.0
TDEE (exercise-30%) 1663
Deficit (exercise-30%) 713
Loss Rate lb/wk (exercise-30%) 1.4
TDEE (exercise-40%) 1425
Deficit (exercise-40%) 950
Loss Rate lb/wk (exercise-40%) 1.9

Based on Harris-Benedict http://iifym.com/tdee-calculator/

BMR 1595
TDEE (sedentary) 1914
TDEE (exercise 5x/week) 2333

TDEE (sedentary-20%) 1531.2
Deficit (sedentary-20%) 382.8
Loss Rate lb/wk (sedentary-20%) 0.8
TDEE (sedentary-30%) 1340
Deficit (sedentary-30%) 574
Loss Rate lb/wk (sedentary-30%) 1.1
TDEE (sedentary-40%) 1148
Deficit (sedentary-40%) 766
Loss Rate lb/wk (sedentary-40%) 1.5

TDEE (exercise-20%) 1866
Deficit (exercise-20%) 466.6
Loss Rate lb/wk (exercise-20%) 0.9
TDEE (exercise-30%) 1633
Deficit (exercise-30%) 700
Loss Rate lb/wk (exercise-30%) 1.4
TDEE (exercise-40%) 1400
Deficit (exercise-40%) 933
Loss Rate lb/wk (exercise-40%) 1.8664

Based on Mifflin-St Jeor http://iifym.com/tdee-calculator/

BMR 1564
TDEE (sedentary) 1877
TDEE (exercise 5x/week) 2287

TDEE (sedentary-20%) 1501.6
Deficit (sedentary-20%) 375.4
Loss Rate lb/wk (sedentary-20%) 0.8
TDEE (sedentary-30%) 1314
Deficit (sedentary-30%) 563
Loss Rate lb/wk (sedentary-30%) 1.1
TDEE (sedentary-40%) 1126
Deficit (sedentary-40%) 751
Loss Rate lb/wk (sedentary-40%) 1.5

TDEE (exercise-20%) 1830
Deficit (exercise-20%) 457.4
Loss Rate lb/wk (exercise-20%) 0.9
TDEE (exercise-30%) 1601
Deficit (exercise-30%) 686
Loss Rate lb/wk (exercise-30%) 1.4
TDEE (exercise-40%) 1372
Deficit (exercise-40%) 915
Loss Rate lb/wk (exercise-40%) 1.8296


If I wanted to lose this last 20 lbs in just a month (4.3 weeks), I would have to bump up my loss to 4.7 lbs/week. That would be a daily calorie deficit of 2326, which is 46 calories more than I’d even be eating in a day following the most conservative plan above.

Solely following MFP, if I continued exercising at the same rate I have been, I would only be able to eat 286 calories each day. Not likely that I would be able to keep up the same amount of exercise.

If I wanted to increase my exercise to allow me to eat at the minimum level of 1200 calories, I would have to burn at least 1567 calories through exercise each day. That’s 915 calories or 140% more than my average. Now, keep in mind, I already exercise 3-5 hours each week, which is 35-60 minutes, 5 days/week. To increase that much, assuming I was able to keep the same intensity, I would have to add an EXTRA 49-84 minutes 5 days a week, for a total of 84-144 minutes 5 days/week. At first glance, it looks doable. But, remember, I’d only be eating 1200 calories. It’s not likely I would be able to maintain my current level of exercise, let alone increase it 140%.

If I wanted to keep eating the same amount I’m allotted by MFP right now, I would have to burn an average of 2247 calories/day through exercise. That’s 245% more than my current average. Also, it’s 119% more than I would actually be CONSUMING each day. Assuming I could somehow manage to continue the current intensity of my workouts, I would have to work out 120-207 minutes, 5 times per week. That’s 2-3.5 hours! Even if I decided to split it between all 7 days, it would be 86-148 minutes EVERY day.

Beyond how HARD it would be to lose weight so quickly, doing so as an average person with a small weight loss goal outside of professional medical advice is just plain dangerous. If you go the eating less route, you risk malnourishment. If you go the extreme amounts of exercise route, you risk injury, both from increased exercise volume as well as lack of coordination due to exhaustion (since you aren't fueling your body enough to support all that exercise). Plus, rapid weight loss leads to hanging skin which probably won't fit into your beach body goals.

Bottom line, be the turtle, not the hare. And check out this post for specific advice on how to actually go about it:

http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/1080242/a-guide-to-get-you-started-on-your-path-to-sexypants#latest
«1

Replies

  • trigden1991
    trigden1991 Posts: 4,658 Member
    *Did not read
  • Sued0nim
    Sued0nim Posts: 17,456 Member
    TLDR

    but yes slow weight loss helps you protect LBM and ease into maintenance
  • Chewitz
    Chewitz Posts: 217 Member
    :):):):):)
  • TimothyFish
    TimothyFish Posts: 4,925 Member
    *Did not read
    Me neither. But higher amounts of weight loss are possible for some people. The reason 1-2lbs is recommended is because that is safe for pretty much everyone. Obese people might need to lose weight quickly, but quickly has higher risks and may require a doctor's care to be able to do it safely.
  • Chrysalid2014
    Chrysalid2014 Posts: 1,038 Member
    edited May 2015
    So, I keep seeing posts pop up with questions about how to lose X number of pounds in X number of days/months. Usually the number of pounds is high, the number of days/months is low, and OP is trying to meet a pretty much unattainable goal. If you’ve been here on the forums for a while, you’ve read the general figures over and over:

    1 lb = 3500 calories
    Maximum safe rate of loss = 1-2lb/week
    Minimum safe calories/day for a woman = 1200
    Minimum safe calories/day for a man = 1500

    The actual recommended maximum safe rate of weight loss for active adults who aren't under medical supervision is 1.5% of bodyweight per week. So yes, a person with a starting weight of 66lb :smile: shouldn't aim to lose any more than 1b per week. And a person with a starting weight of 134lb shouldn't aim to lose more than 2lb per week.

    As @TimothyFish pointed out, the 1-2lb per week and 1200/1500 calorie numbers are oft quoted because they're safe (and achievable) for virtually anyone.

    People on medical diets "safely" lose a lot more and heavier people supervising their own diets can safely lose a lot more.
  • Sued0nim
    Sued0nim Posts: 17,456 Member
    So, I keep seeing posts pop up with questions about how to lose X number of pounds in X number of days/months. Usually the number of pounds is high, the number of days/months is low, and OP is trying to meet a pretty much unattainable goal. If you’ve been here on the forums for a while, you’ve read the general figures over and over:

    1 lb = 3500 calories
    Maximum safe rate of loss = 1-2lb/week
    Minimum safe calories/day for a woman = 1200
    Minimum safe calories/day for a man = 1500

    The actual recommended maximum safe rate of weight loss for active adults who aren't under medical supervision is 1.5% of bodyweight per week. So yes, a person with a starting weight of 66lb :smile: shouldn't aim to lose any more than 1b per week. And a person with a starting weight of 134lb shouldn't aim to lose more than 2lb per week.

    As @TimothyFish pointed out, the 1-2lb per week and 1200/1500 calorie numbers are oft quoted because they're safe (and achievable) for virtually anyone.

    People on medical diets "safely" lose a lot more and heavier people supervising their own diets can safely lose a lot more.

    Please source this statement
  • Sued0nim
    Sued0nim Posts: 17,456 Member
    edited May 2015
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7847427

    this study for obese patients

    "CONCLUSION:
    Risk of gallstone formation in obese persons during active weight loss seems to increase in an exponential fashion. The data suggest that rates of weight loss should not exceed an average of 1.5 kg per week"

    so that's 3.3lbs a week for an obese person

    admittedly this is just gallstones, I'm at work so don't have time to find the studies regarding unneccessary loss of LBM when rate of weight loss is increased
  • Chrysalid2014
    Chrysalid2014 Posts: 1,038 Member
    rabbitjb wrote: »
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7847427

    this study for obese patients

    "CONCLUSION:
    Risk of gallstone formation in obese persons during active weight loss seems to increase in an exponential fashion. The data suggest that rates of weight loss should not exceed an average of 1.5 kg per week"

    so that's 3.3lbs a week for an obese person

    admittedly this is just gallstones, I'm at work so don't have time to find the studies regarding unneccessary loss of LBM when rate of weight loss is increased

    That would make sense; if your starting weight was 220lbs then 3.3lbs would be 1.5%.
  • kickassbarbie
    kickassbarbie Posts: 286 Member
    Okay tbh I skipped over some of the mathy bits and lists but I agree with the gist of this post. Too many healthy weight people on here are expecting to lose 2lbs per week when it's just too hard to achieve without taking drastic and unhealthy measures.


    Slow and steady is both healthier and easier if you don't have much too lose and makes maintenance easier in the future.
  • Chrysalid2014
    Chrysalid2014 Posts: 1,038 Member

    rabbitjb wrote: »

    The actual recommended maximum safe rate of weight loss for active adults who aren't under medical supervision is 1.5% of bodyweight per week. So yes, a person with a starting weight of 66lb :smile: shouldn't aim to lose any more than 1b per week. And a person with a starting weight of 134lb shouldn't aim to lose more than 2lb per week.

    Please source this statement

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3419563/
  • Chrysalid2014
    Chrysalid2014 Posts: 1,038 Member
    edited May 2015
    [duplicate deleted]
  • kpodaru
    kpodaru Posts: 133 Member
    that's a long read and frankly, too much information!

    personally, i think that calculating this or that, analyzing things/numbers constantly, weighing things all the time just zaps the enjoyment out of living healthy and is what makes people stop all together because it's just way too much work all the time. making exercise part of a daily routine is hard enough for some and to throw in all this homework every day all the time? way too much and confusing for a lot of people.

    yes it's important to watch what you eat, have some goals for yourself and exercise regularly but when it gets down to what was posted above, even i get bored just looking at all that information and i'm an fitness freak. i prefer to use this tool as a reference/guide but i also listen to my body; i know what works for me and what doesn't. calculating or analyzing numbers/info won't make you lose weight - it's putting your fitness plan in action and sustaining that long-term will. i lost all my weight and hit all of my fitness/weight goals without all of that because i listened to my body, cut out all the junk from my diet and exercised regularly and i enjoy this healthy living.

    apologies of this seems a bit ranty but fitness doesn't have to be this complicated. eat well, move daily, BE PATIENT, learn to see this as a lifestyle change and you will see results.
  • Sued0nim
    Sued0nim Posts: 17,456 Member
    edited May 2015
    rabbitjb wrote: »
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7847427

    this study for obese patients

    "CONCLUSION:
    Risk of gallstone formation in obese persons during active weight loss seems to increase in an exponential fashion. The data suggest that rates of weight loss should not exceed an average of 1.5 kg per week"

    so that's 3.3lbs a week for an obese person

    admittedly this is just gallstones, I'm at work so don't have time to find the studies regarding unneccessary loss of LBM when rate of weight loss is increased

    That would make sense; if your starting weight was 220lbs then 3.3lbs would be 1.5%.

    yes and if your starting weight was 400lbs then 3.3lbs = 0.8% at 300 = 1.1%

    which reinforces my current issue with a straight-forward percentage rate of bodyweight
    rabbitjb wrote: »

    The actual recommended maximum safe rate of weight loss for active adults who aren't under medical supervision is 1.5% of bodyweight per week. So yes, a person with a starting weight of 66lb :smile: shouldn't aim to lose any more than 1b per week. And a person with a starting weight of 134lb shouldn't aim to lose more than 2lb per week.

    Please source this statement

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3419563/

    Sorry, that's a study on athletes and I don't see the flat 1.5% recommendation .. am I missing it?

    I see "Active clients and athletes in weight classification sports should not gain or lose excessive amounts of body weight at any point in their training cycles"
  • Zedeff
    Zedeff Posts: 651 Member
    Lots of your post OP is based on assumptions without evidence. If you drink the local Kool aid, you'll acquire local tastes - ie, if you believe the local assumptions you'll "prove" the local expectations.

    There isn't much evidence to support your statements that there are minimum safe calorie goals (1200/1500), that a loss of 1-2 lbs per week is a maximum for everyone, or that rapid losses lead to regaining weight.
  • Chrysalid2014
    Chrysalid2014 Posts: 1,038 Member
    edited May 2015
    rabbitjb wrote: »
    rabbitjb wrote: »
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7847427

    this study for obese patients

    "CONCLUSION:
    Risk of gallstone formation in obese persons during active weight loss seems to increase in an exponential fashion. The data suggest that rates of weight loss should not exceed an average of 1.5 kg per week"

    so that's 3.3lbs a week for an obese person

    admittedly this is just gallstones, I'm at work so don't have time to find the studies regarding unneccessary loss of LBM when rate of weight loss is increased

    That would make sense; if your starting weight was 220lbs then 3.3lbs would be 1.5%.

    yes and if your starting weight was 400lbs then 3.3lbs = 0.8% at 300 = 1.1%

    see the issue with a straight-forward percentage rate of bodyweight

    It doesn't make sense to me that the recommended 'safe' weight loss would be the same number for a 400 pound person and a 200 pound person. A bodyweight percentage calculation seems a lot more logical. It's all academic I suppose; I just feel sad for those people on MFP who panic when they think they're losing weight "too fast" because they lost 2.5 pounds in a particular week and then other people start advising them to eat more.
    rabbitjb wrote: »

    The actual recommended maximum safe rate of weight loss for active adults who aren't under medical supervision is 1.5% of bodyweight per week. So yes, a person with a starting weight of 66lb :smile: shouldn't aim to lose any more than 1b per week. And a person with a starting weight of 134lb shouldn't aim to lose more than 2lb per week.

    Please source this statement

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3419563/

    Sorry, that's a study on athletes [/quote]

    It's a compilation of recommendations for PTs working with athletes and "active clients":
    To present athletic trainers with recommendations for safe weight loss and weight maintenance practices for athletes and active clients

  • nosebag1212
    nosebag1212 Posts: 621 Member
    I've always done 1000 cal deficits all the way to 10% bf, never had any problems
  • Chrysalid2014
    Chrysalid2014 Posts: 1,038 Member
    Zedeff wrote: »
    Lots of your post OP is based on assumptions without evidence. If you drink the local Kool aid, you'll acquire local tastes - ie, if you believe the local assumptions you'll "prove" the local expectations.

    There isn't much evidence to support your statements that there are minimum safe calorie goals (1200/1500), that a loss of 1-2 lbs per week is a maximum for everyone, or that rapid losses lead to regaining weight.

    The local 'flavour' appears to be that only a very, very conservative approach is permitted. MFP doesn't wanna get sued, is why!

    As we know motivation and adherence are the two main problems with weight loss programs; some people get motivated by faster results and can adhere to a stricter regime for a shorter amount of time.
  • Chrysalid2014
    Chrysalid2014 Posts: 1,038 Member
    I've always done 1000 cal deficits all the way to 10% bf, never had any problems

    Well done! What was your daily calorie allotment at the beginning and end of the process, if you don't mind my asking?

  • Chrysalid2014
    Chrysalid2014 Posts: 1,038 Member
    rabbitjb wrote: »
    rabbitjb wrote: »
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7847427

    this study for obese patients

    "CONCLUSION:
    Risk of gallstone formation in obese persons during active weight loss seems to increase in an exponential fashion. The data suggest that rates of weight loss should not exceed an average of 1.5 kg per week"

    so that's 3.3lbs a week for an obese person

    admittedly this is just gallstones, I'm at work so don't have time to find the studies regarding unneccessary loss of LBM when rate of weight loss is increased

    That would make sense; if your starting weight was 220lbs then 3.3lbs would be 1.5%.

    yes and if your starting weight was 400lbs then 3.3lbs = 0.8% at 300 = 1.1%

    which reinforces my current issue with a straight-forward percentage rate of bodyweight
    rabbitjb wrote: »

    The actual recommended maximum safe rate of weight loss for active adults who aren't under medical supervision is 1.5% of bodyweight per week. So yes, a person with a starting weight of 66lb :smile: shouldn't aim to lose any more than 1b per week. And a person with a starting weight of 134lb shouldn't aim to lose more than 2lb per week.

    Please source this statement

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3419563/

    Sorry, that's a study on athletes and I don't see the flat 1.5% recommendation .. am I missing it?

    I see "Active clients and athletes in weight classification sports should not gain or lose excessive amounts of body weight at any point in their training cycles"

    Yeah, it's rather wordy. Relevant section is paragraph 8 under the heading Maintaining Body Composition and Weight with Diet and Exercise
    Body composition adjustments should be gradual, with no excessive restrictions or unsafe behaviors or products. On average, weight loss goals should be approximately 1 to 2 lb (0.5 to 0.9 kg) per week but should not exceed 1.5% of body weight loss per week.1,122 A higher rate of weight loss indicates dehydration or other restrictive or unsafe behaviors that will negatively affect performance and health.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    Unfortunately the people who would learn from this won't read it. You might want to figure out a short form for those threads, though. What I find instructive is:
    My Current Stats (imperial units – lbs, inches, etc):
    Weight: 175.6
    Height: 68
    Lean Body Weight: 128.4
    Body Fat Percentage: 26.9% (http://www.livestrong.com/article/90931-measure-body-fat-percentages-calipers/)

    and
    My current goal weight is 155, mostly because that is 40 lbs from where I started in January, and is pretty much the lowest I can ever remember being since high school. I may adjust once I get closer, but for now, let’s say I have 20 lbs left to lose.
    Here’s what my MFP set-up looks like at 1200 calories:

    Based on MFP
    TDEE (sedentary): 1960
    Minimum net calories: 1200
    Minimum deficit: 760
    Max lb/week loss: 1.5
    Average calories burned/day (last 30 days): 652
    Average daily calorie allowance to lose 1.5 lb/wk (last 30 days): 1852
    Average daily calorie allowance maintain (last 30 days): 2612

    and
    If I wanted to lose this last 20 lbs in just a month (4.3 weeks), I would have to bump up my loss to 4.7 lbs/week. That would be a daily calorie deficit of 2326....

    Solely following MFP, if I continued exercising at the same rate I have been, I would only be able to eat 286 calories each day. Not likely that I would be able to keep up the same amount of exercise.

    If I wanted to increase my exercise to allow me to eat at the minimum level of 1200 calories, I would have to burn at least 1567 calories through exercise each day. That’s 915 calories or 140% more than my average. Now, keep in mind, I already exercise 3-5 hours each week, which is 35-60 minutes, 5 days/week. To increase that much, assuming I was able to keep the same intensity, I would have to add an EXTRA 49-84 minutes 5 days a week, for a total of 84-144 minutes 5 days/week. At first glance, it looks doable. But, remember, I’d only be eating 1200 calories.

    That's all compelling to me.

    But to get through to one of those posters you'd have to use their own numbers, and usually they seem to say anyway "so I'll exercise off that many calories and eat some small amount, it's doable."

    So I dunno.

    Nice effort, though!
  • JustSomeEm
    JustSomeEm Posts: 20,269 MFP Moderator
    OP, I DID read, and I think you make several fantastic points. :flowerforyou:
  • WinoGelato
    WinoGelato Posts: 13,454 Member
    OP while I agree with your general sentiment, the average "I need to lose 'unrealistically high' pounds in 'unrealistically low' weeks poster is impatient and therefore unlikely to read/follow your lengthy post with all the numbers and different formulas.

    To those saying that those with more weight to lose can safely lose at a higher rate, that may be true, but those people are usually not the ones posting with the super short time frames on MFP, they should be doing it with doctor supervision, and therefore hopefully have appropriate tactics they are already utilizing.

    I think the type of person this OP is referring to is the one looking to lose weight for an "event", ie wedding, vacation, etc.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    I've always done 1000 cal deficits all the way to 10% bf, never had any problems

    How much do you weigh? I'm assuming you are a guy, and 1000 off is a different percentage for someone with a high maintenance already.

    At my current weight my sedentary maintenance is 1550 or so and my active maintenance is about 2100 (and I'm quite active). I don't think I could eat 1100 at this level of activity (and wouldn't want to), and even if I could increase activity (cardio, really) to bump it up some or cut my intake so much, no likelihood I'd be losing fat more than muscle.

    I lost more muscle than I like just doing 1-1.5 lbs while in the higher part of the healthy range, so for someone of my size it doesn't seem a good way to reduce body fat.
  • Hollywood_Porky
    Hollywood_Porky Posts: 491 Member
    So, I keep seeing posts pop up with questions about how to lose X number of pounds in X number of days/months. Usually the number of pounds is high, the number of days/months is low, and OP is trying to meet a pretty much unattainable goal. If you’ve been here on the forums for a while, you’ve read the general figures over and over:

    1 lb = 3500 calories
    Maximum safe rate of loss = 1-2lb/week
    Minimum safe calories/day for a woman = 1200
    Minimum safe calories/day for a man = 1500

    Aside from the (pretty close to) fact that losing weight too fast usually means that you won’t maintain that weight loss and will possibly even gain back more than you lost to begin with (because nobody looking for a quick fix is going to believe that anyway), I thought I would post up my stats as a fairly average, moderately overweight, 30 year old woman, and what the various CICO methods will do for me in terms of rate of loss to illustrate that even a 2lb/week loss is a bit much.

    So, here goes. If you want to see the spreadsheet/calculations that brought me to these conclusions, feel free to look HERE: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1Mu6rDkPKOySXpBRlQ5VXFoalU/view?usp=sharing

    My Current Stats (imperial units – lbs, inches, etc):
    Weight: 175.6
    Height: 68
    Waist (at naval): 35
    Hips: 42.5
    Wrist: 6.8
    Forearm: 11
    Lean Body Weight: 128.4
    Body Fat Percentage: 26.9% (http://www.livestrong.com/article/90931-measure-body-fat-percentages-calipers/)
    BMI: 26.7

    My current goal weight is 155, mostly because that is 40 lbs from where I started in January, and is pretty much the lowest I can ever remember being since high school. I may adjust once I get closer, but for now, let’s say I have 20 lbs left to lose. That will put me at a BMI of about 23.5, but hopefully a lower BFP, as I’m incorporating strength training as well. Just using MFP at the fastest possible setting that it allows, this will take me a little over 13 weeks/3 months. That’s if I get back on that track. I’ve lost my first 20 pounds in about 4 months so far.

    Here’s what my MFP set-up looks like at 1200 calories:

    Based on MFP
    TDEE (sedentary): 1960
    Minimum net calories: 1200
    Minimum deficit: 760
    Max lb/week loss: 1.5
    Average calories burned/day (last 30 days): 652
    Average daily calorie allowance to lose 1.5 lb/wk (last 30 days): 1852
    Average daily calorie allowance maintain (last 30 days): 2612

    If I use a TDEE-X% method instead, and don’t eat back exercise calories (since they're already figured in), I have the following options. Notice that, in order to lose even 2 lbs/week, I would have to consume under 1200 calories without exercising or less than 1500 calories exercising 3-5 hours or 5 times/week. I can’t even imagine doing the workouts I do on that few calories. I just wouldn’t make it. I could probably eat under 1200/day if I just sat in front of the TV all day – that is if I didn’t fall prey to boredom snacking.

    Based on Scooby's Workshop http://scoobysworkshop.com/fat-loss-plateau-calculator/

    BMR 1590
    TDEE (sedentary) 1909
    TDEE (3-5 hours moderate exercise) 2465

    TDEE (sedentary-20%) 1527
    Deficit (sedentary-20%) 382
    Loss Rate lb/wk (sedentary-20%) 0.8
    TDEE (sedentary-30%) 1336
    Deficit (sedentary-30%) 573
    Loss Rate lb/wk (sedentary-30%) 1.1
    TDEE (sedentary-40%) 1145
    Deficit (sedentary-40%) 764
    Loss Rate lb/wk (sedentary-40%) 1.5

    TDEE (exercise-20%) 1972
    Deficit (exercise-20%) 493
    Loss Rate lb/wk (exercise-20%) 1.0
    TDEE (exercise-30%) 1726
    Deficit (exercise-30%) 740
    Loss Rate lb/wk (exercise-30%) 1.5
    TDEE (exercise-40%) 1479
    Deficit (exercise-40%) 986
    Loss Rate lb/wk (exercise-40%) 2.0

    Based on Katch-McCardle http://iifym.com/tdee-calculator/

    BMR 1624
    TDEE (sedentary) 1949
    TDEE (exercise 5x/week) 2375

    TDEE (sedentary-20%) 1559.2
    Deficit (sedentary-20%) 389.8
    Loss Rate lb/wk (sedentary-20%) 0.8
    TDEE (sedentary-30%) 1364
    Deficit (sedentary-30%) 585
    Loss Rate lb/wk (sedentary-30%) 1.2
    TDEE (sedentary-40%) 1169
    Deficit (sedentary-40%) 780
    Loss Rate lb/wk (sedentary-40%) 1.6

    TDEE (exercise-20%) 1900
    Deficit (exercise-20%) 475
    Loss Rate lb/wk (exercise-20%) 1.0
    TDEE (exercise-30%) 1663
    Deficit (exercise-30%) 713
    Loss Rate lb/wk (exercise-30%) 1.4
    TDEE (exercise-40%) 1425
    Deficit (exercise-40%) 950
    Loss Rate lb/wk (exercise-40%) 1.9

    Based on Harris-Benedict http://iifym.com/tdee-calculator/

    BMR 1595
    TDEE (sedentary) 1914
    TDEE (exercise 5x/week) 2333

    TDEE (sedentary-20%) 1531.2
    Deficit (sedentary-20%) 382.8
    Loss Rate lb/wk (sedentary-20%) 0.8
    TDEE (sedentary-30%) 1340
    Deficit (sedentary-30%) 574
    Loss Rate lb/wk (sedentary-30%) 1.1
    TDEE (sedentary-40%) 1148
    Deficit (sedentary-40%) 766
    Loss Rate lb/wk (sedentary-40%) 1.5

    TDEE (exercise-20%) 1866
    Deficit (exercise-20%) 466.6
    Loss Rate lb/wk (exercise-20%) 0.9
    TDEE (exercise-30%) 1633
    Deficit (exercise-30%) 700
    Loss Rate lb/wk (exercise-30%) 1.4
    TDEE (exercise-40%) 1400
    Deficit (exercise-40%) 933
    Loss Rate lb/wk (exercise-40%) 1.8664

    Based on Mifflin-St Jeor http://iifym.com/tdee-calculator/

    BMR 1564
    TDEE (sedentary) 1877
    TDEE (exercise 5x/week) 2287

    TDEE (sedentary-20%) 1501.6
    Deficit (sedentary-20%) 375.4
    Loss Rate lb/wk (sedentary-20%) 0.8
    TDEE (sedentary-30%) 1314
    Deficit (sedentary-30%) 563
    Loss Rate lb/wk (sedentary-30%) 1.1
    TDEE (sedentary-40%) 1126
    Deficit (sedentary-40%) 751
    Loss Rate lb/wk (sedentary-40%) 1.5

    TDEE (exercise-20%) 1830
    Deficit (exercise-20%) 457.4
    Loss Rate lb/wk (exercise-20%) 0.9
    TDEE (exercise-30%) 1601
    Deficit (exercise-30%) 686
    Loss Rate lb/wk (exercise-30%) 1.4
    TDEE (exercise-40%) 1372
    Deficit (exercise-40%) 915
    Loss Rate lb/wk (exercise-40%) 1.8296


    If I wanted to lose this last 20 lbs in just a month (4.3 weeks), I would have to bump up my loss to 4.7 lbs/week. That would be a daily calorie deficit of 2326, which is 46 calories more than I’d even be eating in a day following the most conservative plan above.

    Solely following MFP, if I continued exercising at the same rate I have been, I would only be able to eat 286 calories each day. Not likely that I would be able to keep up the same amount of exercise.

    If I wanted to increase my exercise to allow me to eat at the minimum level of 1200 calories, I would have to burn at least 1567 calories through exercise each day. That’s 915 calories or 140% more than my average. Now, keep in mind, I already exercise 3-5 hours each week, which is 35-60 minutes, 5 days/week. To increase that much, assuming I was able to keep the same intensity, I would have to add an EXTRA 49-84 minutes 5 days a week, for a total of 84-144 minutes 5 days/week. At first glance, it looks doable. But, remember, I’d only be eating 1200 calories. It’s not likely I would be able to maintain my current level of exercise, let alone increase it 140%.

    If I wanted to keep eating the same amount I’m allotted by MFP right now, I would have to burn an average of 2247 calories/day through exercise. That’s 245% more than my current average. Also, it’s 119% more than I would actually be CONSUMING each day. Assuming I could somehow manage to continue the current intensity of my workouts, I would have to work out 120-207 minutes, 5 times per week. That’s 2-3.5 hours! Even if I decided to split it between all 7 days, it would be 86-148 minutes EVERY day.

    Beyond how HARD it would be to lose weight so quickly, doing so as an average person with a small weight loss goal outside of professional medical advice is just plain dangerous. If you go the eating less route, you risk malnourishment. If you go the extreme amounts of exercise route, you risk injury, both from increased exercise volume as well as lack of coordination due to exhaustion (since you aren't fueling your body enough to support all that exercise). Plus, rapid weight loss leads to hanging skin which probably won't fit into your beach body goals.

    Bottom line, be the turtle, not the hare. And check out this post for specific advice on how to actually go about it:

    http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/1080242/a-guide-to-get-you-started-on-your-path-to-sexypants#latest

    Great post. I saved all the links - great discovery on how MFP doesn't derive the right calorie goal versus the others. I agree - there's no way I could've lost 55# myself using MFP's method. I ate more than what MFP stated I should be eating.

    Sounds like UA needs to get MFP's caloric calculators in line with TDEE.

    Ran the PBF based upon waist measurement - it corresponded to what in-body, hydrostat, and caliper method did - caliper was the lowest - but all within 3%.

    TY for this most informative post.
  • stevencloser
    stevencloser Posts: 8,911 Member
    rabbitjb wrote: »
    rabbitjb wrote: »
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7847427

    this study for obese patients

    "CONCLUSION:
    Risk of gallstone formation in obese persons during active weight loss seems to increase in an exponential fashion. The data suggest that rates of weight loss should not exceed an average of 1.5 kg per week"

    so that's 3.3lbs a week for an obese person

    admittedly this is just gallstones, I'm at work so don't have time to find the studies regarding unneccessary loss of LBM when rate of weight loss is increased

    That would make sense; if your starting weight was 220lbs then 3.3lbs would be 1.5%.

    yes and if your starting weight was 400lbs then 3.3lbs = 0.8% at 300 = 1.1%

    which reinforces my current issue with a straight-forward percentage rate of bodyweight
    rabbitjb wrote: »

    The actual recommended maximum safe rate of weight loss for active adults who aren't under medical supervision is 1.5% of bodyweight per week. So yes, a person with a starting weight of 66lb :smile: shouldn't aim to lose any more than 1b per week. And a person with a starting weight of 134lb shouldn't aim to lose more than 2lb per week.

    Please source this statement

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3419563/

    Sorry, that's a study on athletes and I don't see the flat 1.5% recommendation .. am I missing it?

    I see "Active clients and athletes in weight classification sports should not gain or lose excessive amounts of body weight at any point in their training cycles"

    I found it. It says that it should not exceed 1.5%, right after saying 1-2 pounds per week is recommended.
  • stevencloser
    stevencloser Posts: 8,911 Member
    rabbitjb wrote: »
    rabbitjb wrote: »
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7847427

    this study for obese patients

    "CONCLUSION:
    Risk of gallstone formation in obese persons during active weight loss seems to increase in an exponential fashion. The data suggest that rates of weight loss should not exceed an average of 1.5 kg per week"

    so that's 3.3lbs a week for an obese person

    admittedly this is just gallstones, I'm at work so don't have time to find the studies regarding unneccessary loss of LBM when rate of weight loss is increased

    That would make sense; if your starting weight was 220lbs then 3.3lbs would be 1.5%.

    yes and if your starting weight was 400lbs then 3.3lbs = 0.8% at 300 = 1.1%

    see the issue with a straight-forward percentage rate of bodyweight

    It doesn't make sense to me that the recommended 'safe' weight loss would be the same number for a 400 pound person and a 200 pound person. A bodyweight percentage calculation seems a lot more logical. It's all academic I suppose; I just feel sad for those people on MFP who panic when they think they're losing weight "too fast" because they lost 2.5 pounds in a particular week and then other people start advising them to eat more.
    rabbitjb wrote: »

    The actual recommended maximum safe rate of weight loss for active adults who aren't under medical supervision is 1.5% of bodyweight per week. So yes, a person with a starting weight of 66lb :smile: shouldn't aim to lose any more than 1b per week. And a person with a starting weight of 134lb shouldn't aim to lose more than 2lb per week.

    Please source this statement

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3419563/

    Sorry, that's a study on athletes

    It's a compilation of recommendations for PTs working with athletes and "active clients":
    To present athletic trainers with recommendations for safe weight loss and weight maintenance practices for athletes and active clients

    [/quote]
    A percentage based on total weight without taking bodyfat% into consideration doesn't make sense either.
  • 999tigger
    999tigger Posts: 5,235 Member
    I gave up on the post.
    Some of the reasoning in the last section is just bonkers and contrived.
  • stevencloser
    stevencloser Posts: 8,911 Member
    rabbitjb wrote: »
    rabbitjb wrote: »
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7847427

    this study for obese patients

    "CONCLUSION:
    Risk of gallstone formation in obese persons during active weight loss seems to increase in an exponential fashion. The data suggest that rates of weight loss should not exceed an average of 1.5 kg per week"

    so that's 3.3lbs a week for an obese person

    admittedly this is just gallstones, I'm at work so don't have time to find the studies regarding unneccessary loss of LBM when rate of weight loss is increased

    That would make sense; if your starting weight was 220lbs then 3.3lbs would be 1.5%.

    yes and if your starting weight was 400lbs then 3.3lbs = 0.8% at 300 = 1.1%

    which reinforces my current issue with a straight-forward percentage rate of bodyweight
    rabbitjb wrote: »

    The actual recommended maximum safe rate of weight loss for active adults who aren't under medical supervision is 1.5% of bodyweight per week. So yes, a person with a starting weight of 66lb :smile: shouldn't aim to lose any more than 1b per week. And a person with a starting weight of 134lb shouldn't aim to lose more than 2lb per week.

    Please source this statement

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3419563/

    Sorry, that's a study on athletes and I don't see the flat 1.5% recommendation .. am I missing it?

    I see "Active clients and athletes in weight classification sports should not gain or lose excessive amounts of body weight at any point in their training cycles"

    Yeah, it's rather wordy. Relevant section is paragraph 8 under the heading Maintaining Body Composition and Weight with Diet and Exercise
    Body composition adjustments should be gradual, with no excessive restrictions or unsafe behaviors or products. On average, weight loss goals should be approximately 1 to 2 lb (0.5 to 0.9 kg) per week but should not exceed 1.5% of body weight loss per week.1,122 A higher rate of weight loss indicates dehydration or other restrictive or unsafe behaviors that will negatively affect performance and health.

    By the way, your source got the 1.5% from another source and that source doesn't explain WHY it's 1.5% either.
  • Angel_Grove_
    Angel_Grove_ Posts: 205 Member
    Thanks for the comments everyone.
  • SLLRunner
    SLLRunner Posts: 12,942 Member
    rabbitjb wrote: »
    TLDR

    but yes slow weight loss helps you protect LBM and ease into maintenance

    This.

    Slow and easy is a sustainable journey.
This discussion has been closed.