Why weight loss isn't always constant
Options
senecarr
Posts: 5,377 Member
Spend long enough on MFP, and you'll hear people repeat the mantra: "weight loss isn't linear". It is very true, and often a form of frustration. So what is going on when you're doing everything right (you weight everything! No cups, actual weights! Etc!)?
I've found this diagram in the free online book The Hacker's Diet useful:
The author took it from a NASA conference of all things.
On any given day that you're trying to lose weight and monitor it on the scale, you're trying to track the loss of the .3 lb of solids and 2.2 lb of CO2 going out. Meanwhile, you've got 11 lb of water and how much of it is going in and out that trumps those 2.5 lb of actual weight loss. What you really want to monitor is the 19% of what is going out, but the very variable water is the other 81%. Yes, losing fat does mean losing some water permanently too (fat cells have an average of about 10% water weight).
I've found this diagram in the free online book The Hacker's Diet useful:
The author took it from a NASA conference of all things.
On any given day that you're trying to lose weight and monitor it on the scale, you're trying to track the loss of the .3 lb of solids and 2.2 lb of CO2 going out. Meanwhile, you've got 11 lb of water and how much of it is going in and out that trumps those 2.5 lb of actual weight loss. What you really want to monitor is the 19% of what is going out, but the very variable water is the other 81%. Yes, losing fat does mean losing some water permanently too (fat cells have an average of about 10% water weight).
0
Replies
-
I'd just like to know why I get weight loss the day after over eating and not consistently during the time I eat at a deficit.0
-
I'd just like to know why I get weight loss the day after over eating and not consistently during the time I eat at a deficit.
Obviously if you eat more you lose weight, and if you eat too little you go into starvation mode and will gain weight. I just had a ~800 calorie mud slide last night and lost 1.1lb this morning. It is going to be my new nightly ritual.
0 -
I'd just like to know why I get weight loss the day after over eating and not consistently during the time I eat at a deficit.0
-
Hmmm, is it saying that drinking 9.2 units of water causes you to expell 11units of water? Sincere question here.0
-
nordlead2005 wrote: »
Obviously the second part of this sentence is false.0 -
danieltsmoke wrote: »Hmmm, is it saying that drinking 9.2 units of water causes you to expell 11units of water? Sincere question here.
Much of that 9.2 units of water wouldn't even be liquid water, but water in food.
What is true is that in the long run, you expel more water than you take in. Turning carbohydrates (C6H12O6) or fats into energy involves breaking them into carbon dioxide (CO2) and water (H2O).0 -
ncboiler89 wrote: »nordlead2005 wrote: »
Obviously the second part of this sentence is false.
I would hope that my second sentence would make that obvious0 -
nordlead2005 wrote: »I'd just like to know why I get weight loss the day after over eating and not consistently during the time I eat at a deficit.
Obviously if you eat more you lose weight, and if you eat too little you go into starvation mode and will gain weight. I just had a ~800 calorie mud slide last night and lost 1.1lb this morning. It is going to be my new nightly ritual.
Not only is it not obvious, it's wrong. You don't go into "starvation mode" if you under eat for a day or too, especially if you are overweight. It take months and months of eating VERY little for that to be even a possibility.
The Myth of Starvation Mode
0 -
Yeah weight loss isn't exactly linear but it is pretty close if you adhere to your plan. If you look a graph of your weight loss over several months it pretty much makes a line downward. The little fluctuations don't make it off by that much really. It's not like you're bouncing up and down more that a couple of pounds either way. So when you make your graph of 100 pounds lost its going to look like a straight line......from a distance.0
-
I tend to lose nothing one week, then lose 3-5 the next week..as if my body is like "wait, screw that I'm keeping this fat, it's mine...gah, dang it fine, you can take it..."0
-
nordlead2005 wrote: »I'd just like to know why I get weight loss the day after over eating and not consistently during the time I eat at a deficit.
Obviously if you eat more you lose weight, and if you eat too little you go into starvation mode and will gain weight. I just had a ~800 calorie mud slide last night and lost 1.1lb this morning. It is going to be my new nightly ritual.Spend long enough on MFP, and you'll hear people repeat the mantra: "weight loss isn't linear". It is very true, and often a form of frustration. So what is going on when you're doing everything right (you weight everything! No cups, actual weights! Etc!)?
I've found this diagram in the free online book The Hacker's Diet useful:
The author took it from a NASA conference of all things.
On any given day that you're trying to lose weight and monitor it on the scale, you're trying to track the loss of the .3 lb of solids and 2.2 lb of CO2 going out. Meanwhile, you've got 11 lb of water and how much of it is going in and out that trumps those 2.5 lb of actual weight loss. What you really want to monitor is the 19% of what is going out, but the very variable water is the other 81%. Yes, losing fat does mean losing some water permanently too (fat cells have an average of about 10% water weight).
Excellet post!0 -
nordlead2005 wrote: »I'd just like to know why I get weight loss the day after over eating and not consistently during the time I eat at a deficit.
Obviously if you eat more you lose weight, and if you eat too little you go into starvation mode and will gain weight. I just had a ~800 calorie mud slide last night and lost 1.1lb this morning. It is going to be my new nightly ritual.
The Mudslide & Peanut Butter Cookie Diet.0 -
I think understanding water weight is crucial to controlling your weight without going crazy.
Your body retains water for all sorts of reasons.
Metabolising and storing carbs (I drop about 4lb of water weight when I go from a period of overeating to a deficit, just because of the reduction in carbs - and I don't do low carb!)
Muscle repair (I put on 4-5lb after any big hill walk, long cycle or other unaccustomed heavy exercise. It hangs around for 2-3 days, them drops off again)
Periods
Illness
And so on. As the OP says, you're trying to track small changes in body mass, say 1lb/week, but the amount of water you have on board varies by far more than that in a single day, so don't take any one weigh-in as Gospel - look for the trend over time.0 -
Spend long enough on MFP, and you'll hear people repeat the mantra: "weight loss isn't linear". It is very true, and often a form of frustration. So what is going on when you're doing everything right (you weight everything! No cups, actual weights! Etc!)?
I've found this diagram in the free online book The Hacker's Diet useful:
The author took it from a NASA conference of all things.
On any given day that you're trying to lose weight and monitor it on the scale, you're trying to track the loss of the .3 lb of solids and 2.2 lb of CO2 going out. Meanwhile, you've got 11 lb of water and how much of it is going in and out that trumps those 2.5 lb of actual weight loss. What you really want to monitor is the 19% of what is going out, but the very variable water is the other 81%. Yes, losing fat does mean losing some water permanently too (fat cells have an average of about 10% water weight).
+1 On an Excellent Post
This is very interesting and explains a lot.
0 -
CattOfTheGarage wrote: »I think understanding water weight is crucial to controlling your weight without going crazy.
Your body retains water for all sorts of reasons.
Metabolising and storing carbs (I drop about 4lb of water weight when I go from a period of overeating to a deficit, just because of the reduction in carbs - and I don't do low carb!)
Muscle repair (I put on 4-5lb after any big hill walk, long cycle or other unaccustomed heavy exercise. It hangs around for 2-3 days, them drops off again)
Periods
Illness
And so on. As the OP says, you're trying to track small changes in body mass, say 1lb/week, but the amount of water you have on board varies by far more than that in a single day, so don't take any one weigh-in as Gospel - look for the trend over time.
I agree. That's why I think that modern body weight scales are too accurate for their purpose.0 -
nordlead2005 wrote: »ncboiler89 wrote: »nordlead2005 wrote: »
Obviously the second part of this sentence is false.
I would hope that my second sentence would make that obviousnordlead2005 wrote: »I'd just like to know why I get weight loss the day after over eating and not consistently during the time I eat at a deficit.
Obviously if you eat more you lose weight, and if you eat too little you go into starvation mode and will gain weight. I just had a ~800 calorie mud slide last night and lost 1.1lb this morning. It is going to be my new nightly ritual.
Not only is it not obvious, it's wrong. You don't go into "starvation mode" if you under eat for a day or too, especially if you are overweight. It take months and months of eating VERY little for that to be even a possibility.
The Myth of Starvation Mode
0 -
Thanks for the "food for though"0
-
Yeah weight loss isn't exactly linear but it is pretty close if you adhere to your plan. If you look a graph of your weight loss over several months it pretty much makes a line downward. The little fluctuations don't make it off by that much really. It's not like you're bouncing up and down more that a couple of pounds either way. So when you make your graph of 100 pounds lost its going to look like a straight line......from a distance.
Yes, this is true! Unfortunately too many people here expect a straight downward line with no bumps from day to day, some even hour to hour, so this is why we say "weight loss is not linear".0 -
The author took it from a NASA conference of all things.
On any given day that you're trying to lose weight and monitor it on the scale, you're trying to track the loss of the .3 lb of solids and 2.2 lb of CO2 going out. Meanwhile, you've got 11 lb of water and how much of it is going in and out that trumps those 2.5 lb of actual weight loss. What you really want to monitor is the 19% of what is going out, but the very variable water is the other 81%. Yes, losing fat does mean losing some water permanently too (fat cells have an average of about 10% water weight).
With all due respect, what you're trying to monitor when you're trying to lose weight is not the 19% (solids and CO2) from the diagram. The person in the diagram is at maintenance. When you weigh yourself while trying to lose weight, what you want to monitor is loss of body mass--fat, preferably, but unavoidably some LBM as well. Water, the amount of food/solids in your digestive system at any time, and the amount of CO2 in your body at any given instance (I think CO2 would have a greater specific gravity than air, but not 100% sure on that) are all irrelevant to what most people are trying to achieve--or at least should be trying to achieve--when they seek to "lose weight."0 -
lynn_glenmont wrote: »The author took it from a NASA conference of all things.
On any given day that you're trying to lose weight and monitor it on the scale, you're trying to track the loss of the .3 lb of solids and 2.2 lb of CO2 going out. Meanwhile, you've got 11 lb of water and how much of it is going in and out that trumps those 2.5 lb of actual weight loss. What you really want to monitor is the 19% of what is going out, but the very variable water is the other 81%. Yes, losing fat does mean losing some water permanently too (fat cells have an average of about 10% water weight).
With all due respect, what you're trying to monitor when you're trying to lose weight is not the 19% (solids and CO2) from the diagram. The person in the diagram is at maintenance. When you weigh yourself while trying to lose weight, what you want to monitor is loss of body mass--fat, preferably, but unavoidably some LBM as well. Water, the amount of food/solids in your digestive system at any time, and the amount of CO2 in your body at any given instance (I think CO2 would have a greater specific gravity than air, but not 100% sure on that) are all irrelevant to what most people are trying to achieve--or at least should be trying to achieve--when they seek to "lose weight."
To be most accurate, the problem is the flux in water as released and retained due to hormones, salts, and other conditions is still dramatically large in comparison to the flux in fat changed to CO2 and water.
Ideally, you'd want a device that would give you your lean body mass, fat mass, and water weight as some device claim they'll give you, but none of the home ones are particularly accurate. Even professional DEXA scans aren't accurate enough to measure daily fluxes in those things.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.4K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 388 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.2K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 917 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions