Welcome to Fun and Games! Many of the discussions in this category are games based on responding to the most recent comment. Please take a moment to refresh the page and make sure you are replying to the most recent comment to keep the game going!

Can you keep it going asking ONLY QUESTIONS?

1…12721273127512771278…3453

Replies

  • J383
    J383 Posts: 4,574 Member
    Can I agree with u?
  • OneHundredToLose
    OneHundredToLose Posts: 8,523 Member
    Por que no los dos?
  • slimgirljo15
    slimgirljo15 Posts: 269,456 Member
    fjellrev wrote: »
    slimgirljo15 wrote: »
    What should his costume look like for his part?..what would a giggler be dressed like?

    Do you think Mike would go for hot pink gauchos and a sparkly tube top?

    Do you see him as clearly in that as I do? I also envisioned a pink tutu ..leotards and ballet slippers would look good too..don't you think?
  • fjellrev
    fjellrev Posts: 5,078 Member
    edited March 2016
    Should we therefore vote YARRR for Rob being the Diddler?
  • OneHundredToLose
    OneHundredToLose Posts: 8,523 Member
    Doesn't that sound fitting?
  • slimgirljo15
    slimgirljo15 Posts: 269,456 Member
    What costume befits the diddler?
  • 47Jacqueline
    47Jacqueline Posts: 6,993 Member
    How about a jester's costume?
  • fjellrev
    fjellrev Posts: 5,078 Member
    slimgirljo15 wrote: »

    Do you see him as clearly in that as I do? I also envisioned a pink tutu ..leotards and ballet slippers would look good too..don't you think?

    Isn't it great that I was actually going to suggest a tutu and ballet slippers too?
  • fjellrev
    fjellrev Posts: 5,078 Member
    OneHundredToLose wrote: »
    Por que no los dos?

    Would you rather simultaneously diddle and tickle, or are we settling on strict diddling now?
  • OneHundredToLose
    OneHundredToLose Posts: 8,523 Member
    fjellrev wrote: »
    OneHundredToLose wrote: »
    Por que no los dos?

    Would you rather simultaneously diddle and tickle, or are we settling on strict diddling now?

    If you diddle and tickle simultaneously, doesn't that increase your chances of tittlating the diddlee? Were half of those even words?
  • 47Jacqueline
    47Jacqueline Posts: 6,993 Member
    Why is my forum feed showing that I commented in threads I've never been to?
  • fjellrev
    fjellrev Posts: 5,078 Member
    OneHundredToLose wrote: »

    If you diddle and tickle simultaneously, doesn't that increase your chances of tittlating the diddlee? Were half of those even words?

    Perhaps some empirical research would be needed in order to more accurately determine the correlation between simultaneous diddling and tickling, and "tittlating the diddlee"?
  • J383
    J383 Posts: 4,574 Member
    Who else uses your profile?
  • OneHundredToLose
    OneHundredToLose Posts: 8,523 Member
    fjellrev wrote: »
    OneHundredToLose wrote: »

    If you diddle and tickle simultaneously, doesn't that increase your chances of tittlating the diddlee? Were half of those even words?

    Perhaps some empirical research would be needed in order to more accurately determine the correlation between simultaneous diddling and tickling, and "tittlating the diddlee"?

    Shouldn't research in this field be encouraged, especially where peer review is concerned?
  • fjellrev
    fjellrev Posts: 5,078 Member
    OneHundredToLose wrote: »
    Shouldn't research in this field be encouraged, especially where peer review is concerned?

    Seeing that triangulation of data is academically/scientifically sound, wouldn't it be a surprise if it were discouraged?
  • OneHundredToLose
    OneHundredToLose Posts: 8,523 Member
    fjellrev wrote: »
    OneHundredToLose wrote: »
    Shouldn't research in this field be encouraged, especially where peer review is concerned?

    Seeing that triangulation of data is academically/scientifically sound, wouldn't it be a surprise if it were discouraged?

    Isn't it usually discouraged when the data triangulation is overlayed with heatmap research and found to correlate with areas of biology heretofore avoided for the sake of sensibility?
  • fjellrev
    fjellrev Posts: 5,078 Member
    OneHundredToLose wrote: »
    Isn't it usually discouraged when the data triangulation is overlayed with heatmap research and found to correlate with areas of biology heretofore avoided for the sake of sensibility?

    Wouldn't that depend on the research group since research methodologies may widely vary, even within a single discipline?
  • OneHundredToLose
    OneHundredToLose Posts: 8,523 Member
    fjellrev wrote: »
    OneHundredToLose wrote: »
    Isn't it usually discouraged when the data triangulation is overlayed with heatmap research and found to correlate with areas of biology heretofore avoided for the sake of sensibility?

    Wouldn't that depend on the research group since research methodologies may widely vary, even within a single discipline?

    So are you trying to say that the methodology employed by the performer of the research is what ultimately determines the outcome of the research? Doesn't that defeat the purpose of the scientific method? Or does it even matter, as long as the research is enjoyable?
  • fjellrev
    fjellrev Posts: 5,078 Member
    OneHundredToLose wrote: »

    So are you trying to say that the methodology employed by the performer of the research is what ultimately determines the outcome of the research? Doesn't that defeat the purpose of the scientific method? Or does it even matter, as long as the research is enjoyable?

    Don't you know that researchers are known to fudge data in order to make their research results look more interesting and streamlined?
  • OneHundredToLose
    OneHundredToLose Posts: 8,523 Member
    fjellrev wrote: »
    OneHundredToLose wrote: »

    So are you trying to say that the methodology employed by the performer of the research is what ultimately determines the outcome of the research? Doesn't that defeat the purpose of the scientific method? Or does it even matter, as long as the research is enjoyable?

    Don't you know that researchers are known to fudge data in order to make their research results look more interesting and streamlined?

    So then isn't it important for third parties to perform the same research over and over, in order to ensure that a non-biased perspective on the data is gleaned?
  • slimgirljo15
    slimgirljo15 Posts: 269,456 Member
    Did you two scare everyone away? :D

    How was your day?
  • OneHundredToLose
    OneHundredToLose Posts: 8,523 Member
    Do people get scared away by decent grammar? :tongue:
  • fjellrev
    fjellrev Posts: 5,078 Member
    OneHundredToLose wrote: »

    So then isn't it important for third parties to perform the same research over and over, in order to ensure that a non-biased perspective on the data is gleaned?

    Most definitely, but despite that, isn't it sad that there will nevertheless ultimately be some level of bias, contradictions, or holes in the methodologies and findings?
  • fjellrev
    fjellrev Posts: 5,078 Member
    slimgirljo15 wrote: »
    Did you two scare everyone away? :D

    How was your day?

    Was my day as epic as yours? How will we ever know?
  • slimgirljo15
    slimgirljo15 Posts: 269,456 Member
    OneHundredToLose wrote: »
    Do people get scared away by decent grammar? :tongue:

    Lol..I hardly think the grammar...do you know this reminds me of when I wrote a research paper on Genetic Modification?...was very dry ..but I needed to read it to my family so I could hear how it sounded..but as soon as I cornered someone they would run for the hills..
  • fjellrev
    fjellrev Posts: 5,078 Member
    slimgirljo15 wrote: »
    Lol..I hardly think the grammar...do you know this reminds me of when I wrote a research paper on Genetic Modification?...was very dry ..but I needed to read it to my family so I could hear how it sounded..but as soon as I cornered someone they would run for the hills..

    How could that possibly be dry seeing that genetics is such a fascinating field?
  • OneHundredToLose
    OneHundredToLose Posts: 8,523 Member
    Isn't biology more interesting, since it's essential for genetics? Or is that a chicken before the egg kind of thing?
  • fjellrev
    fjellrev Posts: 5,078 Member
    Can't it all be equally interesting?
  • slimgirljo15
    slimgirljo15 Posts: 269,456 Member
    fjellrev wrote: »
    slimgirljo15 wrote: »
    Lol..I hardly think the grammar...do you know this reminds me of when I wrote a research paper on Genetic Modification?...was very dry ..but I needed to read it to my family so I could hear how it sounded..but as soon as I cornered someone they would run for the hills..

    How could that possibly be dry seeing that genetics is such a fascinating field?

    Right??? I thought so too..possibly dry scientific terms not so interesting to a lay person :D
  • OneHundredToLose
    OneHundredToLose Posts: 8,523 Member
    Don't scientific terms make the right people more wet than dry??

Categories