Women, Muscles, and "Bulk:" A historical perspective

13»

Replies

  • talk2elles
    talk2elles Posts: 124 Member
    I love this!
  • jw203
    jw203 Posts: 50 Member


    Abbye "Pudgy" Stockton
    935368_540363896010195_1388280675_n.jpg


    What a babe! She's my height too. And I reckon my build if I remove some of my lingering fat. Good inspiration for my lifting session later today.
  • 3dogsrunning
    3dogsrunning Posts: 27,167 Member


    Abbye "Pudgy" Stockton
    935368_540363896010195_1388280675_n.jpg


    What a babe! She's my height too. And I reckon my build if I remove some of my lingering fat. Good inspiration for my lifting session later today.


    Loved all the pics but she is my fav too. I love her legs.
  • LoraF83
    LoraF83 Posts: 15,694 Member
    Love this thread!

    The other day, I was carrying a tote of camping supplies to the car and my brother-in-law insisted upon taking it from me. I let him, because he was trying to be nice, but not because I needed him to. It's awesome to be able to handle your own business, lift your own groceries, kids, pets, furniture, etc with ease.
  • lithezebra
    lithezebra Posts: 3,670 Member
    As a farmer - women that cant lift at least one 50lb feed sack at at time = pointless. :tongue:

    Sure, if you're hiring women to lift your feed sacks.
  • Dragonwolf
    Dragonwolf Posts: 5,600 Member
    I love this post!!!!

    I am working my way up on the machines and then going to learn how to lift free weights correctly, I can't wait!

    Meh, just learn the free weights. That way you don't have to unlearn the machines (and you don't hurt yourself trying to go from 70lbs on the machine to 70lbs on the free weights).
  • LoraF83
    LoraF83 Posts: 15,694 Member
    As a farmer - women that cant lift at least one 50lb feed sack at at time = pointless. :tongue:

    Sure, if you're hiring women to lift your feed sacks.

    Traditionally, on a farm, the wife helps the husband do at least some of the work. Small family farms require that everyone work to keep them running. I know a lot of farm wives that can haul feed sacks and hay bales like it's nothing.
  • gooteek
    gooteek Posts: 64
    Never met a woman lifter that had a problem finding clothes that made them look incredible...the heaviest lifting woman cannot exceed her genetic patterns for size unless she uses steroids. Lifters will only attain the best muscle and fitness rendered by their genetics and everyone has a good genetic make up for being fit and lean, it is only poor diet choices and lack of exercise and lifting that contribute to anything less than desirable conditions.

    Frank Zane has won Mr. Olympia many times, but always trained with both lifting and cardio exercise each day...he focused on building lean muscle mass over time with a lean diet and massive heavy lifting. Look at his picture on my profile to see that he only developed a lean Olympian body. His genetic pattern was not to be big and bulky, so it took years of heavy lifting and lean dieting to get to be Mr. Olympia. He is lean and healthy and met his best genetic extremes of fitness through years of hard work and dedicated diet. It is a lifestyle...not a quick fix diet or 90 day exercise program.
  • lithezebra
    lithezebra Posts: 3,670 Member
    As a farmer - women that cant lift at least one 50lb feed sack at at time = pointless. :tongue:

    Sure, if you're hiring women to lift your feed sacks.

    Traditionally, on a farm, the wife helps the husband do at least some of the work. Small family farms require that everyone work to keep them running. I know a lot of farm wives that can haul feed sacks and hay bales like it's nothing.

    I'm aware of that. I'm suggesting that women who can't lift 50 pound feed sacks are not pointless, unless the only reason for having someone around is lifting those sacks.
  • fannyfrost
    fannyfrost Posts: 756 Member
    OK at least this thread was kinda cool to look at, but seriously I think I see maybe 1 thread/week from a woman with this concern, and at least 25/week by someone trying to tell that one chick how it just won't happen. #obsession

    One a week? I see....

    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/1025714-squats-and-big-booties (This glourious cluster...)
    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/1026904-bulky-legs
    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/1027189-arms-got-bigger-from-lifting (Though in her defense the OP didn't mind the bigger arms, but a few other people did pop up with the "I agree, oh noes" train)
    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/1025133-best-way-for-a-female-to-build-muslce (I don't wanna look like a bodybuilder but...)


    From the last 20 hours.

    So those threads and that attitude with women is what made this trainer categorize me and give me a long speech about how I have to build muscle, etc. He was horrible. Automatically assumed that since I am a woman I don't know I need to build muscle. I am so not using him.
  • lithezebra
    lithezebra Posts: 3,670 Member
    I'm a climber, and I have a friend that purposefully doesn't climb on harder stuff because she is afraid she's going to get "bulky". She purposefully dampers her climbing ability because of what the boys will think of her.

    I say she's missing out on improving in a very fun sport, all because of stupid social stigma that isn't even true. sheesh. I'm so sick of females not living up to the best of their abilities because of what some insecure boys will think!

    this is really sad :cry: hope she learns to view other people's insecurity for what it is and goes on to fulfill all her potential in the face of everyone who'd try to bring her down to their level...

    Everyone likes dainty little women who lift heavy and get strong, however women who really have heavier, stronger builds can have a tough time. Not wanting to get bulky sometimes means "I already have 140 pounds of lean body mass, and I'm 5'2"."
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,988 Member
    I've always loved fit women, going all the way back to Rachel McLish days. The first Ms. Olympia!

    RachelMcLish2.jpg
    This was when women's bodybuilding was really cool. Hate to say that when Cory Everson (even though much less muscular than today's females) set the trend to being bigger with some "enhancement".

    A.C.E. Certified Personal/Group FitnessTrainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
  • Lift_This_
    Lift_This_ Posts: 2,756 Member
    thank you for posting this!

    :heart: :heart: :heart:
  • toutmonpossible
    toutmonpossible Posts: 1,580 Member
    I've always loved fit women, going all the way back to Rachel McLish days. The first Ms. Olympia!

    RachelMcLish2.jpg

    I love this picture with her awesome early 80s hair.

    There's a bit of survivor's bias here. Although I personally am not crazy about the overly muscled look (for either sex). McLish looks good. But she has the kind of build that looks good when developed by weights. Not everyone does. As an analogy, if you want to look like a ballerina and don't have the kind of body type typical of a professional ballerina, you aren't going to look like one.
  • weese17
    weese17 Posts: 236 Member
    But seriously. My younger sister is 4. She weighs like...twenty pounds and likes to jump off of tables onto my back/into my arms. Lifting things lighter than that isn't going to cut it.

    Dang, your sister only weighs 20 pounds?! My 4-year old weighs almost 45!!! :D And yes, she still wants to be carried, too.... along w/ my 25-pound 2 year old. Muscles FTW!
  • BusyRaeNOTBusty
    BusyRaeNOTBusty Posts: 7,166 Member
    Speaking of holding children...

    I have 3 kids, ages 6, 5 and 3. After I had my last kid, my oldest was 4. She's kind of a solid built kid (not fat but solid, heavier than she looks). It was getting really hard to carry her. I started to try to explain to her that she was getting to heavy to be picked up or carried, or thrown around, etc. I got back into heavy lifting soon after that... Yeah, she's almost 7 now, weighs about 60lbs. I can carry her now problem and even lift her up into the air over my head.
  • Achrya
    Achrya Posts: 16,913 Member
    But seriously. My younger sister is 4. She weighs like...twenty pounds and likes to jump off of tables onto my back/into my arms. Lifting things lighter than that isn't going to cut it.

    Dang, your sister only weighs 20 pounds?! My 4-year old weighs almost 45!!! :D And yes, she still wants to be carried, too.... along w/ my 25-pound 2 year old. Muscles FTW!

    She did last time I saw her, which admittedly was last summer. I may have been understating her weight. So...20+whatever reasonable weight gain for a child her age in a year is.
  • sabified
    sabified Posts: 1,035 Member
    awesome post!!
  • LiftAllThePizzas
    LiftAllThePizzas Posts: 17,857 Member
    As a farmer - women that cant lift at least one 50lb feed sack at at time = pointless. :tongue:

    Sure, if you're hiring women to lift your feed sacks.

    Traditionally, on a farm, the wife helps the husband do at least some of the work. Small family farms require that everyone work to keep them running. I know a lot of farm wives that can haul feed sacks and hay bales like it's nothing.

    I'm aware of that. I'm suggesting that women who can't lift 50 pound feed sacks are not pointless, unless the only reason for having someone around is lifting those sacks.
    You mean there's other reasons to keep teh womens around?
  • CoderGal
    CoderGal Posts: 6,800 Member
    Still in love with heavy weight lifting Christmas:
    1017575_10151684014231075_2012048732_n.jpg
    554743_10151031591466075_1238780670_n.jpg
  • lithezebra
    lithezebra Posts: 3,670 Member
    As a farmer - women that cant lift at least one 50lb feed sack at at time = pointless. :tongue:

    Sure, if you're hiring women to lift your feed sacks.

    Traditionally, on a farm, the wife helps the husband do at least some of the work. Small family farms require that everyone work to keep them running. I know a lot of farm wives that can haul feed sacks and hay bales like it's nothing.

    I'm aware of that. I'm suggesting that women who can't lift 50 pound feed sacks are not pointless, unless the only reason for having someone around is lifting those sacks.
    You mean there's other reasons to keep teh womens around?

    For some people. Of course, YMMV.
  • allisonrinkel
    allisonrinkel Posts: 224 Member
    I love vintage muscle women pictures:

    These two were stolen from a facebook page I follow:

    Ivy Russell 1930s
    947269_551852478194670_935326665_n.jpg

    Abbye "Pudgy" Stockton
    935368_540363896010195_1388280675_n.jpg

    From the Venus with Biceps book: http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2011/11/venus-with-biceps-a-history-of-muscular-women-in-pictures/248820/
    page270.jpg

    AWESOME!! They have muscles, but they're not roided up and freakish!
  • allisonrinkel
    allisonrinkel Posts: 224 Member
    <- I'm still fluffy but lifting heavy has gotten me these arms and even a new boyfriend!! I do find it fun though to lift a 40lb bag of cat litter at Petsmart and carry it around like it was nothing. It's a great empowering feeling women!!

    You rock girl!
  • neandermagnon
    neandermagnon Posts: 7,436 Member
    I'm a climber, and I have a friend that purposefully doesn't climb on harder stuff because she is afraid she's going to get "bulky". She purposefully dampers her climbing ability because of what the boys will think of her.

    I say she's missing out on improving in a very fun sport, all because of stupid social stigma that isn't even true. sheesh. I'm so sick of females not living up to the best of their abilities because of what some insecure boys will think!

    this is really sad :cry: hope she learns to view other people's insecurity for what it is and goes on to fulfill all her potential in the face of everyone who'd try to bring her down to their level...

    Everyone likes dainty little women who lift heavy and get strong, however women who really have heavier, stronger builds can have a tough time. Not wanting to get bulky sometimes means "I already have 140 pounds of lean body mass, and I'm 5'2"."

    I have a very large frame and I'm naturally muscular. And I'm short, so that makes me look that much larger framed. My lean body mass is greater than the entire weight of quite a few healthy women of my height. (LBM:102lb, total weight 133lb, height 5'1", BMI healthy weight range for my height: 100-132.)

    Honestly my genetics are probably as good as it gets for being able to get really strong, and I'm not getting "bulky" - gaining muscle is NOT easy. I've been eating at a surplus and doing a beginner's program for strength gains and I've gained maybe 1lb of lean mass altogether so far in 7 weeks, and that would be noob gains, so it's unlikely I'll carry on gaining lean mass at that rate for much longer. During that time I've taken my deadlift from 88lb to 170lb so far (my current working weight, I don't know my 1RM) and my squat from around 80lb to 120lb so far (also my current working weight) yet I've only gained 1lb lean mass (if that), and like I said, I was eating at a surplus. I really don't think I would have gained any lean mass at all eating at maintenance or at a deficit. It really is difficult enough gaining muscle when eating at a surplus and training really heavy and doing everything right.... it *won't* happen by accident!!

    Some people probably think I'm bulky the way I am right now.... well that's just my natural shape from the genetics I was born with, and you know what.... not lifting isn't going to change my frame size. So those same people would still consider me to look bulky and/or manly even if I didn't lift weights. I'm not going to magically turn into a small framed person by not lifting weights.
  • MrsWells1983
    MrsWells1983 Posts: 160
    As a farmer - women that cant lift at least one 50lb feed sack at at time = pointless. :tongue:

    I'm a farmer's wife and I think my husband would probably agree with you.... LOL
  • SteveJWatson
    SteveJWatson Posts: 1,225 Member
    As a farmer - women that cant lift at least one 50lb feed sack at at time = pointless. :tongue:

    Sure, if you're hiring women to lift your feed sacks.

    Traditionally, on a farm, the wife helps the husband do at least some of the work. Small family farms require that everyone work to keep them running. I know a lot of farm wives that can haul feed sacks and hay bales like it's nothing.

    I'm aware of that. I'm suggesting that women who can't lift 50 pound feed sacks are not pointless, unless the only reason for having someone around is lifting those sacks.

    Of course - they need to be able to breed you more 'farm workers' and not be squeamish about muckng out/calvling/lambing etc.

    Ability to drive a tractor also a bonus.

    You're welcome. :drinker:
  • lithezebra
    lithezebra Posts: 3,670 Member
    I'm a climber, and I have a friend that purposefully doesn't climb on harder stuff because she is afraid she's going to get "bulky". She purposefully dampers her climbing ability because of what the boys will think of her.

    I say she's missing out on improving in a very fun sport, all because of stupid social stigma that isn't even true. sheesh. I'm so sick of females not living up to the best of their abilities because of what some insecure boys will think!

    this is really sad :cry: hope she learns to view other people's insecurity for what it is and goes on to fulfill all her potential in the face of everyone who'd try to bring her down to their level...

    Everyone likes dainty little women who lift heavy and get strong, however women who really have heavier, stronger builds can have a tough time. Not wanting to get bulky sometimes means "I already have 140 pounds of lean body mass, and I'm 5'2"."

    I have a very large frame and I'm naturally muscular. And I'm short, so that makes me look that much larger framed. My lean body mass is greater than the entire weight of quite a few healthy women of my height. (LBM:102lb, total weight 133lb, height 5'1", BMI healthy weight range for my height: 100-132.)

    Honestly my genetics are probably as good as it gets for being able to get really strong, and I'm not getting "bulky" - gaining muscle is NOT easy. I've been eating at a surplus and doing a beginner's program for strength gains and I've gained maybe 1lb of lean mass altogether so far in 7 weeks, and that would be noob gains, so it's unlikely I'll carry on gaining lean mass at that rate for much longer. During that time I've taken my deadlift from 88lb to 170lb so far (my current working weight, I don't know my 1RM) and my squat from around 80lb to 120lb so far (also my current working weight) yet I've only gained 1lb lean mass (if that), and like I said, I was eating at a surplus. I really don't think I would have gained any lean mass at all eating at maintenance or at a deficit. It really is difficult enough gaining muscle when eating at a surplus and training really heavy and doing everything right.... it *won't* happen by accident!!

    Some people probably think I'm bulky the way I am right now.... well that's just my natural shape from the genetics I was born with, and you know what.... not lifting isn't going to change my frame size. So those same people would still consider me to look bulky and/or manly even if I didn't lift weights. I'm not going to magically turn into a small framed person by not lifting weights.

    You're taking the awesome approach. At the same time, there is a lot of contradictory information out there, including trainers who insist that women can increase muscle size, usually the size of their glutes. If glutes can get larger, and I'm not saying that they can, only that there are trainers who make such a claim, so can obliques, lats, and traps. Women who don't want to get any bigger could be understandably concerned.
  • neandermagnon
    neandermagnon Posts: 7,436 Member
    I'm a climber, and I have a friend that purposefully doesn't climb on harder stuff because she is afraid she's going to get "bulky". She purposefully dampers her climbing ability because of what the boys will think of her.

    I say she's missing out on improving in a very fun sport, all because of stupid social stigma that isn't even true. sheesh. I'm so sick of females not living up to the best of their abilities because of what some insecure boys will think!

    this is really sad :cry: hope she learns to view other people's insecurity for what it is and goes on to fulfill all her potential in the face of everyone who'd try to bring her down to their level...

    Everyone likes dainty little women who lift heavy and get strong, however women who really have heavier, stronger builds can have a tough time. Not wanting to get bulky sometimes means "I already have 140 pounds of lean body mass, and I'm 5'2"."

    I have a very large frame and I'm naturally muscular. And I'm short, so that makes me look that much larger framed. My lean body mass is greater than the entire weight of quite a few healthy women of my height. (LBM:102lb, total weight 133lb, height 5'1", BMI healthy weight range for my height: 100-132.)

    Honestly my genetics are probably as good as it gets for being able to get really strong, and I'm not getting "bulky" - gaining muscle is NOT easy. I've been eating at a surplus and doing a beginner's program for strength gains and I've gained maybe 1lb of lean mass altogether so far in 7 weeks, and that would be noob gains, so it's unlikely I'll carry on gaining lean mass at that rate for much longer. During that time I've taken my deadlift from 88lb to 170lb so far (my current working weight, I don't know my 1RM) and my squat from around 80lb to 120lb so far (also my current working weight) yet I've only gained 1lb lean mass (if that), and like I said, I was eating at a surplus. I really don't think I would have gained any lean mass at all eating at maintenance or at a deficit. It really is difficult enough gaining muscle when eating at a surplus and training really heavy and doing everything right.... it *won't* happen by accident!!

    Some people probably think I'm bulky the way I am right now.... well that's just my natural shape from the genetics I was born with, and you know what.... not lifting isn't going to change my frame size. So those same people would still consider me to look bulky and/or manly even if I didn't lift weights. I'm not going to magically turn into a small framed person by not lifting weights.

    You're taking the awesome approach. At the same time, there is a lot of contradictory information out there, including trainers who insist that women can increase muscle size, usually the size of their glutes. If glutes can get larger, and I'm not saying that they can, only that there are trainers who make such a claim, so can obliques, lats, and traps. Women who don't want to get any bigger could be understandably concerned.

    yes I agree, re contradictory information, also myths and misunderstanding about human physiology

    women can gain muscle, very slowly, through eating at a surplus and training very hard, but it's really difficult, and it won't happen eating at a deficit, and it won't happen by accident. Women who weight train and eat at a deficit end up getting smaller due to losing fat while maintaining what muscle they have. So women who don't want their muscles to get bigger, the advice is simple: don't eat more than you burn off (or eat less than you burn off if you also have fat to lose).

    Also, a lot of women see their muscles get a "pump" after a good workout, and think that the muscles have grown, and think that every workout they do will see the same growth.... but a "pump" is just where the muscles can look temporarily a bit bigger due to more blood flow, and also water retention which is a normal part of the repair/rebuilding that goes on in the muscles after exercise. IMO this is the main cause of women thinking that they gain muscle really easily, and/or are gaining muscle in spite of eating at a deficit.

    Weight training can improve the shape of the muscles, even if they don't get bigger, so you can end up with perkier glute muscles, more shapely thighs etc, by doing squats even if you eat at a deficit... but at a deficit you won't be growing any new muscle, you need a surplus for that. This improvement in shape is what most women want, and why so many advise weight training. And yes I can see how this whole issue is very confusing, which is probably why there's so much discussion about it, because of the myths that need to be dispelled. Most women want the body improvements that you can get from lifting weights while eating at maintenance or a deficit, so if they're not doing that because of a belief they have that isn't true, then the belief needs to be challenged.
  • LorinaLynn
    LorinaLynn Posts: 13,247 Member
    women can gain muscle, very slowly, through eating at a surplus and training very hard, but it's really difficult, and it won't happen eating at a deficit, and it won't happen by accident.

    This needs to be repeated a billion times. :smile:

    This might illustrate what "increased muscle mass" looks like.

    In the first picture, I was 25 years old, and about 115 pounds. I have no clue what my bf% was, but assuming 20%, that would put my lean mass at 92 pounds.

    In the second pic, taken last winter at 40 years old, I was about 135 pounds, and around 20% body fat, so my lean mass is about 108 pounds.

    1998-copy_zps549a3000.jpg

    So that's 15 years later, 20 more pounds of body weight and 16 more pounds of lean mass, and I fit into the same swimsuit. My arms and legs are a little bit bigger. Personally, I think they look a lot bit better, but it really hasn't done all THAT much to my overall size.
  • kevinjb1
    kevinjb1 Posts: 233 Member
    Love all you fit ladies :drinker: