best books about nutrition and weight loss/fitness?
Options
Replies
-
[Yes, CICO will certainly do the job if you are just interested in numbers on a scale, but eating to be healthy is a little more involved.
[/quote]
Yes I know that.0 -
BILLBRYTAN wrote: »
Yes, CICO will certainly do the job if you are just interested in numbers on a scale, but eating to be healthy is a little more involved.BILLBRYTAN wrote: »
. CICO. Fitness - just find something you like to do and you will stick to it.
Eating healthy doesn't mean remove sugar from your diet. That's absurd.0 -
BILLBRYTAN wrote: »The OP deserves to know what is healthy, not just how to reduce numbers.
And what your suggesting as healthy has no scientific basis, just garbage thrown around by the fad diet community.
0 -
Not too long ago I listened to the book Mindless Eating. I thought it was really interesting. They do all of these experiments on people to see when/why/how people overeat. There are some helpful strategies in there too about reducing your calories by just a little a day.
I haven't read this one, but it's on my list...The Ultimate Volumetrics Diet. I'm not really looking for a diet book either, but I've heard this one has some good info.
Lots of threads here at MFP too. You could read for a lifetime!0 -
BILLBRYTAN wrote: »
Try: wellnessresources.com This is an excerpt: Toxins Pose a Major Challenge to Weight LossUltimateRBF wrote: »BILLBRYTAN wrote: »
Some misconceptions die hard. For 75 years we were told to avoid saturated fats which now are widely known to be healthy. Unsaturated fats, particularly solvent refined oils, have been linked to all the diseases which formerly were blamed on saturated fats and cholesterol. Your body cannot eliminate many of these toxic substances so it encases them in fat and stores them in order to protect you. All this still happens whether or not you are in a caloric deficit.123user456 wrote: »BILLBRYTAN wrote: »
This is the best advice I have read today, thank you. It is good to see someone who is more interested in health than numbers on a scale. Even if you are under your calorie allowance, the body will store the food as fat if it is food it cannot use. The trick is to make sure everything you eat is something useful to your body, not YUMMY GARBAGE.bobby19666 wrote: »All you need to do is cut out sugar and simple carbs. That way your insulin drops and your body burns fat. You can even eat fat butter meat. Just cut processed foods
If you are under your calorie allowance, what is left to store as fat?
Do you have any sources for these claims you like to make? Where do you get this information from? And don't tell me to google it.
A variety of reasons toxins pose a major challenge to weight loss. A person who has too many toxins to process will make new fat cells and store those toxins along with fat in them. This is first a form of self-defense against being poisoned, and second, a strategy to get toxins out of the circulation and away from major organs. This means that some people will not be able to lose any weight at all, regardless of how little they eat, until the acute nature of their plumbing problems are addressed.
ahhhh very reliable a selling site...buy our stuff
throws directly her education over board and goes for it....
kidding of course
*************************
You get fat because of excess calories! You make new fat cells ( the simple and short explanation here) when you eat to much calories and your body want to store those
simple!
0 -
BILLBRYTAN wrote: »galgenstrick wrote: »BILLBRYTAN wrote: »
And what your suggesting as healthy has no scientific basis, just garbage thrown around by the fad diet community.galgenstrick wrote: »
The OP deserves to know what is healthy, not just how to reduce numbers.BILLBRYTAN wrote: »
And what your suggesting as healthy has no scientific basis, just garbage thrown around by the fad diet community.
Yes, the fad diet I proclaim is to cut out processed, refined and denatured chemicals which are laughingly called food because they are yummy.
so sugar is a processed, refined and denatured chemical now?0 -
galgenstrick wrote: »BILLBRYTAN wrote: »galgenstrick wrote: »BILLBRYTAN wrote: »
And what your suggesting as healthy has no scientific basis, just garbage thrown around by the fad diet community.galgenstrick wrote: »
The OP deserves to know what is healthy, not just how to reduce numbers.BILLBRYTAN wrote: »
And what your suggesting as healthy has no scientific basis, just garbage thrown around by the fad diet community.
Yes, the fad diet I proclaim is to cut out processed, refined and denatured chemicals which are laughingly called food because they are yummy.
so sugar is a processed, refined and denatured chemical now?
it upgraded i see.
0 -
The OP deserves to know what is healthy, not just how to reduce numbers.BILLBRYTAN wrote: »
[/quote]
ummmmm yes....you just need to go away now..0 -
BILLBRYTAN wrote: »
The fad diet I proclaim is to eliminate refined, processed and denatured chemical poisons which are laughingly called food because they are yummy.galgenstrick wrote: »BILLBRYTAN wrote: »The OP deserves to know what is healthy, not just how to reduce numbers.
And what your suggesting as healthy has no scientific basis, just garbage thrown around by the fad diet community.
Sugar is a poison now too?!?0 -
BILLBRYTAN wrote: »
When separated from nutrients, yes.galgenstrick wrote: »BILLBRYTAN wrote: »galgenstrick wrote: »BILLBRYTAN wrote: »
And what your suggesting as healthy has no scientific basis, just garbage thrown around by the fad diet community.galgenstrick wrote: »
The OP deserves to know what is healthy, not just how to reduce numbers.BILLBRYTAN wrote: »
And what your suggesting as healthy has no scientific basis, just garbage thrown around by the fad diet community.
Yes, the fad diet I proclaim is to cut out processed, refined and denatured chemicals which are laughingly called food because they are yummy.
so sugar is a processed, refined and denatured chemical now?
Sugar is a carbohydrate, which is a nutrient. How in the world can they be separated?
0 -
Really Good ResponseBILLBRYTAN wrote: »
The OP deserves to know what is healthy, not just how to reduce numbers.BILLBRYTAN wrote: »
ummmmm yes....you just need to go away now..
[/quote]
Thank you. Now I'm going to have some sugar....mmmmmmm0 -
BILLBRYTAN wrote: »
The body cannot use carbohydrates as nutrients without vitamins, minerals, enzymes, all of which have been removed during refining.galgenstrick wrote: »BILLBRYTAN wrote: »
When separated from nutrients, yes.galgenstrick wrote: »BILLBRYTAN wrote: »galgenstrick wrote: »BILLBRYTAN wrote: »
And what your suggesting as healthy has no scientific basis, just garbage thrown around by the fad diet community.galgenstrick wrote: »
The OP deserves to know what is healthy, not just how to reduce numbers.BILLBRYTAN wrote: »
And what your suggesting as healthy has no scientific basis, just garbage thrown around by the fad diet community.
Yes, the fad diet I proclaim is to cut out processed, refined and denatured chemicals which are laughingly called food because they are yummy.
so sugar is a processed, refined and denatured chemical now?
Sugar contains carbohydrates, which is a nutrient. How in the world can they be separated?
but it is required that said nutrients be in the sugar you consume. So if you eat a cookie, and a bowl of vegetables, your body can only use the carbohydrates from the vegetables, and the sugars in the cookie is poison?0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 392K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.8K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.7K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 400 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.8K Motivation and Support
- 7.9K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.4K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 990 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.4K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions