We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

Running Intervals or just run straight through?

Jennifer8348683
Jennifer8348683 Posts: 50 Member
edited November 2024 in Fitness and Exercise
Hi:

I am doing my first half marathon in a few weeks. I have completed a 16K race without intervals. I've had a few people suggest to me that I should do the half marathon using 10/1 intervals. I tried a 6K this morning with intervals (3/1) and it was a lot easier and my time wasn't much different. What are your thoughts?

Thanks in advance. :)

Replies

  • WhatMeRunning
    WhatMeRunning Posts: 3,538 Member
    edited September 2015
    I ran my first HM straight through (3:00:09) and was running slower than I would normally walk by the end (and oh so sore). I ran my second one with a pacing group (2:48:09) using intervals where we would walk for a minute at every mile, and "leapfrog" big hills (running part way then walking). I made better time with those intervals because I was not dead tired at the end, and even sped up on some of those later miles. There will eventually come a point where you have the capacity to run all the way through at a faster pace than if you also include walking, but if you are not there then you can definitely benefit from this.
  • This content has been removed.
  • mbaker566
    mbaker566 Posts: 11,233 Member
    i think running straight thru would be best if your training is allowing you to do that. Otherwise, intervals are fine too. i like training with intervals up to the full time.
    honestly, it's what you are comfortable with. and what you want out of the race like @leonsinned said
  • gdyment
    gdyment Posts: 299 Member
    Run/Walk is a great stepping stone to running the whole distance. If you already are doing 16km then I'd go for it.
  • I struggle with this decision too because although running straight through is mentally easier, I find physically that my body responds better to intervals. But it is oh-so-hard to slow down to a walk when you're in the middle of a race and everyone starts passing you.
  • MeanderingMammal
    MeanderingMammal Posts: 7,865 Member
    I tried a 6K this morning with intervals (3/1) and it was a lot easier and my time wasn't much different.

    If Gallowaying works for you, and you want to use it, then use it. Entirely up to you. Personally for a flat(ish) rac I'd aim to run it all, though on my normal races I will walk on the steeper hills. That said I have found myself able to pass runners in that sort of situation.

    When I transitioned from 5K to 10K I did try intervals, and found myself uncomfortable as each running period took me a couple of minutes to get back into a decent rhythm, so I ended up feeling uncomfortable for far more of my run that had I just gone straight through.

    There's nothing inherently wrong with Gallowalking.

  • chelciebrown07
    chelciebrown07 Posts: 255 Member
    I also prefer just running straight through. When I stop to walk I cool down and getting started again feels twice as hard.
  • arussell134
    arussell134 Posts: 463 Member
    I'm a believer you can run the whole thing!!! For me, part of the feeling of accomplishment is knowing I ran the whole thing. Plus, I'm with @chelciebrown07 - once I have to stop and walk, it's very very difficult to get started again and the soreness starts to set in.
This discussion has been closed.