We are pleased to announce that on March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor will be introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the upcoming changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

NROL vs STRONGLIFTS 5x5

SquatNSparkle
SquatNSparkle Posts: 477 Member
edited November 2024 in Fitness and Exercise
Ok I just finished round 1 of NROL for women. I am toying with switching to Stronglifts 5x5. For those of you who know both programs, what do you see as pros and cons of each in comparison to one another? I don't mind NROL, just want to do what is most efficient and effective. Just a little background: I have been working out faithfully for 3 1/2 years, have done kettlebells, kickboxing, and just started yoga once per week recently. My goals include being able to do chin-ups/pull-ups (never been able to do one in my entire life unassisted), getting a nice round strong booty, and just being overall strong and toned yet still feminine. I don't have time for attitude and put downs, just want honest candid respectful opinions. Thanks all!

Replies

  • lishie_rebooted
    lishie_rebooted Posts: 2,973 Member
    I liked Stage 1 of NROLFW but looking ahead, it got too complicated for my liking.
    I was already making substitutions in stage 1 since my gym didn't have everything available. Plus I was criss crossing the gym a lot. Drove me nuts.

    I switched gyms and programs to SL.
    I enjoyed the simplicity of it.
    I currently follow ICF 5x5 which is a bastardized version of SL with iso work, which I enjoy more.
  • hypotrochoid
    hypotrochoid Posts: 842 Member
    NROLFW got too complicated for my tastes (finished stage 1 and 2) so I switched to strong lifts, which I loved except for rows. I then switched to Starting Strength since it has cleans instead of rows and am now perfectly happy.
  • quiksylver296
    quiksylver296 Posts: 28,439 Member
    NROLFW got too complicated for my tastes (finished stage 1 and 2) so I switched to strong lifts, which I loved except for rows. I then switched to Starting Strength since it has cleans instead of rows and am now perfectly happy.

    Really?!? I may switch from SL 5X5, too!
  • Sweet_Heresy
    Sweet_Heresy Posts: 411 Member
    NROLFW got too complicated for my tastes (finished stage 1 and 2) so I switched to strong lifts, which I loved except for rows. I then switched to Starting Strength since it has cleans instead of rows and am now perfectly happy.

    Really?!? I may switch from SL 5X5, too!

    That's the main reason I chose SS over SL...cause rows are boring and I hated them. Cleans are awesome.

    I read NROL and the program seems needlessly complicated. I never tried it, but I liked the simplicity of SS/SL and continually adding weight to the bar got me motivated to get into the gym and break PR's.

    Overall I guess NROL is better if you want variety though. They're all great programs and its just a matter of which one you like enough to stick with.
  • DawnEmbers
    DawnEmbers Posts: 2,451 Member
    I started with SL in part because it was simpler (I also didn't have NROLFW book at that time) and it had less things I had no idea how to do. I hadn't lifted in years, so it was a good starting point for me and I enjoyed the progression. I have been doing NROLFW after getting comfortable with lifting and in order to get out of my comfort zone a bit more. I like some of the lifts that I never would have thought about if I hadn't given it a try but a few I definitely won't be sad about not seeing again. I'm at the end of stage 4 and it doest jump around a bit though a few of the stages are the same as each other, just different rep ranges. But I do feel like I'm wandering around the gym for equipment some of the time. Then again, I also don't follow the program exact. I quit doing some of the stuff (crunches on the swiss ball for example) and I often do a few other lifts as well cause I wasn't going to go months without flat bench barbell bench press.

    I'm planning after stage 7 (skipping stage 6) to go to something more like SL but with accessories. I haven't decided if I'll give ICF a try or something else but I'm sure I'll find something.
  • Wuggums
    Wuggums Posts: 339 Member
    I completed the entire NROLFW program but I wasn't thrilled with all of the accessory work. After looking for something a bit more "basic" I ended up with SL and I really enjoy it. I like the big basic lifts, and I like the app they have for my phone to track workouts, weights, reps, history, etc. I don't mind the rows, but I'm curious about cleans - the few times I've tried them, they seem to really be a weakness for me. I may try SS just to check it out...
  • SquatNSparkle
    SquatNSparkle Posts: 477 Member
    This is all great info ladies! Thank you so much! I need to take two weeks off starting Monday for some medical work (ugh) so I will do some research on SL and SS. What is ICF 5X5?
  • arditarose
    arditarose Posts: 15,573 Member
    I read through both. I would not be interested in actually doing NROL. Especially in a deficit. Too much farting around-jack knifing on exercise balls and crap. No time for that. I would chose 5x5. Though if you're in maintenance or surplus, maybe ICF which someone mentioned-just because I believe it has added assistance/hypertrophy work.
  • hypotrochoid
    hypotrochoid Posts: 842 Member
    edited May 2015
    ICF 5x5 is Ice Cream Fitness 5x5. A lot more accessory work. I passed on it because it uses cable lifts and I'm limited to what I can do with the power rack in my garage. A good program if you have access to cables, though.
This discussion has been closed.