Exercise is not as important as diet in terms of weight loss

Options
DjsMom243
DjsMom243 Posts: 16 Member
in Health and Weight Loss
i never got this concept until now and I can't believe it took me this long I had to do research on deficits and how many calories my body burns natural but I think I'm ready now with the knowledge it takes to actually lose the weight.
«1

Replies

  • queenliz99
    queenliz99 Posts: 15,317 Member
    Options
    Knowlege is power!! Good for you!!
  • Amberonamission
    Amberonamission Posts: 836 Member
    Options
    I hit the gym hard for 3 months with only a 2 pound loss. Finally got my tracking right and now I'm melting.
  • MidnightVixen
    MidnightVixen Posts: 4 Member
    Options
    My body responds faster to exercise than it does to diet. I learned the hard way about 6 years ago that both are essential. Even if you exercise constantly, you can't out run a bad diet. XD
  • zoeysasha37
    zoeysasha37 Posts: 7,088 Member
    Options
    Good for you , learning how this works is wonderful. Get a food scale, log accurate and you'll be on your way !
  • 999tigger
    999tigger Posts: 5,235 Member
    Options
    Its all about the deficcit however its made up.
  • Werk2Eat
    Werk2Eat Posts: 114 Member
    Options
    For me, when i exercise i do not feel hungry. Not only does exercise allow me to have a larger deficit by burning more calories, it also keeps me from snacking all day and having less calories later when i am hungry. Also i know people will argue this but, someone who doesn't excercise will have a slower metabolism then someone very active. It might not amount to much but someone who exercises will have a higher BMR on days they dont excercise and burn more sedentary , then someone who does not exercise at all.
  • Cortneyrenee04
    Cortneyrenee04 Posts: 1,117 Member
    Options
    You're very right BUT it will change your shape. I have a crazy picture of me at 135 pounds vs 133.5 and I look totally different.
  • sunandmoons
    sunandmoons Posts: 415 Member
    edited September 2015
    Options
    Losing first then maintaining. Adding cardio, bike riding, then weights to define. I dont want water weight during weight loss. That always hinders me and I give up
  • michelle7673
    michelle7673 Posts: 370 Member
    Options
    It would be hard for me to eat at a significant deficit without exercise on a day-to-day basis. But yes -- I think you *can* do it with intake alone, while exercise alone is nearly impossible.
  • michelle7673
    michelle7673 Posts: 370 Member
    Options
    sunandmoons wrote: »
    Losing first then maintaining. Adding cardio, bike riding, then weights to define. I dont want water weight during weight loss. That always hinders me and I give up

    This is an interesting point. I think a lot of people start a hard strength/workout regime when they start out and the water weight frustrates them to the quit point. I restarted this time with long hikes (usually an hour plus) around my hilly neighborhood. It's enough to make me feel good, not enough to make me feel bad, and it's below the point that triggers insane hunger too. It is working well as a launching point for me.

  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    Options
    I believe I could do it with diet alone if I needed to, but exercise is really important for me in lots of ways, and whenever this comes up I always think that I couldn't quantify the percentage importance or claim one was more important than the other.
  • malou1985
    malou1985 Posts: 138 Member
    Options
    At the gym i go to every once in awhile they'll say 'How many work outs do u need to get in before u have abs' and the answer they want back is '0 coach, abs are made in the kitchen' although i think u have to exercise atleast a little to define muscles
  • niniundlapin
    niniundlapin Posts: 327 Member
    Options
    "No matter how well you exercise, a poor diet is gonna screw you up anyway." Funny that my nutrition professor actually mentioned this 10 years ago but I totally ignored it until the past few years...

    But I also don't believe diet along can help improve my respiratory function, increase bowel movement, and reduce fat around my used-to-be floppy thighs.

    Exercise is not essential for weight-loss unless you decide to move up to the next level...
  • stephaniespringer212
    stephaniespringer212 Posts: 3 Member
    edited September 2015
    Options
    Diet is more important but both are extremely crucial! Exercise has so many added benefits other than shedding the pounds :) if anyone would like to get started on a exercise program with daily support and motivation from me email [ edited by mfp moderator]
  • cafeaulait7
    cafeaulait7 Posts: 2,459 Member
    Options
    Exercise is pretty darned important to looking good at the end of weight loss, imho. Just ask my butt and inner thighs a few months ago ;)

    I really had to make them work (weights) to make them not look sad at goal weight. I added 2 lbs with that, so no biggie at all. I had only given up weights because my physical therapist insisted, though, so it could have been much worse if I'd always had a no-butt problem and lost the weight without exercise. It's much easier to keep the muscle as you lose than it is to add some later!
  • SKME2013
    SKME2013 Posts: 704 Member
    Options
    At the end of the day it is all a question of caloric deficit. Yes, you can not outrun a "bad" diet, but boy...does it help to improve mine.

    For me the exercise part is the most inportant part of my daily routine: I am successfully in maintenance and that for about a year now. I have set my activity level here on MFP to "sedentary" and I am "earning" extra calories through cardio, my activities measured with a heart rate monitor and a multisportswatch.

    My daily calorie allocation from MFP is about 1500 calories. As most of you know that does not allow for very much and certainly not for treats. I burn in average between 600 and 1000 calories a day (I am training for a marathon and walking my dogs for 6-9 km every day).

    So, instead of 1500 calories I can now eat around 2200 which certainly helps. If I had to stick to 1500 calories every day, this would feel like a diet to me and not something I could maintain easily. If I can eat around 2200 calories every day, I do not feel that I ever miss out on something. (I eat most of my calories from exercise back and so far this worked for me without a glitch)

    For me, the introduction of exercise made my weightloss journey so much more bearable, leave alone, that now at the tender age of 50 I am much healthier and fitter than ever in my life before.

    Stef.
  • AspenDan
    AspenDan Posts: 703 Member
    Options
    My buddy keeps talking about the gym and getting "ripped"..then asks me how I've lost 60lbs, and I'm like...I eat a lot of chicken and brocolli..
  • Kalikel
    Kalikel Posts: 9,626 Member
    edited September 2015
    Options
    You cannot outrun a terrible diet, but you can outrun a couple handfuls of peanuts. I consider both to be of equal importance to my health and weight loss, but diet would probably win in a race. :)
  • sunandmoons
    sunandmoons Posts: 415 Member
    Options
    michelle7673 wrote: »
    sunandmoons wrote: »
    Losing first then maintaining. Adding cardio, bike riding, then weights to define. I dont want water weight during weight loss. That always hinders me and I give up

    This is an interesting point. I think a lot of people start a hard strength/workout regime when they start out and the water weight frustrates them to the quit point. I restarted this time with long hikes (usually an hour plus) around my hilly neighborhood. It's enough to make me feel good, not enough to make me feel bad, and it's below the point that triggers insane hunger too. It is working well as a launching point for me.

    I love hiking too. Where I live there are mountains completely surrounded this county city. Every other week we hike to our favorie mountains stream and walk through the forrest.

Categories