Is low carb dangerous? possibly.
Replies
-
mlboyer100 wrote: »realityfades wrote: »I don't eat low carb, but I was wondering if low carb diets long term are unhealthy. I came across an NIH article that detailed how many carbs, proteins and fats each and every organ of your body requires. It said that the brain alone requires 120-130 grams of carbs a day to remain healthy. To me, that implies eating a low carb diet may be starving the organs when done long enough.
Thoughts?
This is the article for anyone interested: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK22436/
[I am not debating the efficiency of low carb vs CICO for weight loss, I am talking about it's long term effects on organs]
I've been low carb for 30 years... No I side effects. I have hypoglycemia, opposite of diabetics, but our diets are about the same. The body converts protein into the necessary energy the organs and muscles need to perform. I eat high protein, have lots of energy, do cardio and strength tracings 3-5 days a week, active and healthy! Just passed my annual physical with flying colors. There may be certain health issues where low carb would not be healthy, but for most folks, it's the best way to go if you want to lose weight. I'm at my perfect weight for a 68 year old and have never felt better!
Question for you; you say you have hypoglycemia. Does that mean that you were hypo before and are controlling your condition with low carb or you went low carb and now have much lower blood glucose levels? Personally I went lower carb (still around 100g per day) and got much more frequent low blood sugars and so stopped.
And yes, I realize that several keto people are convinced that if I went full keto it would have solved my problems, but I'm doing just fine eating my carbs and no longer have sever hypo symptoms.
Very good points. I was diagnosed with hypoglycemia and went on a low carb nutrition plan (old Atkins) to control it. It was amazing how quickly my body adjusted and I loved the way I felt. I have continue it over the year, not absolutely religiously, I do have my cheat spells, but always end up feeling bad later. Actually, it's not the total carbs I eat that I count so much as the percentage of carbs to protein and fat. I'm at my best when they are 30-35% carbs, 20% fat, 45-50% protein and 1500 calories. 5'7" @ 130 lbs. I'm posting on FB pics of my daily foods with nutrition values. If you AR einterested, friend me, Marsha Weaver Boyer. I want to show people that 'dieting' doesn't mean you have to give up eating good foods! I had S'mores protein cheese cake and protein ice cream last nite for my nite-time snack!0 -
The ketogenic diet as a medically necessary diet for certain things like people with seizure or cancer I believe long term does not damage organs bc of conversion of something ( I forget what it was) but it is a protocol and I'd assume it were medically safe for people to be put on to help medical issues. I think you need a magnesium/ potassium supplement and to drink more water than a normal person bc of cells or something from articles I read.0
-
realityfades wrote: »I don't eat low carb, but I was wondering if low carb diets long term are unhealthy. I came across an NIH article that detailed how many carbs, proteins and fats each and every organ of your body requires. It said that the brain alone requires 120-130 grams of carbs a day to remain healthy. To me, that implies eating a low carb diet may be starving the organs when done long enough.
Thoughts?
This is the article for anyone interested: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK22436/
[I am not debating the efficiency of low carb vs CICO for weight loss, I am talking about it's long term effects on organs]
My thoughts? Don't read 13 year old academic texts. The info represents 20 year old information. You are missing a full generation of research.
Science doesn't expire.0 -
FunkyTobias wrote: »realityfades wrote: »I don't eat low carb, but I was wondering if low carb diets long term are unhealthy. I came across an NIH article that detailed how many carbs, proteins and fats each and every organ of your body requires. It said that the brain alone requires 120-130 grams of carbs a day to remain healthy. To me, that implies eating a low carb diet may be starving the organs when done long enough.
Thoughts?
This is the article for anyone interested: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK22436/
[I am not debating the efficiency of low carb vs CICO for weight loss, I am talking about it's long term effects on organs]
My thoughts? Don't read 13 year old academic texts. The info represents 20 year old information. You are missing a full generation of research.
Science doesn't expire.
Good science does not expire. Bad science does not expire, but it sure does get discredited and ignored eventually.
0 -
Your body runs on glucose! You need it to create energy, literally! (cellular respiration, the mitochondrial electron transport chain..). Sure your body could survive, but you'd be lethargic and moody. Simple sugar is the quickest way to up your energy (which is why athletes eat chocolate or energy drinks before a race!). If you want that energy to be slow-releasing then eat complex carbs that are harder to break down (sweet potato for example), take longer to digest and won't spike your blood sugar.
p.s. i'm a medical student xD don't know if you can tell...
0 -
ForecasterJason wrote: »Your body runs on glucose! You need it to create energy, literally! (cellular respiration, the mitochondrial electron transport chain..). Sure your body could survive, but you'd be lethargic and moody. Simple sugar is the quickest way to up your energy (which is why athletes eat chocolate or energy drinks before a race!). If you want that energy to be slow-releasing then eat complex carbs that are harder to break down (sweet potato for example), take longer to digest and won't spike your blood sugar.
p.s. i'm a medical student xD don't know if you can tell...
You need to test to see how it affects you (and keep in mind that avoiding carbs can itself lead to artificial IR). I mentioned that a friend of mine found worse results when he ate carbs with sat fat together, which I'd assumed was uncommon, and was directed to evidence/studies that showed that it's apparently common.0 -
FunkyTobias wrote: »realityfades wrote: »I don't eat low carb, but I was wondering if low carb diets long term are unhealthy. I came across an NIH article that detailed how many carbs, proteins and fats each and every organ of your body requires. It said that the brain alone requires 120-130 grams of carbs a day to remain healthy. To me, that implies eating a low carb diet may be starving the organs when done long enough.
Thoughts?
This is the article for anyone interested: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK22436/
[I am not debating the efficiency of low carb vs CICO for weight loss, I am talking about it's long term effects on organs]
My thoughts? Don't read 13 year old academic texts. The info represents 20 year old information. You are missing a full generation of research.
Science doesn't expire.
Good science does not expire. Bad science does not expire, but it sure does get discredited and ignored eventually.
I wish that were true, so much of the bad science promogated in the popular media and on the Net that we have today is because of one horrible study years ago, vaccines would be one of those.0 -
lemurcat12 wrote: »ForecasterJason wrote: »Your body runs on glucose! You need it to create energy, literally! (cellular respiration, the mitochondrial electron transport chain..). Sure your body could survive, but you'd be lethargic and moody. Simple sugar is the quickest way to up your energy (which is why athletes eat chocolate or energy drinks before a race!). If you want that energy to be slow-releasing then eat complex carbs that are harder to break down (sweet potato for example), take longer to digest and won't spike your blood sugar.
p.s. i'm a medical student xD don't know if you can tell...
You need to test to see how it affects you (and keep in mind that avoiding carbs can itself lead to artificial IR). I mentioned that a friend of mine found worse results when he ate carbs with sat fat together, which I'd assumed was uncommon, and was directed to evidence/studies that showed that it's apparently common.
I think meat and potatoes counts as carbs and sat fat so I would predict that it's very common.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions