Exercising without a heart rate monitor
GlutenFreeAussieGirl
Posts: 44 Member
Hi there,
Is there an accurate(ish) way to calculate calories burned without a heart rate monitor? I go on an elliptical but it's second hand and the calorie reading is all over the place (once it said I burned 900 calories after 20 minutes... if only!).
I've asked for a fitbit for my birthday from my folks, but that's not for a month or so, is there a way for me to calculate calories burned? Or should I just trust what MFP tells me when I input what I've done?
Thanks for any advice.
Is there an accurate(ish) way to calculate calories burned without a heart rate monitor? I go on an elliptical but it's second hand and the calorie reading is all over the place (once it said I burned 900 calories after 20 minutes... if only!).
I've asked for a fitbit for my birthday from my folks, but that's not for a month or so, is there a way for me to calculate calories burned? Or should I just trust what MFP tells me when I input what I've done?
Thanks for any advice.
0
Replies
-
HRM aren't terribly reliable, anyways. not unless youre running or biking, anyways.
you can use mfps estimates, just make sure you only eat back around half of the calories.0 -
I used to be all spun up in that technology
Had two different heart rate monitors
Now two years in I don't use any of that stuff
You know when you are panting and all out going at it.
I would not worry so much about a heart rate monitor as a good food scale and great diet
There are reasonable guesses on calorie burn for rough rough estimates on MFP....
But I think they all run about 30% high for me
I eat half of my exercise calories back if I'm feeling starved, otherwise I ignore them
Lost 130 pounds in two years.
Have fun with it. It makes it easier to stick with fitness long term0 -
HRMs are for measuring heart rates.
Elipticals are the most unreliable and difficult bits of cardio on which to measure calorie burns.
Imo go for a 2 prong approach.
1. MFP calories@50% eatback and adjust based on results.
2. Performance measures, record time and distance traveled. I prefer to do a set distance and then keep track of times taken, with a steady emphasis to keep up the pace so Im aiming to beat the previous time. This imo is more importnat because its a fitness measure and a reliable method of progress.0 -
I use an HRM to set the base line for any activity, then I extrapolate after that. I don't worry about it. I track cardio when I lift weights, but it's always lower than a Zumba class, for example. However, your body keeps burning calories after you stop lifting fo the rest of the day, which I don't pay any attention to it.
MFP and all those activity trackers are incredible optimistic about how much you burn.0 -
I used a ploar HRM for several years and just got a fitbit. They are fun and interesting but just confirm what I already knew. The MFP estimates tend to be pretty close to what I measure. The on thing they can do is push you to work to achieve whatever goals you might have.0
-
47Jacqueline wrote: »I use an HRM to set the base line for any activity, then I extrapolate after that. I don't worry about it. I track cardio when I lift weights, but it's always lower than a Zumba class, for example. However, your body keeps burning calories after you stop lifting fo the rest of the day, which I don't pay any attention to it.
MFP and all those activity trackers are incredible optimistic about how much you burn.
I like how you said that
Incredibly optimistic!
I put a food in my diet log for 500 calories. Excess Calorie Burn Off.
When Map My Ride dumps in some insanely high calorie burn, I punch tat in a time or two to make it more realistic for calories to eat back
Goofy program....0 -
Even a good HRM is only going to give you a ballpark number to work with. If it's steady state cardio it could be pretty accurate, if it's circuits or HIIT could be up to like 25% off. I used to do it that way and then just eat back half of my earned calories. But eventually I just switched to the TDEE method and now I just log my workouts as 1 cal burned and eat at 20% below my TDEE. If you have a semi steady schedule and routine to your exercise regime look into TDEE, might be a better way for you to go.0
-
It's easy, check your pulse the old fashioned way - with your fingers. Then to determine calorie burn, take your average heart rate and go to http://www.shapesense.com/fitness-exercise/calculators/heart-rate-based-calorie-burn-calculator.aspx0
-
Traveler120 wrote: »It's easy, check your pulse the old fashioned way - with your fingers. Then to determine calorie burn, take your average heart rate and go to http://www.shapesense.com/fitness-exercise/calculators/heart-rate-based-calorie-burn-calculator.aspx
While certainly cheaper, those numbers aren't particularly accurate either.
0 -
I do think my HRM overestimates my caloric expenditure. The reason I like using a HRM is because it captures all my workouts relative to each other. I can see how hard I work in a spin class vs. when I ride outside vs. when I lift weights and so on. So even if it isn't 100% accurate, it's a benchmark for ME. I like to see how everything compares. As someone said, you know when you're pushing yourself and when you're not, so I don't need the gadget to know that...but I like it and it motivates me.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions